Amen! I use KJV for my daily devotin .. I may refer other translations for clarifications

Great stuff brother, it is good to keep this fresh in our mind so we can answer when challenged. Thank you

So when Jesus, who was himself celibate, said some are called to be "eunuchs for the kingdom," he was wrong? When Paul advised young men not to marry, he was also wrong?

Thank you for these short & to the point lessons

Why would Jude quote an entire paragraph from the book of Enoch and even credit Enoch with the quote if it wasn’t inspired?

The letter J was invented only 500 years ago... the letter Y is what you're looking for.

Good stuff brother. I feel like people these days choose orthodoxy because it doesnt come with the stigma of the catholic church.

What do you think of the social trinity vs classical trinity debate?

This verse alone is what convinced me to stick to the KJV. It obviously belongs there. I don’t care what the Catholic wall decorations of Vaticanus and Sinaticus say. God would not reveal the eunuch asking a question that is not answered, followed by him getting dunked. This verse was obviously and deliberately removed by those that believe in baptismal regeneration.

Not truthfully represented at all: As they went along the road they came to some water; and the eunuch said, “Look! Water! What prevents me from being baptized?” [And Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”] And he ordered the chariot to stop; and they both went down into the water, Philip as well as the eunuch, and he baptized him. - Acts 8:36-38 NASB

I sure appreciate this because I keep hearing others misunderstanding these verses; thank you😊

You are just a proud heretic.

Pray that God convicts Pastor Steven Anderson of Faithful Baptist Church in Phoenix Arizona of that Heresy, cos in Matthew 23 Jesus said woe 2 the scribes, pharisees, hypocrites, they shut up The Kingdom of Heaven Against Men, they neither go in themselves, neither suffer those that are entering to Go in

There is nothing unique about the KJV version. It wasn't the first of it's kind, it didn't use texts that nobody else had access too, the authors themselves even included a note saying essentially this is not the end all be all. This is pure KJV-onlyism

There's nothing so boring like reading from KJV. The boring English makes you not understand anything. I am definitely sure that the one who translated that Bible is a devil worshipper. He was recruiting people for the devil using the Bible. That's how many people in churches are going to hell and living unholy lives because they were tricked by the devil using the Bible.

If Bible translations are to be ranked then my 1599 Geneva Bible is superior to the KJV. Ole king James used the GB as one of the basis for the Bible translation that bears his name; hopefully everyone knows the kind of man king James was.

And Jesus Christ our Lord, declared to be the Son of God by the resurrection from the dead! Romans 1:3-4!

John 14:28, per your comment at 44 seconds in. ""for my Father is greater than I"". Trinity, therefore, is contrary to what Jesus taught. End of discussion. Neither is he that is sent, greater than he that sent him.

Silly video. He’s just spouting off. He’s very ill informed

Thank you Brother! Eyes up! Ephesians 2:8-9 "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the GIFT of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Acts 16:31 "And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house." Colossians 1:14 "In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:" Salvation is obtained by simply believing in Jesus' death (Blood sacrifice), burial and resurrection with all your heart for payment of all your sins, past, present and future.

Wow! This is just wrong. As a Roman Catholic, I find this video really offensive. You should seeks pastoral counseling from your parish priest. If I met a lot of Catholics like you, maybe I would convert to Orthodox.

The note says it is not in the most reliable manuscripts. And as already stated, you assume the KJV is the standard. It is not. The manuscripts that precede it are. And that includes the dead sea scrolls which were not known to exist in the 17th century.

Wait a minute, please don't tell us that you are a protestant! I am an atheist by the way; and atheist all around the world recognize that the one true church of Jesus is the catholic church. You protestants showed up 1500 years later and now are you telling us that your sect founded 1 week ago or 1 day ago, or 10 minutes ago is the church of Jesus? WHAT A JOKE!

Do you suppose 4 out of 5 patriarchs choose "Catholic Lite"?

You know when Papist content creators are feeling threatened when they have increased their polemics against the Eastern Orthodox.

I will say this -- I am a pre-tribulation rapture believer, not based on my Tim LaHaye movies or the Darby Bible. I never owned a Darby anything. That being said, I am open to changing those views if I am incorrect. What I truly want to do is make sure I am ready to stand for the Lord Jesus Christ now, tomorrow and in the future, if He allows me to live. I just want to stand and doing all to stand being fully clothed with the armor of God no matter if the rapture is pre, mid or post. God bless you all 🙂

I encourage you to have a better understanding of what you are sharing online. Your points are wildly inaccurate.

This is not how copyright law works. There's no test of originality when filing; the work is assumed to be original, and a translation produced by new work is still copyrightable even if it happens to be identical or nearly identical to an older one. Bible copyrights are mainly aimed at protecting scholars' financial interests in their glosses, endnotes, and commentaries.

Catholic Lite??? We have to enlarge our Holy Church because of ALL THE CATHOLIC CONVERTS we are getting. Post Vatican II Catholicism is completely different from Pre Vatican II. There is laxity today.....quite enough to go around for everyone. It affects all of us Christians but today's Roman Catholicism is a sad state of affairs. Let us pray and be vigilant that APOSTASY not overtake the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church of Christ. Amen.

satan in end times will remove JESUS out of everything , started by schools .

It is interesting that your site is called "Streaming Truth" when you speak nothing but untruth.

As a Roman Catholic who greatly admires the Orthodox you are the perfect example of Alexander Pope's dictum that fools rush in where angles fear to tread. You are an example of protestant lite. Lacking any sound theology, you gain attention by cheap clickbait. I have my theological disagreements with the Orthodox, but I can assure anyone who unfortunately came across this video that the Orthodox are not nor have they ever been Catholic Lite.

