40:24 with little help. Very cool puzzle.

As I discovered that windows 1, 2, and 4 were complete regions, I was able to use a subset of the usual windoku tricks in those rows and columns. By the time I was able to prove that the final window was as well, there was no need for those tricks, since the edge digits had been resolved in other ways. My time today was 8:04, solver number 1369.

00:19:21 - not so difficult, a lot of scanning in the end. 😊

Interesting puzzle but outside my experience. Nicely solved by Bremster.

08:38 and I didn't use the Sven calculator 🎉 No needed a lot of pencilmark nor colours, but I still had plenty of fun 🧐 😀

Once it was clear that the top two "windows" were "windoku windows", it could be easily shown that the three triples finishing off rows 2,,3,4 formed their own region.

Woo hoo 12:50 for me. I'm improving.

I never thought about cages the way you described in which you go through the options until you get a repeated pair, very cool, thanks. Aren't ninjas supposed to be stealthy? Seems like shattering windows is clumsy 🤪

10:35 to solve.

That was fun! Thank you! ❤

Easy one, think I used a small windoku trick in the end to speed up things. Final time 7:57 I kinda wish I could switch "heat" with BremSter, currently got -5°C outside🤐

You often say "this is breaking my brain". I too have a similar feeling, but for me it happens when you overcolor. Since I am colored blind it is hard for me to distinguish between the yellow and green that you use and the blue and purple that you use. And my brain gets broken.

17:36 for me [broke once] nice puzzle

18:37 with no help. Very nice easy puzzle by Rif.

The time isn't important, showcasing the puzzle, the logic, if there are useful techniques or things to know I think it's what the majority of the people are looking for.

Solved it in 17 mins 17 secs. This one was quite easy & approachable

absolutely stunning flow, thank you!

Nice puzzle! My time today was 13:17, solver number 1640.

It’s an oldie but a goodie! Hadn’t seen one of these except back when first starting (so I gave them a wide berth!) Love this “look back in anger” series of some of the puzzles that were the beachheads for things we now take as normal. Thanks BremSter

23:08 ... I went wrong somewhere first try and then got it. But I bifurcated! Such a clever puzzle. Bravo!!!!

20:03 but should be less, I had to comeback almost everything because I placed a digit in the wrong position... ha! 😅 But it was a great puzzle! 😀

A lovely puzzle today, and a bit of a challenger. My time today was 19:34, solver number 430.

Drama... Unacceptable man! You had 5 in COL 1 right at the start so Box 1 could have been solved. But even if you missed that, when you do 6 in Box 4 based on Col 1-3 logic, you NEED TO FOLLOW UP and do 6 in Col 1, right?! That was just unacceptable man.

That was BRUTAL1. ❤

got stumped and needed a bit of help with where to look, so thanks for providing that

In 8:06 the elimination of 1's in r2c1 and r3c1 not necessarily implies that the 1 have to be in r1c1. There could still be a 2 in r3c1 putting a 1 in r3c2 and a 3 in r1c2. Then the problem arises with the outside 2 at the botton of column 2.

The 5 in box 7 was concealing itself. Advice for (newer) solvers: always update your pencilmarks when placing a digit.

21:47 for me. Box 1 could have been more easily solved about 10 minutes earlier by simple sudoku. The 5 in R9C1 looking up at the 5/9 pair you had in R3C1, and the 6/9 pair you had in box 7 (C2) looking up at the 4/6 pair you had in R1C2.

24:26 for me nice puzzle

Hi Bremster, love watching your channel! But I sometimes wonder why you leave the conflict checker off. That would often make the solving way smoother and watching your videos more interesting imho (consider, just as an example, how long you missed some trivial things in column 2). After all, the videos are about showcasing the sudokus, and not about your solving / scanning capabilities, if I'm not mistaken?

Hi! In german i would say: I am standing on the tube ;-) Why can R3C1 not be a 2? Then R1C2 would be a 3 and the 1 would go in R3C2.

Cool spot on the 5 in C6! And in my opinion that's the beauty of solving, finding this sorts of stuff while exploring the grid it's priceless!

I came up with a different solution. All the x sums are the same, but the nabners are different: 2947,6248 (these 2 were the same as well),835, 5139, 8316, 4163 & 375 (also the same).

19:49 for me. That was a fun puzzle.

What’s really funny is that I made the same mistake you did near the end and got the same conflict as you in row 7.

15:47 ... that was great fun!

Interestingly enough, while this did end up effectively being a windoku, I didn't really use any of the normal 'tricks' associated with that constraint. Lots of careful scanning helped me on this one, finished in 9:41 (conflict checker off). Many thanks to AnalyticalNinja for a cool puzzle and to BremSter for presenting it!

Thank you for this fun feature, BremSter! This puzzle has been set for a prompt in which we were asked to combine X-sums and Nabner lines. I am not sure if I would have come up with that combo of constraints myself otherwise, but I had great fun setting with it. :) I am looking forward to more of your content and wish you all the best for the future. Kind regards, Nils/sujoyku

Standard @BremSterPuzzles template - Miss Sudoku and then call rounabout logic "CLEVER".... 34 pair and 7 in Box 5 means the third missing digit in the box needs to be a known digit... Please do Sudoku - Dont blame needing to talk. Its not the truth!

24:09 it was very fun. I only has to pencilmark the renbans and even didn't use colours! 😅 Thanks!!! 😀

Very enjoyable puzzle. Thanks! ❤