Пікірлер
@Wheresmytoastxd
@Wheresmytoastxd 13 күн бұрын
good vid
@ThePsychoAnon
@ThePsychoAnon 17 күн бұрын
Mid tier USA feels like this with the 6 inch crap until you hit Pittsburg or early battleships.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 16 күн бұрын
It definitely lacks a bit, but there's still a lot that can and will be added, so there's hope for the future
@JamieDownes11
@JamieDownes11 19 күн бұрын
Wait no way I've found an actual W Naval youtuber. Liked and subscribed! (also pls cover any/all British Bluewater BB's xD)
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 19 күн бұрын
There's sadly only a few of us lol. Thanks for the sub! I will cover some of UK stuff right after update drops, because of Repulse incoming to the tree
@bati_core
@bati_core 29 күн бұрын
and u can also attach more 7.62 and make urself living bullet hell
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 29 күн бұрын
I really don't want to say that but 4:00 is me saying exactly what you're saying. Thanks for the suggestion tho.
@bati_core
@bati_core 29 күн бұрын
@@AventarYT yeah ik now, i posted this comment right before u said that xD
@TheRealJay.77-kg2db
@TheRealJay.77-kg2db Ай бұрын
Nice video man, you can try adding more goofy ahh sound efects to fit in with the video
@AventarYT
@AventarYT Ай бұрын
Thanks, I'll try to do it in one of the next videos that are coming up soon.
@nicksimmons1305
@nicksimmons1305 Ай бұрын
This is something that a basic education or attempt at understanding other countries could resolve. Ridiculous.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT Ай бұрын
One would think that if only one country in the entire world uses such thing, it would be easy to understand. Reality is quite disappointing.
@Macht002
@Macht002 2 ай бұрын
what ships do you want? USSR:DA
@malakov5
@malakov5 2 ай бұрын
I think I’ll use mine to grind the next naval event coming up.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 2 ай бұрын
@@malakov5 That's quite a good idea, recently you can get really good score with her
@pbj8961
@pbj8961 2 ай бұрын
Da war doch was - Betrete einen Raum und vergiss was du dort machen wolltest
@GAMINGisAWES0ME
@GAMINGisAWES0ME 2 ай бұрын
I was really expecting you to spontaneously explode hahaha
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 2 ай бұрын
The best part was me getting 7 kills after this short ends lmao
@jakubvsv9305
@jakubvsv9305 2 ай бұрын
The 4 naval players:
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 2 ай бұрын
A bit more than just 4 I'd say
@4C0-q7h
@4C0-q7h 3 ай бұрын
I believe carries should not be playable, but they should make air spawns squadrons (expect fighters) , where you have Ai follow your lead plane into a bombing run
@cadeanderson9733
@cadeanderson9733 3 ай бұрын
How do you get it to zoom more?
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
The hold breath button gives you a slight zoom in.
@MyCLAUDIO123456
@MyCLAUDIO123456 3 ай бұрын
Gaijin should copy battlestations:pacific when its about submarines and carriers
@EliteFuller
@EliteFuller 2 ай бұрын
Yes
@WarToTheThunder
@WarToTheThunder 3 ай бұрын
Bro pulled a Wide Profile not a Maverick
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
It's because it was from Red Tails, not Top Gun
@KaiserFroggo
@KaiserFroggo 3 ай бұрын
Could work if people played naval
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
Well, it might be smaller community within WT, but it's still a community full of thousands of people
@nitebones1
@nitebones1 3 ай бұрын
i think one idea could be AI carriers being added to EC maybe as a objected that shows up and it moves around spawning in ai fighters in waves, we have something simular in sim air mode where attacker aircraft will spawn to go attack a location and players have to go intercept them.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
We do have something similar in EC, where you have a carrier roaming around that needs to be detected and destroyed by the enemy team. It doesn't spawn fighters or attackers though.
