Пікірлер
@PiyushMani-dr1hy
@PiyushMani-dr1hy 14 сағат бұрын
Sir, I remember as a Bengali Hindu all our beddings are still made with Shimul Tulo or the silk cotton that you were speaking, Even far in Northern India, Muslims weavers and bedding makers ascertain that only bengalis demand Shimul cotton from them, which they have to bring upon order basis! It helps in keeping pillows and Kantha in a good condition and is different from ordinary cotton!
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 13 сағат бұрын
True Piyush! The mulmul was called as kalinga cotton around 500-300bc as per records, as Gangetic Muslin when romans picked it up during 26bc-100ad as per Roman records and more recently as dhakha mulmul. My sense is it was probably the odissa-Bengal region (lower range of Ganges and thereabouts) where it originated. Bengal muslin too was famous over the last 2000 years. Maybe it was a slightly lower grade of the same cloth since Dhaka muslin had many grades. There are Tamil sangam poets who have written poetry about how Tamil ports used to wait anxiously for ships coming from Bengal/kalinga carrying India’s finest cotton from these two regions.so why would modern day Bengalis not ask for it with 2500 years of use!!😀
@PiyushMani-dr1hy
@PiyushMani-dr1hy 11 сағат бұрын
@kaafirnama yes sir you your vedios and knowledge are actually very inspiring sir! Thank you for your IIT and Dhaka Muslin Vedio, now I have something better to reclaim from pseudo Intellectuals!
@sauravsarkar8522
@sauravsarkar8522 16 сағат бұрын
It is said to kill the competition and destroy Muslin, the British rulers cut the thumbs of the Muslin weavers
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 14 сағат бұрын
Hi Saurav, I put up the vlog to dispel the Muslim weaver myth floated with the story that you mentioned. (Nothing against Muslim weavers per se.) I have heard and read the story since my childhood though it has no basis in history. The story claims that the weavers thumbs were cut off immediately after the 1857 uprising. But dhakha muslin continued to be exported as usual to Britain till at least the 1870s. After which the European textile industry pushed British govt to kill the fabric through tariffs and similar means. More on that some other day. The Dhakha Muslim was exhibited in the two great exhibitions conducted in Britain in 1851 and 1862 (the first ever global exhibitions. Read about them in Wikipedia or British official websites on the two events.) The Dhakha Muslin was exhibited in both. The details I quote are based on British research as also independent research of those times. These details were put up with the diagrams I have put in the vlog as explanatory placards during the exhibition. If you are interested in the subject, please do read the two sources I have listed on the subject. They have explained the fabric more elaborately than what I have done in a short video. As also how the European textile industry was distraught at the prospect of competing with dhakha muslin.
@sauravsarkar8522
@sauravsarkar8522 13 сағат бұрын
@kaafirnama Hi, l wrote Muslin weavers....not Muslim. I meant the weavers of famous Muslin Saris....thanks for your input anyway
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 13 сағат бұрын
Hi Saurav..apologies! I am getting along in age😀 and using the phone to type answers seems to be a practice that I should best avoid henceforth. Rest of what I stated does hold true. Thanks for pointing out my mistake.
@ritamde8009
@ritamde8009 23 сағат бұрын
After Jaipur dialogs and Sham Sharma show, I've found another gem of indic wing
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 21 сағат бұрын
Thank you very much🙏
@RamMandir-h2s
@RamMandir-h2s Күн бұрын
channel ka naam hi ghatya hain
@priyamvadar3583
@priyamvadar3583 Күн бұрын
Very informative in tracing the history of Dhaka Muslin
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama Күн бұрын
Thanks!🙏
@kaziahsan_habib
@kaziahsan_habib 2 күн бұрын
Indians... Will do Hindu Muslim on literally everything....
@ganashok9817
@ganashok9817 2 ай бұрын
Why Muslims could not start Joint family businesses?
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 2 ай бұрын
Hi please do watch the next episodes in the series. They are already up. The question has been answered.
@bigfortune5325
@bigfortune5325 2 ай бұрын
Sound effects are good keep up sir
@travelsphere7402
@travelsphere7402 2 ай бұрын
I was wrong about my understanding of this channel. You are doing great work. I will share this channel with others.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 2 ай бұрын
Thanks! 🙏 greatly appreciated.
