Thanks for sharing Paul, Great explanation of a real challenge that happened in a daily basis in a manufacturing environment, perhaps, one of the main discussions when you have a company with the organizational structure departmentalized "silos" (commercial x Manufacturing)
@sindredyngen1835 күн бұрын
Dear Paul, is there any chance you could give us more information about the Six Sigma BB handbook? Maybe a short video going more into what the book covers or get Lulu to post some photos of the context On a side note, thank you for all the videos! 🎉
@paulallen53215 күн бұрын
Sindred - drop me a mail on [email protected] and i'll something to you...
@ritmanik111 күн бұрын
Respected sir, I want to do stress analysis of laser cladded samples . I have 3 laser powers and 3 scanning speeds . Then how i can use minitab to decide best 6 sets out of them?
@DrKate_stories11 күн бұрын
I have never understood RSM to this extent, thank you very much🌹
@Jean-PhilippeGarde14 күн бұрын
Super cool explanantion. So great
@Bandhon12314 күн бұрын
Very help full vedio ❤❤
@NilaIslam-lb9wl14 күн бұрын
Sundor video
@sanjayt125015 күн бұрын
Very Nice I was looking simple video which you did very Nicely thanks Sir
@deanopenn16 күн бұрын
Hi Paul, Another comment on your videos haha. i have seen a scenario where If PP and PPK fail to achieve the minimum requirement e.g. 1.67 but CP and CPK passes. The big factor is the tolerance is so small it doesn't leave much room for any process variation as PP and PPK is long term. What are your thoughts on this due to tight tolerances?
@dmaradiaga4417 күн бұрын
Hi Paul, first I have to say that I'm happily surprised with your fast response!! I really appreciate it. Now my question is mostly about which type of MSA should I perform, due to such small quantity, however they do are expensive devices that we most make sure are their measurements are accurate.
@paulallen532117 күн бұрын
drop me a message on [email protected] and i'll see if I can help...
@dmaradiaga4418 күн бұрын
Hi Paul, thank you so much for your very informative videos. Could you please advice what type of MSA would you recommend to perform in a service shop where you can only find 2 pieces of the device to be measured on any given day? and no more than 50 devices are serviced per year, do we really need to perform MSA?
@paulallen532118 күн бұрын
Good to hear from you, it really depends on what those measures are for. If you make expensive business decisions or important customer checks that could be costly it would be great to be accurate. If they are not important measurements, sure don't need an MSA...
@deanopenn18 күн бұрын
Hi Paul. What are your thoughts about the main difference between MSA TYPE 1 study and MSA TYPE 3 study? if you are measuring a Diameter of a product with a non contact measuring device, would either be ok to use? any advice would be appreciated
@paulallen532118 күн бұрын
Type 1 only works where the process is all machine based. You'll get bias if you try type 1 with operators. Otherwise type 2 is always best to do.
@deanopenn18 күн бұрын
@@paulallen5321 Thanks Again for your swift response, so you wouldn't do a type 1 study based on the operator placing the component onto the measuring device and its a non contact measurement? once its in place the operator has no influence and can only work if its placed where it should be? Also do you thing a type 3 study is feasible, somebody has mentioned this before but this is something i have not come across (only seen type 1 and type 2)
@kalyanbasak534419 күн бұрын
Best MSA explanation using Minitab that I have come across so far. Brilliant 🎉
@deanopenn22 күн бұрын
Hi. In regards to this would you suggest also doing CP and CPK after you do CM and CMK? Do you think CM and CMK is enough for PPAP submission also.
@paulallen532122 күн бұрын
Hi Dean - good to hear from you. I would say that in the PPAP you only have enough data to work out CmK. You havent completed a production run yet, so the first 50 or 100 peices is all the variation you can see..and that is essentially a Cmk value...
@deanopenn22 күн бұрын
@@paulallen5321 thanks for responding, but you would still do Cp and CPK inline with this? Also if you let's say collect 50pcs for CMK, what that then be a subgroup size of 1?
@paulallen532122 күн бұрын
Yes Dean at some point you need to go back and check a proper production run and complete the CpK and yes the sub group is 1...
