Amen ❤

repent Jesus may come soon

YESSSS…!!!! Amen! 🙏❤️‍🔥🙏

Amen

PRAISE GOD 🙌🙌 ❤❤❤ LOVE YOU DEAR SISTER

So my friend… you said that this video was for the purpose of showing Jehovah’s Witnesses that Jesus is God -Ok…. first before I deal with the scriptures you referenced we need to get a handle on what’s taking place in revelations and how it’s taking place….. let’s first look at revelations 1:1 and it reads: (NWT) a revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place, and he sent his Angel and presented it and signs through him to his slave John…. There is a few points of interest here that we must understand and that is…. This is a revelation from God that he reveals to Jesus intern Jesus reveals it to an angel, and the angel reveals it to John… so what’s the point here… before I make it, we have to understand the Greek word for revelations… please look up(Strongs 602: and the word means an uncovering or a revealing… so why is that significant right out the gate?… because it’s showing us that Jesus is receives divine knowledge from God that he. didn’t already have … that would not be the case if Jesus was the supreme being because the supreme being is all knowing…… this then proves that Jesus is not all knowing it also proves that the angel is not all knowing and clearly John is not…. That’s the first point of contention….. The second point is and I believe a lot of people overlook this fact, and that is Jehovah Jesus is ever speaking to John directly. How do we know?… because it’s an angel who is delivering this message to John…. Not Jehovah…. Not Jesus and Angel…. That’s the second point that we need to keep close in mind….. So now let’s talk about revelations 1:8: and it reads: I am the alpha and the omega says Jehovah God, the one who is and who was and who is coming the Almighty… you referenced that scripture along with revelations 22:20… That reads.. the one who bears witness of these things yes I am coming quickly. Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…. And you proceeded to say that we as Christians only believe that Jesus is coming and that Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that Jesus is the only one coming…. My friend that is absolutely incorrect….. yes, we believe that Jesus is coming for sure… but we also believe that Jehovah is coming as well. The very context of these verses in chapter 1 tells us this… and that is revelations 1:4,5 : Reeds: (NWT) John to the seven congregations that are in the province of Asia. May you have undeserved kindness, and Peace from the one who is AND WHO WAS AND WHO IS COMING and from the seven spirits that are before the throne verse5… AND FROM JESUS CHRIST the faithful witness the first born from the dead and the ruler of the kings of the Earth…. right here in verse 4 And in inverse 5… clearly shows that God is coming and at the same time draws a distinction in this case of Jesus not coming why did I say that?…. Because verse 4 says, may you have undeserved kindness, and peace from the one who is and who was and who is coming … Distinguishing that statement from verse5 that says and from Jesus Christ…. So yes, we as Jehovah’s Witnesses along with the Bible, believe that God is coming as well…. let’s go back to revelations.1:8 Where are you believe that it’s talking about Jesus as the alpha and the Omega and the one who is coming almighty… this is absolutely impossible that this is speaking about Jesus why…. First remember that it is an angel, who is speaking for God at times and speaking for Jesus at times, but the context gives us insight to who these words are being applied to. I contend that this is not being applied to Jesus inverse.8 …. And this is why…. In revelations. 1:5,6… What do we read and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness the first born from the dead and the rulers of the kings of the Earth to him who loves us and who set us free from our sins by means of his own blood…. Verse here’s the point verse.6 and he made us to be a kingdom and priest to his God and father…. Echoing in my regards what we read in revelations 3:12… and it reads the one who conquers I will make him a pillar in the temple OF MY GOD And he will buy no means go out from it anymore, and I will write upon him the name OF MY GOD and the name of the city OF MY GOD The new Jerusalem that they sent out of heaven from MY GOD And my own new name…. Jesus says here for times that he has a God…. I’m going to take it a step further and go to revelations. 3:14.. and it reads: to the Angel of the congregation in laodicea write these are the things that the Aman says the faithful and true witness THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION BY GOD …. The book of revelations is telling us that Jesus was created pure and simple…. so my friend, in short, we have to understand that this revelation originated with God he then gave it to his son Jesus Christ, and then Jesus gave it to an angel who is speaking for Jehovah times in Jesus at times, but the context of the scriptures tells us who is being spoken of at any given time….. And last, but not least if you believe that, Jesus is God in revelations 1:8 or revelations 22…. if that’s what you believe then tell me who the alpha and omega’s GOD is because in revelations 1:6…. It says Jesus has a God….. this is an edit.:::::: when you pointed out that it says in revelations that God sent his angels, and then you pointed out that Jesus sent his Angels and you said they were the same because of those two statements…. My friend that’s exactly what took place. What do we read in revelations1:1… God sent his angel because he sent him with a revelation/uncovering/revealing to Jesus and Jesus sent his angel with a revelation/uncovering/revealing to the angel…. They absolutely did both participate in that separately from one another………………………. please excuse the grammar flaws. I tremendously apologize…. I’m writing in a little box and just simply trying to get the point across, not grammar….. but for that, I apologize

