I have been battling the local APD and unprovoked nuisance. Lol but honestly I've been riding my Quad all over and (over landing) where ever that land may be.😂 Anyways twice now I've been riding off the road way, pretty much field when APD officer initiated contact with lights and sirens. I know better than run for the (flight) rules and fact's I stop and articulate judgement to fuck off 😂

Thank you for your honesty breakdown of Terry V Ohio. I agree with the importance of good faith effort under this standard. And reprehensible value of application and addressing the issue of bad faith actors who are putting this ability at risk; by guy's like me... Lol jk 😂

Cops all need that ID like a crackhead needs that next rock. Police asking for ID absent a crime is offensive and should be grounds to sue them Or get them Fired. Stop being effing nazis

Love these videos. They are extremely helpful. Thank you!

Terry V Ohio & Pennsylvania V Mimms are the two cases that lead to Govt overreach! I wish they were stricken from case law. These cases infringe on the citizens rights in favor of a cops BS suspicion

kzbin.info/www/bejne/q5mlkHp3lrV4sJYsi=6u3iqF9HMxFzkwPO

If you're on a bike stop and a dog alerts on a backpack, you need a warrant for the backpack if you have no other PC than the dog sniff. - I learned this from you Anthony, so I feel this needed to be clarified. I dropped a link for one of your older videos in the comment section on this.

That's funny 😂 the cleaning Lady

Mimms requires RAS that occupants are armed AND dangerous, Counselor.

Just eh careful with relying on the system and what it tells you if the arrestee has some other official document proving that the system is incorrect. There is a second circuit case (I forget the citation) where a man was pulled over and the system showed his license had been suspended (I think in CT). The man produced a letter from the DMV showing his license was reinvoked and that he paid outstanding fines. The officer refused to look at the official document and arrested the man anyway. He successfully sued claiming the “officer was not free to ignore plainly exculpatory evidence” (Kuehl v Burtis) meaning if the officer claimed to rely on DMV databases they would also need to reasonably consider official DMV documents and just relying on the system wasn’t good faith. Not sure if this is applicable in warrants because I don’t think a person can get a document showing his warrant was rescinded but it highlights the totality of the evidence and not to blindly rely on systems if there is other physical exculpatory evidence.

If a state doesn’t recognize the good faith exception can it be invoked for qualified immunity in Federal Court in that circuit?

Not just no but hell no. It’s vandalism and prior restraint.

Nowadays officers can get warrants online so they can stay on scene

You're a rockstar in you own domain

Burst through my door without a knock and announce and I am going to assume home invasion and likely at least two of us will suffer serious wounds

Good answer. Knocking & waiting a little bit can also go a long way in preventing excessive force complaint. (Pro note: cover all exits.)

Knocked it out of the park again! Thank you for posting the webinars and I hope you continue to post them. Thanks!

In the case of DUI, how would a cop articulate exigency? Destruction of evidence using elapsed time?

When in doubt, any exceptions should be viewed in the light most favorable to the citizen. The constitution does not limit citizens, it limits the government and ALL entities representing the government.

Thanks for your knowledge and understanding of what is Law. You're the Best source factual basis legal advice available to agent's period

Invaluable information. Thank you for everything y'all do!

This would be really hard to enact in a real situation. If the cop thinks they need ID they're likely to arrest you due to ignorance and you'll need to deal with it in court. Even a sergeant may not even know this rule. It's not worth the trouble. I would try and say yeah but since being asked to leave and complying isn't a crime I don't need to identify bc there is no RAS. If they still disagree I would just show ID unfortunately for expediency.

What was the case law for the k9 stop hand over?

I enjoy your channel and have learned much from as to my rights as a citizen, however where I am going, where I am coming from for a minor traffic infraction is none of any cops business

You use military vech-

What was the RAS?!?!?! No Pretext stop. The cop is violating the 4th amendment.

Can an officer trespass you from a property if u already left the scene and they find u somewhere else.

No because the license plate itself doesn't belong to the person it's "registered" to. The plate and stickers basically say it's ok for that vehicle to be on the road, the plate itself belongs to the state which is why of you fail to insure your vehicle, they can suspend or revoke it.

If you can take a phone to search later under a warrant, you can take a car. That’s how I see it.

Wait a second / if you have him in handcuffs and in the back on your car at that point why isn’t it an arrest?

How about when parked behind a low fence, sufficient to block the plate and leave only one of many make/model/color combos?

