sir. maybe you could be one of the reformer s we need for the episcopal church of today and you, sir are like fresh air
@cbumgmtinc78643 күн бұрын
I’m new here. Thanks for speaking to this.
@4evaavfc3 күн бұрын
Timothy 1 says a bishop is the husband of one wife.
@gregattanasio31853 күн бұрын
I'm guessing she is My body , my choice
@Michael-k8r2g3 күн бұрын
30 years ago: LGBT did alright, until they colluded with the left and overplayed their hand and met with the pushback they deserved; likewise immigrants three decades ago largely lived without fear until far left politicians decided to use them as political pawns and subverted national laws; and refugees were once mostly actual refugees fleeing for their lives -- until the left expanded the concept of "refugee" so broadly that the term became suspect, even meaningless. The fears this "bishop" is asking Trump to be mindful of are the direct consequence of policies she and her cohorts on the left forced on the nation. If she genuinely wants, in whatever pastoral activities she may indulge outside of her activism, to allay the fear and discomfort these groups will experience as Trump takes the necessary steps to restore balance, common sense and sanity to America, then the best thing she can do is to meet these groups and personally apologize for misleading them to expect what is not rightfully or legally theirs.
@monikat13303 күн бұрын
I do like your comments to her horrible speech, what I don’t understand why did you have to mention that you do not agree with Mr. Trump, when pretty much everything you are saying is what he wants for people. She is so wrong to say what she say and thank you for translating her intention behind her ( kind ) words. Thank you for clarifying it . By the way there has to be some reformatting of legal process because like you mentioned in past your family came on a boats and were naturalized, it doesn’t happen these days anymore. You can’t come here anymore just because you want to. Work visa is very hard and specific to get. You can’t only come to America if you marry a citizen. So there’s no way to come here legally and stay.
@claudiaf.22363 күн бұрын
I think it is natural and healthy when men lead. When men lead they can speak to the hearts of othercmen and the church gets filled again with men. As a woman i do not care if a man is preaching to me or a woman. But for men it is important to have other men leading. And what else should woman want that the church is again filled with men - so chr
@denisefielding51243 күн бұрын
Such a shame some 'denominations' have rejected the ministry of deliverance - a prime example of 'sweet speak' with trigger words. What a travesty of 'faith' in the Name of a HOLY GOD. A disconnect that appeases verbally and ensnare souls. HE came and taught to set free from the bondages of sin. It is tragic! My motto is compassion without compromise of THE WORD.
@beckylieb26374 күн бұрын
"Father"??????
@barelyprotestant53653 күн бұрын
@@beckylieb2637 yes?
@cherylhaskell98304 күн бұрын
The Episcopal Church was given the privilege of hosting "National Day of Prayer." Disengenuous to use the opportunity to further divide a fractured and inflamed nation; rather than present a message of love, joy, peace, unity. Bishop Budde insulted President Trump and an entire electorate that overwhelmingly opposes ALL that she espoused. Worse, the Bishop is a heretic that Blasphemously spoke against Biblical truth as "Clearly" stated in Scripture - Romans 1: 21-31.
@mikeandtanjagoodall49814 күн бұрын
Is any of her diatribe in the Bible, are we not told to follow the word of God, not the word of false preachers ... she's embarrassing and out of touch 😊
@DonBailey-od1de5 күн бұрын
No authority for s woman to have leadership rolls . She was made from a mans side , authority was given to ADAM , not EVE.
@eldansambatyon5 күн бұрын
not only women there are a lot of men woke church people too.... Thats the problem with woke pastors, preachers and priests.... they cant help themselves from spreading and preaching virtue signaling half-baked false message leading others with them to perdition!!!
@kerrytusc5 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@fernandoperez85875 күн бұрын
If it is new it more than likely isn't of God. We're to hold on to the traditions of "the faith once delivered." The only "new" thing that in my opinion is of God is the Charismatic movement. Not that every part of it or person in the movement is doing everything right. But I believe in the general mission to reclaim the spiritual gifts that have only in more recent centuries waned. The earliest Church Fathers still experienced some of the spiritual gifts and miracles. They have in some part operated throughout the centuries, but a lack of holiness, missions and faith for the miraculous has caused them to wane.
@justchilling7045 күн бұрын
Women can be ordained, the blatant denial of sound exegesis and reason is insane.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
@@justchilling704 they can't be ordained. I have videos explaining why. You're more than welcome to watch them!
