Пікірлер
@SzabolcsBődi-h3u
@SzabolcsBődi-h3u 8 күн бұрын
Awesome stuff ! Well done, nicely put together, informative and also engaging! Much appreciated!
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 8 күн бұрын
Great to hear you love it - hope you enjoyed the whole 6-part mini series on DMAIC.
@SzabolcsBődi-h3u
@SzabolcsBődi-h3u 8 күн бұрын
I did indeed sir 👏! ​@@TomMentink
@thusharajayalath-cq7qh
@thusharajayalath-cq7qh 13 күн бұрын
Great, very insightful
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 13 күн бұрын
@@thusharajayalath-cq7qh happy to hear you the video was valuable to you. Feel free to suggest other video topics that you would like to see and/or share with your colleagues.
@unastanojevic3434
@unastanojevic3434 14 күн бұрын
So valuable! Thanks Tom :)
@chrikanipe779
@chrikanipe779 23 күн бұрын
Thanks for the videos Tom. I enjoy the way you present and give us the challenge to think deeper. I am a CIM in the USA and at my company we are working to get better at using the A3 process. We use an eight step or five step version variant. I’ve been watching your videos the last couple of years and appreciate them. Happy New Year all!
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 23 күн бұрын
@@chrikanipe779 thanks for sharing! And thanks for your kind words - great to hear you’re getting value from my videos. Does your A3 process (or the difference between 8-step and 5-step) come from a difference in expected problem or solution direction? (or maybe more how difficult/time consuming you expect the project to be?) Happy New Year!
@hai-r8l
@hai-r8l 26 күн бұрын
in Cpk case, why use Rbar / D2, but just calculate with the ∑ (Xi-μ)^2/n-1. it is not difficult due to the computer developing
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 23 күн бұрын
@@hai-r8l I don’t think there’s much of a reason nowadays, it’s just that your formula is what was once defined as the Ppk and Cpk uses the range to estimate SD. The difference in ‘short term’ and ‘long term’ variation is more a result of the formula’s than an original goal, but now that we have these two different ways to calculate, that’s one of the results. I don’t think any client will have a problem with using Ppk’s formula to calculate Cpk, but I do think you should know what you’re using when implementing a specific calculation method.
@liljohnyboy25
@liljohnyboy25 Ай бұрын
I am coming late to this party, but yes I agree as well. My team does this every time we do a Root Cause Corrective Action.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink Ай бұрын
@@liljohnyboy25 you’re still very welcome to the party. I think this video is ever-green, because this is just too common a pitfall of the fishbone diagram (and was in fact one of the original design ideas of it). Probably good to share this video with your team then 😉
@YM-qf8iz
@YM-qf8iz Ай бұрын
If I understand correctly, is it possible to say that each individual Cpk is a LOT of component production (and there are three LOTs in the video) while the Ppk is a tolerance that represents the change in the component's tester? Thank you.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink Ай бұрын
No, it's not that difference per se. Due to the way Cpk formulas estimate the SD from the moving ranges, the effect of a sudden shift in process mean (which then is stable around that new level for some time) or a trend. Ppk uses an SD calculation that checks all measurements vs the mean value for all measurements. This method does react quite strongly to a sudden process shift. That's what causes the shorter term and longer term sensitivity to variations.
@jeffreykoning5045
@jeffreykoning5045 Ай бұрын
Very interesting stuff mister Mentink, very interesting! 😃
@TomMentink
@TomMentink Ай бұрын
Glad you like it mister King, there’s much more where this came from 😎 @@jeffreykoning5045
@Geitepielekupke
@Geitepielekupke Ай бұрын
Hee Tom! Geweldig uitgelegd, heb je het excel template nog steeds beschikbaar?
@TomMentink
@TomMentink Ай бұрын
Jazeker: www.tommentink.com/problemsolvingtemplate
@giorgiademattei8659
@giorgiademattei8659 Ай бұрын
Good morning, knowing the OEE of all my machines and having some that work in parallel and others in series, how can I calculate the OEE of the whole process? Thanks in advance
@Jack-z3k8l
@Jack-z3k8l Ай бұрын
Great video on the exact subject I was searching for. I've been tasked with the responsibility of doing a Gage R&R study (my first time doing this) on a backlash measurement fixture I designed and have been using at my company for over 2 years. The parts are lead screws & nut subassembly that aren't always the highest quality machining (due to special material used on the nut). Making it more difficult is the fact that the users I've trained for the study find it difficult (but it's easy for me). We just ran a test and the numbers are pretty high, so we can't validate the fixture so others can use it. My manager is really pressuring me to get this done, and I'm at my wits end.
