In your videos you talk about "playing against" is this in relation to counterpoint? Pushing the counter point down but the othter character is bringing that up in me? As the scene goes on, I either succeed or fail in repressing the counterpoint i.e. love vs the point (fear)? like will in good will hunting his point is fear but his counterpoint is love for the whole film until he fails at repressing it at the end and chooses love goes to california? "despite the fact im afraid of going to california but i realize love trumps fear"
@TheActorsFoundryOnline6 күн бұрын
Precisely. “PLAY AGAINST” or “UNDERLYING TRUTH” or “INHERENT CONTRADICTION” or “SECRET WITHIN” …these are all different terms directors will use to describe “counterpoint”. I’ve even heard “the character’s secret lurking in the woods”…
@chaelsonnen27475 күн бұрын
@@TheActorsFoundryOnline I took this and watched all of your videos on counter point made in into a word document like a nerd, studied until 2 am and used it in acting class the next day and the acting teacher thought I had been acting for years and wondered what I was doing. I didnt tell her because I didnt want any one else to know this tool, call me selfish fine! this underline flame of the underlying truth that is lit under everything allowed me to real fight for what I wanted in a scene (it was a break up scene because she cheated) but at the same time allowed the nuance of me being scared of leaving her made all the difference. my point was trust/integrity and counterpoint was lonliness/feeling incomplete and the theme was despite the fact that I really dont want to be alone, I no longer want to be treated like a doormat by a cheater. I made it so hard for myself to accept being lonely and it paid off in the scene The need is was to find the good in her, that I think is still there even after what she did. That is what drove each moment. all this is gathered from your videos. not sure if if I did it right but it worked because it was real in my body. , thanks matthew lol
@TheActorsFoundryOnline5 күн бұрын
@@chaelsonnen2747 THIS IS AWESOME!
@lucindaarmour742218 күн бұрын
Thank you for this. Can we discuss the push to the floor in the final Sarah/Charles scene. Genius. All 3 storylines collide - in anger he pushes her too hard - is it the character, the actor playing the character or Jeremy Irons? Her response leads to her American accent returning and three seconds where you would assume the director of the fictional film would yell cut - is it the actor playing the character or Streep? Pinter at his smartest. How to combine the storylines in one great moment - a play within a play within a play.
@tartanjosh21 күн бұрын
best acting lesson I've ever heard / seen
@JamesWilliams-vo8ldАй бұрын
Why do you memorize lines while tapping your chest?
you are presenting a completely false impression promoting this nothing of a commentary with an image of Mark Rylance Shame on you.
@TheActorsFoundryOnline27 күн бұрын
I’m sorry you feel my teaching on stillness in acting is “nothing commentary”. I refer throughout that Mark Rylance (on stage and screen) is a master of stillness - but cannot show video of his work in Wolf Hall due to KZbin copyright rules. This is a vid for the working actor.
@kimberlyhayden4804Ай бұрын
Great points! Thank you!
@DavidRoche-c5nАй бұрын
Cherry Jones is the worse acrtress I havw ever seen what are you talking about
@AlexanderOshiameАй бұрын
That's an amazing teacher right there 🤝
@TheActorsFoundryOnlineАй бұрын
Thank you! Glad to help.
@DelIsInYourMindАй бұрын
Sooo whats the point?
@TheActorsFoundryOnlineАй бұрын
All characters, just like all people in the real world, are a mixture of external conflict and internal conflict. All characters are playing against something inside of themselves, pushing down a contradictory emotion and narrative… Something like: “despite the fact that I am terrified”. Or:“despite the fact that I actually love her”. Or: “despite the fact that I don’t think I actually know what I’m doing”. This counterpoint in the character is what makes the character interesting… This is not something the actor invents … this comes from the script. An actor who plays only the external conflict is by definition “one note”. Top notch experienced actors always play their point (the objective, the action, the desire) against the counterpoint …again, because this is what real people do. Always. And if it happens in life, it must happen in acting. This is why these actors are so interesting and realistic. The exercise is designed to embed the counterpoint (AKA “play against”, “internal conflict”, “vertical story”, “underlying truth”…all synonyms) in the actor which they have to suppress in order to get what they need in the scene. It drops actors into character and releases full and complex moments - that brings the script to life.
