heading for my Msc physics exam and CP violation in kaons is a real hit
@latiefmohiuddin684020 сағат бұрын
I prefer the precise way of explaining a topic in a relatively shorter video and this is why I request you to please upload other topics of the subjects in your playlists. 5 videos for nuclear physics is too small a course
@ambersiddiqa13386 күн бұрын
Tomorrow is my exam and i am leaving it in the morning just to understand clearly with a fresh mind.😂not a backbencher but just like them ✌️
@booklover_008 күн бұрын
Shortest and the best explanation for understanding this! Thanks a lot!!
@ColbyMerrill-z1u11 күн бұрын
I will use this next time im playing tetherball
@mdsaquibansari48115 күн бұрын
Thanks from India
@mdsaquibansari48115 күн бұрын
Good
@abdelhaycharkaoui170419 күн бұрын
thank yous
@estebantapia-penas820622 күн бұрын
What a great video! Thank you!
@mkhatiri461523 күн бұрын
But why the niobium is a simple element but is a superconductor type 2 not type 1 ???
@kristofmohoric286126 күн бұрын
Explained as it should be. Well done!
@earhyelАй бұрын
Go and read you can't learn MEE 206 in one night - to unimaid engineering students
@ShreyaAnish-p6tАй бұрын
Thank you sooooo much!!! I am amazed how you taught me so much in 4 minutes!!!
@abdalrahmansaad-u7dАй бұрын
cp problem😮😮😮😮😮😮
@daniellewilson1536Ай бұрын
Stanley Mandlestam was South African
@salmanhassan1866Ай бұрын
seedhi baat no bakwas
@duartenicolau7022Ай бұрын
The area doesnt impact the velocity? if we puch a small hole woudnt the water travel faster and reach bigger distance from the tank than a big hole?
@Al0w1nАй бұрын
Amazing!
@PrettyMuchPhysicsАй бұрын
Thanks!
@SanjayKumar-f1y9cАй бұрын
such a nice explanation
@sayanjitbanerjeeАй бұрын
Are the both helicity and chirality observables?
@IVBURAKАй бұрын
thanks
@ww.ww.uАй бұрын
very good video!
@suraiyaratryorni7325Ай бұрын
Dear, I hope this massage finds you well. My name is Orni, and I'm incredibly excited about the potential of the BL4S competition.It's a competition about to create a special experiment that can be done using a powerful particle accelerator. We're a team from Bangladesh eager to delve into a groundbreaking research project. We're particularly interested in exploring Particle Physics. We believe your expertise in Parties & Detectors & accelerator could be the key to unlocking innovative solutions. Could you share your thoughts on potential research topics that align with the competition's goals? Your guidance would be invaluable as we strive to make a significant contribution to the field. Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to hearing from you! Best regards, From Bangladesh
@codemeaw2 ай бұрын
bro's a life savior
@User_336692 ай бұрын
So basically does that means 2s and 2p have different energies due to stark effect........?
@JamesVestal-dz5qm2 ай бұрын
ChatGPT and Canvas tell different stories about internal energy in the ising model. We need to decide whose telling the right story about the internal energy based on the UC systems perception of the ising model.
@Dr.SerenaMehta2 ай бұрын
How is g factor of proton is 5.59
@NKG4162 ай бұрын
what if there is a lot of holes?
@israelsadovnik2 ай бұрын
Dirac and Lorentz Transformations Dirac took an electron and figured out how the electron will transform under the Lorentz transformations and after published the results as the existence of an antielectron / positron. Electron after Lorentz transformations changes into an antielectron.
@CharlJadeOfals2 ай бұрын
1:02 ❤
@raginald7mars4082 ай бұрын
Quantum Failed Theroy
@neurolancer812 ай бұрын
This is so ironic that you are using devices which work based off the calculations on QFT. It’s incomplete but not “wrong”.
@adityashrivastav60152 ай бұрын
Nice explanations ❤
@ngdnhtien2 ай бұрын
If we consider free electrons, then the solutions to the Schrödinger equation are plane waves, no? How come we're having standing wave solutions (at 1:05), which assume electrons are trapped inside a cubical potential?
@duzanluizagasalazar25232 ай бұрын
Nice
@brandonflorida10922 ай бұрын
Why would you assume that someone who wants to see where the Lagrange equation comes from knows the calculus of variations???
@athallahaziz19413 ай бұрын
Broooo, this is goood!!!!, thank you so much!
@fiftysevenforce3 ай бұрын
Now this video seems more relevant than ever!
@WalkerThede-w2w3 ай бұрын
Jakubowski Path
@ricky53693 ай бұрын
lagrangian
@rajdeeptah18733 ай бұрын
great video!
@r4fyel3 ай бұрын
This is a really nice video, you make this phenomenon easy to understand and the math is really well explained 🙂
@PrettyMuchPhysicsАй бұрын
Thank you very much!
@RichardKCollins3 ай бұрын
You rushed at the end and missed the most important insights and applications. SLOW DOWN and think while you are talking.
@Rajendran-y2w3 ай бұрын
🎉😊😊😊❤❤❤
@gracygohil15313 ай бұрын
This was very good. Quick ready to point and nothing else. Informative and easy to understand
@michaelgonzalez90583 ай бұрын
When gravity wedged on the gravity it became seen on the theory
@CassandraMeyers-oo2ps3 ай бұрын
Reminds me is like 1X1=1.
@DaMonster3 ай бұрын
Excellent video!
@wawan_ikhwan4 ай бұрын
So, what is the different between pure state and mixed state?
@meetghelani52224 ай бұрын
ayo, mah man, great explanation but where's the reduced planck's constant @3:27 ?