@joebishman6163
@joebishman6163 Ай бұрын
Hello. I enjoy your videos. Thank you.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink Ай бұрын
@@joebishman6163 thanks for sharing those kind words. If you have questions or video suggestions, please do share them too 😉
@niccodarri
@niccodarri Ай бұрын
Great Video, Tom! Thanks! I am not an expert in the industrial sector (more services), but isn’t it also true that in order to make one piece flow there is so much work to do in balancing the processes first? If you have processes that are not balanced to takt and produce at different cycle tomes, you would still go back to batching and inventory in between processes! Or if you have many defects, one piece flow is almost impossible. One piece flow seems so much valuable but it is true that certain videos and animations simplify its applicability ridiculously. The condition to implement one piece flow is can be pretty hard to achieve
@ESforest
@ESforest Ай бұрын
Nice video!
@worktrustqc
@worktrustqc 2 ай бұрын
Hi Tom, I’m your big fans also following you on LinkedIn. Thank you for sharing 👏👏👏
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 2 ай бұрын
@@worktrustqc so great to hear, thanks for sharing your kind words. Know that I’m always happy to receive questions and requests for future video topics, so feel free 😉
@shagananorak
@shagananorak 2 ай бұрын
Surely you would observe prior to 5S? Otherwise you are making improvements before understanding. IMO
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 2 ай бұрын
Yes, that is true: of course we also observe before and during 5S. What I meant is that you first want to organise the workplace around the current process and only then look at (observe) the tasks within the process with the intent of changing those tasks and subtasks. First take care of the basics, then redesign.
@Justwil07
@Justwil07 2 ай бұрын
I have an exam tomorrow, what if so 20 10 - 5 - - 10 40 i mean there are two different stations and they are doing same thing but one is doing in 20 sec and the other is in 40 sec ??
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 2 ай бұрын
@@Justwil07 good luck with your exam! With parallel Process Times of 20 and 40 sec/unit, average Cycle Time can be calculated by thinking in ‘how many per time’, for instance: 20 sec PT => 2 per 40 sec & 40 sec PT is 1 per 40 sec = 3 per 40 sec => 40/3=16,7 sec average Cycle Time = on average every 16,7 secs one unit is produced by these two stations together.
@will5577
@will5577 2 ай бұрын
How is the Cpk calculated when I have a target value of 0 and the max allowed is 50.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 2 ай бұрын
@@will5577 first off: do you have a lower bound too? (-50 maybe?) Or is 0 the minimum physically possible? In the first case you have a ‘normal’ bilateral tolerance - see if the mean is closer to the upper or lower spec limit and divide the distance between mean and closest specification limit by 3xStDev. If 0 is a pure physical level and general target point, that is, you only have an USL of 50, then you have a unilateral tolerance and always take the difference between mean and 50 and divide that by 3xStDev.
@shrinivasjahagirdar6058
@shrinivasjahagirdar6058 2 ай бұрын
Can I become quality engineer to transition from PhD to industry
@慧王-w5f
@慧王-w5f 2 ай бұрын
That is a really good metaphor and easy to understand. When I started my career as an industrial engineer responsible for plant layout and time measurements, I found that I could implement many improvement projects each year. However, one day I realized that it wasn't enough; I needed to think about how to involve more staff in improvement projects at different levels within my plant. I shifted my mindset from "hunting" to "farming." After one or two years, the plant director told me that I couldn't just create a platform for others to participate; I also needed to have my own projects. He was right. I began to build object detection systems to help inspectors find missing parts, and I returned to "hunting." As the only CI leader in my factory (580 staff total), I must balance my time between hunting and farming. Interestingly, some colleagues prefer to see their CI leader actively involved in projects, as it demonstrates problem-solving methods and engineering skills.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 2 ай бұрын
@@慧王-w5f such a nice and strong real life example - thanks for sharing! Any manager, and definitely CI managers, should be both farming and hunting. And good structured Problem Solving is also a part of that, as long as you also investigate and eliminate Root Causes, thereby improving your systems. Whether or not a CI leader should participate directly in many projects depends on the capabilities and needs of the rest of your organisation, but CI leader should be able and willing to improve processes and solve difficult processes. So there’s nothing wrong with your colleagues’ expectations there. A CI leader is, however, often the main person to build the structure and systems that direct improvement resources and sustain changes. Only ‘doing Black Belt projects’ can be good, but often is just a pretty way to describe what really is fire fighting… You seem to have found a great balance: as the only CI leader in such a large factory, you likely are one of very few who can lead complex Problem Solving or DMAIC teams, but your organisation needs you to focus and structure overall CI resources too. Again, thanks for sharing your learning journey.