@gk021176
@gk021176 2 ай бұрын
The social structure of muslims community is designed only for tactical war and looting. Nothing behind that. This is largely evident with the situations in muslim countries.
@travelsphere7402
@travelsphere7402 2 ай бұрын
During license raj, and before LPG Hindus got favoritism and support from Govt organizations and officers. Now in the open competition where most startups are failing, people will understand who real enterpruneours are.....
@rajeshshetty3342
@rajeshshetty3342 2 ай бұрын
I am disgusted by your thinking.
@dustydrives
@dustydrives 2 ай бұрын
It seems you have not watched the video and generally commented. This guy is producing research from before 1947 on the history of why Muslim businessmen did not do well. It includes views by sir Syed ahmed khan etc.
@travelsphere7402
@travelsphere7402 2 ай бұрын
@@dustydrives Before 1947 Parsis and Hindus got business from British, by pleasing and boot licking them. They supported British in their occupation and exploitation of natural resources of India.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 2 ай бұрын
Some Parsis indeed did work closely with the British on opium trade. But not all did. And no Hindu or Jain entrepreneur did. Read detailed research by global and Indian researchers on the subject from the enclosed link on why Hindus and Jains succeeded vs Muslims. And why Muslims did not do well beyond trading enterprises anywhere in the Middle East too. Also what about 1500-1800 when Hindus and Jains dominated business. There were no British then. You will shortly get their stories too on this channel. Also why Khojas, Bohras and Memons continued to dominate business vs other Muslims despite being 0.4 percent of Muslim population. Why other Muslims failed? Sorry this channel is for serious conversation on such topics and not ignorant face buried in the sand type people who make sweeping generalisations.
@Haaatdfffvvvhhhteedddhj
@Haaatdfffvvvhhhteedddhj 2 ай бұрын
​@@kaafirnama The Ambani family put all their efforts to prevent a book from publishing and those who know why , they know 😂
@somnathbose7455
@somnathbose7455 2 ай бұрын
I am loving the editing ..... suggestion: just to add to the authenticity , please mention the book and page numbers and references .. so that butt hurt deniers don't come up with the 'trust me bro' excuse
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 2 ай бұрын
Thanks Somnath! Indeed very valid suggestion. I usually include a Google Sheet link to all content sources (and any image credits if required) in the video description. But put it back due to time pressure for last two videos. Have done so now. I don't include page numbers though....but will try to do so in the future. Thanks for your encouraging words🙏Please do look up other videos on the channel.
@somnathbose7455
@somnathbose7455 2 ай бұрын
@@kaafirnama 👍
@assassincreed1238
@assassincreed1238 3 ай бұрын
Sikhs and Hindus basically owned west Punjab while they had to leave everything Muslims in Uttar Pradesh bihar got to keep their big feudal land holdimhs
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Correct! Actually even going up to Peshawar. part of Muslim families stayed behind in UP and the other part migrated to Pakistan, having the best of both worlds. But to be fair, many ordinary Muslims who migrated lost their belongings in India.....but they were given the property of Hindus who had left under the Enemy Property Act. India too had the same act but Gandhi resisted/protested when the properties of Muslims who left India was being handed over to Hindu refugees.
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for info Sir interesting... It should also be noted that Balochistan and NWFP were not given the status of the governor's province until very late.. And they had tribal society... Ralph Griffith was first governor of NWFP in 1932 and even Legislative Council was established there very late and so were political parties.. It also hindered economic development. Chelmsford reforms of 1919 were neglected in these provinces.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment. Indeed so. More interestingly, the education levels of Muslims in these provinces was actually higher than most other provinces.. more on that in a later episode.
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything 3 ай бұрын
​@@kaafirnamaYes Chelmsford reforms of 1919 were neglected in these provinces.
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything 3 ай бұрын
Sir Aga Khan had even proposed to make Arabic as state language of Pakistan.. Jinnah at least should be admired for choosing Indian language like Urdu as state language. Otherwise Pakistan may have been a member of Arab League by now.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
True…you are right on the first part. As regards Arab league… ask any Arab what Arabs call subcontinent Muslims(you can look it on google too)…and if they consider them to be of Arab descent?!