Romans 8:1 NKJ begins "There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ " what does it mean to be "in Christ "? Does it mean to be inside of him.? The NWT reads " Those in union with Christ". Is this an unreasonable rendering? A few verses later Rom 8:10 reads "if Christ is in you" could this phrase have the same meaning as the phrase " if you are in the Christ" that is being in union with the Christ as the NWT puts it?

The footnote to Romans 8:9 in the REV bible is helpful understanding these verses The phrase “of God” is a genitive of origin; it is the spirit from God. “spirit of Christ.” This is not a different spirit than the gift of holy spirit from God in the first part of the verse. Rather it is a different name for holy spirit. The genitive “of Christ” places the emphasis in a couple of different ways.e First, since his ascension it has been Jesus Christ who has given the holy spirit, so it is a genitive of origin, “spirit from Christ.” Also, holy spirit allows us to relate to Christ: to better understand the aspects of the Christ and also to be like him. Thus “spirit of Christ” is also a genitive of relation. Second, very accurately, anyone without “spirit of Christ,” i.e., holy spirit, “this one is not his.” A Christian is one who has the seed of God born and sealed within him, and thus is a partaker of the divine nature. A person without holy spirit is not a Christian.

About the translation, “in union” captures the meaning fine, I personally prefer more literally translations with notes or brackets around additions, but “in union” conveys the actual meaning accurately. Take a look at John 14:10-11 from the NIV, we read "Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence ofthe works themselves." While the NWT uses the phrase "I am in union with the Father and the Father is in union with me”…Well that's fine too, the question is just what that means, and given the intellectual mileu of John, the general usage of the phrase, and the early reception history, there's nothing there that implies the later homoousian doctrine on which the trinity is based. So I have no issue with the rendering 'in,' or 'in union'. Several trinitarians have said in the past that the text is saying Jesus is in the Father and the Father is in Jesus, and that the NWT has added the word "union" there, while most other translations have not. So how can this be addressed? The Greek translated word for "in" or "union" is ἐν. What is interesting, is that the word ἐν is used in other non-trinitarian passages and notice how these same translations render the verse. Ephesians 1:1 ISV we read, "From Paul, who by God's will is an apostle of Christ Jesus--To God's people in Ephesus, who are faithful in their life in union with Christ Jesus:" Ephesians 1:1 GNT we read, "From Paul, who by God's will is an apostle of Christ Jesus--To God's people in Ephesus, who are faithful in their life in union with Christ Jesus:" 1 John 5:20 WNT we read, "And we know that the Son of God has come, and has given us understanding so that we know the true One, and are inunion with the true One--that is, we are in union with His Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and the Life of the Ages." 1 John 5:20 GNT we read, "We know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we know the true God. We live in unionwith the true God--in union with his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and this is eternal life." Obviously, this is just a small sample size of the many other texts that the word "union" has been inserted by other translations, but I believe the evidence is clear. Goodspeed's translation also does a fine job in inserting the word union for ἐν, in a plethora of texts as well. So, if someone feels that a more literal translation is best, well that is their prerogative. However, when Goodspeed's translation incorporated the auxiliary word "union" into these texts over one hundred years ago, and then translated it as "I am in union with the father", I do feel he brought out the correct flavor of the meaning for current English linguistical principles. The only issue I would have is that I think it would have been nice if the reference study NWT Bible had put brackets around the word "union". The truth is several Bible translations will incorporate this auxiliary word to convey the proper meaning, and therefore it shows the original NWT has a sound basis for doing so, and isn't alone in their translation principles. I cannot see why anyone would think the addition of "union" would be an anti-trinitarian theological bias, so it just seems obvious to me that both "in union" and "in" could be used.

why christianity need soo many bible soo wich one the truth?

Good afternoon i was a Jehovah's witnesses for 28years i realize that these people don't even know Jehovah or Jesus.

Just as JW teach Michael is Jesus heavenly existence they also teach that the 1st horseman of the Apocalypse is also Jesus Christ. How would we disprove or bring to understanding the identity of the 1st Horseman ?

