Do Markets Corrupt Our Morals?
1:04:31
Meaningful Economics
58:11
Жыл бұрын
The Culture Wars: A Discussion
1:47:14
2 жыл бұрын
The 1619 Project: A Missed Opportunity
1:32:18
Eric Nelson "The Theology of Liberalism"
1:21:32
Пікірлер
@Honza-vd8kh
@Honza-vd8kh 9 сағат бұрын
America is not democracy nor Republic!! America is oligarchy that's all. Democracy is a Fake concept. Show me one country where there's Democracy. Nowadays Democracy stipulates that you should close your eyes, shut your mouth and your ears. If you express your opinion then you are guilty of treason or something else like antisemitism. You can loose your job or be arrested and tried and condemned. It is forbidden to criticize Ukraine, NATO, the EU and Israel. But you can always criticize Russia, China and every other country or leader who is not allied to the USA. The American policy stipulates that if you don't accept to be my slave then you are my enemy!!!!
@nazihater2798
@nazihater2798 2 ай бұрын
Ziooonnism = Nazzzzism = Ziooonnism Hitler was a Zioonist too, that's a fact. Bibi Netanyahu stated " Hitler did not want to kill the Jews, he wanted to get them to Israel" , the Ziooinist and Nazzzis also had a legal agreement. The Haavara Agreement.
@thewintersgorefamily
@thewintersgorefamily 2 ай бұрын
song in beginning?
@asimalkhawaja
@asimalkhawaja 2 ай бұрын
What liars you are! You occupy other people's lands, and you shamelessly attribute this occupation to religion shame on you
@joeblowmha
@joeblowmha 3 ай бұрын
Uncomfortable truths that we are no longer tough enough to accept.
@TheEnlightenedMachine
@TheEnlightenedMachine 3 ай бұрын
I read her book, truly inspiring.
@shamim621
@shamim621 5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this insightful information. I hope many get to watch it. God bless you
@GeorgiosMichalopoulos
@GeorgiosMichalopoulos 5 ай бұрын
This is a very interesting event and very happy it is available online. Without wanting to be rude, it is a bit disappointing that the sound of the presenter is so bad at times.
@Freefolkcreate
@Freefolkcreate 6 ай бұрын
The US only ever had a pretense of democracy. 9/11 tore the mask away. At last we are seeing who our government truly is, unspeakably hateful to their own people and the world. Power is corruption when it raises people to unaccountability.
@kaseymonroe1063
@kaseymonroe1063 7 ай бұрын
Does money creation lead to economic growth? How is money created?
@mohammadtorikh
@mohammadtorikh 8 ай бұрын
this is intersting, thank you for sharing
@brothernet
@brothernet 8 ай бұрын
please fix the sound quality
@kjeryngraydumont7117
@kjeryngraydumont7117 8 ай бұрын
1:06:04 once the reparations moneys are spent by each individual adult, who do their children or possibly future descendants blame for their status in life?
@whatmeworrynotoday
@whatmeworrynotoday 8 ай бұрын
It wasn't "southern democracy". All couldn't participate. It was "southern tyranny".
@humblegrenade118
@humblegrenade118 8 ай бұрын
Democracy fueled by Capitalism leads to corporate power and corruption in government policies and less freedom for the individual and a Constitutional Republic has the checks and balances to prevent the government from being a corporate structure and more freedoms for the individual and a government for the interest of the people and not the corporations that are funding it , like the Federal Reserve
@aaronjohnson6261
@aaronjohnson6261 9 ай бұрын
The “historical mill” is still running… and the way I’m which debates like this influence public opinion are part of the causal machinery of that mill.
@thomasrogers9146
@thomasrogers9146 9 ай бұрын
China has no interest on dominating the world.This is American projection. china has a 5000 years of no invasion or external wars. the only nation looking for war is America. Asia is china's largest trading partner. This is all about mr colby obsession with American exceptionalism and America should have to rule the world. COLBY IS A PSYCOPSTH.