@nitebones1
@nitebones1 3 ай бұрын
@@AventarYT yea I think if they added that to naval ec they should make it more of a objective like having it spawn fighters or a forward spawn point for players, like for me at least in ec they is only really just shoot and capture with some pve aspects I think it might be more fun as there would be stuff to do, expecally if they start to add in subs to the game
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
That would be something for a start no gonna lie. Btw nice pfp, Kongou rules!
@xXE4GLEyEXx
@xXE4GLEyEXx 3 ай бұрын
Only in Enduring Combat In all honesty Naval RB should be Enduring Combat only to begin with.
@trevorwhitham6742
@trevorwhitham6742 3 ай бұрын
Yeah the games are to short due to capture zones
@Caktusdud.
@Caktusdud. 3 ай бұрын
The problem with the AI in those single battles is that they'll go after the first enemy they see. You have no control of them, they are just there to be there. So they'll need work. They can strafe, dogfight, bomb and make torpedo runs but they're not that good. As mentioned before the maps don't work for them outside of EC. Its worse for carriers than you think. Carriers are fragile as fuck. They're just giant floating ammo racks waiting to happen. In fact take all the carriers ever sunk and look at how many have exploded. Its a huge proportion of them. With Gaijin's totally amazing damage modelling I bet the frunze would kill one with her guns. If not a complete explosion its damage to your top sides and aircraft as well massive crew losses. That alone is killing the idea off. They also need to work in a sense that they are simple and flexible. Im a little unsure on how to do this. If they do come they need to be very simple carriers. Like Im talking HMS Hermes or Zuiho levels. Small and simple, just to see what happens. With fixed aircraft types and payloads just to see what happens. besides there are other types of warships I wanna see in game over carriers.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
For sure the AI is not the greatest, but they can be modeled to follow marked targets so with little tweaking they won't be just a visual addition or a cannon fodder. What we could do is to have something you suggested so an event with a small carriers just like what we had with submarines. To test the waters. I am afraid of implementation of carriers but at the same time I'm hopeful they make them right from the get go with little to no rework. EC implementation could work simply because players there are more willing to cooperate and organize themselves in natural task forces.
@Caktusdud.
@Caktusdud. 3 ай бұрын
@@AventarYT I think the biggest issue we face is weather Gaijin would be arsed to do it right in the first place. They can't get anything right especially in naval.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
@@Caktusdud. Sad but true. But one can hope that they will stand and deliver something good.
@dirtydee9440
@dirtydee9440 3 ай бұрын
Interesting suggestion, I like it. Perhaps combined with the ability to orbit and cycle between leader and ship as well
@ToddLawrence23
@ToddLawrence23 3 ай бұрын
I think they could work if you make them "RTS", you could point in the map the place you want your planes to attack and let them be controlled by AI like in air battles.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
If so then first setting a waypoint would need to include later marking a target for them, most likely just like you can now mark a target for your AI controlled guns. Not a bad idea with the RTS-ish approach. It could be worth it implementing a way of being able to "see" the aircraft's perspective without controlling them, to as previously mentioned, target ships for attack.
