@@hyggeandfood elsker dig ❤️

@@sayantanghosh3675 thank you. You mean the kit lens? It's not that bad. It is pretty sharp and if you zoom in you can still get a decent amount of blur. A fast prime is of course better.

@@therealboogie23 its not intuitive to be honest. You save the recipes on the custom dial C1, C2, C3 and C4. I have a video about memory recall for Sony. It is basically the same way it works.

@@josepmariaalandisomoza1315 almost yeah. There's a few horizontal in between. I don't why. It was not intentional. Might have had something to do with the camera being so small and I only had one hand free

@@neklamp2431 thank you my friend ☺️

@@JJCPhotography thank you 😊 have a wonderful day 🥰

@@PiyushSharma-zu3rm both are great I think. The Sony might have an advantage in lens choices and perhaps slight better auto focus. Ho with your gut feeling and you'll be happy 😊

@@cloclommx thank you 🥰 you should visit.. not in the winter though 🌨🥶 the recipes don't work for raw. So it is all done in Lightroom afterwards

@@31acruz that's a good question. It sounds like something is wrong, because it can produce perfectly fine and sharp photos. Is it in different modes it does it?

@@pemitaki i have another video for apc-sensor lenses, where I recommend the Sigma 18-50mm. It's a great lens 👌🏼

@@wiranata9540 thank you!! Have a wonderful day 😊

🎉❤

@@styleztheproducer6744 I haven't used the camera, but I'm 99 percent sure it does have it.

You mean AF-lock in the middle? It is a tracking feature that is true. It is not really controllable though. And doesn't work that well either, If you ask me.

@ no like literally a square that appears around the object and when you move the object around it stays focused on it

@@johannesbgonzalez yeah indeed it is the center lock on af I never use it tbh but yeah, anyway what picture profile do you use? I did a test today of slog 2 and 3 and hlg3 and s-log2 itu709matrix is imo the best one as it does not have a lot of color noise in the shadows and on walls

@@ixography I tried to use it. But it has a really hard time sticking to the subject. But I havent used it more than that to be honest. I use the "standard" s-log2 profile on the camera.

@ try to use itu709matrix. You will have much much less green and purple artifacts in the footage on walls by example

@@Knightllk thank you. It genuinely makes me happy to see a message like this. I hope you have a wonderful day 💗

@johannesbgonzalez you deserved it bro ❤️

Thank for taking the time to comment on my videos. I hope you will enjoy your A6000!

Thank you, Roland! :)

Hi Roland, Thank you. I am glad you found the video helpful for your decision.

@@Martin-xu6cg if the battery wasnt depleted, then it sounds like a malfunction.

@@johannesbgonzalez Yes. Probably. The question I ask myself is whether I can trust it in a pro setting where malfunctions can't happen. The big question... :) Thank you.

@@Martin-xu6cg I haven't had any issues with mine. But yeah you might need a backup

In terms of the picture quality it is really hard to see a difference. If I just needed it for personal use, I think I'd go with a7iii. For video work I'd might lean into the a7iv, because it also has dual ISO.

It's been a while since I did the video, so don't hold me up on this. But I don't think I did any stabilization to the footage. You really can move your feet, when shooting on the a6000. You can get away holding the camera tight and move your body, but thats it. Some of the movement in these clips are done in post (the panning from one side to the other)

Tak Billie

@@WoodyWoodPeckkerr yes the noise canceling only works when it is recorded through the receiver (unfortunately)

I don't think I could have spotted the difference either if I didn't knew. I see no reason to upgrade my a7iii either 😊

What do you do when your client wants, 10 bit filming

Very good point 👍🏼👍🏼

@@Artist-8-tsirtA 🤷🏽‍♂️

the 55 1.8 is a great lens. I like the smaller factor of the 50 1.8 though and also it's less sharp and contrasty which I actually prefer. I havent tried the 35mm 2.8.

@@MiguelMichia De nada Amigo 🙂

@@FisherPost I'm not sure I totally understand but stereo is for using both transmitters. For getting stereo out of one transmitter you use mono and change the output in post.

