Пікірлер
@jamessanborn3043
@jamessanborn3043 9 күн бұрын
The 1st century AD Historian Josephus considered the letters of the Tetragrammaton as vowels. Please see his Jewish Wars 5, 5, 7.
@Matthew-307
@Matthew-307 22 күн бұрын
ANNO DOMINI
@hitension7
@hitension7 25 күн бұрын
Thank you for your educational video. And the song of Moses sang in Hebrew from “Prince of Egypt” was very touching.
@squids
@squids 25 күн бұрын
Hello again sir! Thank you for the new content, i deeply apreciate it❤
@G.D.9
@G.D.9 25 күн бұрын
Glad to see you're back, great content as always!
@KushDaddy333
@KushDaddy333 Ай бұрын
Thank you
@MereEdgeMinistry
@MereEdgeMinistry Ай бұрын
The Bible never commands to not speak God's name, only to not take it in vain, blaspheme Him. Exodus 23:13 ...be circumspect and make no mention of the name of other gods, nor let it be heard from your mouth. If we cannot speak God's name, we also cannot speak the name of Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, Adonai, etc.
@theuntouchable7277
@theuntouchable7277 Ай бұрын
This fake codex was written in 19th century by Constantine Simonides. Move on.
@richardgraham-green6643
@richardgraham-green6643 Ай бұрын
Your whole premise is that Phonetician and Hebrew have the same pronunciation, sometimes we write something and read it different when its from a dialect or like this a completely different language. Ἰαχὼβ YHWH or YAH even YAHO is not the same as Ἰαω. YAHO is Γιάχο. Try reading Hebrew biblical instead for a while. I have read the Torah each week for 25 years, come back when you have seen that much and tell me what you see, or maybe you have never read the Torah fully all the way through in Hebrew. So read the Torah in Hebrew a few times over a few years and you will know. Otherwise your a spectator or just have an opinion from a very outsiders position .
@sitisyahrina3330
@sitisyahrina3330 Ай бұрын
in ancient hebrew is YA'OH
@nealcorbett1149
@nealcorbett1149 Ай бұрын
I believe the majority of Genesis is missing from the original ms, from Gen 1:1 to 46:28.
@1belladoggy
@1belladoggy Ай бұрын
Thank you for bring back the truth of GOD’s name: Yahweh ❤
@richardcoplin4103
@richardcoplin4103 2 ай бұрын
Haya in Hebrew is the English word for "was"
@truthseeker9070
@truthseeker9070 2 ай бұрын
I find it interesting that NaHash is used as a name of king and the same thing is the NaHash (same spelling) who decieved Hawah. A lot of people argue that the name or word could mean "serpent or shining" or could be both at the same time. Like a serap---a burning winged being with appearance of a serpent, a throne Guardian
@truthseeker9070
@truthseeker9070 2 ай бұрын
Hi, Do you have an access to DSS psalms? I tried to check chapter 138 but I cant find it Thanks
@JordanDayBiblicalGreek
@JordanDayBiblicalGreek 3 ай бұрын
Nice channel!
@stevenvalett1231
@stevenvalett1231 3 ай бұрын
Dated 325, by whom? No ink annalists has ever been performed to actually date Vatican Codex.
@GhazarYaohBanLoay
@GhazarYaohBanLoay 3 ай бұрын
YA'OH, no rough breathing H sound. Just a clear distinction between the A and the O sound
@michaelart4878
@michaelart4878 3 ай бұрын
Just b 💘
@4robertbates
@4robertbates 4 ай бұрын
The Masoretes made a handful of errors when they used all "3" vowel pointers in both the Aleppo Codex from around 920AD, AND the Leningrad Codex from around 1009AD. These mistakes, I call them mistakes because most of the time they left one of the vowel pointers out using only 2 of the 3, yet the handful of times they did include all three the pronunciation is clearly "YEHOVAH". Isaiah 12: 2-5 Behold, God is my deliverance; I trust and am not afraid: for Yah, Yehovah, is my strength and my song; and He has become my deliverance. Therefore with joy you will draw water out of the wells of salvation, in that day shall you say, Give thanks unto Yehovah, call upon his name, and declare his deeds among the peoples, make mention that his name is exalted! Sing unto Yehovah; for he hath done excellent things: let this be known in all the earth.
