Has this software stopped being updated? The interface I looked at many years ago is still the same. It would be nice if, when a program/application wants to access the internet, it would ask the user for information such as the location of the program on the disk, the IP number it wants to connect to, the domain name, whether it has a digital signature, the name of the manufacturer, etc. I am currently using the free version and the notification settings seem insufficient to me. Isn't it possible to improve these? By the way, I would like to thank all the developers who contributed to this wonderful software. I hope this software will be developed more. It is a wonderful thing, I enjoy using it. I am thinking of buying it after trying it for a while. I would like to thank everyone who contributed again, for saving us from the exploitation of Windows.
@SafingIO2 күн бұрын
hey thanks for the feeback. We actually went a different rout from the one you suggested, where we made import and export of porifiles easy. There is also a community where you can share them with others and get going faster with your own setup github.com/portmaster-community/apps per connection blocking is also a thing, in prompt mode, but as we keep saying, we don't think this is the way to go, everyone doing the same things over and over again... is just a waste of time - Sharing good profiles saves time, and you might learn a thing or two about how Portmaster works as well. I hope this helps.
@assa-eu4kq3 күн бұрын
I find myself rapidly switching inbetween port and sniffnet, and here's why. Sniff cant show the website url hiding behind it's cloudflare ip like port does, but sniff does let u sort IPs by total data transfered, a basic ui feature which port seem to lock behind a paywall. and maybe this is just placebo, but I almost feel like sniff is more immediate and 'realtime' in showing new IPs, while port requires u to press the refresh button rightafter u visit a new webpage before it showsup
@JóvenesSantos15 күн бұрын
Tienen una app para android?
@jimp213814 күн бұрын
Please help none of my connections are loading
@pasdedeux486716 күн бұрын
It did not keep me from enjoying the stream - nothing much can, but there was a noticeable underlying noise with the audio this time around. Pink/Brown noise mostly with some modulation.
@SBL972-one24 күн бұрын
bonjour, peut ont installer sur MX Linux ? xfce j'ai essayer mais a la fin probleme que je n'arrive pas a resoudre_ j'ai fait comme cela kzbin.info/www/bejne/p5muq5mwmKeXaas pouvez vous me dire comment ? merci bien_
@SafingIO24 күн бұрын
Hey there @SBL972-one I have no experience with MX Linux, but a quick search told me that it is debian based. Which means depending on the version of debian that you might need to install - IPtables and then you can use the .deb file or the curl method described here: wiki.safing.io/en/Portmaster/Install/Linux
@scrollop28 күн бұрын
Thanks, though when I turn off global incoming block, remote desktop still doesn't work. IWhen I turn off portmaster, RD works. Could you help with what to try next?
@romanflyx77Ай бұрын
after i installportmaster i dont have internet say Portmaster did not detect any network connectivity.
@SafingIOАй бұрын
then you probably have some compatibility issue. typically its some VPN or AV (often with VPN) you can look into the debug info for more details,. also the wiki has some great resources to help you through this.
@pasdedeux4867Ай бұрын
Can we play with the Beta in an Alpha (Cosmic) environment?
@garyp1130Ай бұрын
Hello. Hoping you could answer a quick question (well maybe 2, LOL!). 1) We use a DDNS service with a hostname/domain name. So when connecting remotely we use the assigned domain name. Is it possible to create a rule that allows connections only when connecting using that domain? I've tried nearly every possible combination that you list out in your incoming rules section, but no luck. 2) Also, is there a way to delete just one rule in a grouping--it seems that if two or three rules are grouped together, all have to be removed? Thanks in advance!
@SafingIOАй бұрын
would love to help. But tbh yt comments are not ideal for things like this. Join our discord and ask in the help channel there :D
@Roland_VolpahartАй бұрын
Greetings ! Is there any way to install portmaster on coreelec ?
@SafingIOАй бұрын
I have no experience with coreelec, and it is not officially supported, you can always try though :D
@johes19872 ай бұрын
this very interesting program, it would be good if you had the option to put it in spanish or in another language.
@SafingIOАй бұрын
Multi Language is something we would want to do in the future as well. But there is no timeline for now.