@justchilling7045 күн бұрын
@ I watch your videos, we just disagree, while I understand your arguments once agreed, the biblical evidence weighs in favor of their being no divine and or apostolic prohibition.
@marmeemarch70805 күн бұрын
Calling people who disagree with you "insane" is not going to make any of them quicker to agree with your pov but rather the opposite.
@justchilling7045 күн бұрын
@@marmeemarch7080 I never said anyone who disagrees with me is “insane”. I suggest rereading my comment.
@marmeemarch70805 күн бұрын
@justchilling704 Your qualifier is one that can only be applied to human beings, not actions. What did you mean to say, then? There are 2000 years of "sound exegesis" on the side of the traditional view. Some of the Early Fathers wrote fiercely against women presiding at the Lord's Supper centuries before there was agreement on how many sacraments there are. Would you claim that they were wrong then, or that the Church should make a change now?
@tedrohe90485 күн бұрын
I was hoping for a thoughtful and intelligent criticism theologically and generally of this sermon but instead this was just a diatribe based on your hate of Episcopal church, your hatred against liberals, & your hatred against LGBTQ. It isn't thoughtful analysis but it is sadly sardonic.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
Sure, Jan.
@tedrohe90485 күн бұрын
@@barelyprotestant5365 That's very mature of you.
@barelyprotestant53654 күн бұрын
@@tedrohe9048 thanks!
@b19gow763 күн бұрын
Give an example of hatred portrayed in this video
@tedrohe90485 күн бұрын
It's unfortunate to see you agree with the mocking of how someone looks as a leader of a church.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
Huh?
@tedrohe90485 күн бұрын
@barelyprotestant5365 It's 10:42 timestamp of your video.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
@@tedrohe9048 Yeah, I was thinking specifically of her speech, not her clothing. However, I will 100% agree with the idea that all women in vestments look silly.
@tedrohe90485 күн бұрын
Clearly she isn't talking about Christian unity but unity as a nation.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
Yes, we call that "eisegesis".
@tedrohe90485 күн бұрын
When she quotes Jesus it's the "solid rock" part only meaning just as Jesus talked about a firm foundation for faith our nation needs a firm foundation of unity.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
Yes; we call that "eisegesis".
@tedrohe90485 күн бұрын
@@barelyprotestant5365 It's not eisegesis. It's an analogy. It's two different subjects one being the foundation of unity within a country and the other is Jesus as the foundation of the Christian faith. Both areas, one political and the other theological require a foundation.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
@ I mean, call it what you want: it's an imposition on the Text (eisegesis), not something derived from the Text (exegesis).
@tedrohe90485 күн бұрын
@barelyprotestant5365 Again, it's neither exegesis or eisegesis. It's an analogy.
@barelyprotestant53654 күн бұрын
@@tedrohe9048to claim it is analogous is to impose upon the Text.
@wessbess6 күн бұрын
Donald Trump is one of the greatest presidents this country has ever had. He has more courage than most people have and we should give him our full support for what he is doing to save the country and restore our freedoms. We should not give him backhanded support but full support for what he’s doing He has more opposition than anyone than anyone anyone.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
He's promoted sodomy and defended abortion. He automatically cannot be one of the greatest when he's done these things.
@AntiSocialCritic6 күн бұрын
I’ve been fascinated a lot by the progressive Christianity of the early 20th century and how fundamentalists and TradCaths could simultaneously be progressives and socialists with totally orthodox theology. That mode of thinking has totally dissolved tho and Christianity isn’t much better being entirely along partisan lines that are prone to personality cults and false assumptions
@BramptonAnglican6 күн бұрын
And stop trying to blame black people for your problems.
@barelyprotestant53655 күн бұрын
Huh?
@DougMacGruber9 күн бұрын
Where did you get your Bible? It’s hard to find KJV without cross references and apocrypha books included, or at least I can’t find one 😢
@Acek-ok9dp15 күн бұрын
I use the Anglican Office Book, 2nd Edition most of the time. The best English prayer book with Holy Scripture together that I came across.
@GastonRamis-i6s19 күн бұрын
For an atheist what god experiences is a nonsensical question, because god does not exist for us
@barelyprotestant536519 күн бұрын
@@GastonRamis-i6s k, thanks?
@GastonRamis-i6s19 күн бұрын
For the universe the right answer will be: we don’t know, we don’t have enough evidence for any model to be true. philosophical arguments are not evidence
@barelyprotestant536519 күн бұрын
@@GastonRamis-i6s Do you have any evidence philosophical arguments are not evidence?