@TheActorsFoundryOnlineАй бұрын
Accurate story analysis is imperative for the actor in understanding how to play the scene. To accurately uncover the meaning of the scene...the character's objectives, internal conflict, and actions moment for moment in a scene...the actor must first accurately pinpoint the THEME of the story. The THEME is the combination of the TWO CONVERSATIONS in the story. As we often hear: "There are two sides to every story". Well that is a law (the LAW OF COUNTERPOINT). The conversations are combination of two opposing concept nouns. The two values are not direct opposites to themselves (Good versus Evil). IT IS NOT: "Love versus Hate". "Poverty versus Wealth". "Safety versus Fear". The TWO CONVERSATIONS are two concept nouns that are DIFFERENT concepts...that are in opposition to each other (Good versus Loneliness): "Love versus Fear". "Wealth versus Morality". "Family versus Survival". Together, and in conflict with each other, the two conversations set the THEME... and then everything else in the story and scenes are born of those conversations and theme. As in: - Fear will close the heart to Love. - Money corrupts Compassion. - Surviving the world outweighs loving your family. Once the THEME is uncovered, the actor who is analyzing a scene is able to assess which characters reflect which conversation. Then the actor can pinpoint the inversions of points and counterpoints (A/B = B/A). Scenes are not "A versus NOT A". As in: "I want you stay, but you want me to leave." That would be ONE conversation. Al scenes are always A/B versus B/A. "I want to love you even though I should really leave, and you want me to leave even though you really want me to love you" (Love versus Morality). Frankie And Johnny: Despite the fact that I'm dying to Love you (counterpoint), Iwil kick you out because I'm Afraid of being hurt (point). Margin Call: Despite the fact that I really need the Money (counterpoint), I want out and away from the Immorality of what we've done (point). Fences: Because it's a tough world, I need to toughen my son up to be a Man (point), despite the fact that what I really want to do is hug and Love him (counterpoint). And from there, the actor can accurately deduce the Actions (Realizations and Decision) that the character is playing in each and every moment of the script. And play the action top note while sub- merging the equal opposite counter note that is within them. This explains why the great actors are so exciting to watch....so moving...and so realistic. Hope this helps. Acting is not easy. Life is complex. But once the understanding of how it works is learnt, th actor can soar.
@DelIsInYourMindАй бұрын
@@TheActorsFoundryOnline Thx for explanation... But i was making a "Point" Joke (= Very informative thou. Some one may find it usefull.
@TheActorsFoundryOnlineАй бұрын
@@DelIsInYourMind Ah. Your point was my counterpoint. Well done.
@DelIsInYourMindАй бұрын
@@TheActorsFoundryOnline but to get back to topic - very good explanation. I'm a stage director myself, and it's nice to see some new exercises, for my actors, and to remember some things brushed by the time. Maybe one day I'll join your online classes. Sadly can't do it right now.
@dawnmarieandjeff2 ай бұрын
This is one of the most helpful headshot videos I've seen. Thank you!
@TheActorsFoundryOnline2 ай бұрын
Pleasure!
@benjamminsfriends2 ай бұрын
You have to feel it..be in the moment even improvise..
@Timthethespian892 ай бұрын
Matthew, you’re a giant compared to that person to your left hahah But great video! Great reminder
@TheActorsFoundryOnlineАй бұрын
HA! I thought you meant metaphorically in my KNOWLEDGE!
@Timthethespian89Ай бұрын
@ I mean, yeah, you’re a damn smart human being but a giant in terms of stature as well ;-)
@z.humphrey24982 ай бұрын
Surrender!!!
@candiceburgess-look89812 ай бұрын
Cant wait until you visit Cape Town again Matthew 🤗
@LittleTimmyO3 ай бұрын
This is actually quite good. I know you don’t like technique, as you stated. However it’s very rooted in meisner. Understand the context and everything about the scene/script. Show up and let go; let the preparation and your own natural instinct free while the story pours through you
@speakerscoach3 ай бұрын
These are wise words of wisdom for sure. Im not sure of the name of the speaker but he is absolutely 100% correct. BUT there is many more powerful advantages of acting training for speakers than the 3x aspects he mentioned.