@Erick-128902 ай бұрын
Hagan el programa en español por favor
@SL-sg9tk2 ай бұрын
Since the SPN obviously adds latency i can still watch 4k HDR content from Netflix. Using CTRL ALT SHIFT D confirms this as it shows every aspect of what you`re getting from Netflix at any given time. If im downloading a large game patch, i toggle off SPN and with a GIG connection up and down the patch downloads very fast, once done i turn SPN back on. Portmaster isn't perfect, one example is the refresh rate of the network activity NEEDS to be configurable or at least increased drastically. But from what i understand Portmaster is still in its infancy and i respect what they have accomplished so far with the SPN. Im excited to watch this product grow and ive subscribed to pro for a year to help support the development. Thank you Portmaster/SPN team!
@SafingIO2 ай бұрын
Super cool Feedback. Thank you! Regarding the download. Why do you disable spn for the whole pc and not just the application that downloads? If you trust that domain and it’s the same every time you can also just exclude the single domain from spn
@enkaskal2 ай бұрын
appreciate the rambling, but also appreciate brevity. personally i like the more unfiltered raw videos that are as long as need be, but not longer ;)
@SafingIO2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the feedback
@enkaskal2 ай бұрын
anybody who has never built their own account or payment service will never understand…given limited resources, i’m impressed that your redisgn will still be self hosted tbh. personally i think features like mobile support would be a higher priority.
@enkaskal2 ай бұрын
i know these videos dont have a lot of views, but as someone looking into portmaster and opensnitch they’re very useful so thank you 😀
@enkaskal2 ай бұрын
always appreciate leaving in surprises or “mistakes” in videos like this 😀👍you mention replacing electron discussion… be nice if you linked to it as well
@SafingIO2 ай бұрын
What link is missing?
@enkaskal2 ай бұрын
@@SafingIO to the live stream discussing electron. i found it eventually it was on feb 22nd (but i also listened to march 7th and have the latest on in the background now :)
@pasdedeux48672 ай бұрын
Acoustic panels?
@araujo81283 ай бұрын
Tem como instalar no Android ?
@MatthewJamesKalasky3 ай бұрын
A tiny bit off topic, but, those thumbnails you guys use. AMAZING.
@MrVincentGiardina3 ай бұрын
I just downloaded and installed your app; however, it is indicating that the Device is Offline. I don't see where there is a setting to turn this on or off. Please advise.
@SafingIO3 ай бұрын
Probably a compatibility issue with another app such as antivirus or vpn (installed is sometimes enough, the vpn software does things even when it’s turned off)
@MrVincentGiardina3 ай бұрын
@@SafingIO I've allowed the entire Safing folder on the C:\drive but still to no avail.
@christopherkurilla74583 ай бұрын
is there a way to set Force Block Incoming Connections to Force Prompt Incoming Connections or is this a feature that can be added in the future? Everything else looks good as far as what I am looking for in this product
@Pol-to5tg3 ай бұрын
Great vibes! Looking forward to learn more about this protocol.
@Infolific3 ай бұрын
The question about paying for Plus monthly could be a result of the checkout page not being clear. The page indicates you can select a number of months to pay for with the default being 1 month and the Purchase button looks clickable even thought clicking it has no effect. Not until you click the discount area, which seems optional, does the text change to how many years.
@SafingIO3 ай бұрын
thank you for the feedback. I assumed that most people would have chosen on the website and not in the checkout... and I believe it remembers what you picked there.
@Infolific3 ай бұрын
@@SafingIO Yes on the website the choice is clear, but by the time you get to the checkout page, the yearly aspect has been "forgotten". I just tried it again and the check out shows monthly, asks you how many months, and defaults to 1 month.
@Infolific3 ай бұрын
The import/export mentioned here as a soon-to-be-released feature has come in handy for app profiles that have a lot of rules. I'd copy the export to the clipboard and use a remote desktop tool to paste into the import window.
@SafingIO3 ай бұрын
super great use case. you can also edit some settings in there quick. Keen in mind if you change something in there you also need to delete the checksum at the bottom
@Infolific3 ай бұрын
I agree that PortMaster free provides a lot of value. Having played with it now, I also agree that the network history is a feature worth paying for and it's a good place to draw the line for the first paid tier to support future development.
@Infolific4 ай бұрын
It's fun hearing about the major features you planned to add and knowing that you did :-) And you were right that the history module is a big deal.