@jongundrum1076
@jongundrum1076 10 ай бұрын
It's a pity that the speaker, (who is miked up) didn't repeat the questions from those who asked them, who weren't. He is an experienced speaker and should have catered for that problem. None the less, it was a very enlightening speech, very polished and fluid. Thank you for posting this.
@CarollemMen-cl8nz
@CarollemMen-cl8nz 11 ай бұрын
We are to worship God not a people Looking UNTO JESUS, THE AUTHOR AND FINISHER OF OUR FAITH. Jesus Christ nor Apostle Paul who spread the Gospel to the Gentiles never instructed Christians to praise anyone except the Lord. God's chosen people are those who by FAITH believe in Jesus Christ Christian Zionist are worshipping the anti-christ. Those who say they are Jews but are of the Synagogue of Satan. THE ZIONIST SAY THEY ARE JEWS! ARE THEY? NO
@RustyDust101
@RustyDust101 11 ай бұрын
The USA are BOTH and NONE of the two. Because depending on how strict or broad the definitions are interpreted the system of governance vs the system of attaining such governance aren't mutually exclusive but rather a Venn diagram with quite large sections of overlap. What's happening here is the typical dumbing down to the lowest common denominator by the intellectual right wing. It's claimed that both democracy and a republic are mutually exclusive. Which they aren't. Especially as neither of them can be seen to be absolutely pure versions of their original definitions. However the far right intends to fracture the USA into even more splintered factions as those are far easier to manipulate and control.
@ckennedy309
@ckennedy309 4 ай бұрын
Hey Rusty, what you claim the right intends to do. The left perfected years ago. And they do it by race baiting every 4 years and then doing nothing for those who are baited. All they have to do is call the other side racist and call it a day. They don't even have to promise them anything. And honestly , I'm sick of looking at it. The left acts royal and treats constituents as subjects to be manipulated and it's not hard to see if you look. Because all left policies are rooted in control based on the human experience. They're not planning for a dystopia. They intend to rule.
@patrickvernon4766
@patrickvernon4766 11 ай бұрын
The Manifesto for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money with explanations provided by Gottfried Feder, Dipl. Engineer
@davidevans4697
@davidevans4697 Жыл бұрын
i was with him till he said. regulate my liberty.
@rickyp1991
@rickyp1991 Жыл бұрын
🎶 Promo*SM
@n3rdst0rm
@n3rdst0rm Жыл бұрын
I just tried to argue this to my left leaning coworker. We need to make the distinction because the definition of Democracy and Republic has been changed, coupled with how many things we have that go against the will of the majority put in place as checks and balances for every Man and Women whether part few or majority. He phrased his argument as such "A square can also be called Rectangle as it has 4 sides" My argument is "A square is a square because the constraints of the definition made it so each side needs to be the same length as the sides it connects to. It can also be a rectangle due to its definition but it is a square first and foremost"
@jongundrum1076
@jongundrum1076 10 ай бұрын
Your square and his rectangle are descriptively constrained by their structure. A square is a square by definition, as is a rectangle or a parallelogram. They are both quadrilaterals, a four sided 2 dimensional shape, unique to it's dimensions and internal angles. A rectangle cannot be a square, and a square cannot be a rectangle. Two opposite sides of different lengths does not make a square.