@inkycat7167
@inkycat7167 3 ай бұрын
the only way i’d want to play Naval
@barnykirashi
@barnykirashi 3 ай бұрын
I have two things in my mind for carriers: First is that I want Carriers to be unlockable, grindable, tech tree vehicles, I sometimes want to jump into a game just goofing around with them, not having to play EC for 1-2 hours, only to then get unlucky and not being able to spawn in with the carrier. I want to do Custom games, playing as a CV, Customize my ship, etc. The second thing is locking specific aircraft for Carriers. I propose the idea that to begin researching Carriers, you first need to unlock certain Aircraft in your Air tree, or every carrier should have a certain few 3-4 planes as a default set, but you can change them to ANY Aircraft you have unlocked. I'd even go as far as being able to use landplanes, but with the difficulity of having nearly no way to recover them. At the hangar, you can set your desired aircraft similarly to suspended armament customization for planes, then you'd be able to choose a preset, and then you set the amount you take of them, and their priority, like you do with Ammunition in a Tank. For example, let's say, I play with my beloved Kaga, so I, while her default aircraft are the A6M2 mod22, the D3A and the B6N2, go to the custom plane preset menu, and set up the A7M2, the D4Y3, the B6N2, and the P1Y1(Notice, it's a landplane). I queued into a game, I found a match, Now I select my preset of aircraft, and say, I take 2 P1Y1s at the first priority, meaning they will sit on the forefront of the deckparking planes. They are big planes, so they take up a lot of space, so I can't take all 90 aircraft, which is Kaga's capacity, I can only take less, since the two bombers take up a lot of deck space. I still have wiggle room on how much aircraft I take from the rest of the set up, and how I'll position them, what goes into the hangars, and what stays on the deck. I have spawned in, (and this time, even though I love bullying unsuspecting DDs with the 200mm Casemates, today we are grinding the Shinano, so we need to maximize our rp gain.) So I pull up the Squadron Preparation menu with a key, and select my P1Y1s, arm them both with 2 500kg bombs, and select 3 A7M2 Reppus to escort them, in case anything happens. I choose one of the P1Y1s for the leader, and begin setting up. This would take a few seconds, and then the game would tell me what I need to do: In this case, we are taking off with Bombers, which are large, so the game tells me to turn into the headwind, after wich I can initiate the take-off, I take controll of the squadron leader I designated, and I'd take off, with the other aircraft, like in single player missions, following me a bit behind. With a key, like ALT+M, or whatever you set up, I can open the tactical map, on which I can give directions to either the Carrier, or a squadron I don't controll, I can also split up my squadron (This is a suprise tool, that will help us later) I can tell Kaga to keep moving to a set point, while I carry out the attack with the bombers. I reach my target, and let's say we got away with the attack. Now I can't land the Bombers back on Kaga, so I set off to land them on the airstrip. then I split up the squadron, land the Bombers, and since Kaga's deck is still full, I'll let the fighters keep flying at a higher altitude, near Kaga. Now I see somebody spawning with a Pe-8, so I return my control to Kaga, set up a new squadron of fighters, merge them with the A7Ms already in the air, and I'll go to intercept the Pe-8. Meanwhile, I can set up another squadron of D4Y3 Dive bombers, and send them out towards the side of the map for a flank attack. And of course, matches take more time, etc, let's just assume Naval is fixed, in 10 minutes, I can assert pressure at nearly all points of the map. This takes a lot of practice, and strategic thinking, patience, in general a lot of dedication to juggle the act of being a moving airfield. Plus I'd have to manually land my aircraft back on Kaga, if they need refueling or rearming. I also need to juggle Kaga herself, as she may get intercepted by an enemy ship, and I'll need to fight them as well. I'd change AA on ships with one single change, and that's that you need to Mark targets for them, so you're not just permanently, automatically defended from any and all air attacks, but you actually have to do the bare minimum, and if you phase out, or tunnel vision too hard, you will suffer the consicquences, but if you don't, you will get those juicy "Aircraft Destroyed" payouts. And if a Destroyer really dares to get through the map, I'll just fucking blast their ass to oblivion with 200mm-s of unnecessary destructive force.
@truongminhkhang9902
@truongminhkhang9902 3 ай бұрын
very interesting idea, but if that the case we need to make the maps bigger like in naval battle which often take a very long time to play and people quite often get bored with it, especially those slow moving ww1 battleship that have no aa and no destroyers willingly escort them. Therefore result in less people want to play naval battle to eat bombs and torps for the entire of the game. However your idea is very good, can add some scout planes too ( function like drone in ground battle ) ( i think that get rid of the name tag like simulator battle would make you idea works ).
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
That's a very interesting idea. To the point that you could post this on forum and it would be included into "Passed to developers". I like the idea of wiggling a little bit with aircraft loadout, but I'd say keep the more incompatible like aforementioned P1Y etc. to arcade battles, while saving strictly aircrafts historically available for carriers, most likely as a modification upgrade that you can switch in or out in custom loadouts, for example with Kaga it would be only a switch from A6M2 to A6M5 or D3A1 to D4Y4. Something like that. Otherwise the idea of marking planes for AA is a very good one, so that players won't just mindlessly wander with no worries, but make it an engaging mechanic.