My friend… I am the Jehovah’s Witness that responded to your Michael, the Arcangel video…. would you like for me to respond to this video as well?…

Loving this series. Romans 8 is my absolute favorite chapter

Romans 8:10 was fire on the explanation🔥

This obviously is a resent video, as the jdub is wearing pants………. But I saw that the jw was using an actual bible! Didn’t they stop all together with using the actual bibles, replacing them with tablets?

thank you i am now 100% convinced that the trinity is from the devil

When Jehovah God imparts his spirit it is out of him, his personal influence, power and character, always emulating his superlative qualities. No wonder Jesus personifies the spirit when explaining its function as the Paracletos. Jehovah lovingly provides the Spirit through his son and it is thereby imbued with the character of Christ so it is sometimes called Christ’s spirit when it helps God’s Spirit Begotten sons emulate the attitude of Christ (Romans 8:9,15-17 ) so the spirit has a variety of operations and when it works it emulates the personal disposition of the one who gave it. And I already showed Knieshia that God’s spirit is indeed called an “it” in scripture but she just looked the other way. See for examples Numbers 11:17. “And I will come down and talk with thee there: and I will take of the spirit which is upon thee, and will put it upon them; and they shall bear the burden of the people with thee, that thou bear it not thyself alone.”-KJV

i am a jw and finding my own way out and what makes me connect to your channel is how sympathatic you are.a lot of people think just they need to make an "aha got you"others are ex jw speaking from hurt.i am a jw whose entire family is as much as i have always questioned and never connected with certain teachings like this i was mostly happy because they are not bad people but i do believe there is so much cleanse that needs to happen

Great!!!! This was one of the light-bulb scriptures that I’ve discovered too, God’s Spirit=Christ’s Spirit=Holy Spirt. So well explained and demonstrated! Well done Knieshia! 🙏👍👏🤗

Thank you for this teaching. Must say I was now aware of this

She is too sweet, God bless her and her attitude 😅😊❤

They are normalizing what is not normal

Glory to God and the life with Jesus 🙏❤️

I feel the same way you do: if they only knew how true this is. Gods heart always shows. Be blessed

Let’s take a look at these 2 texts Knieshia shared with us. Rev 21:23 reads:
“And the city has no need of the sun nor of the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God illuminated it, and its lamp was the Lamb.”

Then Rev 22:5: “Also, night will be no more, and they have no need of lamplight or sunlight, for Jehovah God will shed light upon them, and they will rule as kings forever and ever.”

Remember Hebrews 1:3? He (Jesus) is the reflection of God’s glory and the exact representation of his very being,” So Rev 21 tells us in heaven, there is no moon or sun for light, but “light” comes from the “Glory of God,” and the Lamb. Then according to Hebrews, Jesus is the “reflection” of God’s Glory. So naturally Rev 22:5 identifies Jehovah himself as the ultimate source of the “light” that the anointed use to rule.” Jesus simply reflects it. In addition, we see 2 Samuel 21:17 calls David the “lamp of Israel” please note: “At once A·bishʹai the son of Ze·ruʹiah came to his aid and struck the Phi·lisʹtine down and put him to death. At that time the men of David swore this oath to him: “You must not go out with us to battle anymore! You must not extinguish the lamp of Israel!” Solomon was called the “lamp” as well at 1 Kings 11:36: “To his son I will give one tribe, so that David my servant may always have a lamp before me in Jerusalem, the city that I have chosen for myself as the place to put my name.”

Thank you so much for all of your videos! I love your channel and a new subscriber. They are so helpful. Keep them coming girl, when you can! ❤

They don’t like people check the internet only their disgusting website.

Well done!

Great study! It's always insightful to compare translations.

Beautiful ❤❤

Hello! Jesus is the son of the highest Luke 1;32 KJV he is not God

Hello! Praise JAH! Psalm 68;4 KJV and his name alone is the most high Psalm 83;18 KJV

Hello! God Almighty Exodus 6;3 KJV

Where is the lie

Crazy how even Christians can’t agree on what their Bible teaches.

How can ppl not be emo? WE HAVE LIFE IN JESUS ❤

Praise God 🙏

Our Life is hidden in Christ Jesus Colossians 3:3 KJV For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.

I would rather live life for Him and find out He doesn't exist than NOT live in His ways to find out He DOES exist and loose out on my chance to live in His kingdom in my house he has made for me, and see thier faces if that is something that can be done! He has done so much for me and kept me protected! Even from things I did/could not see!