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
for me it is fun to read your comments going through the backlog, this was always part of why we wanted to have them on yt, so they can stay up for long... But tbh I haven't watched any of them back. are you on our discord? if not, it would be super helpful if someone is on there knowing what we said in the past 😅
@Infolific4 ай бұрын
The learning mode you two described sounds very helpful, but as you said the backlog is long :-)
@nubfaceforthelose4 ай бұрын
Portmaster is a must have program for me. Thanks for the work. I do have a question though and it's probably a dumb one, but when I boot and look at Portmaster, Microsoft Edge has like 30 something connections. I never use edge, don't even open it or have a shortcut so I block it. I'm guessing that's telemetry? or something? Is this a bad idea? or are Microsoft being creepy af?
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
No that is a good idea, my edge is blocked by default. again thank you for the kind words!
@nubfaceforthelose4 ай бұрын
@@SafingIO Nice. Thanks guys!
@nubfaceforthelose4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the awesome app guys!
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
I’m glad you like it -r
@Infolific4 ай бұрын
Privacy is important, but I think many of those people looking into PortMaster are entering the "journey" from a stronger interest in security. That's why there are often comparisons with tools like simplewall and glasswire i.e. firewalls. Your customers might be telling you their interest by their choice of Plus vs Pro. Subscribers with Plus may actually represent the security-centric folks. The Plus subscribers may not just be people that want to support you or just people not able to afford Pro.
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
I get your point, and if we would want to optimize for growth above everything we might make more changes, but privacy is the goal. We see that there is value in adding more security oriented features as well. Portmaster is a security product don't get me wrong, but the defaults are set for privacy.
@doudoud824 ай бұрын
does portmaster support DNSSEC also? when I use dig to check the DNS response it doesn't have the DNSSEC response additional fields?
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
it does not we support dot and doh. What need would DNSSEC fulfill for you that dot or doh don't do?
@doudoud824 ай бұрын
@@SafingIO I was just curious to know if it is supported since DNSSEC is a way to authenticate the DNS server's responses.
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
If you add the ip address and the verify label then Portmaster does check if the server is correct. and of course tls as well as https do make sure the response has not been tempered with.
@Infolific4 ай бұрын
This was a great discussion and I like the Q&A format with one of you asking and the other answering. There might not be a huge audience for deep-dives like this, but I certainly appreciate them. I've only recently learned about DNS over TLS and I was glad to see that it's a feature of PortMaster since it's not natively supported by Windows 10.
@Infolific4 ай бұрын
I learned about a feature from this old stream. I had no idea I could combine apps to work as a single entity. Awesome!
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
thank you for the feedback... there are probably a couple features we need to highlight better 😅 one other thing not a lot of people know: you can press "ctrl" and then click to copy on almost any field in Portmaster
@Mojo_DK_4 ай бұрын
You are doing a great job guys! 😁
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
thank you!
@BillAnt4 ай бұрын
At 2:45 you mentioned that without a VPN the IP and DNS/websiteURL is not encrypted. True, but the actual data is via HTTPS/TLS. I prefer a direct faster and lower latency connection using a "burner phone" with no name or any info on file and change it once a month. ;)
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
Which of course is work on your end, but interesting approach, not possible in all countries as Europe requires KYC for mobile plans. Also we are thinking about making combining multiple internet connections an option, so your traffic gets split between the ISPs - that would also increase the available speed.
@HoOoleander4 ай бұрын
Maybe the idea was already outspoken, but can you add a funktion to allow a Domain/Connection etc. temporarly. Like the NOSCRIPT addon for Firefox for example. Sometimes i want to visit a webside only once and have to allow the domain. It would be cool if the rule exaption would turn back after about 10 - 15 minutes or untill Poortmaster gets restarted. Thank you for this good tool.
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
Adding such an option would fit when we touch the prompting system again. We are currently working on the backend of the ui system where we are moving a couple features into the same system. New prompts with more options are something we would be looking into.
@kevinhughes98014 ай бұрын
Great breakdown. Question how much latency does spn add to connection?
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
There is an effect on latency, but it is minimal, and for normal use you should not feel it. Because of how each rout is calculated for each connection things like speed tests are not a good source on telling you what you can expect... since it only reflects that one rout
@kevinhughes98014 ай бұрын
@@SafingIO ok thanks
@BillAnt4 ай бұрын
Any time you have any extra servers between you and the website, there will be some extra inherent latency, no way around it. It's a privacy trade-off, except if you're using a direct connection with a "burner phone". ;)
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
I hope this video is a start into better visualizing what we do differently. There is more to how VPNs can get attacked with pattern matching and so on... where the local isp your pc is connected to can actually know more, and I initially wanted to get into that as well, but, that would have been a much longer video. Also SPN does protect more then what is shown in the video, but again, that would have been a much longer video. So I hope this is a great stepping stone into other explanations, so please let me know what you would want to know more about. Here is ok and on YT.
