watching this at the beginning of my psych clerkship as a preview and its perfect! thanks!
@deathkissgoodbye24 күн бұрын
I think where you shine compared to other medicine KZbinrs is your explanation and logical, common sense thought process and reasoning behind certain things. It really made me understand somethings by logically thinking, instead of regurgitating facts and memorizing uworld table. It’s similar to the way divine teaches and some Emma Holiday, but your even better at explaining in simple terms that any common man could understand without using complex terminology.
@heather8025 күн бұрын
Super helpful! For HDS BAT w/o peritoneal signs, looks like all roads lead to CT? Regardless of whether the FAST is +/- the next step is CT, either to plan surgery or to look for another cause for the symptoms... so why even bother with the FAST? Is it mostly if a patient is borderline going unstable and you want info fast? Otherwise as the algorithm is written it looks like "waste" since it wouldn't alter the diagnostic path. But I could totally see the utility of FAST for quick info incase things went south fast
@deathkissgoodbye24 күн бұрын
Unstable and no peritonitis, but fast scan is positive > laparatomy. Mainly for that, bec there is fluid leakage, no peritonitis, and there unstable, so surgical exploration is needed. Fast scan negative + unstable or fast scan positive + stable = CT bec it’s not urgent danger and have time to investigate further.
@Doctor_Tim15 сағат бұрын
The below comment hit it on the head, great point! Imaging is always helpful for localizing a source of trauma but FAST is faster, and done at bedside without any potential delay meanwhile CT may take time to transfer, wait time, and then the process of completing the scan itself. So FAST is a more time-efficient way to confirm that there is significant intra-abdominal injury to warrant surgery. CT will give a more detailed survey but the downside is the time it takes could delay surgery by even a few minutes, so its only ideal when there is time (either the patient is stable, or FAST is negative and there's indeterminate location of an injury).
@numanjaved4718Ай бұрын
Superb bro. ❤
@joshranta6941Ай бұрын
Dr. Tim is the GOAT. Thank you from a medical student preparing for Level 2!
@TheNewVictorАй бұрын
Do you know of a resource that has the diagnostic and management algorithms/steps for these cases? I can identify most of these things but need more concise next best step in management or treatment in each case or scenario. Thanks
@willjanes2451Ай бұрын
Case Files - Internal Medicine fourth edition by Toy and Patlan is what a lot of us are using. Maybe not specifically for emergency medicine but it has a lot of examples that you're describing. Maybe you can buy it but I know people just airdropped PDFs of it so it's probably around
@richarddarrah2014Ай бұрын
“Surgery because it freaks me out…” lord please don’t ever be my doctor. Stanford type B is medical management, but glad to know that student thinks surgery for everyone.
@megansmith6576Ай бұрын
Awesome videos!!! You're an inspiration Dr. Tim ✨️
@greeenbay50Ай бұрын
Thank you Tim! For your Jakafi example, do we just assume that they did a valid study with appropriate significance all the the ad itself gives no details on how the study was conducted?
@Doctor_TimАй бұрын
Yes, that's exactly the thought! Unless you can see the measures of significance in detail or if they mention some internal flaws of the study, it's usually best to just interpret with those assumptions (unless they specifically mention otherwise).
@user-vh5hy4mo1jАй бұрын
Is this applicable for step 3 as well?
@Doctor_TimАй бұрын
Yes, that's right. Specifically for the diagnosis/next step/management style of questions the material has quite a bit of overlap!
@user-vh5hy4mo1jАй бұрын
whats a good resource for the risk factors and prognosis questions??
@Doctor_TimАй бұрын
That's a tough one. There are probably several that are decent but hard to fine one that is totally comprehensive. The Amboss library, U-World summary tables, Divine Intervention series, and even Up-to-Date articles can all be useful!
@cobblestone5642Ай бұрын
this was a very good video with just enough explanation of basics to understand everything without memorization and keeping it brief to the high yield information. My only feedback is that I would have preferred if you also explained how to spot the subcortical stroke symptoms so we could get the full picture.
@user-bx1wq9mj9y2 ай бұрын
not sure if you'll see this but how do you differentiate between manic psychosis and one of the schizo diseases? That trips me up in question stems
@Doctor_TimАй бұрын
Great question! The main things to keep in mind are using whatever diagnostic criteria they are giving and using those when you can. Like for example with schizoaffective, they will almost always emphasize a 2-week period with psychotic symptoms and no features of the mood disorder. Otherwise sometimes it can be helpful to try and figure out what the primary symptom(s) are and which seems more "accessory" or "secondary". For example in bipolar disorder with psychotic features, the hallmark symptoms of mania will be the focal point of the question with some added notes about hallucinations. For sure though these can be difficult and it's a combo of using diagnostic criteria and using the "picture" they are trying to paint to find the underlying primary diagnosis.
@lukaszadamczyk91162 ай бұрын
Can we get this pdf as well on the website??? Thanks in advancen
@Doctor_TimАй бұрын
Done!
@lukaszadamczyk91162 ай бұрын
Can you put this pdf/pptx on the website?? Thank you!
@Doctor_TimАй бұрын
For sure!
@NguyenThiLeThuy-qc7uj2 ай бұрын
thank you for your video <3
@fatimahkadiku73682 ай бұрын
I didn’t chose A in Q1 becos I believe troponin would not show up in the first 2 hours in an MI or ACS.