@Caktusdud.
@Caktusdud. 3 ай бұрын
There's a lot of problems with this. Firat is map design. Who's not to say that you spawn in your carrier only to get sniped by a battleship from the otherside of the map? Good luck telling Gaijin to fix that. Second is the fact that this is a very complex way to play carriers. Having to queue aircraft and manage their payloads. Then having different aircraft in the same flight then telling your carrier to do shit mid flight its just a pain in the arse to play. Especially if you play on console where you simply don't have enough buttons for anything. You also have to use AI more for your aircraft and carrier. How do you know they're gonna fuck up? Its just a lot to manage and I get it, carriers I just like that but a simpler approach is needed. I question if carriers would even work at all. As a researchable ship class sure even just to good around with in custom battles.
@kingdedede1066
@kingdedede1066 Ай бұрын
That sounds ok, but I think only naval aircraft should make up the carrier wing.
@therealspeedwagon1451
@therealspeedwagon1451 3 ай бұрын
I really don’t think carriers would work for Naval in War Thunder. If we were to base such carriers off of the carriers in World of Warships they’d suck and be very hard to implement properly. In WoW, planes from carriers act in coordination without any flaws. It’s as if the squadron of planes have a hive mind they way they fly in such synchronicity. War Thunder on the other hand is about independence for its planes. If carriers were to be implemented, a whole group of players would have to fly in unison while one player is stuck playing a glorified mobile base with SPAA. SPAA in naval is nothing like SPAA in ground combat. You can’t just shoot your AA guns against ships that often have meters of thick armor. It’d be like trying to fight a tank with a BB gun. I also don’t trust players to be able to fly in such perfect unison. I do however think carriers could potentially work if they were instead just spawn points for players or if you the player controlled groups of planes either like how you can in WoW or something more like an RTS game.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
We do have AI planes that can follow you semi independently so mixing that with the floatplane mechanic that allows you to switch between plane and vessel, I think that could potentially work
@ilija5103
@ilija5103 3 ай бұрын
i will like to gajin add carriers in naval so to i unlock achievement destroy 5 carriers :D
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
It should be called Leyte Gulf Hero :)
@helljumper4565
@helljumper4565 3 ай бұрын
This I just watch a 16 minutes video about a guy expressing his love for a ship? I don’t blame him, I would fuck Kongo If I had the opportunity
@helljumper4565
@helljumper4565 3 ай бұрын
That’s actually a very great idea, I wish naval was a more popular game mode
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
One day it will, one can hope
@ChronicAndIronic
@ChronicAndIronic 3 ай бұрын
I am one of those guys who has top tier
@trevorwhitham6742
@trevorwhitham6742 3 ай бұрын
I’m working on British naval will probably stop at the Eskimo though
@TonyChristy-dy7qv
@TonyChristy-dy7qv 3 ай бұрын
The answer for Naval I feel is to abandon the current game play that is AB/RB matches on maps that are entirely too small and improve on Naval Sim EC. In Naval EC you have plenty of room to operate with lots of task. This would also allow for things like CVs and Submarines to brought into the game immediately . First they would have to open it up to 7 days a week, then get rid of the ridiculous you have to X amount to get a better ship mess. They would also have to make Naval EC count for events and BP. Or!! lets merge air sim and Naval EC together and that would fix every problem almost instantly and increase the player base tenfold. Either way the unavoidable fact is that Submarines and Aircraft Carriers will eventually have to come into this game in some compacity, if they intend on keeping up with competition like World of Warships otherwise they will continue steeling their players. Lets also add that there are lots of folks who want to, but will NOT play this game because they wont unfck Naval and add these two vehicles into the game.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
It is unavoidable and I know Gaijin will add them to snatch the WoWs audience that are disappointed in the game. Naval EC as a permanent mode is a good idea. SP system isn't that bad, it just needs slight changes like the amount you need to grind for a better ship. Air and Naval combined is something I can get behind. It would even add more tasks for both air and navy. Using EC as a test bed for new types of vehicles and missions is a good thinking. With the normal Naval modes I'd say I'd like to see rework of maps and modes to instead use tasks from EC like escort/attack on convoys, base capture etc.
