Dr. Roger Penrose has suggested instead of trying to create a particle called the "graviton" to explain gravity, why not try to describe subatomic particles in terms of spatial curvature, as in the twist in a piece of real thread. What if we add one extra spatial dimension to the "Twistor Theory" of Sir Roger Penrose? It can be "chiral" by having either Right-hand or Left-hand twist. It can be "Quantized", based on the number of twist cycles. If Physicists describe electrons as point particles with no volume, where is the mass of the particle? Can one extra spatial dimension produce a geometric explanation of the 1/2 spin of electrons? The following is an extension of the old Kaluza-Klein theory. Can a twisted 3D <---> 4D soliton containing one extra spatial dimension help solve some of the current problems in Particle Physics? What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Geometric Unity of Eric Weinstein and the exploration of one extra spatial dimension by Lisa Randall and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? Is the following idea a “Quantized” model related to the “Vortex Theory” proposed by Maxwell and others during the 19th century? Is the best explanation of the current data a form of “Twistor Theory” first proposed by Sir Roger Penrose during 1967? During recent years Dr. Peter Woit has explored Twistor Theory as a possible solution to help explain the current Standard Model. Has the concept of the “Aether” been resurrected from the dead and relabeled as the “Higgs Field”? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. Are these the “Flux Tubes” being described by many Physicists today? When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton. The term “entanglement” in this case is analogous to three twisted ropes being wrapped around each other in a way which causes all of the ropes to move if someone pulls one of the ropes. Does the phenomenon of “Asymptotic Freedom” provide evidence that this concept is the correct interpretation of the experimental data now available? Can the phenomenon of "Supercoiling" help explain the "Multiple Generations" of particles in the Standard Model? The conversion of twist to writhe cycles is well understood in the structure of DNA molecules. Can the conversion of twist to writhe cycles and vice-versa help explain "neutrino oscillations"? Within this model neutrinos are a small, twisted torus produced when a tube becomes overtwisted and breaks producing the small, closed loop of twisted tube (neutrino), and a twisted tube open on each end, which is shorter than the original. (Beta Decay) Within this subatomic model gravity is produced by a very small higher dimensional curvature imbalance within atoms, which causes all atoms to be attracted to all other atoms. This extremely weak attraction reveals the very small scale of the curvature imbalance. This produces the curvature of spacetime on a larger scale like the solar system which is required to counterbalance this small imbalance in the individual atoms.

You saidn times any term Now you're squaring n How both of them can you the same answer ... Means 2 times n or 2×n wil give you 100 if n= 50 But in the second explanation how n^2 gives you 20 if n=10 Bcz 10^2 =100

Your spicy 🌶️ experiment 🔬 changed everything tho 😂 nothing is in a natural state if you keep on experimenting with it all get back in the test tube 🧪

Imagine leaving a body on the moon, with images sent back to monitor what occurs. And on one image we see a group of vultures, circling overhead, ultimately landing and consuming the corpse. Wouldn't that be surprising?

I really love your show it has always been helpful

Thank you so much.

Thanks

Prof, pls explain how proton is formed.

Very good teacher ❤

Probably dry up like a prune.

Best video on circuits on whole KZbin.

This guy is a fantastic educator. I’m 64 years old and he’s getting me excited about science/maths again. I’m getting a in your bone understanding of wish list subjects I had for decades when I watch his videos

Good one sir watching from Nigeria

he always conveniently forgets the part about "+c" (some constant of integration)

Idk if I like this yet but I’m going to listen to it while I’m cutting down some ruffage

I have r riggermortis every morning I wake up. Riggermortis! Rigger mortis!

I’ll save everyone 20 min you turn into a mummy after a while you completely dehydrate and turn to dust

Gravity is nothing but all bodies of mass in a falling state, we are in a special state of falling due to angular momentum, and our atmosphere. Because the universe is so vast man cannot conceptualize that everything is in motion.

Only one human is buried on the moon. In January 1998 the ashes of Eugene Shoemaker was sent to the moon aboard the lunar prospector which impacted the lunar surface. Shoemaker was a geologist, scientist, astronomer and astronaut in the Apollo program. Although he was disqualified from flying to the moon because of a medical condition he helped train the other Apollo astronauts and made historical astronomical discoveries (Shoemaker-Levy Comet). He did fly to the moon eventually.

No bodies on the moon yet but i heard Matt Damon was left on Mars a few years back

I wish someone explained this to me 45 years ago the way you did in this video. THANK YOU.