@oscari-j938027 күн бұрын
Why are there copies of the style section all over the place, d-do you have a dog? A little chow or something?
@blidardiapinal29 күн бұрын
Let's see Paul Allen's purchasing systems.
@davidhill361829 күн бұрын
Great stuff. Will be getting this book. Got the drink tea and also point my green belt Ip4 learners to your videos.
@ovdicksonАй бұрын
Thank you Paul. How do I install this DOE add-in in my excel
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
if you go to Sigmazone.com you can try DOE pro for 5 days free, then it will cost $229 dollars. if you just click on the desktop icon, it will automatically install in the ribbon....
@ovdicksonАй бұрын
Thank you.
@ovdicksonАй бұрын
Good day Paul, I have a quick question. I have chosen to use 2levels instead of 3 levels to save me time. But I included a centre point in the experiment which is the average of the 3 factors I have each. Is there a way to include this centre point in DOE analysis on DOE pro or on minitab software?
@paulallen532129 күн бұрын
@@ovdickson send me a message on [email protected] and I'll explain...
@Strider9655Ай бұрын
Clean desk, empty skull. I used to work as a bench repair engineer, I had 7 desks, i'd have multiple jobs on the go at any one time. Company director was an accountant by trade, wanted "clean desk policy", wanted any jobs waiting for parts to be put into a box and hidden away, like good luck finding out which screw goes where when you bunch them all into a plastic bag, I lay out fixings/etc as a screw map around the item i'm working on. People who don't do your job, don't understand why you work the way you do, they just see an untidy mess and try to apply office logic to it. Now I work in manufacturing, from a desk in an engineering office, I don't have so much physical mess around, but I may have product samples laid out, they can't be tagged because if anyone accidentally puts one back into the production line it'll snag on the conveyors and cause a breakdown, as well I have 2 laptops, 1 PC and 3 monitors, same nonsense though "clean desk policy", when we already use 5s, it's just people with little/no work to do, looking for problems to solve, constantly pointing the finger at other people, other departments, so that nobody ever questions why that person is actually needed. Same people keep getting on at the engineers for not wearing our ID lanyards (ie noose) around our neck, again people who don't do the job, office admin types with absolutely no idea what other peoples jobs involve, sticking their beaks in and trying to control everything.
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
Hi Strider - I'm a favour of a bit of organisation to help you, but as you say we often get organisation that gets in the way!
@hopefullysoonaweldingengineerАй бұрын
Hello, in hypothesis testings we usually define the significance level or in other words alpha. But there is a calculation for alpha in your example. Could you please give more information to where I should look for this kind of examples? I found this is interesting. Thank you for educative statistics videos. They are very good but sometimes it it very difficult for me to understand your accent :). But can pause and play and understand.
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
I don't really major on the maths as most people use computers these days. But it's a T-test look the maths up on wikipedia if it's important to you...
@hopefullysoonaweldingengineerАй бұрын
@@paulallen5321 Thanks for answer. Like your videos.👏
@user-rz6jt4km6cАй бұрын
Thank you Sir, you are the best!!! Simplicity. I'm a long time follower from the US.
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
Carl - many thanks for your support...
@jonathanandrews807Ай бұрын
Dear Paul, thanks so much for creating both this video and the model you kindly sent. Most helpful!
@cristianomacieldeassis7082Ай бұрын
Great video Paul, thanks for sharing!!! I´d like to ask how to better approach when you have a daily production routine with a huge diversity of SKUs ? Thanks very much for your great work and for sharing so much wisdom!!!
@DR_1SАй бұрын
👍🏼⬆️🆙
@user-ky4mn1qo9uАй бұрын
Excellent 😊😊
@ExLima887Ай бұрын
Relly amazing 😊
@ericstefko4852Ай бұрын
The second curve (top right) looks like a logarithmic function, am I missing something?
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
Hi Eric - There are lots of mathematical functions that could describe a curve the traditional one of the sq function or quadratic. These days software tends to group them as polynomial...
