Thanks.

You can watch the video to find out.

@ OK I have a photo for the AT&T quarter telephone model 1818

@@gunnarbondank3893 Ok.

The thank you! The did you?

@@Classic_Electrics Not the yet the T.

In the case of that, the good luck.

Yeah, and that’s a great idea with the wax paper, but the last time I tried removing a sticker from a handset, it was pretty much ruined. I haven’t used this phone too much, but maybe I’ll try using some alcohol to get it unstuck. Yes, I started always doing that more recently after this video was recorded. I have tried the battery in another phone, and it seems to be working pretty well, so hopefully, I didn’t ruin it! Thanks for letting me know. I agree, and was surprised to find that color difference after looking at the box again. That makes sense about the buttons, thanks for telling me. And I actually found a listing for the screen version NIB, but it’s kind of expensive, so I may not end up getting that particular one. Thanks! Agreed. Although the earpiece isn’t quite as comfortable as the EXP7900. But I do love a good, wide, sturdy phone.

Thanks.

Thanks for letting me know! Do you still use it?

The thanks.

Thank you, the Aaron! I really love these phones, but in addition to the burned-out backlight diode on the WXI477, it seems that either the DWX207 itself or maybe the battery I put in it has a loose connection, as it does weird things when dropped (including making the screen cut out similarly to the infamous Panasonic display problem, but again, only if it’s being jarred).

@@Classic_Electrics The yep.

Thanks for letting me know.

Thanks. What do you like about it?

Nice, so do I. It's one of my favorites.

@@Classic_Electrics I got mine for 5.49 at Goodwill.

@@Classic_Electrics I was on the hunt for a WR-100 but that was a big score I found. I also saw a RadioShack there too but I decided to only get the Reecom.

@@HSETM That's cool. Yeah, I'm still looking for a 2010 WR100, and actually an R-1650A. What RadioShack did you find?

@@Classic_Electrics I actually don't remember. My R-1650 is an R-1650A.

Can you clarify what you're saying?

@@Classic_Electrics it is not boombox

@@BoogieBMWE34 From the Merriam-Webster website: boom box noun : a usually large portable stereophonic radio and tape or CD player

@@Classic_Electrics usually ? it is like to call classic telephone unit as pre-smarthone. BoomBox is name from early 2000s, and it was about small cheap CD/casette player, with small speakers (2x5/10W) and poor sound quality. Machines of 80s/90s was much more serious devices and better, with higher parameters, 60-100W of speakers power. It is totally different than boombox, if you dont feel diffence just dont make movies about that

​@@BoogieBMWE34 In my experience, while the term may not have emerged until later on, those cheesy little things don't deserve the name "boombox". They can't even boom, which the actual box-shaped vintage ones obviously can, so I prefer using 'boombox" to describe the good ones, since it really fits them the best (I know the one in this video is not like the '80s ones either, but it honestly sounds fantastic. I can feel the bass from across the room even at very low volumes, and it can get loud enough to be pretty painful without really distorting at all). All the websites I can find about boomboxes (I spent about 45 minutes on that last night, actually!) describe the '70s and '80s as the high point of "boomboxes" (or sometimes "ghetto blasters"), and the '90s and '00s as their turning point, with less popularity, quality, and volume. My guess is, the dumb little '00s devices that had "boombox" branding were trying to oversell themselves (like how the early digital answering machines often referred to themselves as "tapeless", indicating that they were suitable replacements for cassette answerers when in fact, they were not).

Thanks.

Thanks! Yeah. I really wasn’t too impressed with it at first, but as I suspected, that was because I wasn’t playing the right music on it. After a few months of using it, it’s become one of my favorite speakers, and I use it almost every day.

Greetings. I hope you enjoy these videos.

@@Classic_Electrics you bet i will

Thank you, the Aaron! Hopefully, you can the find one the soon. I’m just glad I got a great deal on mine.

Yeah, wow. As I said, typican GE! But I do agree with loving the look of it. Thanks!