@GastonRamis-i6s19 күн бұрын
@@barelyprotestant5365 Sorry, i was not clear, in this circumstance it's not enought, your claim is too big for just an argument, in my view you will need much more that just philosophy. Do you have any actual observation that support your claim?? i will really want to hear it, thanks for your time.
@cramblm855325 күн бұрын
1:01:57 Does this mean that people not under an episcopal polity are heretics outside of the faith, meaning they're not brothers/sisters in Christ? Akin to a Jehovah's Witness? I just wonder, because in an older video of yours I watched (Is a Eucharist Valid in a Lutheran Church?), you did consider them Christians proper, merely professing there that because of their lack of bishops, you cannot have assurance of their Eucharist, an intentionally ambiguous term from what I understand, that is meant to only be a critique of their ecclesiology/holy orders rather than to label them as heretics outside of the faith. And you affirm your lack of assurance about their Eucharists once again in this livestream (as well as even praising Lutheranism at certain points). I'm just left feeling kinda confused. Are people in non-episcopal churches heretics because of their lack of apostolic succession in your view, or are they merely in signifcant error? Are they just missing out on the _fullness_ of the faith because they aren't recieving the body and blood of Christ? Or am I using 'heretic' and 'heresy' in a different sense than you are? Sorry if this is all a flurry of questions 😭💀 I just seek clarification!
@barelyprotestant536525 күн бұрын
It's amazing how, when I first uploaded this video, so many of the initial comments were from pro-sodomy people poo-pooing the fact that I'd condemn this. I do find it interesting that they were so quickly able to find a video about sodomites grooming children. It's almost like they have their notifications set to immediately let them know when there's a video uploaded about sodomy and child-grooming. Hm. Wonder why they'd have that.
@randygrayson901526 күн бұрын
Just let God be God! Article 10 of No Free Will interpretation forces Article 17 to an unconditional reading of Election! Let’s not tiptoe through the TULIPS 😂
@buckett6106Ай бұрын
"I'm growing my hair out! I don't know if you've noticed" Father James is so wholesome 😊
@buckett6106Ай бұрын
I didn't mind this guy at all until the cross examination. He just doesn't care about what you say, only what he says matters to him
@johncollorafi257Ай бұрын
20:58 Yes, Mark of Ephesus called the Council of Florence an "ecumenical synod' as quoted in the Memoirs of Sylvester Syropoulos, the principal anti-Unionist primary source. On the debate, Ybarra argued gallantly but lacked the linguistic background to cite effectively original language primary sources supporting Rome's claims. Five times Adrian I writing to the seventh ecumenical council claimed the principatus, a Latin term synonymous with "sovereignty, highest authority," found in earlier popes (St Leo, ep. 55, St Gelasius, passim, etc.). (Fr Price usually translated that as primacy or primatial authority in his English version of the Acts, and only once as something like sovereign authority). Ubi quoted in translation Theodoret's letter ascribing to Rome "precedence" over the churches of the world, whereas the original Greek said hegemonía (a term meaning leadership, supremacy, empire or military command in classical Greek and imperial rule in Lk. 3, 1).
@HenryLeslieGrahamАй бұрын
when the anglo-catholics and roman-catholics join forces, what can they NOT accomplish?
@clintwilliams6345Ай бұрын
Fr James, what church are you pastoring?
@barelyprotestant5365Ай бұрын
St Francis Anglican in Spartanburg, SC!
@Anglo-tonАй бұрын
Wanted to watch it live but miss it 😢
@PopeDefendersАй бұрын
Should use your phone to do these James
@kerrytuscАй бұрын
Near Cullman, Alabama? EWTN? If so, I live near there! It’s great!
@barelyprotestant5365Ай бұрын
@@kerrytusc yup!
@Moreh17Ай бұрын
This is very helpful! As a relatively new Anglican, I have been trying to research and navigate the place of the deuterocanonical books. This video was very helpful and clarifying. Thank you!
@traviswilson36Ай бұрын
Who’s that in the thumbnail? Wow really pretty
@goodquestion7915Ай бұрын
Watkins has a wonky idea of Atheism. He's like a caricature of an atheist drawn by a conservative comics artist.
@goodquestion7915Ай бұрын
Who proposes a dichotomy is a charlatan, and who entertains it without questioning is a hairless ape.
@goodquestion7915Ай бұрын
As on everything Ignorance touches, there's always a possible additional option, NEVER a "dichotomy".