I was now a 2nd year medical student. 3 years back i watch your videos and suddenly today i remember the iconic "flippppinnnggg physiiiiics" intro and i am not disappointed to see it again after years. Thanks again sir , without you i cant enter med school and love physics
Brilliant. Used this with my AS Phys class today and we loved it. Videoing Meldes experiment and the animation of interference really gets the key points across clearly. Thank you, your production values are so advanced.
@jeff-wКүн бұрын
Except if its in an ocean and you're a politician bent on increasing carbon tax😅
@FlippingPhysicsКүн бұрын
What? I don't get it? You are aware there are giant glaciers on land that, when they melt, will increase ocean levels, right?
@JB-mf9obКүн бұрын
Remains the same
@Lï-Santana-DrácûL2 күн бұрын
Three states these nuts. H20 water by definition when fire is added breaks apart into Oxygen and Hydrogen...no longer water as the heat does not allow for rebinding of structure until the visible particles cool on a surface and collect oxygen to form water again. For the genius whos going to say that greyish white is water vapor obviously doesnt understand that oxygen burns transparent...so you'd only see the bubbles of collecting Oxygen in the water before it hits the surface and pops sending out the Hydrogen vapor. Look up oxygen fire if you don't believe me. -Abéràk SamUéL Lï Santana DrácûL Former Dr. JACKAL
@little_mymble2 күн бұрын
Thank you for this explanation! Thank you so much for acknowledging and addressing the math components too! i had the same exact questions the students had. I am taking an advanced physics course but have not taken geometry yet so I am at a bit of a disadvantage when it comes to angles and trig functions. I am happy when physics teachers take some time to address the geometry components so everyone can be successful.
@Goucvdidah3 күн бұрын
So you're saying global warming is a lie?
@FlippingPhysics3 күн бұрын
Nope.
@tentimesten66453 күн бұрын
Wow, that's amazing! Will you be creating an AP Physics C Ultimate Review Packet? That would be awesome. Thank you for all your helpful videos!
@FlippingPhysics3 күн бұрын
Eventually, yes. However, it's going to be a couple years before I can get to that!
@raspberry8973 күн бұрын
love it 😊 <3
@FlippingPhysics3 күн бұрын
Thanks for the love!
@MohaMohamoud-r2d3 күн бұрын
thanks for ur great explanation
@duckymomo79353 күн бұрын
Is this fluid mech?
@FlippingPhysics3 күн бұрын
This is basic fluid mechanics.
@torpedoo44073 күн бұрын
w
@Pedritox09533 күн бұрын
Great video! Peace out
@Benozkey3 күн бұрын
**For anyone confused:** Ice is less dense than water, so when it melts, the water level should rise. But, some of the ice is above the water. The volume of ice displaced is equal to the volume of water it will turn into when it melts (pV=m). So the water level does not rise.
@Padraigp3 күн бұрын
It depends though some ice is solid and some ice is white and got air in it and ice with air in it displaces more water than is in the ice. Really depends how much air is in the ice. In theory all things being equal sure as a principle..but reality has variables ..or variabubbles 😂
@MohaMohamoud-r2d3 күн бұрын
wow amazing teacher thank you so much teacher for ur good work hope u have a good day
@ksenian15283 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for making these videos. I am so happy I found them, and I purchased your Ultimate Review packet, and it is very good!
@scoobscoob10553 күн бұрын
Can I use delta Y =Vyinital (t) +.5(a)(t)^2 instead of the intial formula you used? I still got the same answer.
@jackflash87564 күн бұрын
The right hand side of the Work-Energy Theorem says change in KE but that is incorrect because the velocity you used was the speed of the COM . In reality each of the individual forces that make up the 'Net Force' will have different displacements in the direction of those individual forces . If you summed the product of those individual forces and their displacements (in the direction of the forces) that would be the real work done on the system. Using the displacement and rate of displacement (ie. velocity ) of the COM only works if the 'body' is regarded as a point particle . Therefore that is your big assumption and the right hand should be regarded as the 'change in kinetic energy of the COM'.
@Blaze8up4 күн бұрын
Meow
@Mohith11114 күн бұрын
you are a life saver!!!
@FlippingPhysics4 күн бұрын
Glad to help!!
@adamgrimsley29004 күн бұрын
Yep
@kzyoi4 күн бұрын
my teacher linked this video to a joke problem he assigned us and i skipped to the middle and was terrified
@PeterH2694 күн бұрын
So why are the, global warming fear mongers, always talking about sea levels rising?
@FlippingPhysics4 күн бұрын
Clarify your question please. How do you think this video relates to global warming and sea level rise?
@Ravaxr4 күн бұрын
Antarctica is made of land. It has several kilometers of ice on top of it, and is big enough you can just about fit the contiguous United States inside its coastline. That much water will cause significant sea level rise if it all melts.