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks! And that’s great to know, I was hoping something like that would be the case. The people who gave me these were able to locate all the original adaptors, and with (incredibly) the belt clips for the GE and one of the AT&T handsets, so I’ll be making an update video soon. I’ve also tracked down all the batteries on Amazon and will be ordering them in a week or two.

Thanks for letting me know! I’ll look into it.

Thank you, the Aaron! Good to the know.

Thanks for telling me; I am aware, but a lot of phone people (including me) seem to enjoy deliberately mispronouncing and changing words and brand names. That’s a nice idea. I would recommend a trimline with a backlit keypad for a bedroom. But I would also recommend searching for a cheaper deal than the current 210s sell for. They’re good phones, but nothing like the vintage ones and certainly not worth $20+, though the old ones are getting harder to find in perfect condition.

@@Classic_Electrics I opted for a Cortelco Trendline 8150 (new, open box) from a seller on eBay. The title states it's white but there is no white option for that phone. The photos show only different angles of the box, not the phone itself, so I'm going out on a limb buying it. The box has a black circle on it, so I presume it's actually black as opposed to ash or red. Seller paid shipping. I paid $17 plus tax. If it's actually new, unused and works well then I'll be happy. I would have preferred the ash color because I live in the desert southwest and dust is a huge problem here. Black will show dust very easily. :(

That’s a nice phone, especially if you’re hard of hearing. I will say that black is best for not yellowing over time/with sunlight exposure, but yeah, it does easily show dust. The price was good, though, if it’s unused.

@@Classic_Electrics It arrived yesterday, yep it's new, unused, and black. It looks dingy now that I've used it a few times (fingerprints make it look kind of matte instead of shiny). It works and feels great on my ear. I'm happy with it. I'll be buying an ash color phone to replace my other phone.

Nice!

Disculpas, no sé de qué estás preguntando. Pero este es un sintonizador de instrumentos musicales antiguos que puede ayudar al usuario a sintonizar cualquier instrumento que pueda detectar, si saben cómo hacerlo. También lo siento si este párrafo no tiene mucho sentido; No he terminado de aprender español y he tenido que usar Google.

Thanks, the Aaron!

That’s interesting. Maybe these were like Panasonics in that the default date was the year before they really went on the market.

Thank you!

Thanks.

The thanks, the Nipper.

Thanks.

Thank you! Oh no, it's definitely a cheapened-out version of the EP5632, but I still think it's a neat phone. If it retailed for significantly less than the 5632, which I don't know either way on, then I would say it was a good phone. Also, it took me a few days, but I managed to find out why it seemed familiar: I saw it in one of my favorite of your Phones Ringing videos!

Thank you!

@@Classic_Electricsyour welcome!

Thanks, the Aaron! And yeah, it is. As it turns out, I already identified that I wanted it a year or two ago, so I'm really glad to have found it.

Thanks.

The thanks, the Aaron!

Reposting my videos, edited or not, without permission will result in action being taken against you.

Thanks.

The OK

The Aaron, should I start exclusively replying to him with the OK as well?

@@Classic_Electrics Nah. I the appreciate it though.

The O the K.

Thanks.

Thanks, the Aaron! Cool. But I thought you've had one for several years?

​@@Classic_Electrics That was the DCT648-3 I got.

@@aarondunn1489 The O. In that case, good luck on finding a DCT6485!

Thank you, the Aaron! That's interesting, I didn't know VTech had an equivalent model.

Thanks.

What about it?

​@@Classic_Electrics you didnt know that meme,search what is english or spanish meme if you need information

The thank you! To be honest, it’s not my favorite from VTech, but it works perfectly.

Cool, this is a good one. Especially with the number announce feature.

Thank you!

Thanks! Yeah, they really have a special feel to them. But I do notice that they sometimes seem to add a little bit of hissing to the sound quality (not a problem for me, as I find it cool, but it's still kind of odd). That could just be a function of cheaper analog cordless phones, though.

Thanks.

Nice. These were/still are good phones.