@worktrustqc
@worktrustqc 2 ай бұрын
I do enjoy the journey! thank you , Tom
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 2 ай бұрын
@@worktrustqc great to see you’re so active in Quality management and enjoying your journey of continuously improving your QM competences too 😊
@worktrustqc
@worktrustqc 2 ай бұрын
very good videos!
@worktrustqc
@worktrustqc 2 ай бұрын
very good videos! thank you for sharing, Tom.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 2 ай бұрын
@@worktrustqc it’s a good system to manage your actions, and the concepts transfer well to departmental approaches for sorting and deciding what to do with incoming ‘inputs’ and for how to manage follow-up.
@sohamnanavati8871
@sohamnanavati8871 3 ай бұрын
Superb explanation 👌
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your kinds words, @@sohamnanavati8871 Happy to hear this video was valuable to you. If it raised any follow-up questions or video suggestions, feel free to suggest 😉
@BUDWEIZER777
@BUDWEIZER777 3 ай бұрын
Wage slavery
@edsonsamuel7287
@edsonsamuel7287 3 ай бұрын
Hi Tom. Very insightful video once again Tom, congratulations! I just have two questions: 1- Imagine I want to present this to my management as a way to implement a Performance Excellence Program, how can I estimate the duration of each cycle if I want to present it as a roadmap? And from your experience, how long does each cycle last? 2- Once I reach the Strategy cycle, is it the goal to stay on that cycle indefinitely, or should I revisit the other 2 cycles? PS: I work in an Energy Utility company, specifically in the O&M of a power plant.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
@@edsonsamuel7287 great questions, it immediately sparks ideas for follow up videos 😎 1a - there is no end to the cycles, you need all three of them from the beginning and always (you can choose to stop the improvement cycle for some time). 1b - for the factory level, one full cycle for Strategy is a quarter to a year; for Improvement month/quarter; for Control day/week. 2 - start all of them from the beginning. Although for many clients, strengthening the Control cycle quickly gives the biggest impact to their organisation.
@jeddaaah
@jeddaaah 3 ай бұрын
many thanks
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
My pleasure @jeddaaah, happy to hear you like the model and I hope it brings value to you and your organisation
@fpchd
@fpchd 3 ай бұрын
Great explanation of interconnecting the parts! Powerful!
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
@@fpchd thanks for sharing your thoughts. Good KPI control is very important for sustaining performance, so I’m happy this video brought you more understanding and I hope it will help you and your organisation.
@artiomturkoff
@artiomturkoff 3 ай бұрын
Thank you, Tom! I wish more people in management and analytics were aware of FMEA.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
You and me both! While it’s not per de needed from the start of an Operational Excellence journey, you should be aware of what FMEA is, how it works and what it can bring. And quite often, it is a good early fit for organisations…
@vback4238
@vback4238 3 ай бұрын
Excellent job!!!
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
@@vback4238 thanks for sharing those kind words.
@Futbolollz
@Futbolollz 3 ай бұрын
Really like the simplicity, all the support keep it up Tom!