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything 3 ай бұрын
@@kaafirnama Somalians and Morrocans are not Arabs.. but as they speak Arabic they are members of Arab League.. Same would have happened to Pakistan. Arab League is based on linguistic grounds not ethnic.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Correction - Moroccans are largely Arabs (and some Berbers). Somalis speak Somali… very few Somalis speak Arabic. Even today- it was less 50 years back. Arab league was a Muslim grouping among others that came up post 1945… and had little to no political significance or solidarity. All Arab league nations including the biggest Arab country - Egypt - have been thrown out of the league from time to time. The Saudi run OIC was relatively powerful since it was backed by Saudi oil revenues..Pakistan could not do much with OIC.. what would they have done with Arab league?
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything 3 ай бұрын
@@kaafirnama yes it is also true
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything 3 ай бұрын
Although it's true Mughals didn't focused that much on navy like Europeans but that's also fact that Portuguese were not able to colonize India due to Mughals like they colonized Brazil... Portuguese also had missionary zeal to convert others to Christianity unlike British.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
You are correct on the Portuguese conversion part… it was brutal..I have closely studied Goan history (descend from that state)…only small point I want to add is Mughals did no such thing… they never fought against any colonial power. Portuguese and French lost to the British on the Indian Ocean…. A control that the Anglo Saxons continue to maintain with the US navy. The handover officially happened around 1950 when the British went bankrupt post the Second World War..
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything
@KnowledgeConcerningEverything 3 ай бұрын
Pakistan is military controlled state but Mughal empire was not... Only peope who use Mirza, Baig, Mughal as their surname in Indian subcontinent have Mughal ancestry.. E.g. Mirza Ghalib, Sania Mirza etc
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
All states in the past were military controlled too… Pakistan is run by an elite that comprises the Army at the helm. And the army privately owns enterprises like the Mughals did despite living off the state treasury like the Mughals did. Plus all other theories of the decline of the Mughals (have done a separate episode) corresponds to the scenario in Pakistan
@Yoga.Nindra
@Yoga.Nindra 3 ай бұрын
I have many references of history .. if you want i can send you
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Sure. Please write into kaafirnama at gmail.com
@Fan_edit123
@Fan_edit123 3 ай бұрын
Here i Gathered some information from our Turkic Sources it clearly says that apart from well known turkic tribes like Ogüz, Goktürks, Qajars, Kumyuks, Uyghurs and others like Kazaks, Turkmens, azeris, uzbeks there is list of lost turkic tribe what i mean by lost turkic tribes according to sources some of turkic tribes assimilated in local society of region they settled in. These Lost Tribes are Baburlar Mogolar Karluklar Gucarlar=Gujar Raçputlar Rajput Jatlar=Jat So we need reunifaction of lost Turkic Tribes
@MyGV8369
@MyGV8369 3 ай бұрын
very good initiative.. but channel hindi may hota to jyada jaldi grow krta
@MyGV8369
@MyGV8369 3 ай бұрын
i could understand English but most of listener not.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
बिल्कुल सही कहा आपने!! हिंदी चैनल दिसंबर ६ को लॉंच होगा। 🙏 आपके प्रोत्साहन के लिए धन्यवाद!
@sidheart7447
@sidheart7447 3 ай бұрын
Kaafi₹ , r = ₹ hona chahiye 😅
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Sid you are very creative!! I am doing a series on currency a few weeks down. Will use your thought and give you a shoutout.