I feel like the first 2 questions are debatable. The seizer of private property like towing a car for probable cause? If you had probable cause why would you need a warrant. To act surety and protection of civilians private property takes away from the officers duty to serve and protect the public interest. This is police for profit and abused far too often for Being responsible officers of public service. That's bad faith advice my boy's

If you make a traffic stop and have PC to search the vehicle then why would you need a search warrant? The automobile exception should apply or did i miss something? Also, here we cannot assist medical on a doctors order to commit. We have a mental health individual who we call and he only talks to the police and he can give a verbal order for the individual to go. We went through this and a deputy had his ear bitten off by the patient. We will only force through mental health or probate order.

Good luck Zach

My gate and fence signs which are posted every 15'-20' clearly state, WARNING!! NO LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTRY WITHOUT A VALID WARRANT OR NOT IN PURSUIT! NO EXCEPTIONS! I aim for it to be very clear to everyone, more importantly law enforcement and judges, of my expressed intent to not be harrassed or questioned by law enforcement for any reason what-so-ever without a lawful warrant being served in my hand first. I would not answer the door at any rate, but I do not want to be surprised by the presence of cops. Especially while I am outside of my home on my property because I am always armed and ready to defend myself and my property.

Thanks for the information

Why should the police have more constitutional rights than a law-abiding citizen??? If you try and say training, we both know that's bulls**t. Many, police officers only shoot their firearm once or twice a year to keep their qualifications. And that's only because they have to! Statistics show that police are more likely to commit a crime than a legally armed citizen with a carry permit. Law enforcement tramples all over civilian gun rights all the time. I sure as hell don't give two Shits about your carry rights being limited. Welcome to the club! The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun. The only question is, how long before the bad guy with a gun gets challenged by a good guy with a gun! With an armed population, it is instantly. With an unarmed population, it's whenever the government can get there! Then you may have to wait another hour before they even start to do anything to help you (See Uvalde Texas)! Crime statistics show that many more criminals are killed or wounded each year by armed citizens than by the police; this proves that owning a gun is possibly the most effective way to protect oneself from crime. Protection of self, loved ones, one's home, and community is the root of American self-reliance and our long tradition of gun ownership.

I agree that circumstances dictate. 40300.5(e) CVC - The person may destroy or conceal evidence of the crime unless immediately arrested.

Too many cops forget they are law enforcement NOT the law.

How about going to a wellbeing check call where the neighbors haven't seen their elderly neighbor 5 days, vehicle in the driveway, mailbox full, etc.... Are we entering the house to check on the elderly persons under emergency aid or community care taking? No crime/suspicious activity reported.

In missouri, if a officer gets a call from dispatch about a possible misdemeanor hit and run. Can an officer go to the suspects house and start searching a vehicle for evidence of the crime if the vehicle is located in the driveway of suspects back yard without a warrant?

Would love to hear your response about the reports of the Las Vegas hotel raiding guest rooms at the DEFCON it security concention

Thank you sir!

Do you mean a police impound lot or the wrecker service lot? Should the vehicle be under control of the police department until it is searched?

ARE the people s|av3s and subject to the "authority" of a man wearing a disguise a badge and prominently displaying a deadly weapon (armed robbery)?

What if you respond to a noise complaint and conduct a knock and talk on the yellow zone of the curtilage which is the front door. You tell them to turn it down and they say no and go back inside. You cant enter the home because you dont have a warrant or exigency. You cant cite them because they went inside. What are your options.

Thanks, this is awesome

If the person is on private property then this is fine. It’s different if on a public sidewalk. The police cannot make you “move along” if you’re panhandling in front of a business. The Supreme Court ruled that panhandling is protected by the 1st Amendment saying that it is asking for a charitable donation. The police asking a business to trespass someone from the property is just a power move driven by ego.

Great video Anthony! One question on drones. Does a citizen have the right to shoot down a low flying drone directly over their airspace? I think I know the answer but with ownership of the airspace above a home not being concrete I was curious on your thoughts. For context, the drone is not law enforcement. I’m talking more about a nosey neighbor flying a drone over their neighbors land/house.

Finally a pithy explanation without a bunch of lawyerese word vomit. Citizens need to learn what can or can't be done and why regarding their rights to defend themselves against agents of the state especially those who believe a citizen exercising their rights is somehow an affront, a personal challenge or some type of hostility. This is why I watch your channel and others. It's good citizen training.