when you think of maneuver warfare, think of this static trap....
@samuelkelley54257 сағат бұрын
Cmon bird man. Surely some part of you believes they'll at least try to pry it open.
@persistentwind7 сағат бұрын
You made John Boyd sad.
@Lord_Baphomet_7 сағат бұрын
I legit thought he was gonna do a demonstration on how to set small game traps
@bbearc35527 сағат бұрын
Bluuuuuuuuuuuu
@VincentM-w5t7 сағат бұрын
Yeah guys lost there feet for life... Columbus used this tactic.
@bryonslatten31477 сағат бұрын
A trap, like drawing the US military into a 20 year $7T futile war in the mountains of Afghanistan?
@2.40s27 сағат бұрын
Could a combat knife pry open the trap?
@Kashikoi_Magicarp7 сағат бұрын
I wish i could hear what he was saying over that obnoxious music
@joelob52258 сағат бұрын
this is from before poland lol. im in this vid lol
@davidwilliams59308 сағат бұрын
Assault through never set still. Then the shock is transferred to the opposing force.
@SignTracker548 сағат бұрын
👍
@Mihais812 күн бұрын
Fun fact.In Korea,one big issue was that modern US ARMY was roadbound.NORK divisions were big on infantry(light infantry does not exist) and they kept using the rugged terrain to infiltrate Allied formations. Viet Cong sappers crawled under the nose of sentries,so slow they weren't detected,until they reached what was valuable inside a FOB Likewise,these days,the most successful attacks on both sides in Ukraine involve very small units avoiding the multitude of sensors.Very few if any attacks involving anything larger than a PLT met success. So if anything,maneuvering in the physical domain of war now and in the future means the tactical level,at the very lowest level,down to individual. Setting an attritionist engagement,even something as a Company attack is likely to end badly against an enemy with enough sensors and indirect fires.
@ratiounkn32104 күн бұрын
So being sneaky and underhanded is better when you want to kill someone for their their stuff.
@mryan20107 күн бұрын
Thank you. Great way to contrast the difference between the two.
@technovikingnik7 күн бұрын
Maneuver is awesome but it needs a lot of planning and preemptive moves, setups, and a lot of well informed decisions. David vs Goliath is not good example because it is more like technological advance/tactic advantage on low level.
@cascaderifles817 күн бұрын
Speed, preemption, fighting asymmetrically, It’s has it all I’d say. What would be a better example? Appreciate your opinion on the matter.
@technovikingnik7 күн бұрын
@cascaderifles81 I apologize for sounding full of self and rude, I wasnt criticizing. I was just saying that it asks for much more knowledge and effort, a lot more preparation is need for maneuverism, and its kind of state of mind to think and fight unconventionally/out of the box. Russians and hence all Eastern countries have such non inventive conduct. The society and goverment doesnt allow for thinking out of the box(freedom of thought) . Russians are waging wars in that way since ever, just brute forcing, they are imperial state, hence only emperor has right to say his opinion. Your channel is awesome and I am grateful for chance to learn.
@cascaderifles817 күн бұрын
Not at all. I appreciate the feedback. Really great insight. Yes Fighting using a maneuver warfare style is hard and frankly it is scares folks. To treat fear we try to prescribe a good dose of control. Richard Simpkin calls those people “Addicts of Attrition”. The other way is “Mastering Maneuver” by being willing to “ risk it all to win it all”. Your example of Russia is spot on. Thank you for your insights. We love talking and debating this way of thinking.
@Mihais815 күн бұрын
@@technovikingnik One nuance is that,at least in some eras,the Russians/Soviets valued flexibility and innovation,but is mostly at operational level.The tactical level is all preset,with repetitions,nomograms and just ''go there,do that,the boss knows best''.Another nuance is that,context depending,their way of planning things may be faster.A third may be that even the most maneuverist force may be at some point be put in a situation where attrition is inevitable.The example of Iwo Jima is spot on and it may repeat itself in the era of robots.On Iwo Jima you had fanatical Japanese that no amount of psychological pressure could compel to give up.Robotic systems of course don't give up. So,which approach,at what level,at what time and place works best I think is situational.And that's the beauty of the job.