@4robertbates
@4robertbates 4 ай бұрын
We're not talking about everyday speaking, so using Father IS fine when WE speak of Him to each other,- BUT it is about Reading SCRIPTURE. God would not have had proper WRITE His name in scripture if He didn't want us to say it! The 3rd command is not about speaking His title as profanity, but to not swear FALSELY by His "NAME". His title God has nothing to do with the 3rd command. As a matter of fact God Himself Swears upon His own name. It is about "VOWS", and making vows which is to swear to do something by God's name.
@jamiecarter4993
@jamiecarter4993 4 ай бұрын
That's what's wrong with the scriptures today written in Greek then translate it to another Greek and whitewashed
@khazak-yaohgad5662
@khazak-yaohgad5662 4 ай бұрын
51 seconds into this video I can see this guy has got it all wrong. The ancient Hebrew text was not called Hebrew when it was given to Mashah (Moses). It was called Ghabaray after Ghabar, the Great-grandfather of Abraham. This man is the only man who walked away from the tower of babel speaking Shapah Barorah aka The Pure Language. This language is the language of creation and to read and understand it, one must know the rules of the language. The narrator said there are no vowels in the ancient Hebrew which would be ludicrous. How can you pronounce words without vowels? Furthermore, he stated the Tetragrammaton is four consonance when it is infact four vowels.. The Y is actually Ya when at the beginning of a word, elsewhere it becomes a long A. Oh, that's a vowel. The second letter is not an H but a Ha when at the beginning of a word. Elsewhere it is a silent vowel placeholder with a few exceptions. Oh, that's two vowel. The third letter is a Wa only at the beginning of a word, elsewhere it becomes a long O. Oh, another vowel. The last letter is another Ha, a silent vowel placeholder. The pronunciation iis one word with two syllables. YA'OH is how you pronounce the sacred name of Abayno, our Father. His children have His name in them. We are Ya'ohshar'al just as Mashah was. Isaac's real name Ya'ohtsakak and his son Jacob was Ya'ohghakab until the Angel changed his name to Ya'ohshar'al and not Jacob. Jacob is a lie and so is Israel. Lies to keep us in the dark! But YA'OH has other plans! His name is pronounced YA'O. It is spelled YA'OH, the Ha is silent! His name is sacred. We are not allowed to pronounce it wrongly, that would be an abomination la YA'OH, to YA'OH! Calling Him some name other than the truth? One may never recover from that! My Father's name is YA'OH! GET IT RIGHT! 🔥
@barend4803
@barend4803 4 ай бұрын
Not the entire bible. Many parts missing in the real manuscript. Other parts the large dropcap letters are clearly part of the original text.
@kbunky69
@kbunky69 4 ай бұрын
Praise Yahuah glory to Him
@kbunky69
@kbunky69 4 ай бұрын
Yahuah glory to Him
@hectorlarios8689
@hectorlarios8689 4 ай бұрын
I think this proves that Jesus is referring to Yahweh as God and his father. Whenever , according to the Gospel authors, Jesus calls God Lord, so he's actually referring to Yahweh.
@vm1552
@vm1552 4 ай бұрын
Cool. But I dislike your use of Adonay where God's name is clearly there. You can read it as "Jehovah, or Yehovah, or Yehowah, Yahveh, Yahweh, Yahuah", or other similarity. But please, don't say Adonay where it doesn't read as such. Be courageous and actually mention any of the possible variant of his divine Name, and not a title such as Lord (LORD). Please don't continue the unjustified "tradition" of avoiding the use of the name of the Most High, whose name must be proclaimed to everyone and never forget what it entails to know it. - Isa. 42:8; Psa. 83:18; 34:3.
@richardcoplin4103
@richardcoplin4103 4 ай бұрын
It can only be read as Yehovah. He only gave Moses one way to say it. Yahweh and Yehovah does not mean the same thing.
@rambho115
@rambho115 2 ай бұрын
Even in Hebrew because obviously that's not hebrew his name is 1 and for all generations he made it clear he revealed his name to Moses when he asked our Creator what is your name his reply Exodus 3:14 IAm that IAm ..in Hebrew ahayah Asher ahayah this is his name let this be known this codex was in the hands of converts who needed an translation this is the reason for the lack of his true name which he said he would remove out of the earth and scatter the sons of Jacob from 1 end of the earth to the other for his names sake . Israel was supposed to be the light to the gentiles but failed and was cursed by the laws of Moses in deut..28:68 where he made it clear he would send the sons of Jacob into Egypt by ships which he promised because israel moved him to jealousy be aware the negros blacks are sons of Judah/whydah are seen as captivess on the walls of ancient Babylon and seen as rulers of elam in persia artifacts believe not the jewish lie rev 2.9 they do lie they are not jews its us the blacks negroes bywords the ones yall love to hate we blessed by him our music our talent all nations cleave to our house oh jacob is the former of all things .. they will say. In the end surely our fathers have inherited lies teach us.