I am a disassociated JW. I pioneered from 1976 until 2021. Your point of view was something I came upon over and over again. Of course the 2013 translation can be used to counter your belief. The main problem we all have today, is that every Christian religion emanated from the Roman Catholics. It is extremely, highly likely, that the true version of Christianity has never been taught outide of the Roman empire of Jesus and the disciples day! Jesus claimed he was the son of God. Paul, apparently made it clear at Romans 10:13 that all those calling on the name of Jesus will be saved, but that on it's own is quite a bald statement. When Jesus himself said, whilse talking to the Samaritan woman at the well, that God is looking for those who worship him with spirit and truth, so more is involved that a quick gloss over of Paul's words. All Bibles today, with the exception of the translations made by the watchtower, and the 2001 Bible translation have been translated by translators who believe in the trinity, and or in conjunction with paymasters who believe in the trinity and have commissioned the Bible to support their beliefs, not the truth! Consider the following. I have quoted other Bibles, but these scriptures can be found in the 2013 translation. 1. Jews when in a covenant relationship with our heavenly Father, did not and were not taught that God was part of a trinity. 2. Jesus did not teach that he was part of a trinity. Wikipedia says “Neither the word “Trinity” nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the Shema in the Hebrew Scriptures: “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Deuteronomy 6:4).23 Oct 2023 3. At NO time did he consider himself equal to his Father. “Do not be afraid and anxious, little flock, for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom”. - Luke 12:32, Amplified Bible. If Jesus was equal to God, or was God, would it not have been simpler to say ‘I am giving you the Kingdom’? “Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, *I go unto the Father: for **my Father is greater than I”. - John 14:28 - King James Bible. Note John 14:28 above, Jesus *went to his Father, if Jesus were God, why would he need to go anywhere to see his Father, he would have been afterall, his own Father, would he not? Jesus acknowledged that his **Father was greater than him. BUT, supposedly, in a trinity all three members are pronounced to be equal. “Keep this mental attitude in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, although he was existing inGod’s form, gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should beequal to God.” Now look at the same scripture from a trinity teaching Bible. “Philipians 2:5&6 - New World Translation. Philippians 2:5-6 In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus: Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality … Note how easy it is for false religion to twist the meaning of a scripture? With the evidence presnted above, we can see how cautious we must be. We MUST have God’s Holy Spirit to help decipher such. If we are diligently searching the Bible for the truth of God’s word. his spirit IS with us, and will help us. He, we are told in John 4:24 “God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.” If you are truly trying to do that, he will open the meaning of the Bible for you. That is what Jesus disciples did for the Jews and Gentiles who truly wanted to know God! 4. The trinity was not taught until between the third and fourth century; although there were rumblings about it earlier from a few people. “The first defence of the doctrine of the Trinity was by Tertullian, who was born around 150-160 AD, explicitly “defined” the Trinity as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit and defended his theology against Praxeas, although he noted that the majority of the believers in his day found issue with his doctrine. - Wikipedia. So, if anyone should know the truth about this, surely that anyone is Jesus, and Jesus DID NOT teach a trinity. All these arguments and false teachings began, only after the disciples had died, as predicted by Luke “25 Now I know that none of you among whom I have preached the kingdom of God will see my face again. 26Therefore I testify to you this day that I am innocent of the blood of all men. 27For I did not shrink back from declaring to you the whole will of God. 28Therefore keep watch over yourselves and the entire flock of which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers. Be shepherds of the church of the Lord and of God, which He purchased with His own blood. 29For I know this, that after my departure, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock. 30Even from your own number, men will rise up and distort the truth to draw away disciples after them. 31Therefore be alert and remember that for three years I never stopped warning each of you night and day with tears. Luke 20:25-31. - Majority Standard Bible. The disciples had been personally taught by Jesus. They were a guard on the purity of Jesus word and teachings. It was only after their death’s that false teachings commenced, just as Luke warned. “Keep this mental attitude in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, although he was existing in God’s form, gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.” Philipians 2:5&6 - New World Translation.

Praise God!!!

Jesus is not archangel Michael, his cosmic identity is a son in the order of MIchael. Michael is actually a title, not a name. He is known as Christ Michael, not archangel Michael. Check out the Urantia Papers

If you don't agree with them it frightens most of them because they know all they know is what's according to their religion not the Bible.

One thing I've learned is no matter how right you are, you can still be wrong. He that has an ear will understand.

I like talking to jws because iron sharpens iron.

I have the whole enchilada 😂

Frog