@technovikingnik5 күн бұрын
@@Mihais81 You have put it much better than me. Thanks :)
@endhimrightly34088 күн бұрын
3:00
@BrendanHeyUSA18 күн бұрын
People aren’t built for this. They can’t hack it.
@G.I.JeffsWorkbench25 күн бұрын
Great advice. And don’t even think about recycling. You shouldn’t even consider this option.
@mryan2010Ай бұрын
Really nice clean exposition of a simple and subtle concept. Great examples.
@ChloeBroylesАй бұрын
wow so interesting. never thought of it like that before. this is my new favorite video. thanks for explaining and posting. your such a slay king
@BlueRazzleDazzleАй бұрын
Do they let weak swimmers wear a life jacket for the water events?
@colefields5902Ай бұрын
Ours made a bigger hole so yeah.
@GhostofSash1m1Ай бұрын
Thank you for making these! Coming in very handy
@budsmoker650Ай бұрын
its a crime that this video only has 270 views. thank you to you gentlemen for taking the time out of your day to expand the pool of knowledge we would all be wise to draw from!
@EdReed-r8nАй бұрын
No one wants to fight for jews.
@Ghost-mg5xzАй бұрын
Good in depth explanation of maneuver and strategy.
@lordflash4312Ай бұрын
Some nice sounding theory….you guys may want to do something about that invasion at our Southern border, or at least go shake the tree at the headshed and wake those traitors and cowards up…
@JGodrАй бұрын
Great content as always!
@cascaderifles81Ай бұрын
Appreciate it!
@mryan2010Ай бұрын
Really nice.
@cascaderifles81Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@leifwywadis1803Ай бұрын
Lessons learned on Chode hill would have received more views😊 Great to see these and hear lessons learned Winning deceives,losing educates
@vickiheath6133Ай бұрын
I’d say that that’s a pretty humble soldier
@Wormhole7982 ай бұрын
This is basically fire and manuver and command and control with different words. different words
@teddycadle33872 ай бұрын
Embrace the suck. Never say quit. Worked for me.
@dougtompkins1002 ай бұрын
Your what legends are made of . Ha ha
@sporeken2 ай бұрын
Are these mercenaries?
@RS-jh2kl2 ай бұрын
Great commentary Cascade Rifles 👏
@vickiheath61332 ай бұрын
I’m thankful for all those soldiers. It makes me so sad to see when they get hit. I can tell the struggle is real.
@dus7772 ай бұрын
Brilliant. thank you.
@MadDSon3003 ай бұрын
this was amazing.
@markinaction13 ай бұрын
For the deer hunters out there. It’s literally the same thing you look for on a map minus the roads.
@nmelkhunter13 ай бұрын
We dig small hole, put in explosive and make big hole after boom. That sums up the video. In all seriousness, 12B’s are pretty alright.
@pingupower353 ай бұрын
16:30 - Battle of Solferino 1859 (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Solferino)
@martinremes99543 ай бұрын
One of the most vivid explanations I ever seen...inspirational.
@sahhaf12343 ай бұрын
More terrain related videos would be fine. This one was too summary... For example, some of the key terrains the presenter indicated are too exposed, and it would be hard to supply/extract troops from there. Some other positions are not mutually supporting. One more important thing that must be considered is the use of hollows/ravines/backslopes in the defence. This must also be covered.
@martinbowman19933 ай бұрын
In COIN the key terrain is the human terrain.
@earlgeorge75733 ай бұрын
thank you for your service and the swim survival test is indeed difficult if you can not swim
@woolywil103 ай бұрын
I miss the smell of C-4
@mryan20103 ай бұрын
Brilliant.
@vickiheath61333 ай бұрын
This is what a true career Army soldier trains for. Go Colonel Broyles. Your passion shows.