ION : Disbalanced Atom ION : That electron that disturbs the Equilibrium of an Atom

be careful yall. never drop a brick on plutonium. and wear your PPE

Wow , thank you.

my electron cloud is jiggling. i am a jiggling cloud!😅

Dear lord! Just tell us what the heck happens. I don’t want to sit through a whole freaking lecture.

Without 'air' you stay the same except what the extreme cold may shirval you up ?

Another delightful educational programme and brings back my school days. (I am 80!). Beautifully explained. Thank you.

it better to have a teacher instead to do things online if elon musk and Indian people and Chinese people want all of us to do things in computer

Fantastic demonstrations and explanations. My two favourite numbers are zero (0) and one (1). So much rides on these two. Thank you.

A bit of a side question. So NaCl is salt, what energy/process moved to combine these two separate elements to form a stable, physical 'thing' that we dig out of the earth?

I’m interested but why don’t we get the speaker’s name and scientific qualifications?

ay

How well explained. The word "function" was so confusing that only now I understand what it means in mathematical jingo! Its a form of an equation. Thank you.

Can charged particles through a magnetic flux density field excite the neutrons on metallic surfaces?

I'm a physics professor. Along the way, I had many instructors who pointed to a button on a calculator to explain a math term, which meant to me: go look it up. And so I have for 40 years.

Thank you for these videos. Are the tshirts available yet? 😅

If it was an Israeli astronaut... ... how long would it take for his wife to sell his golf clubs???... 🤔

Your mountain analogy is a great way to visualize this topic. Thank you.

Isn't an electromagnetic field just an electron space/time wake, just like the wake from a boat as it travels through the water?

Gravity/acceleration involves a BALANCE of WHAT IS inertia (and/OR inertial resistance), AS this is entirely consistent WITH the fourth dimension, TIME, AND TIME dilation !!!! (Indeed, consider WHAT IS THE EYE; AS two AND three dimensional SPACE are BALANCED in accordance WITH WHAT IS the fourth dimension, TIME, AND TIME DILATION !!!!) ALL of SPACE is (CLEARLY) proven to be electromagnetic/gravitational ON/IN BALANCE !!!! Consider sphericity. Consider what are OBJECTS. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky consistent with TIME, the fourth dimension, AND TIME dilation, AS gravity/acceleration involves a BALANCE of WHAT IS inertia (and/OR inertial resistance); AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Great !!!! Consider what is THE EYE. CONSIDER WHAT IS THE FOURTH DIMENSION !!!! Consider the man (AND WHAT IS THE EYE) who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground. Great. Now, consider dream experience as well. Excellent !!!! Consider the “plasma” that is lightning. I have CLEARLY proven WHAT IS the fourth dimension. I have CLEARLY solved WHAT IS the coronal heating “problem”. Indeed, consider what are galaxies. Consider what are galactic jets. Consider what are supergiant stars AND neutron stars. Again, consider sphericity. Consider what are Einstein rings. Great. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

Thank you very much. I learned a bit more today.

Here's a question for you that I can't seem to find an answer to... Put a magnet under a piece of paper, right? Sprinkle iron filings on it, ok? The standard iron filing magnet experiment. There are lines of magnetic flux that emit from the magnet in certain places. What exactly is it, that determines WHERE every line of magnetic flux emits from a magnet? And when you pass a current through a line of mercury which is moving...do the lines of magnetic flux move in relation to the mercury, or do those lines remain stationary?

soooo, basically an atom cant reach +-5 charge, it can only go as high as 4+-? Fe (-5) isnt possible?

So electricity being the "flow" of electrons through a conductor is chemistry? But it is governed by the EM forces? Also, with the like forces repeling and differing attracting, the Strong Force keeps the protons/neutrons together, but this does not apply to the electron here? This is where quantum physics comes to play, with the electron cloud only being allowed to have certain energy levels/standing waves...so because the electron cant loose energy analog, it only can get down to the lowest energy level and no closer. This is where Plank was with the UV catastrophe....ok, I think I answered one of my own questions. Thanks for making me think and letting me ramble here. Chemistry feels pretty intuitive when it comes to the main group items. I suspect, based on my question about electrity, the metals in the middle are going to be fun.

Definition: A function is any non-empty set of ordered pairs such that no two different ordered pairs have the same first member. Drilled into my head by Dr. Nick Metas of the Queens College CUNY Math Department.

It's a Vacuum Tube, without the incandescent light bulb.

I thought electrons were negatively charged. I didn't know there were positively charged electrons.

Wow! I don't understand all I know! Must be a negative!