@LorenzoMannino3 ай бұрын
Very interesting...I'm watching another TV series with him these days - Touch - and he always looks like the same character from 24, with the same bad habits. Even if I like a lot of his acting skills in terms of actions and movement and micro-expressions, he always has this kind of "dead eyes" that you are talking about. Also, it seems that he doesn't always listen to the body and words of every actor working with him.
@TheActorsFoundryOnline3 ай бұрын
Agreed. It’s good for actors to see this. Not so much to call out “bad acting”…but top remind ourselves how high the bar is for mastery.
@LorenzoMannino3 ай бұрын
@@TheActorsFoundryOnline Yes, Action/Reaction is kind of the first rule in acting/directing and, I don't know why, this is a little bit underrated, sometimes.
@veronicamozee3 ай бұрын
She's very pretty and her soft voice and well spokeness is gonna get her far!
@bethenawaltz41903 ай бұрын
first, saying that life is a verb and not a noun, is literally incoherent second, there are lots of dogmas in acting, which effectively reduce to cognitive science generally, and i'm not super well-read on all this so if it's wrong it's wrong but i am exceptionally skeptical to ideas like "objectives" and "strong choices," that actors think people have, and that there's some correlation between this abstract mental concept of a character, and the physical reality of an organism that's a homo sapiens my point is that a lot of the stuff that happens in, let's say, an audition has nothing to do with "objectives" or "strong choices" but are instead mere interplays of humans cognizing; and that's not at all well-understood or even clarified seen like this, there's a tendency for actors and people involved in representing text interpersonally to speak in vague-gesturing-and to in some sense, teach that to actors; what actors are learning, i'm not sure if it's actually an "objective,"; they're learning, or disciplining themselves how to behave in a historical pretext prior to an audition, in which the director exists, too, and then the decision of "hiring" is influenced by all sorts of psychological factors; but to suggest that there is something beyond acting that is just saying the lines as you would say them when you say them, i don't at all believe that and i'm tired of the dogma that there is something beyond that that has to be empirically demonstrated, not just asserted
@aditya.sri244 ай бұрын
Dude!! These videos are so helpful. Thank you. I wish I could come and be a part of these learnings in person.
@TheActorsFoundryOnline4 ай бұрын
I teach in Vancouver full time, also travel to Toronto, NYC, London, LA, and Cape Town to teach. Also there is the VIRTUAL CLASS that has actors from the UK, Australia, India, South Africa, and all over the US and Canada. www.actorsfoundry.com/virtual-training
@GairickDam4 ай бұрын
how to practise stillness in acting while memorizing a text and scene
@princervv5 ай бұрын
Continuity - second button on coat as he steps up onto the breakwater.
@TheActorsFoundryOnline5 ай бұрын
Yeah…noticed that years ago. Glaring. That’s pre-playback days.
@e2stella5 ай бұрын
🔥 🔥 🔥!!
@candiceburgess-look89815 ай бұрын
💥👏
@Exotic_St4rxxx5 ай бұрын
🙏
@Wordsareprayers5 ай бұрын
Why don’t U have respect for Nicolas Cage or Keanu Reeves? That’s a lot of 💩talking. Where can I see Ur work?🤓
@TheGravygun5 ай бұрын
Acting is a craft not an art form you're pretending for a living give me a break
@TheActorsFoundryOnline5 ай бұрын
I agree. Acting IS a craft…not an art. “Art” is in the eyes of the beholder. Acting is a skillset - a process that the tactician (the actor) develops. However…from your comment it seems you have no idea how unbelievably hard it is. Acting is the craft of absolutely being psychologically yourself, while ing=habit int the emotions, actions, and behaviours that are foreign to you. Most people have difficulty with the being yourself part…let alone the second half of the craft. Thank you for your comment.
@e2stella5 ай бұрын
HERE WE GO!! Wish I could watch the scene! 😅
@chaelsonnen27476 ай бұрын
Keep this coming!
@H566386 ай бұрын
IT IS SEWAGE WATER!
@chaelsonnen27476 ай бұрын
Hi Matthew, very cool video, can you explain a little about what these people are doing? I noticed by the end the gentlemen is was in an heightened state where he was out of his head!
@e2stella6 ай бұрын
It's emotional preparation that Matthew teaches. At the end, the two actors were doing sound of movement. All these warm ups are to help the actors get into the right emotional state and be connected and open to each other when they do their scene.