@Basegitar
@Basegitar 4 ай бұрын
Definitions are important. When most people say "we are a Republic not a Democracy", they are usually relying on Democracy meaning exclusively "pure democracy". And yes, under that definition, we are not a pure democracy, and I don't think anybody thinks we are, nor do they want that. That would necessarily entail getting rid of Congress, the Presidency, the Courts, Governors, State Legislatures, Mayors, City Councils, etc. When people say "America is a Democracy", they mean ultimate authority is in the people at large, as opposed to wealthy noble families, aristocracy, or a single person, monarchy. The people can wield that authority directly (pure democracy), or through representatives legally accountable, directly or indirectly, to the people themselves (representative democracy). A government of the people, by the people and for the people. Under this definition, I would hope that we would agree, the United States of America is a Democracy. Now some people will say "hold on, the Founders never used that definition!" That's not true. Both themselves and their philosophical progenitors did. In Fed 10, Madison takes great pains to make clear by specifically defining the type of democracy he was talking about was "pure democracy". Why would this be necessary if his intended audience ONLY used democracy to mean "pure democracy"? Hamilton gave a speech to the New York Ratifying Convention on July 12, 1788 on this very subject. He starts this speech, ironically, by telling the Convention that word "Republic" can apply to Rome under the Kings, Sparta and Carthage through a Senate for life, Netherlands through hereditary nobles. He makes clear that this is NOT the type of Republic the Constitution intended to establish. He then defines "Democracy" using the latter definition from above: "the whole power of the government [is] in the people, whether exercised by themselves, or representatives chosen by them either mediately or immediately and legally accountable to them." Hamilton then goes on to say that the type of government the Constitution sets up is a "REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY" (he unlined that phrase twice in his handwritten notes). This definition is wholly consistent with how others, such as Madison and Franklin, would have understood the term "Republic". That term was popularized in the mid-late 1700s by Charles Montesquieu. Montesquieu wrote The Spirit of the Laws and this was the origin for concepts such "separation of powers" and "checks and balances". Montesquieu is the ONLY person to be cited directly in the Federalist Papers, with about 1/3 of Fed 9 being a direct citation of The Spirit of the Laws and Madison in Fed 47 called him "The Oracle who is always consulted and cited" (he's cited a few more times in different Fed Papers). According to Montesquieu, there were 3 types of governments: Republics, Monarchies and Despotism (tyranny/autocracy). Of Republics, he says there are two forms: Democracy and Aristocracy. He defines these two forms as "WHEN the body of the people is possessed of the supreme power, this is called a democracy. When the supreme power is lodged in the hands of a part of the people, it is then an aristocracy." (The Spirit of the Laws, Book 2, Chapter 2). Under this understanding of Republic, I would hope that we would agree, that the United States of America is a Republic, whose form is Democracy. If you want to define "Republic" in such a way that it is exclusionary to ALL forms of Democracy, you are free to do so, but that isn't how the Founders understood the words "Republic" nor "Democracy". Additionally, and this is my biggest concern with this whole debate (which you didn't necessarily do), is that if we say we are a Republic and in no way, shape or form a Democracy, then we must necessarily exclude the definition that defines Democracy as a form of government where the ultimate authority is The People. If the ultimate authority isn't the People, then who is? Who would benefit by convincing The People that they shouldn't be the ultimate authority? I would say people who want to take that authority from We The People, so that they can keep it for themselves.
@cnoyes98
@cnoyes98 Жыл бұрын
In searching for some other ground upon which to negotiate this argument, I think it's regrettable at 56:45 that the conversation turns to Adrian Vermeule instead of Judith Shklar, whose reflections on the "liberalism of fear," and the prioritization of mercy over justice as a virtue, offers a more promising path forward.
@TheTruthAboutUs
@TheTruthAboutUs Жыл бұрын
He is a damn nut. If black men are pulled over at 6 times the rates whites are explains everything. In addition, America reduced the humanity of blacks to less than a dog and reinforced by our government and society. If you were told your dog was now human, you would always view the dog as non-human regardless of the rights or protections granted to the dog. No group in the history of the world was ever demonized like this. He knows absolutely nothing about the black community period. Black neighborhoods are policed in ways white communities aren't, that's a fact. In addition, whites receive more lenient sentences and have more resources to higher lawyers and avoid convictions
@TheTruthAboutUs
@TheTruthAboutUs Жыл бұрын
Institutional racism is pervasive here
@TheTruthAboutUs
@TheTruthAboutUs Жыл бұрын
How do you explain the sentencing discrepancies between blacks and whites? Did you not read the data from stop and frisk in new york? Where they pulled over blacks 3 times more than whites? 96% of those pulled over committed no crime? Policing has always been different between blacks and white? He a coon
@TheTruthAboutUs
@TheTruthAboutUs Жыл бұрын
Glen is a damn disgrace.