@Ph0enixL0rd
@Ph0enixL0rd 3 ай бұрын
I met that one yesterday in my game too. Pre chill bot lol
@cpresuttis
@cpresuttis 3 ай бұрын
bruh its always one or 2 maps. one or 2 dudes per teams brings a PT boat rushes A/B cap and essently win the game for the team who brought more PT boats. then you got the games where its legit 4 ACTUAL players per team
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
That is a plague for normal maps, that are still not optimized for ships bigger than frigates. Naval has it's problems, but a lot of them just comes from the initial release stigma, that has yet to disappear, such as low count of players but that can just change over time, if Gaijin will show that they do put some work into the mode and are trying to revitalize it.
@covid19wasaWMD
@covid19wasaWMD 3 ай бұрын
Hahaha yeah open seas are kind of boring. But, I wish we could captain aircraft carriers. And send of some NPC airplanes and you could switch out planes.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
Carriers, just like subs could be tested in Naval EC. For now, even though we have all the mechanics needed to implement them, they still are quite finicky to add. I was thinking about just utilizing already existing random plane spawn for SP, but instead of only one plane, you start with 3-4 planes in a squadron that is controlled by AI and follows your plane.
@Sayonara_WNC
@Sayonara_WNC 3 ай бұрын
This should've failed the quality check thank god i accidentally had my sound turned low
@RedVRCC
@RedVRCC 3 ай бұрын
Jesus christ that was fucking loud, I was legit curious what this video was gonna talk about but had to turn it off cause I can't know if it's gonna happen again.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
I'm going to be honest, I muted this clip much as I could and with check-up with my other CC friend they said it was okay so I assumed everything's alright.
@bluedotbdk
@bluedotbdk 3 ай бұрын
Open sea warfare must have been hard during the ww2😮
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
They were, maybe that's why a lot of engagements were in close proximity of land.
@Nothing123Battle
@Nothing123Battle 3 ай бұрын
Algorithm gods hear me. Don't care about the sea battles but you got passion.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
Algorithm hath giveth me the chance. Thank you for kind words!
@zenki_ls400
@zenki_ls400 3 ай бұрын
Naval EC was the most fun i had in naval
@flabbergast_se
@flabbergast_se 3 ай бұрын
There should be objectives that are realistic. In a real world instance you just don't throw ships into a place knowing there are just as many enemies coming from the other direction. There should be convoy objectives. Get from point A to point B. Protect convoy. Stop enemy ships. Other team can have similar or more attack convoy, stop it from passing basepoint X.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
Asymmetric gameplay modes would be great to see. Or modes that would incorporate all the ship classes with different objectives per class.
@shadeofdeepgreen24
@shadeofdeepgreen24 3 ай бұрын
Maybe don't have YELLING at the start of the video..
@RedVRCC
@RedVRCC 3 ай бұрын
Yeah, I can't imagine what it was like for anyone with headphones... I was watching on phone speaker and volume was only about half but that shit was so loud I could feel my phone vibrating, and not because of a notification lol.
@VisibleToThePublic
@VisibleToThePublic 3 ай бұрын
Yea, I used to play World of warships since the day it came out and then started playing WT ships instead. These maps and the odd decisions around Naval tech tree has made it that I haven’t played in a looong time and don’t intend to.
@TonyChristy-dy7qv
@TonyChristy-dy7qv 3 ай бұрын
I honestly only play Naval EC anymore. However on the rarest times you catch me in RB that is a instant return to hanger for me
@ExiaLennelluc
@ExiaLennelluc 3 ай бұрын
i usually plan the Naval EC now at least in those the theres a bit of travel time
@johnnymnemonic8487
@johnnymnemonic8487 3 ай бұрын
Dam dude that yelling sucked!