@jamesmaybury7452
@jamesmaybury7452 4 ай бұрын
Nehemiah gordon’s videos on KZbin are very good and thorough on this subject.
@marcelovigas5100
@marcelovigas5100 4 ай бұрын
In the Masoretic text there is no form YAHWEH, but rather JE-OH-VAH.
@marcelovigas5100
@marcelovigas5100 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video. However, there are several proper names in Hebrew that begin with YE-OH, names that have not lost their correct pronunciation. Isn't it closer to the ancient Hebrew JE-OH-VAH? On the other hand, the hypothetical form "YAHWEH" is late and defended by Western Christians.
@YumiInJapan
@YumiInJapan 5 ай бұрын
🤲🏻SHALOM🤲🏻素晴らしい解説をありがとうございます🙇🏻‍♀‎𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄の祝福がありますように👼🏻 The grace of our Adoni Yahusha Mashiak be with you.🕊✨
@Yahudi7694
@Yahudi7694 5 ай бұрын
Nope. This is Phoenician.
@jammehrmann1871
@jammehrmann1871 2 ай бұрын
They are similar in writing style but the language is (biblical) Hebrew, not Phoenician. The script is mostly the same
@PenelopePumperNickle1972
@PenelopePumperNickle1972 6 ай бұрын
Yahuah Elohim HalleluYAH!!
@Gabre030
@Gabre030 6 ай бұрын
YOHUAHU YOA'OH ALA'AYM
@jerrymercado3838
@jerrymercado3838 6 ай бұрын
THANK YOU!
@carlrosenbaum3754
@carlrosenbaum3754 6 ай бұрын
So what do you think gods real name is?? My self i just the native Americans i think they say it best yaheywua native Americans say heyyah. So you flip it and you say yah hey wah
@HAILYAHALMIGHTY777
@HAILYAHALMIGHTY777 6 ай бұрын
Ancient Hebrew was the pictographic version.
@WilliamH490
@WilliamH490 6 ай бұрын
The Sinai text is a total fraud.
@timp1051
@timp1051 6 ай бұрын
Fascinating video!!! New subscriber. Can't wait to dig in to the other videos.
@2besavedcom-7
@2besavedcom-7 6 ай бұрын
Your introduction is a wee bit misleading... At 0:26 min you claim "God is called by many names..." There is only ONE Name that is ever used with the words "this is My Name" or similar and that is the Name of YHWH (Yahweh) ALL the others are titles: Elohim, Adonai, El Shaddai, etc.
@gabriella-vf9rd
@gabriella-vf9rd 2 ай бұрын
I keep Running in to you Bruh!! I love your video and will be posted it , SHARING it soon.. I've myself had many Testimonies on the name YHWH( I MEAN I E BEEN HEALED MOST BY THIS NAME) SO I know deep deep down inside my soul it has to be it!!
@RandyReneau
@RandyReneau 6 ай бұрын
YHWH is the devil. He was evil from the time he presented himself to Moses, he killed and tortured Israel.
@justinian420
@justinian420 6 ай бұрын
AD
@blackeyedturtle
@blackeyedturtle 7 ай бұрын
The fact that the Codex Vaticanus begins each book with enlarged Drop-caps, which were not used prior to the 15th century, lends validity to the argument that it was entirely written over top of the original document it contained. In my opinion the age of the material of its pages, cannot be used as a metric to determine its reliability, if in fact the script on its pages was not placed there until the 15th century. Any manuscript that contains as many changes, alterations, and peculiarities as Codex Vaticanus, cannot be used as a metric to determine the reliability of other manuscripts. Older manuscripts retained the integrity of their substance (condition of their pages) due to 2 major factors. 1.) They existed in environments advantageous to their preservation, such as hot, dry and arid environments lacking in humidity. 1.) They were known to be from unreliable sources of original authorship, and stemmed from Gnostic or other forms of heretical theological sources. Thus they were very seldom trusted as a reliable source from which to copy from, and were not handled by human hands, receiving little or no use by those who upheld orthodox theology.
@DeepJiesel
@DeepJiesel 5 ай бұрын
Yeah, Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Syriac Sinaiticus, Bezae or Washingtonianus must surely be gnostic. Are you trolling?