You are highly misinformed.

The Orthodox church is more fundamental than the Catholic church. Catholicism is full of alterations.

Orthodoxy preserves how the apostles invision the church. I just can't wrap my head around how you think they are less fundamental. Do you know what fundamental means? Why wasn't papal supremacy a doctine in the early church? Why wasn't purgatory acknowledged? And why did they have the same systemic structure as the orthodox do now? Catholicism is a path away from traditional and fundamental faith.

Where in the life and teachings of Christ has anyone seen the smallest even trace of an earthly kingdom of God? Only in the so called "catholic" church. In fact, the Orthodox Church is the true catholic church, meaning "universal", on top of being "orthodox", that is "truth bearer".

Orthodoxy is protestantism.

Braindead video

This is easily explained. If you read the NIV version Acts 8:37 is omitted, but it has a footnote explaining that the earliest manuscripts do not have this verse but later ones do. They include the verse in the footnote. It's not trying to say Jesus is not the Son of God, it's just saying the evidence for this verse is missing in early translations. The KJV was based on later translations. It doesn't change who Jesus is. There is plenty of evidence that Jesus is who he said he is. The bibles integrity is not in question because of 1 verse in Acts.

The problem with this argument is that you are making the KJV the standard and everything else corrupted. Along the centuries, scribes encountered textual amendations that they feared to exclude from new copies. They believed that it would be better to include footnotes and amendments than to delete, or exclude them. Over time, these additions took on the belief that they were canon. When examining older texts, we can clearly see that there were additions that scribes made to the body that were not in the originals. Many of the modern translations that you are condemning have footnotes to explain the reasoning behind them being left out of the text. Stop making the KJV the pure, uncorrupted, Holy text of God. The Word of God was recorded in Hebrew, Greek, and some Chaldean. English (in any form) did not exist when either Testament were recorded. The KJV has been revised several times. Not merely spelling updates, etc. The 1769 Blaney revision is what people are reading today. It is very different than the 1611 that we hear so much about. The Oxford and Cambridge editions of the Authorized Version are different. Which one is correct? Add to that the first editions of the KJV included the Apocryphal books. If it’s so pure and perfect, why are works like Bel and the Dragon included in the Sacred texts? The next issue is the numerous issues with the Textus Receptus, which the Authorized is heavily derived from. Every edition that Erasmus released was different from the preceding one. We have a wealth of texts and information that King James’ scholars lacked. I trust that they acted honestly and tried to render an updated and modern translation for their time. I was a KJV Onlyist for 55 years. Once I began exploring the issue deeper, I began to understand the differences much better. Stop saying that the modern translations are from the Devil! You will answer to our Holy God for maligning the truth. If you have not explored the history of this contention faithfully, you are an unrighteous judge. If you are content to accept one side of the argument, without hearing the other, you are a terrible judge! Imagine a jurist who allows the prosecution to speak, question witnesses, and make arguments. If this hypothetical judge refuses to allow the defense to make their case, he is an unrighteous judge. You are following sincere and well intended personalities. Well meaning, or not, they can be wrong. Read the Dedicatory statement that used to be in the front of every KJV bibles. The publishers decided to exclude it from bibles, but it plainly laid out the thoughts and ideas of the King James translators. If you refuse to do your homework, you forfeit your right to criticize others on this issue. Listen to the prosecution and the defense and by all means, do your homework. The Word of God is Worthy of your time and attention!🙏🏼

This video should be taken down. It is utter slander of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Our Church holds to every belief the apostles did and our doctrine has never shifted or been invented unlike the other churches after the schism. Is it not right to mention history when discussing which Church first existed?

Praise the Lord Jesus Christ. I have been aware of the deliberate change of doctrines for a loooong period of time. It was the Good Teacher Who exposed errors in my NLT and instructed me to look in "the old Bible" I took up an 1860 Family Bible and started comparing....woe!! I currently read between a Geneva 1560 facsimile and a King James AV. Only those with ears to hear what the Spirit says ever get this. I just gently show them and testify of the goodness of God in how I got to the Bibles I read. Hallelujah brother, so great to hear you speak out ❤

This is a strawman view of Holy Orthodoxy. Roman Catholicism is much closer to any Protestant denomination than Orthodoxy (Hence the term western vs eastern Christianity). To amount the differences between Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy to the pope is to ignore our very belief on what salvation is (to start).

Catholic lite? The modern catholic church has abandoned 2000 years of patristic witness of councils, liturgy, and patristics to teach evolution, incorporate pagan idols, pray with muslims, neglect fasting, and reduce the mass to a mere 30 minutes. Whatever benefit the pope has to preserving the church clearly seems to not be working recently.

There is also a prohibition of adding anything to the scriptures. In light of that, how do you know I'd said verse wasn't added?

Bible manuscripts became corrupted early on to support false teachings. That’s why I trust the oldest few and not the received or the majority.

The New American Standard 1995 says that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. The KJV and NASB both translate word for word. The other translations use train of thought not word for word.

Get your facts right. The reason that verse was removed is because it is not found in all of the oldest texts. It was added, not removed!

The problem with vs. 37 is not what it says. It is the FACT that it is not contained in the oldest original language (Greek) manuscripts, including the Sinaiticus (4th cen.), the Codex Vaticanus (Vatican 1209, 4th cen.), the Codex Alexandrinus ( 5th cen.) the Codex Ephraemi (5th cen.), the Chester Beatty 1 (3rd cen.). This preacher wants to say something was wrongly removed. Which is wrong: to remove something that was added later or to add it in the first place? Jerome did not even include it in the Vulgate (C 400).

Which is what Paul preached in Rom 10:9-10: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.