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
Thanks @@Futbolollz for your nice words amd timing the time to share them. Happy to hear you’re enjoying my videos. Feel free to ask CI/Lean/OpEx questions or suggestions for future videos 😉
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
Over at BeltCourse.com you can participate in an interactive guided set of workshops on CI leadership, and Strategic Planning in particular. These are online, but they have a brilliant way to simulate issues and situations in an online environment, which allows for practical learning of the skills you learned in the theoretical part of the course. Link to get a 15% discount on Belt Course's Strategic Planning Workshop: www.beltcourse.com/a/2147951457/6eADKB6z Or get 50% discount on the Strategic Planning Program for all leaders: www.beltcourse.com/a/2147947690/6eADKB6z
@aliceb2574
@aliceb2574 3 ай бұрын
Hi Tom, you mention there are different fish one categories for different sectors. Where would I find them for strategy pls? Google search not helping. Thankyou.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
Can't directly help you with those either, except for that I think there shouldn't be a set for Strategy to begin with - it's not really a results driven process (unless you consider a strategy document a valuable result), so analysing which factors led to deviations in the outcomes isn't so much a thing, I would say.
@taishihasegawa8380
@taishihasegawa8380 3 ай бұрын
Eye opening
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it, and happy to have helped sharpen your thought process. If there's a related question or topic suggestion for a next video, don't hesitate to ask 😉
@taishihasegawa8380
@taishihasegawa8380 3 ай бұрын
@@TomMentink thank you Tom. Hope to see more of your videos. Just wondered if you have any tips for revealing unrealized problems within new potential customers? Some of our clients require us to explore new markets even. I use 5 whys but it’s time consuming and feels like finding a needle in the haystack..
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
@@taishihasegawa8380 the first thing I would go to is FMEA - failure mode & effect analysis. That tool doesn’t go as deep as 5 why’s and is much more useful for identifying potential problems and summarising process know-how. I don’t have a video on it myself, so it’s probably time to make one 😉
@019danielalejandro
@019danielalejandro 3 ай бұрын
What a wonderful video you have done here
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
Thanks@@019danielalejandro, for taking the time to share that. Over the years, I’ve covered a bunch of topics already, but there’s always more questions - so if you have a topic question or video request, don’t hesitate to ask
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
To boost your own CI analysis skills and up your value to the whole organisation, be sure to check out my course on calculating the financial effect of improvements and problems solved: www.tommentink.com/savings-reporting-course
@thomasgoetz8178
@thomasgoetz8178 4 ай бұрын
Unfortunately I had to stop this video as the sound of the pen scratching the paper is unbearable.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 4 ай бұрын
@@thomasgoetz8178 yeah, maybe it’s time to make a new version of that video - I’m not sure it will come out as nice and natural content-wise, but the sound will definitely be better with my new setup. (I tried post editing this video, but that didn’t have the desired effect, unfortunately)
@nandalukiko7355
@nandalukiko7355 4 ай бұрын
thank you so much, very in-depth explanation
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 3 ай бұрын
You're very welcome! I'm happy my videos add value for you. If you have related questions or topic suggestions, feel free to ask 😉
@Mary-Compt
@Mary-Compt 4 ай бұрын
Great points! I’ve seen companies struggle with their learning and development programs because every employee has unique needs, and often, employees don’t know where to begin or what to spend their funds on. This uncertainty can be a barrier to fully utilizing available benefits. At Compt , we’ve been talking to dozens of L&D and HR leaders, and it’s clear that the process for managing L&D requests is broken-full of endless spreadsheets, manual forms, and cluttered inboxes filled with questions on balances, budgets, and questions on how employees can spend their funds. Our new L&D feature is designed to address these pain points and improve the employee experience. Our platform streamlines managing requests and budgets for classes, certifications, tuition reimbursement, and student loan repayment-all in one place. One of the most impactful features is the pre-built suggestions tailored to each department, helping employees maximize their benefits by removing the guesswork and making it easier for employees to find relevant opportunities. Thanks for sparking this important conversation-by addressing these challenges, we can help companies and employees focus on what really matters: growth and development!
@foozito
@foozito 4 ай бұрын
Hi Tom, I recently finished my degree in industrial engineering and management and I really liked the part about continuous improvement. I got a job in a company and I want to improve processes and systems here in the company. I bought the book New Manufacturing Challenge by Kiyoshi Suzaki and I'm finding it very interesting. As the professional that you are, what would you say I try first, what books, videos of yours, where to start? I feel a bit lost. Thanks in advance
@ebiniolajide2848
@ebiniolajide2848 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for this great content.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 4 ай бұрын
My pleasure, happy to hear my videos bring value to our community.