@moonlitfoxling8448
@moonlitfoxling8448 3 ай бұрын
yeah, a simple all 5.0 destroyer going against heavy/light/destroyers is not fun, but I do have a lot of fun in 2.0 naval battles
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
There's not enough appreciation for low tier coastal like 2.0. Even as a bluewater enjoyer myself, I like to hop in some 1.7 sub-chaser and have fun shooting small boats
@VICTORRUBIO-ih6kc
@VICTORRUBIO-ih6kc 3 ай бұрын
MY EARS jeez
@boravedat2931
@boravedat2931 3 ай бұрын
why did you yell soo much?
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
Yell? I thought this was one of my more normal videos. A bit passionate, but overall without raising my voice.
@Cjm7603
@Cjm7603 3 ай бұрын
Hey man u might want to check the audio balancing at the very beginning. That was legit offputtingly loud
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
My bad. Fun fact, this clip that you mention was set on the quietest setting before my program would completely mute it.
@MrCyberTank
@MrCyberTank 3 ай бұрын
@@AventarYT You should always try to verify the end product if anything is amiss. I had a similar situation with another smaller creater, but instead to adress it he simply mocked me. I legit was about to turn off the video. Earrape was never funny and never will be.
@IvoryShard
@IvoryShard 3 ай бұрын
@@AventarYT Then your program isn't that good. There's no such thing as the quietest setting being close to mute. 99% of all video editing software uses db. DB has an almost infinite value to make the sound louder or quieter. That's what all DAWS uses, that's what Davinci Resolve uses, that's what Audacity uses, that's what Premiere uses, etc.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
It does use db, it just sometimes mute the clip altogether after a certain threshold. This particular clip was set on the maximum allowed decrease of db. Next time I'll check it on few devices before publishing, instead of just relying on my pc settings
@IvoryShard
@IvoryShard 3 ай бұрын
@@AventarYT That's not true. I am a mixing engineer. Db only fully mutes a track if it is set to infinity. Programs use mathematical equations to calculate the volume after changing the db, that's why only true infinity would mute a track. You can bring down a track to -100 db, render it in WAV, and bring it back up to normal levels. I'm not trying to be confrontational, I am stating facts.
@iampsico
@iampsico 3 ай бұрын
I hate them too
@Samo_rust
@Samo_rust 3 ай бұрын
is naval always this dead? I literally que alone and get in a game with bots
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
Besides the quiet hours, where a lot of the players are unavailable. This kind of matches happen mostly at full top tier without a downtier ships.
@gamingtoday3708
@gamingtoday3708 3 ай бұрын
Lazy....?, Sir you are Delusional this is just Naval. Nobody cares about the maps because most the players are Bots. Naval is a waste of Dev time unless they do a FULL Rework. This goes for Helicopters to, Waste of time unless a rework.
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
There's quite a nice community around Naval that do care and we try to be vocal about it. The only time you see more than 1-2 bots per side is at the very top tier or during some unusual hours where most of the world isn't available. Rest of matches are full of players so I'm not so sure that most of them are bots. Full rework is not needed, as the core mechanics are good. Naval needs tweaking in terms of maps or more modes that require every class of ship to cooperate, so EC but in smaller format so to speak for example, but unlike helis, that don't even have dedicated game mode besides PvE and exist solely to be a menace in ground modes, there's no need for full rework.
@orbitaldropshockpizza
@orbitaldropshockpizza 3 ай бұрын
im so disaponted WT calls Alasks a battle cruiser
@AventarYT
@AventarYT 3 ай бұрын
It's because in their "sekrit dokuments" Large cruiser-class is classified as battlecruisers. Same thing with HMS Glorious or how Gaijin names Kirov-class or Krasny Kavkaz light cruisers, although they are classified as heavy cruisers all around the world.