@chaelsonnen27476 ай бұрын
@@e2stella I see, I noticed at sound of movement part and they are imitating each other. going from big to small etc. good stuff
@sheilabelem74897 ай бұрын
Absolutely amazing. So in love with your classes. Thanks for such a golden content. I'll definitely be your student very soon.
@TheActorsFoundryOnline7 ай бұрын
So glad to have you as a student!
@chaelsonnen27477 ай бұрын
Heyy Matthew! Quick question, when I do my scene analysis and break it down into threes... for example in ACT 2, I win that act because of a positive turn in that I establish my A conversation. so in Act 1 lose, Act 2 I win, but Act 3 I lose. It's because at the end of the scene my scene partners B conversation sets the tone over my A... Right? I fail in pushing down my counterpoint
@TheActorsFoundryOnline7 ай бұрын
That’s exactly correct! Spot on.
@TheActorsFoundryOnline7 ай бұрын
In the MOONSTRUCK SCENE outside his apartment after the opera: In ACT I, LORETTA sets the conversation - MORALITY. But RONNY changes the conversation to PASSION. She loses. ACT II: Loretta has a huge speech about morality, guilt, sin and RESETS her conversation. She wins. ACT III: he says sure, but it doesn’t matter because he wants her in his bed. PASSION. She loses (ironically making love to the man she really loves). www.actorsfoundry.com/files/File/Moonstruck.pdf
@chaelsonnen27476 ай бұрын
@@TheActorsFoundryOnline thanks so much, by the way I tried to find the video on YT of you drawing the graph on a scene with the 3 act structure in a scene, do you remember the name :)
@TheActorsFoundryOnline6 ай бұрын
@@chaelsonnen2747 The full video on structure in scene analysis is Chapter 2 on the campus (www.actorsfoundryonline.com) first month free so jump on and watch!
@chaelsonnen27477 ай бұрын
NICE! keep uploading man!!
@LittleTimmyO8 ай бұрын
Fantastic insight. Succinct, straight forward, no nonsense, and loved the part where you said the most important: that you have to be stunningly good at what you do. Be in class rather than at the party. Mic drop there
@flowtennispro8 ай бұрын
that was some truth. thank you this is very helpful
@Tee13-o8t8 ай бұрын
Misogyny is a term that has no placement in that film, its time frame or perspective. She was stigmatized for notions related to virtue and honor (American and Old World puritanical values that, in the US, were more or less lost during the sixties and after.) Bygone notions do not have to be vilified simply for having been overturned with a certain tide that, itself, might in turn be overturned.
@Timthethespian898 ай бұрын
Live life instead of trying to achieve it. Damn. All of this is great, BUT THAT is a great wrap up. Thank you!
@Timthethespian898 ай бұрын
Watching this blew me away. When you watch the film, Zemeckis finds all these ways of blocking out Tom Hanks from her life: Childs gate blocking up stairs, and when Helen opens the fridge, and it shoves pictures of her family in his face. BRILLIANT
@SETOBAND-tc8pi8 ай бұрын
Solid teaching
@SETOBAND-tc8pi8 ай бұрын
Inner game of tennis is classic read...thanks Matthew for your tutorials on Acting...giving it another go..
@TheActorsFoundryOnline8 ай бұрын
When you read INNER GAME - and then FLOW by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi - and then THINKING FAST AND SLOW by Daniel Kahneman …it all becomes clear…
@davidleyes6409 ай бұрын
Great info... a lot of people forget....to come to their headshot shoot well fed and well rested... also allowing themselves to be a bit nervous or anxious... it's normal !, also bring clothes that you LOVE ..not clothes that you never wear... and bring lots of clothes so you have lots to choose from and to mix and match with!
@TheActorsFoundryOnline9 ай бұрын
Agreed on all. Thank you @davidleyes640 …except the wardrobe. If you have isolated your market hits, how you fit into the film/TV industry, then you should already have ascertained your three major headshot “events”…and worked out the appropriate wardrobe in advance. Too much guesswork on the day can lessens the tine playing in front of the camera.
@flowtennispro9 ай бұрын
great teacher
@TheActorsFoundryOnline9 ай бұрын
So interesting: TENNIS and ACTING have so much in common…specifically in finding “FLOW”. I have often suggested actors read “The Inner Game Of Tennis” by W. Timothy Gallwey.