@ashish_vanya
@ashish_vanya 3 ай бұрын
Great sir
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Thanks Ashish
@Arjakh-ly3io
@Arjakh-ly3io 3 ай бұрын
Chcha bjp new joining liye hai kya
@mohnishnayak2672
@mohnishnayak2672 10 күн бұрын
Kuch nahi ata toh kuch bhi mat bol, Britishers ne iit banaya tha nehru ne nahi
@sunilmandavkar7270
@sunilmandavkar7270 3 ай бұрын
Good that you also shown meaning of some compelx English words
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Thanks Sunil🙏
@sunilmandavkar7270
@sunilmandavkar7270 3 ай бұрын
जय भारत
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
जय भारत! 🙏
@farkalittherock6850
@farkalittherock6850 3 ай бұрын
AFTER SOME TIME THEY WILL CLAIM MUGHAL WERE NOT CAME TO INDIA, IT IS JUST RUMOUR SPREAD BY LIBERALS AND COMMUNIST 😂😂
@farkalittherock6850
@farkalittherock6850 3 ай бұрын
Source - trust me bro 😂😂😂
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Information sources for this video are mentioned in the link in the description. They are history papers taught at the Aligarh Muslim Univ etc, presented at the Indian History Congress and other global history forums. The authenticity of their information can be checked with any history prof at AMU, JNU or any other eminent university of choice. The history papers give detailed references to Mughal court documents and other sources from the period that are also available in the public domain.
@Batman-gs9sw
@Batman-gs9sw 3 ай бұрын
@stormshadow5283
@stormshadow5283 3 ай бұрын
How can you say this sir? Nehru was present during sagar manthan 😂
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
@@stormshadow5283 😂
@stormshadow5283
@stormshadow5283 3 ай бұрын
Commented for the algo
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
@@stormshadow5283 🙏
@stormshadow5283
@stormshadow5283 3 ай бұрын
Brilliant and objective oriented video. Love the humour and brevity. Mark my words, this channel will blow up soon! Subscribed and commented for the algorithm.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
@@stormshadow5283 thank you very much. Greatly appreciate🙏
@youtubeviral66
@youtubeviral66 3 ай бұрын
Sar yiu joking or telling reality ? Nice sarcastic vidro😂
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Information is as real as it can get. All based on research into Mughals and presented as research papers by eminent historians at AMU, Indian History Congress etc. Sarcastic-yes indeed! But these similarities are real. Watch out for next two series in the series!
@sunilmane2648
@sunilmane2648 3 ай бұрын
Surprised😱
@srajanchouhan5215
@srajanchouhan5215 3 ай бұрын
Surprised that you have so little followers
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
@@srajanchouhan5215 🙏 thanks! Need your support and encouragement. Started only a month back.
@NaveenJawalagi
@NaveenJawalagi 3 ай бұрын
Good going uncle 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 3 ай бұрын
Thanks Naveen!
@mojorisin08
@mojorisin08 4 ай бұрын
Manmohan was the finance Minister when liberalisation was mooted. It was Subramanian Swamy Jee who was behind Narasimha Rao Jee who was instrumental in the implementation of Free Market economy for India instead of Socialist Protectionism.
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 4 ай бұрын
@@mojorisin08 true. More on that in a later episode maybe … this one is solely on how economies of Pakistan and India compared on some aspects in 1947 and just before partition. (I covered the liberalisation program in 1992-93 as a journalist with the Economic Times and subsequently with the Business Standard)
@shenoyn
@shenoyn 4 ай бұрын
Nice, Ajay!
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 4 ай бұрын
@@shenoyn thanks!🙏
@anupagarwal8347
@anupagarwal8347 4 ай бұрын
Waiting
@Rohit1993-s4j
@Rohit1993-s4j 4 ай бұрын
Nice sir
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 4 ай бұрын
Thanks Rohit!
@sshabeerali989
@sshabeerali989 4 ай бұрын
Battery sasura
@AMITAPAI-o4f
@AMITAPAI-o4f 4 ай бұрын
Love the short bursts of interesting facts woven into the larger context!
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 4 ай бұрын
Thanks 🙏
@Satanreincarnation-zg6sl
@Satanreincarnation-zg6sl 4 ай бұрын
🙏🏼!!
@AMITAPAI-o4f
@AMITAPAI-o4f 5 ай бұрын
Punchy, educational videos- with an objective, evidence- based balanced view on economic history of India!! Keep it coming, @Kaafirnama!!👌👍
@kaafirnama
@kaafirnama 5 ай бұрын
Thanks a ton
@AMITAPAI-o4f
@AMITAPAI-o4f 5 ай бұрын
Joining this journey!! Very interesting topic.❤