@necro23385 күн бұрын
So the glaciers melting won't flood the world. Gotcha
@FlippingPhysics5 күн бұрын
Incorrect. Here’s your hint: where are glaciers located?
@babetesfaye10015 күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤ thank you teacher
@keithhanshaw92175 күн бұрын
Bobby - that was gerat - thank you for creating this! 🙏 I really enjoyed learning with you too!
@0s0sXD5 күн бұрын
I got you G
@0s0sXD5 күн бұрын
god bless you
@0s0sXD5 күн бұрын
absolutely brilliant you deserve global funding from the all countries' education funds allocated to their government
@spencer19805 күн бұрын
We are not worried about ice in the oceans melting. We are worried about ice on land melting and making the oceans higher, a thing that has absolutely happened in the past.
@FlippingPhysics5 күн бұрын
Agreed. This video was never meant to have anything to do with climate change. It really is just a video about understanding buoyancy.
@kevinmoore43554 күн бұрын
Just about to comment that we're afraid of the ice melting at the poles because that's basically a giant Land mass. For instance, if I stacked more ice on top of the ice that was in the cup it would most definitely.
@kevinmoore43554 күн бұрын
Get bigget
@Shmidershmax4 күн бұрын
Prefiring before they peek
@markwildt57282 күн бұрын
We're not worried about either, because global warming is a ludicrous regressive hoax.
@crownofroses38386 күн бұрын
For the projectile motion, why do the adjacent and opposite sides get assigned subscripts, is it purely for the equation, or is it the direction?
@FlippingPhysics5 күн бұрын
This video of mine addresses that question specifically: www.flippingphysics.com/nerd-a-pult.html
@jamesdabney65826 күн бұрын
This video is not helpful at all unless, of course, someone has already taken physics. What about the novice who has never taken physics? This video doesn't tell you how these equations were derived? What is the purpose of these equations? They just popped these equations without any explanations at all. Why do a didactic video without a detailed explanation of every step?
@FlippingPhysics5 күн бұрын
This video is not for a novice who has never taken physics. Also, I would not suggest someone who has never taken physics attempt to derive Kepler's Third Law. If you watch the roughly ~1000 minutes of physics videos which precede this one in the playlist, you will certainly have all the answers to your questions and you will then understand that this is, in fact, a detailed explanation of every step. kzbin.info/www/bejne/o6nFpJqne9OBjLs
@thetroiimaster6 күн бұрын
I thought it would go down because ice expands and takes up more space, so when it melted it would take up less space overall.
@PeterH2694 күн бұрын
Well it’s does expand the exact amount that sticks out of the water.
@thetroiimaster4 күн бұрын
@@PeterH269 Air usually gets trapped in there too, so that would make it more boyant, no? Causing more ice to stick out. Eh, nvm. Too tired to think.
@Ladybee26 күн бұрын
Thank you so much ,I struggled understanding this force my entire highschool year ,but i think i finally got it If only teachers would explain forces like this,sometime demonstration do the work 😊❤ 3:09
@masonhofmann44866 күн бұрын
Youre saving the semester
@Ement6 күн бұрын
I'm kinda worried about the 2025 Mechanics exam cause they changed the MCQ style to be much more comprehensive and 'theoretical'. (Use to be kind of a plug and chug test with numbers here and there, while now it's 75% situations where we pick the most accurate statement that involves some physics law or equation) Have you heard anything about the upcoming test and are there any resources that could help with this worry? I've been taking the past FRQ's they post and I kind of have them down... just the MCQs that kills me lol!
@monoxxides6 күн бұрын
12 hours until i leave for my unit one exam.. thank u!
@damarianatrench6 күн бұрын
This is really great but I probably should've watched this sooner rather than hours before my exam 😭
@AlexIakovlevPhysics7 күн бұрын
This is the much clearer explanation that they do on AP daily videos, well done!👏 I'm waiting for the moment you will be featured on AP daily videos:)
@FlippingPhysics7 күн бұрын
Thanks! Yeah, maybe someday I'll be worth of the AP daily videos. Also, I absolutely love your tangential velocity demo! Do you mind if I make my own version of it? And, what did you use to make it?
@Crimsonxblade907 күн бұрын
so if i'm keeping track... h= [(kxi^2) / (2mugcosθ+2mgsinθ)] sinθ
@meon_bim7 күн бұрын
Let me appreciate you professor ❤❤❤When I first watched your video, I found really complicated and lost but I gradually starting to understand and I think I'm not afraid of physics anymore. The Questions and Answers environment during your explanation is such a treasure time❤❤❤❤
@FlippingPhysics7 күн бұрын
That’s awesome to hear! I am so glad you’ve been able to learn from my videos.