@Doctor_Tim2 ай бұрын
That's a reasonable thought, it is pretty early in the timeline for troponin to be significantly elevated. Because it is such a highly sensitive marker though, it can be useful early on in management to see what the "baseline" value is and see if that changes over time. So even if it was normal or only mildly elevated, being able to trend it over the next several hours will be very useful in management. Great point though!
@alanwaterman13282 ай бұрын
Excellent lecture. Thanks.
@studywithmeasmr79912 ай бұрын
Dr. Tim! these reviews are so helpful! carried me thru OBGYN, Peds, and Psych. Have my Medicine self in a few days. Would love to see if you have pulmonary review. watching the other dedicated systems rn throughout the week. Thank you for the great presentations through out!
@Doctor_Tim2 ай бұрын
That's great to hear! Definitely have a pulmonary review in the works, that's a great suggestion!!
@TheMedicalDots2 ай бұрын
Great explanations!!!
@musicbeachdance2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this! The timing of this was perfect as I'm taking my IM shelf next week and don't have a ton of time to review ID. I also used your content for psych as well. Looking forward to more content!
@Doctor_Tim2 ай бұрын
I'm glad it was helpful for you! Best of luck!
@Thedreamer5792 ай бұрын
Very accurately described.
@ZebralterMedical2 ай бұрын
Thank you
@elizabethdean12093 ай бұрын
Phenomenal job! Great content! Perfect pace! And brilliant slides! Please put your name on all your slides. Sometimes I screenshot them to reinforce the material & on occasion share with a classmate. Thank you for your work‼️
@alanwaterman13283 ай бұрын
Excellent video. Great revision and peactice. Thanks.
@Imonaboattt9003 ай бұрын
For the second question can you explain why the answer was NOT sarcoidosis? The explanation provided afterward basically showed that all the hints you gave applied to both, so I am curious as to what the reasoning to be used there to discriminate them
@Doctor_Tim3 ай бұрын
Great question. Sarcoid could definitely be considered solely based on the lab findings alone including the restrictive pattern and even reduced DLCO. The way to differentiate it from ILD was the history and demographic information. The age-range and "fine" crackles fits more with ILD and helps deter from sarcoid. They could show you a similar question with a young female with no prior history and that shifting of the background and demographic would be more typical of a sarcoid question!
@Imonaboattt9003 ай бұрын
@@Doctor_Tim Thank you Dr. Tim, great video btw, I've watched every single one, now IM is my last rotation
@Doctor_Tim3 ай бұрын
@@Imonaboattt900 That's great to hear! Best of luck on your rotation!
@hubby_medical54544 ай бұрын
Can you do a part 2, where you include things like Cost Benifit analysis and related topics? (Sensitivity analysis, Cost utility, QALY, DALY, etc...)
@Doctor_Tim4 ай бұрын
That is a great suggestion, definitely some topics I can incorporate into a QI/QC type video!
@hubby_medical54543 ай бұрын
@@Doctor_Tim Thank you doctor. I am in medical school and surprisingly (or surprising to me) This topic (plus biostats) is worth 11% of my total grade from year 1 and year 2 of medical school and a substantial part of my Step 1 Exam. Its become a huge topic in medical school.
@sanisch32234 ай бұрын
Thank you so much!!! So well explained.
@emmycoffey4004 ай бұрын
This was the BEST cardio video I have ever seen. The explanations are amazing! Can not believe cardio has never been taught to me this way. Thank you!!!!
@alexanderradaoui41364 ай бұрын
Wouldn't wide-spread vasodilation lead to decreased peripheral vascular resistance and pooling of blood in the peripheral tissues. As a result, wouldn't blood flow to the extremities be compromised? Wouldn't this lead to cold extremities due to decreased perfusion and circulation to those areas?
@Doctor_Tim3 ай бұрын
That's a great question. What you are saying could be possible after an extended period of distributive shock. However, they tend to primarily test the initial insult and the direct cardiovascular manifestations of that dysfunction. And in the short term, the decreased SVR and relative pooling of blood in the extremities is how the extremities stay warm in contrast to the other types of shock.
@ygpark16194 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@MerlyCosta4 ай бұрын
This is great! Thank you so much!
@loicerono33054 ай бұрын
Thank you
@loicerono33054 ай бұрын
Please do for all the systems. The vedios are helping me with the USMLE step 1 prep
@inthisalleyway94084 ай бұрын
Can step 1 takers watch this
@Doctor_Tim4 ай бұрын
Yes, this video was more focused on the clinical side but much of this is very applicable to Step 1 and the basic sciences as well!
@Be1smaht4 ай бұрын
too easy
@Thescientist2274 ай бұрын
A single dose of betamethasone is still given if there is preterm labor between 34 0/7 weeks and 36 6/7 weeks.
@lorithompson57534 ай бұрын
This was such a great review!! Im on my second to last rotation and really wish I would have discovered you sooner!
@ajones77134 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing this, I found it very helpful for last minute shelf review!
@abhinavmahajan35695 ай бұрын
Great Video. Please do one on Eye and ear pathologies for USMLE 2CK.
@Doctor_Tim4 ай бұрын
Great suggestion, definitely one that is planned!
@mustafarafat56345 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot
@ivonneszamko89685 ай бұрын
Thank you, Dr. Tim, for this amazing review! It has really helped me in preparing for my Canadian boards.
@sophiasu58855 ай бұрын
You are absolutely amazing. Helped me so much in questions!
@drblade78735 ай бұрын
Nice video man! Have my first shelf Friday! Keep up the good content!