@blackeyedturtle
@blackeyedturtle 5 ай бұрын
@@DeepJiesel I am not sure I know what trolling means. I do not comment on KZbin videos, nor do I reply to other peoples comments with malicious intent. I try to stay on topic and present arguments or support based on fact. I spent over 2 years researching the reliability of scripture, and after 2 years I came to the conclusion that it was not the product of men's imaginations. If G-d produced it, He is able to preserve it. If G-d is able to orchestrate events in such a way that Kepha (Peter), was able to find enough monies in the mouth of a fish, to provide for the temple-tax for all Messiah's disciples. Preserving scripture through the ages and the vagaries of humans is well within G-d's abilities.
@S.R.M.
@S.R.M. 7 ай бұрын
Christ said, “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it” (Matthew 7:13-14). Are many Christians unwittingly on the broad way that leads to destruction? “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits, you will know them” (Matthew 7:15-20). He further stated in Matthew 7:21-23, “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’” We must know the way of salvation as revealed from Heaven! “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved. ‘He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God’” (John 3:16-18). No one seems to notice, that if you deny the actual revealed name of the Savior, that one already stands condemned. Did you know that the name Jesus has only existed since the 17th century? If God never revealed the name, of Jesus, then those who propagate the name of Jesus, proffer a counterfeit name, and are workers of Lawlessness. Why do Christians think that none of what is said here applies to them? Why would these warnings be found in the Gospel except they apply to those who think they are following Christ, but are following “the Traditions of Men,” as given in Matthew 7:13-14, “for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it”? Why do so many Christians not understand that “there are few who find it” among them? Why do so many Christians hold to the name, “Jesus”, when the Father never revealed this name as the name of salvation? Because they say, “I have seen demons cast out in the name of Jesus!” Or, they say, “I have seen wonders in the name of Jesus!” Historians tell us that Christ was never known in His lifetime as “Jesus”, as the eminent historian Ernest Renan has emphatically stated in his book, The Life of Jesus, p. 90. Again, they do not heed this warning from Christ, found in Matthew 7: 21-23. Listen, you practice lawlessness when you hold to a commandment, revelation, and specifically a name never revealed by God. You practice lawlessness when you hold to the traditions of men that make void the word of God! Why do Christians not heed the warnings by avoiding “the Traditions of Men”? This warning is found in Mark 7: 5-8, “Then the Pharisees and scribes asked Him, “Why do Your disciples not walk according to the tradition of the elders…?” He answered and said to them, “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written: ‘This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’ For laying aside the commandment of God, you hold the tradition of men…” Do you worship Christ in vain holding to the traditions of men, which are according to Christian leaders, who ignore the commandments and the will of God? Do you give lip service to Christ, but your heart is far from Him, as you are emotionally attached to a name or names, or even traditions, never revealed by the will of the Father? Why do you hold to a name as His name or names, such as the names Jesus, Iesus, Iesous, or even Jehovah, never revealed by God? What is the name which is the name above every name by which we must be saved? These names were never given by the will of the Father and God of our Lord and Savior, who is our only God, our Rock (Isaiah 44:6-8, compared with 1 Corinthians 10:1-4), according to the will of the Father until all things are fulfilled! Holding to things, traditions, or names, never revealed by God makes you one who practices lawlessness! Each one of us is to know the truth, for our Savior instructed us “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened” (Matthew 7:7-8). Why do so many Christians not realize that the name “Jesus” (or “Jehovah,” Yehovah) has only existed, historically, in its (or their) present form since the 17th century, and a name (like the name Jesus) that was never given as the name of salvation by the angel that announced the coming of the Savior to Joseph, who was betrothed to Mary, the mother of Christ? Behold the only name of salvation, YAHSHUA! “Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). Halleluyah, meaning “Praise YAH” as found in Strong's Dictionary of Bible Words: in Hebrew: Strong’s #3050. יָהּ (YAH) -- “the name of the God of Israel…” Strong's Concordance for: “YAH: the name of the God of Israel. The Original Word: יָהּ Part of Speech: Proper Name Transliteration: YAH! Phonetic Spelling: “yaw.” The Definition: HaYAH, the name of YAH is “the I AM,” as revealed from God, who told Moses, indeed