@AdrianGilbert19 ай бұрын
I really loved this analysis but there are a couple of things I would add. For me, the moment she looks up at him at the end, she is suddenly in character. Flipping in and out of character goes on throughout the film. I think it was as much about the difficulty actors have in living their own lives when they so easily fall in love with the 'love interest' of the film. The novel was by John Fowles, who lived in Lyme Regis. He was very into Jungian Psychology. So this novel is concerned with how we project the 'anima' (Jungian archetype for the beloved woman) onto women we meet and vice versa. The film gives two endings: one is the fantasy of living happily ever after, the other is reality after the shoot when the 'beloved' goes back to her real life. Thjis, I suspect, is a real predicament all actors face and is why they find marriage so hard.
@TheActorsFoundryOnline9 ай бұрын
Superb analysis
@liviacomar52529 ай бұрын
Na minha opinião, a dissonância entre a interpretação dos personagens foi propositada, considerando o contexto da história. De um lado, a presidente que estava eufórica com a possibilidade de instaurar a paz mundial a todo custo e do outro lado, Jack Bauer, que como sempre era muito realista e tinha plena consciência que seria impossível instaurar a paz sem a devida justiça. Parabéns ao Kiefer e a Chery pela magnífica performance.
@TheActorsFoundryOnline9 ай бұрын
Gran aporte. Gracias
@chaelsonnen27479 ай бұрын
Cheers! Keep these coming please!
@TheActorsFoundryOnline9 ай бұрын
Definitely!
@josh1duffy9 ай бұрын
Damn. This was helpful. And spoke directly
@Zlata1Z9 ай бұрын
Holy crap! This makes me tear up. How fortunate are these people to be his students! I'm Ukrainian in Vancouver and it would be a dream come true to learn from such an inspiring mentor. Though it's unlikely there's any demand for people with Ukrainian accent (it's more subtle than Russian accent but still present).
@BrettWolfe-o3t9 ай бұрын
Your teaching has revolutionized my craft, honestly. It's incredible stuff, Matt. Thank you. I do have one question about the practicality of doing a full intellectual prep on audition sides. Often times, we will get two or three self-tape requests within a short time, with a quick deadline turnaround. Now, in a perfect world, I could spend a few hours doing the text analysis, then enlist a coach or actor colleague to R&D the other character in the scene with me, rehearse it to make sure I'm vectoring out, etc. However, that seems unpractical for a self-tape I have to submit by tomorrow (for example). What would your advice be if I had no other options but to enlist, say, my (non-actor) partner as a reader and do the work myself? Do I need to then R&D both characters so I can make sure I'm hitting the moments even if my reader isn't? Surely not every working actor is able to get another working actor to be their scene partner (and have that other actor do the full hours-long prep) on every single self-tape. So how would you advise I get the best possible outcome in that grey area?
@TheActorsFoundryOnline9 ай бұрын
Fantastic question. Yes…if time permitted, for every self tape we would do thorough analysis of both (or all) characters then rehearse, and re-rehearse. But of course TIME forces us to abandon our rehearsal and surrender to the scene at some point. So…WHEN time permits, analyze and work out thematic conversations, scene structure, relationships, objectives, consequences, research style and genre, deduce R&Ds, and rehearse thoroughly. A three page audition should - in the perfect world - be given 5 hours attention minimum (before shooting). BUT…not always possible. The solution: learn to work more efficiently and faster. When NOT doing self tapes…get in a class, or work with fellow actors in studio, or online, or work solo from home…work on BIGGER more complex scenes and PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE! Then when forced to work under time constraint, analysis comes MUCH quicker, and R&Ds can be ascertained on the fly. The more experience you have, the fewer surprises scripts will present. In class, we use scenes as templates. So when I coach an actor, I will often say something like: “it’s A STAR IS BORN bathroom scene with a little MOONSTRUCK.” Like mathematics, analysis comes quicker and faster the more you practice. One last note: it is NEVER difficult to find professional and aspiring actors to help with self-tapes (every actor wants and needs to practice and play). I would NEVER work with a non actor in a self tape environment. Ever. You are only as good as the company you keep. Have fun! MH
@TheActorsFoundryOnline9 ай бұрын
By the way…I’m so pleased to hear the teaching is helping.