@panda2gundaАй бұрын
Nice video brother thish video is good
@sylviaorodho6369Ай бұрын
Hello Paul. I really like your videos, in fact, I bought one of the books "Drink Tea and Read the Paper..." Coud you also avail the "Six Sigma Black belt handbook " as an Ebook and others too? It would be much easier to procure in E-format
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
Sylvia - send me a mail on [email protected] and I'll sort an e-copy out for you and thanks for your support...
@mikemotorsportАй бұрын
I would be interested to see his gage r+r results before coming to such an involved doe model. A follow up video would be interesting on this.
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
Hi Mike - yes good input. I think I would want that data as well. Although now we have the DOE data, if the model it creates confirms, then the measurement system must be working ok. Also the graphs he sent over over move nice and smoothly as time is increased. So I have some confidence in this data. But I've sent him the model now and I'm waiting for the confirmation test results
@parelectricengineeringllc1816Ай бұрын
Great video. Use of P-Mapping, Ishakawa diagrams, SOP are great. I am about ready to start drinking 🍵 Tea !!
@Jose-jb8xoАй бұрын
Thank you for all your work 🌹🌹 truly appreciate your help
@jamescharlier393Ай бұрын
Really great piece of work
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
James - many thanks for your positive comment
@tanjason72Ай бұрын
Hi Paul, why taking the lowest value can save money? For Y bar, the highest seal strength is 77.125 (Set 6), isn't that the best solution?
@paulallen5321Ай бұрын
Hi Tan - row 6 looks best, but statistically it is producing no strong signal and the setting didn't confirm but it's not a bad idea to pick the best run and try it...
@tanjason72Ай бұрын
Thanks. ❤ Good video.
@kiwifrenchie6036Ай бұрын
Like to see your sunglasses mark haha
@TheZakluk2 ай бұрын
Nice explanation Paul.
@billsinclair65152 ай бұрын
another excellent video Paul: question, what do we do with a compromised design that will not lend itself to any CpK improvement?
@alis.75532 ай бұрын
Great video 👏👏. I will be buying that book. Love from Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦♥️.
@paulallen53212 ай бұрын
Many thanks Ali - drop me a line if you ever need some help...
@oxilary23692 ай бұрын
Just wanted to say I appreciate the videos Paul, came for a simple explanation about DOE and now I watch every video
@paulallen53212 ай бұрын
Hi Oxilary - Thanks for your support. I'm not sure there is a simple explanation of DOE? I would say this though, there are tests that will contain lots of new information and tests that contain almost no knowledge. All data is not equally useful. A DOE makes sure your tests contain the maximum information for the minimum amount of tests...
@husseinaljarwani22222 ай бұрын
Amazing 👏
@abhideepsingh44842 ай бұрын
Always pleasure to see your videos
@MattRichterSand2 ай бұрын
Hey Paul, these videos are great. Thanks for sharing your knowledge. You mentioned the operator is not allowed to fiddle with the controls. I am curious when is it OK to adjust the controls… when you are dialing the process in? If you cannot explain the out of control data point through the control plan?
@paulallen53212 ай бұрын
Hi Matt - good to hear from you. When can they adjust? 1. When dialing in standard settings 2. If the process naturally wanders and needs a reset. Some grinding processes naturally move from top to bottom tolerance. Other than that, there role is to use the rules/settings specified. If they do that and the process goes hay wire, we know there is a problem that they need help with. What are your thoughts?
@MattRichterSand2 ай бұрын
@@paulallen5321 thanks!
@paulallen53212 ай бұрын
Hi Matt - here is a video specifically to answer your question more fully kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXi5poCgoZeJfZI
@gldil2 ай бұрын
Hi Paul, I love your simple to the point explanations! 🙂 One point I'd like your perspective about is a "too high" CPk . We should always keep in mind the long term relevance of our process limits and whether they are reflecting the quality we require from it
@paulallen53212 ай бұрын
I'll make a video and send you the link....
@quality_bus2 ай бұрын
Congrats on the new Black Belt book!
@paulallen53212 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@jorgedelarosa7502 ай бұрын
Quality content as usual Paul. Thank you for sharing your knowledge 🙏