@frasse4462
@frasse4462 4 ай бұрын
We are doing alot of this, even with FMEA and Controlplan, the quality of the parts. PPAP. Can we call us Quality Engineers??? What is the difference between a Quality Technician and a Quality Engineer?
@Deezuzjohn
@Deezuzjohn 2 ай бұрын
Wait, you guys messed up FEMA!?!? GET EM!
@rezagh5438
@rezagh5438 4 ай бұрын
This video and presentation are Great I wanted to ask questions but they were answered. Having this kind of education on multiple platforms would be wonderful. There were a little bit of noise upon cuts.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 4 ай бұрын
@@rezagh5438 than, you for sharing that feedback. I’m happy to hear you liked it. In the spirit of this video, I should of course ask you for a positive point, an improvement suggestion, something that you loved and some learning or new insight you had 😇 The noise was a thing I notices during editing already something went wrong with the microphone and I tried to make the best of it because the content came out so well… I repost this to LinkedIn as well, but I sort of quit Facebook, Instagram and X, since they take up a lot of time and I’d rather focus on 2 platforms - if you want to share my video links to your network on those platforms, feel free. And remember, video topic requests are always welcome too 😉
@juanpablogonzalez7000
@juanpablogonzalez7000 4 ай бұрын
Excelente explanation. Thank you!
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 4 ай бұрын
@@juanpablogonzalez7000 thanks for sharing that, glad to hear my video is of value to you.
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 4 ай бұрын
Already during the live workshop, people asked me where they can get the file I used during the presentation - it's available in two places: 1. As a stand-alone download from my website: www.tommentink.com (scroll down a bit) 2. It's included in the upcoming Capacity & Labour challenge (www.tommentink.com/sales-page-c5fb244b-4d85-43ec-96eb-ba54b6dcf9ab ), during which you will do this C&L analysis for your department or factory with my guidance and the support of all participants. A great way to learn in practice, receive direct support on any obstacles you encounter, and immediately generate a tangible result for your organisation!
@saravanankrishnan6812
@saravanankrishnan6812 4 ай бұрын
thank you🙏
@PetCumings-j2v
@PetCumings-j2v 4 ай бұрын
Jackson Timothy Garcia Deborah Thomas Richard
@chronometa
@chronometa 4 ай бұрын
What are hard skills for this?
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 4 ай бұрын
Just to recap: in this context, hard skills are the more technical/analytical skills, while soft skills cover change management, communication and the like (and know that 'soft skills' are just as hard to master as the hard skills 😉). So hard skills important for a strong start as a CI manager are things like: able to analyse operational performance, link performance to financial numbers, performance variation analysis, calculate OEE and its constituents, make a material balance, design a performance and projects follow up meeting structure, guesstimate the operational benefit of an improvement proposal and calculate the expected financial benefit based on that; and also more basic skills like: read a P&L, able to make a 4M fishbone, do a 5 Why, able to set up a KPI tree, organise an A3 problem solving team or Kaizen Event, etc.
@chronometa
@chronometa 4 ай бұрын
Thanks. I'm trying to transition from inventory management and tbh depending on the industry (food and beverage manufacturing) it sounds more like an industrial engineering role. Wearas I see it a Business analysis role with a specialization in lean principles
@hzxci1158
@hzxci1158 4 ай бұрын
Hi Tom, would you be able to make a video on the 3 legged root cause, systemic, detection, specific?
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 4 ай бұрын
Yes, that is a nice topic for a future video - thanks for bringing it up. I wonder how this video got you to that idea, but hey, sometimes great ideas just pop up when you're thinking about something that's only half connected...
@chronometa
@chronometa 4 ай бұрын
Do you need to be an engineer?
@TomMentink
@TomMentink 4 ай бұрын
No; it is a good start, but you don’t need an engineering degree. There’s 2 main streams of competences you need within CI: analytics/engineering & human change management. To be good at the first one, an engineering degree is a good prep, but and MBA is great too, or any technological studies, or even just a mindset of wanting to find out how things work.
@chronometa
@chronometa 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the thoughtful reply, I've been involved in inventory management, which translates well to this in my opinion. Analysis, process, change. ​@@TomMentink