Hi, Nice to meet you! I understand the dilemma. I'll give you my thoughts and perhaps it will help you make a decision. Where the a7iii shines over the a6000 is in video. In pictures, although, the a7iii on paper should be better, it is very hard to see any difference unless you shoot in very low light conditions. And to be honest I can't say for sure it will that big of difference (I haven't compared it in a real life test 1 to 1). For the a6000 I see these pros: You can get the a6000 for 2000 kr on dba. And the lenses for APC-sensor cameras are cheaper in general. So you can more gear for the money going this route. It is smaller and weighs less just like the lenses, which makes it easier to bring with you. (I often takes this camera with me because of this instead of the a7iii). Cons: You'll miss out on video performance. It doesn't have eye focus and you cannot focus by touching the screen (a feature I personally miss). In general the focusing system might be slower, but I don't really feel a difference in real life scenarios. Battery life is worse (you can just get another battery). Doesn't have minimum shutter speed limit, when using auto iso (also a feature I miss) Pros for the a7iii: Better video performance in quality, coloring and focusing. Comes with the touchscreen focusing. Has in body stabilization which is useful in video and can be for photos (in low light). Has better performance in low light. Has better battery life. Has minimum shutter speed limit in auto iso. Has more programmable buttons. Cons: More expensive and the lenses are more expensive. It's bigger and weighs more. All in all I like both cameras a lot. I've had the a7iii since it came out and I have used for it a lot of street photography but also work like portraits and events. I bought the a6000 used because I wanted a smaller camera that is easier to bring with me also on the days, where I don't really feel like shooting anything. It is an older camera but the image quality is on pair with the a7iii. If I was you I would properly go for the a6000.

@johannesbgonzalez thanks for the unexpected response. i have another question. How much should I worry about the shutter number?

@@blabla871 Not very much. It is true that a higher shutter number comes with a higher risk of shutter failure. But you need to make a lot of photos to ever get that high. My a7iii is at 18.000 and I have used it for 6 years now.

@@wessmall9169 thanks for the feedback. I'll remember that the next time

@ the images looked great but couldn't focus on them 😀😀

@@wessmall9169 I totally understand!!

@@saurabhbesoya thank you 😊 I'm really thinking about buying the fuji x-m5, so I guess my edit is trying to emulate fuji 😅

@@johannesbgonzalez although I am not a photographer by any means, fuji autofocus (my XT4 with 16-55 f2.8) seem to be okay for photos. But its demon possessed when it comes to video, Its a fkboi who dont want to be with me, always jumping here and there, I am at my limits with video. I use it occasionally for office events and it has taken the joy out of my life because it chose to be a hunter and keeps on twitching like a person having seizures. Ughh. Colors are really pretty, video output is just such pretty. But Autofocus is such a pain! I am planning to get a sony zve1/A7c2 for videos for my travel and personal use. Again, for photos its fine. also, XM5 doesnt have inbody stabilisation. if you are anyway interested in fuji maybe a XS 20 is worth looking as an option. Cheers!

@@saurabhbesoya thanks for your thoughts on this. I'm just intrigued by the very small form factor and of course the fuji color science. In this way it would be a substitute for my a6000. You can get away with alot if you just lock the focus. It's a bummer with the missing stabilization, but I guess it just isn't positive when it's so tiny.

@@comsamihai9033 here you go www.johannesgonzalez.dk/grain-presets

@@dipo2000 I haven't used the sony 24mm 2.8. But I'm pretty sure optically it is a better lens than the samyang. It is also quite small and doesn't weigh much. But the samyang is still smaller and less heavy. The price is noticeable though. The samyang is way cheaper. For the price a great lens I think.

@@mtamech535 that's sound like a to good to be true deal. It is usually 500 usd.

@@johannesbgonzalez Are you still happy with it? The one I saw was an open box.

@mtamech535 yes. You can never get enough power. It works very well

@@johannesbgonzalez Thanks buddy, I REALLY appreciate your responding to me, it means a lot.

@mtamech535 sure, no problem 😊

@@cubillo77 that's great 👍🏼 I hope you'll enjoy the combo

@@JuliaBowlinMD thank you 😊 I'm glad it was helpful

@@GregorStevenson that's okay it can sometimes be hard to see with the youtube compression. But the theory is still true

@@MythoscopicArts thanks. Yes that's correct. 60 fps slowed down 40 % to 24 fps. Some of the clips have stabilized with warp stabilizer in post (mostly the ones with the longer focal lenght)

@@johannesbgonzalez Nice. I think because you capped it at 24 fps is why the quality still looks great!

@@MythoscopicArts that would be close to the limit depending on the movement of the subjects in the shot too. If you change the clip to optical flow you can sometime get away with more. If you use warp stabilizer in Premiere Pro. You shall slow it down first, nest it, and then do the stabilizer. This gives the best result.

@@johannesbgonzalez amazing advice, thanks !

@@boi5697 no. But there is ff equvilant, but without the OSS

@@roro515_video im glad you found it useful. Have a great concert!