God said, “HaYAH Ashar HaYAH,” which means: “the I AM Who the I AM,” Behold, “the Name which is above every name,” The Essential name of God is ‘YAH’ given to the Messiah, the Christ, who is called YAHSHUA! The apostle Paul on the road to Damascus heard Christ tell him His name in Hebrew (Acts 26:14-15). YAHSHUA means, “I AM Salvation.” Why is the name “Jesus” a false name for Christ? Because the name “Jesus” was never revealed to anyone by God. It is a name that has existed in its present form only since the 17th century. Also the name “Jesus” is not Hebrew. The name Jesus has evolved linguistically over time into an entirely different name with no intrinsic meaning regarding salvation. The name “Jesus” is Latin, from the name “Iesus”, which for centuries was the English name for Christ, pronounced “ee-sus” (see the 1611 English King James Version), and the name Iesus was transformed from the Greek name Iesous, which is a transliteration of the Aramaic name “Yeshua”, however, the name “Yeshua” does not have “the name which is above every name,” which is “YAH”. The apostle Paul, who heard the name of the Messiah in Hebrew, and therefore, never heard of the name Jesus, wrote, “Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name {YAH} which is above every name, that at the name of YAHSHUA every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that YAHSHUA the Christ is LORD, to the glory of God the Father” (Philippians 2:9-11). Finally, when the Sanhedrin, the Jewish Court, heard the testimony of the apostle Peter, as he testified in the name of YAHSHUA, and upon hearing the name {YAH} in His name, they commanded them not to preach in that name (Acts 4:12-20). The apostles knew the very name, YAHSHUA, the very name of salvation as revealed by God, and it was given through an angel (Matthew 1:21). So successful were the Jews and Hellenistic Christians, knowingly and unknowingly, in hiding the true name of salvation, YAHSHUA, that today many think of the name as a philological impossibility. And yet another warning is not fully understood, indeed, “So the great dragon… that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world…” has made his deception complete by hiding the name of salvation (Revelation 12:9). Praise be to the Lord YAHSHUA, who reveals His name to His saints, the very name YAHSHUA, “Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). “And now, O priests (pastors, teachers, and evangelists), this commandment is for you. If you will not hear, And if you will not take it to heart, To give glory to My name,” Says the Lord of hosts, “I will send a curse upon you, And I will curse your blessings. Yes, I have cursed them already because you do not take it to heart” (Malachi 2:1-2). Halleluyah, Praise YAH, Praise YAHSHUA!
@Raphael-mb2rd
@Raphael-mb2rd 7 ай бұрын
🚩 *[Almighty God Has 1 Name]* 🚩 *[Yeshua Is Not Yahweh]* *{Jesus Is Not Jehovah}* • *True, Almighty God has One Name!* • *True, No sin to pronounce Divine Name in your own language.* *[However]* *Jesus [Yeshua]* Is Not The One Mentioned At *Zechariah 14:9.* 🚩 *[NOTE]* 🚩 *[Divine Name King James Bible]:* • *Zechariah 14:9* - And *Jehovah* shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be *one Jehovah,* and *his name one.* *[Restored Name King James]:* • *Zechariah 14:9* - And *YHWH* shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be *one YHWH,* and *his name one.* *[Emphasized Bible]* • *Zechariah 14:9* - So will *Yahweh* become king over all the earth,-In that day Shall there be *one Yahweh* And *his Name be one.* ________ *[Divine Name King James Bible]:* • *Isaiah 42:8* - I am *Jehovah: that is my name:* and my glory will I not give to another... *[Emphasized Bible]:* • *Isaiah 42:8* - I am *Yahweh, that is my Name,* -And my glory to another will I not give... • *James 2:19* - You believe that there is *one God.* Good for you. (compare NKJV, NLT, BSB) _______________ *{Reference}* • *The New Encyclopædia Britannica* says: “Neither the word Trinity, nor the explicit doctrine as such, appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict *the Shema* in the Old Testament: *‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord [Yahweh] our God is one Lord.’* (Deut. 6:4) -(1976), Micropædia, Vol. X, p. 126.
@Richard-zb3sy
@Richard-zb3sy 7 ай бұрын
thank you for your work
@Scrollermania1963
@Scrollermania1963 7 ай бұрын
Yeah, well, Until Someone, Finally comes forward, with the Two Original Stone Tablets, that Shows, what Letters, that God Wrote, on those stones, with His own Finger....all Languages, are in a holding pattern, including Ghaberay....
@abrahamkristian1975
@abrahamkristian1975 8 ай бұрын
That's just what you think.....because it's impossible for the words "Jesus Christ" to be found in the Sinai codec.....Just look carefully again....where did those words come from before there was Jesus and Christ, whereas the word "kristo" is the first child of a thousand Greek female Gods........And the word "Jesus" is the translated name of Yeshua Hamasia........
@WagesOfDestruction
@WagesOfDestruction 8 ай бұрын
I remember a book "The Source" which modeled this text