@TheTruthAboutUs
@TheTruthAboutUs Жыл бұрын
The first speaker is ignorant
@chicago618
@chicago618 Жыл бұрын
The lecture begins at 2:39
@lucasmembrane4763
@lucasmembrane4763 Жыл бұрын
The unique property relationship in the new industrial state appears to now be caused principally by the producing workers having restricted access to the means of efficient marketing and promotion through myth making.
@williamoarlock8634
@williamoarlock8634 Жыл бұрын
And his book is one of the most expensive on kindle...
@wherespookie1
@wherespookie1 Жыл бұрын
I don't understand how he can feel the way he does about capitalism, but at the same time think consumerism is a good thing. Consumerism is one of the worst things Capitalism has cultivated and has only reinforced the idea of money as God.
@andyxyz01
@andyxyz01 Жыл бұрын
In the western mind, there is no higher sexual pleasure than to ram a bayonet into the guts of a Chinese baby
@andyxyz01
@andyxyz01 Жыл бұрын
Everyone knows that it’s the wests deepest and most erotic desire to humiliate, torture, and kill all Chinese so that they can take over china. Colonial bloodlust never changed in 400 years.
@அவானிஉயர்ந்தது
@அவானிஉயர்ந்தது Жыл бұрын
China means to Rockefellers what Israel means to Rothschilds. Now control of the humanity could be easier than ever.
@jamesdennis8290
@jamesdennis8290 Жыл бұрын
On the phenomenon of money and the hypostatization of the quantifiable substitute for "value": It sounds like you've read Keynes with a good depth of understanding, instead of just parroting the nostrums.
@winglo1697
@winglo1697 Жыл бұрын
Why not seek a method that is both sides agree and benefit to both sides, instead of confronting with each other, and resulting deaths on both sides
@JameBlack
@JameBlack Жыл бұрын
Hello from Ukraine.
@truthaboveall7988
@truthaboveall7988 Жыл бұрын
I heard the best analysis of the China model on Ben Norton w guest Roland Boer - the idea that the west has democracy & China does not is pretty quickly debunked once u understand that the American model was founded on the largest genocide in the history of mankind (we prefer to blame Mao for famines ignoring our bloody history) In the US we have socialism for the rich/corporations we privatised our financial institutions we privatised everything we could we let the Church walk us backward so we r now becoming Hungary but w out their common sense decisions on China China didn’t need to conquer the world as the largest economy for 17 centuries U guys kill me - democracy is only a thing u have when u don’t have total corporate capture of ur country China is at least interested in its people - their Govt is far more democratic than America Please visit there & talk to the people America bans more books than China & in fact China has more freedom than we do in the US where any minute I may b mass massacred
@marcelolima77
@marcelolima77 9 ай бұрын
This reminds me of that old Soviet joke: "Radio Yerevan was asked: "Is it true that there is freedom of speech in the USSR, just like in the USA?" Radio Yerevan answers: "In principle, yes. In the USA, you can stand in front of the White House and yell, "Down with Reagan!", and you will not be punished. Equally, you can also stand in the Red Square in Moscow and yell, "Down with Reagan!", and you will not be punished." With all the faults the US has it is by far a better leader for the world than communist China - you seem to have learned nothing from 20th century history. The Chinese empire (meaning it had colonies) didn't disappear with communism, it just had a name change - the colonies just happen to be at the borders and not in other continents. The Chinese government has spent huge amounts of its people's wealth in white elephant projects that have no real economic return - the chickens are coming home to roost now that the economy is struggling and can't generate wealth. China is still a poor country and still wasted so many resources, it's quite incredible. The credit for the any impressive real economic growth goes to Chinese entrepreneurs, the CCP has often just gotten in the way with their interference. China started as one of the poorest in the world, poorer than in 1949, as the CCP spent a few decades destroying people and wealth. Frankly, if the way you think is so closely aligned with CCP propaganda it's perhaps time to stop and reflect (unless you are a propagandist yourself?).