@BillAnt4 ай бұрын
At 6:35 VPN companies be like "Trust me bro, we're not logging anything!" Riiiiiiight! lol So basically an SPN is a channel aggregator breaking down the packets into smaller bits through different servers, then reassembling it at the user's device.
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
@@BillAnt not sure how you interpret channel aggregator in this case. With SPN your internet connection that typically would originate from your PC is broken down and resembled at both ends of SPN, Your PC and the exit node. With a VPN the connection ordinates 100% from your PC and is only piped through the VPN, which is why they have to be concerned about leaking and such - when a packet "leaks" from the pipe it is still a 100% valid connection.
@James_m74 ай бұрын
My VPN can't connect to internet when using Portmaster, it says DNS error ... Do I have to add my VPN domain as an exception into the Portmaster DNS setting somewhere, if so, how and what exactly do I have to do? thx
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
depending on the VPN client there are different settings you need to change. you can find guides here: wiki.safing.io/ there is also an extended one for proton VPN just use the search bar
@Jesse321425 ай бұрын
Try Nobara Linux maybe for some Fedora~Nvidia gaming
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
Yes I used to run nobara, but when he made the switch to plasma my whole desktop flickered and was unusable... I might look into it again
@Jesse321424 ай бұрын
@@SafingIO oh I see, hopefully you can find something that works 🙂
@endoftime44345 ай бұрын
Question: Is it possible to manualy target and ad.. like the zapper in Ublock Origin?
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
the functionality you are talking about would have to be implemented in the browser, not on the system level. The ad should not show up if it is served though an ad vendor. But sometimes you still see the empty box, this is due to Portmaster not interacting with the web page but only the network traffic. we will need a browser extension to accomplish that, which might happen in the future.
@enviromoment5 ай бұрын
This program looks good but in practice it is useless. I need to have a clear message that a program wants to connect to the internet. In this window there should be an option to remember setting permanently for the whole program, otherwise I get 1000 requests for every firefox connection to the Internet. To grant it total access I have to open options and only set allow there. Pointless. No one will want to do such a job, even though the program is beautiful and has a lot of options. Even the biggest computer whizzes will eventually get discouraged when they are forced to set settings for the program every time a new program requests Internet access.
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
you changed the setting from default allow to prompt. If you are using Portmaster in prompt for all apps that is what you are in for, but what we recommend doing instead is going in and allowing the apps you trust, blocking the apps you don't and prompt only the few you actually want to prompt like this. For browsers there are other options built into the browser we recommend using, things like µMatrix I hope the guides help you to setup Portmaster in the way that works best for you, if you found the defaults confusing, let me know
@chillpill73485 ай бұрын
How to enable local (Lan) connections? Allow button is disabled there..
@Flat_Enclosed_Earth5 ай бұрын
Distorted and blurred text in UI on nvidia GPU systems. It's a shame that this issue has not been fixed yet. Not sure about AMD gpus.
@bobrinho5 ай бұрын
Well I tried Portmaster and is really useful, sadly it seems it lacks some more control over the "Force Block Incoming Connections" bypass, I have AgentDVR running withc uses WebRTC and Portmaster simply blocks access to it and I have no way to enable it. There should be a simple Override to the "Force Block Incoming Connections", for example, simply allow all incoming connections to a specific port or port range. If there is this option I can't find it.
@SafingIO4 ай бұрын
Hey, I am a bit confused, where in the video did I loose you? the process is as simple as disabling FB incoming connections, finding the connection and then setting up the rules in simple steps... If I better understand what you did not understand, I can improve for the future :D
@jonnycrono86945 ай бұрын
Awesome people. Awesome program. Now let's do our part guys. Donate if you can but at least, raise awareness about this masterpiece of a firewall. The more people learn about this tool, the stronger it will become.
@SafingIO5 ай бұрын
Thank you for your support!
@AmerBakeer5 ай бұрын
Amazing!
@SafingIO5 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@AmerBakeer5 ай бұрын
Dear Raphael & the fantastic Safing development team, Thank you for this amazing product. I finally found the precise control I needed for all my apps. I was stuck with Comodo Firewall for 8 years, but now I have found the best alternative in every way. I am thrilled with the level of control available (especially when it comes to controlling outgoing connections). I will soon subscribe to the Plus plan. Please continue the excellent work. Thank you again.