This is just Hegelian dialectics mixed in with French postmodernism. Very idealistic and lacking in materialist analysis. It fails to account for how many conflicts occur due to material conditions and how material conditions change and shape values and ideas; it believes values and ideas dictate human history as an external somehow sublime force that can affects humans but can't be affected by humans. Very silly.

I have spent hours exhausting my patience trying to find this guy spend more than one sentence of description of his highest level of maturity.

This is the kind of false dichotomous story telling that reinforces division. This style of story telling is quite popular and effective. I find myself wondering often how we can reframe this way of thinking in a way that promotes unity without othering (villain) or idealizing (hero), but all the methods I've seen are more complex. Nuance isn't simple even if it is more accurate and less harmful in the long run. 🤔

Why titling this third tier if you don’t say anything about it, and you barely mention second tier?

Educaction in no way implies that a person is capable of critical thought. Education is a significant part of the indoctrination system.

Same here! That’s the crazy benefit I’ve noticed 🙂

yap

Thank you for sharing this interview with Ken. I would like to ask you, regarding AI, how close it currently is to your vision described in your book "boomeritis." thank you. I love them. Pablo, from Argentina.

um, too lengthy. too much emotion, exaggeration ("world's smartest man"!?) This guy pushes my bad buttons. PLEASE - less selling and more explaination. Lost patience. Will have to look elsewhere for the theory he's so enamored with.

jeff bezos took alot of money, hitler took alot of lives, stalin tried to compete with him, kim jong un goes into his fathers footsteps and we got xi and putin creating their own legacies. but in positivity, its opposite for the immediate people around you.

1:22:15 I have heard Ken Wilber tell this story several times. And it is simply not true as he describes it. For one thing, the event was not the end of the relationship between Jung and Freud, not at all. Freud and Jung met for the first time in Vienna in 1907, where they dove into intense conversations about the human mind. Jung later said they spoke for 13 hours. What followed was an intense correspondence, and it was the start of a professional collaboration and personal friendship that lasted until 1913, when professional disagreements between them led Jung to resign from his position as chairman of the International Psychoanalytical Association - an organization that they had founded together. They met in 1913 for the last time. The conversation Wilber refers to took place in 1910 (see Jung’s memoirs). It is a false assertion that they never spoke to each other again after that. That is simply wrong. How Wilber can claim that so definitively (‚They literally never spoke to each other again after that conversation, not till the day they died and they never ever said a single word including till the day they died.‘) almost leaves me stunned. As I said, the final break did not occur until 1913. He also quotes the conversation itself inaccurately: Wilber claims that Jung wrote about it in his memoirs that 'Freud did not realize that what he (Freud) called occultism was everything I was interested in in my life'. When in fact Jung wrote: 'What Freud seemed to mean by "occultism" was virtually everything that philosophy and religion, including the rising-contemporary science of parapsychology, had learned about the psyche.’ Wilber should either keep quiet about the conversation in question or get a correct picture of it based on the numerous literature available. It would also do him no harm to read Jung's memoirs (again), especially his chapter on Freud. And then, Mr. Wilber, you may recount the event truthfully.

Thank you so very much for hosting Ken Wilber. Next? Chris Langan to review his Theoretical Cognitive Model of the Universe (TCMU).

Banquet pot pies are gross

Sending Love ❤

Dumb

Now THAT is the scariest jump scare I've EVERr seen

**I’m doing a Special LIVE Interview with Ken Wilber on Tuesday, October 29th - and you’re invited to be on the line with us! Register here: toddjason.com/ken-wilber/

**I’m doing a Special LIVE Interview with Ken Wilber on Tuesday, October 29th - and you’re invited to be on the line with us! Register here: toddjason.com/ken-wilber/

We just had a 2hr LIVE call with Ken. Watch the recording here! > kzbin.info4YrMyWY5MfQ

I really hope not one penny of government money went into that study stupid

EPOCS not epics

The earth is flat. Yes, but what if it is not?

Give Me Your money! Yes, but what if No

Tell me how to step in with out a full on revolution.

Did you see how unsafe it is for women? Taxi cabs just for women so they feel safe. Good for you to explore and share.

That is why the energy of America is so beautiful ))) Are you kidding me??

Voice comes in and out at times. Couple clarifications: Innovation distribution curve theory says the parabolic launch occurs around 20% adoption after the chasm. My understanding is there are 4 quadrants Ken stated there are 10 stages, you were stumbling with numbers You cherry picked your truth, but failed to mention it when you had the chance Truth is subjective in one’s internal world, objective truth resides in the field of what possibilities through only through a formal process of falsification. Sure it was The Ken Wilbur you spent time with?

Even though it took a while to be enlightened at 28, I'm like him this happened to me at 25 and I'm now 37! It's about maturity and how you want to go through life, I'm still somewhat struggling but it could always have been worse! 💯

So good

Is that why you feel down and out?

Been on repeat for 30 years 🤷🏻‍♀️

Wow, so beautiful, Todd, thank you so much. ❤🙏❤

You can’t “teach” your children to be resilient. Kids don’t listen to you, they IMITATE you.

That's the kbly reason why I sporadically I smoke. I smoke alone, and immediately I meditate, and I discover the things I wasn't able to see.

Attention is an object. It possesses varying intensity, ranging from dimmed when we are sleepy to heightened and alert when wide awake. Additionally, attention has a directional quality: it can turn inward towards thoughts, memories, and dreams or outward towards sensory experiences. Also, attention has a type of aperture to it that can be either wide-allowing for a general awareness of everything-or narrow, focusing intently on a specific sensation. However, Awareness of attention is integral, beyond (transcends and embraces/welcomes) attention (object, experience, measurable, limited), incl. the experience/sense of being/awareness.

111 views ❤

Signed up for your course. Super stoked!

YES! Grateful for this profound reminder... I love how this energy plays out through you, me, and all of us...

Appreciated 😊

Clinton the pedo? Or was it Clinton the womanizer? Or was it Clinton the liar? Help me out here…..

So much indeed! So grateful. Is this random? I wonder…

She should have been obliged to make ends meet just for a month with an average salary in a third world country.

What happened to this guy? That wig looks so bad, so fake. He used to be my favourite philosopher. I kinda lost interest after his book "One Taste". He described that when he went on business trip in 1997, it took him 2-3 days of living in the real world to lose access to higher levels of consciousness, and back then he already was a very advanced meditator with over 20 years of practice (2-3h per day).

Make America Human Again

true

This lady is really well informed.