@kathylo4943
@kathylo4943 4 ай бұрын
This guy talks as if he knows /understands China. He does NOT. His thots are constrained by what he thinks he knows which is micro not macro . He does NOT and would not hv the open mindedness of trying to put himself in the Chinese leaders’ shoes there and then and there and now. China was poor. China had been and still is being bullied. He did not live thru the era in China long enough.
@brothernet
@brothernet Жыл бұрын
非常🈶️深度的采访。谢谢分享。
@RifatIslamXD
@RifatIslamXD Жыл бұрын
the year david hume died LOL
@vladdumitrica849
@vladdumitrica849 Жыл бұрын
Countries with parliaments (representative democracy) are in fact oligarchies (few lead). In order to be a true democracy, the decisions of the Parliament should be submitted to the approval of the citizens. The "fatigue" of democracy occurs when there is a big difference between the interests of those elected and the voters, so people lose confidence in the way society function. As a result, the poor and desperate citizens will vote with whoever promises them a lifeline, i.e. the populists or demagogues. The democratic aspect is a side effect in societies where economies have a strong competitive aspect, where the interests of those who hold economic power in society are divergent. Thus, those with money, and implicitly with political power in society, are supervising each other so that none of them have undeserved advantages due to politics. Because of this, countries with large mineral resources, like Russia and Venezuela (their share in GDP is large), do not have democratic aspects, because a small group of people can exploit these resources in their own interest. In poor countries, the main resource exploited may even be the state budget, as they have converging interests in benefiting, in their own interest, from this resource. This is what is observed in Romania, Bulgaria, when, no matter which party comes to power, the result is the same. The solution is modern direct democracy in which every citizen can vote, whenever he wants, over the head of the parliamentarian who represents him. He can even dismiss him if most of his voters consider that their interests are not right represented. Those who think that democracy is when you choose someone to make decisions for you without him having to consult you, are either a fool or a scoundrel. It's like when you have to choose from several thieves who will steal from you. It's like when you have to build a house and you choose the site manager and the architect, but they don't have the duty to consult with you. The house will certainly not look the way you want it, but the way they want it, and even more surely you will be left without money and without the house. It is strange that outside of the political sphere, you will not find, in any economic or sports activity, someone elected to a leadership position and who has failure after failure and who is fired only after 4 years. We, the voters, must be consulted about the decisions and if they have negative effects we can dismiss them at any time, without to wait until the term to be fulfilled, because we pay, not them. In any company, the management team comes up with a plan approved by the shareholders. Any change in this plan must be re-approved by the shareholders and it is normal because the shareholders pay.
@miker3298
@miker3298 Жыл бұрын
Frank is .a fantasist not a real scholar doing real reaearch and finding the facts. he just has biased opinions which suit the US narrative
@brothernet
@brothernet Жыл бұрын
他讲出来中国人自己不敢讲的历史真相。
@ckennedy309
@ckennedy309 Жыл бұрын
Is this a real question? See Dan Smoot
@Basegitar
@Basegitar 4 ай бұрын
Right? Why is this even a real question in 2024? Read Montesquieu and Hamilton's speeches to the New York Ratifying Convention. Much better sources than someone who came along almost 200 years after the fact.
@louistan7560
@louistan7560 Жыл бұрын
Western "civilization"? There is no "civilization" if you add the US into the pot. And even then, how old is "Western civilization" as compared with the Iranians, Indians and Chinese? The refinement is just not there.
@hoksuncandra9030
@hoksuncandra9030 Жыл бұрын
Why do you have to contain other country's peaceful rise ? USA should spend more money in building the infrastructure , societies and health care instead of giving money to the war contractors , wake up all americans !
@xushenxin
@xushenxin Жыл бұрын
Self made, weapon manufacturer funded, CIA related, young propagandist with good old imperialist mind set~ but I don't think he knows what he is talking about, and it is quite insulting to hear a little punk like him to talk about China.
@miker3298
@miker3298 Жыл бұрын
Confront Beijing ? US has history of going to war with small nations and sucessfully loosing for the past 70 years. Now it wants to confront a large well equiped nuclear power with Allies similarly equiped. Your a joke mate.