@@Justyn_Lim Not sure, probably 144+ all the time, but I’ll upload a video soon at max settings.
@HeartOfAdel4 күн бұрын
Still mostly gpu bound at 1080p, impressive stuff. I think 3080 at 1440P + DLSSQ is perfect for this cpu
@yezivid4 күн бұрын
Holds up waaay better than I expected. Tried Space Marine 2 yesterday, can hold around ~70-80FPS even with huge hordes on screen, that’s also pretty respectable. I would have gave up memory tuning without your help, big ty from here too. 🫡
@Maxoverpower7 күн бұрын
Thanks, nicely done.
@J_ILd9 күн бұрын
2070s i7 6900k good?
@yezivid9 күн бұрын
Would say it's fine, especially if you're only aiming for ~60FPS.
@J_ILd8 күн бұрын
I want to play Fortnite, Valorant, Warzone, Overwatch. I want good frames, fps 180+.
@J_ILd8 күн бұрын
@@yezivid What should I buy 1660ti with 12400f or 2070s with i7 6900k
@yezivid8 күн бұрын
@@J_ILd If you only play competitive games, get the 12400F and 1660 Ti, then upgrade your GPU later. The Ryzen 5 5600 is also a good option, and you can upgrade to a 5700X3D for cheap later. The 6900K is a dead end, and it won’t get you really high frames, especially without overclock and decent memory.
@Madoka_S210 күн бұрын
Are those speakers at maximum volume?
@yezivid10 күн бұрын
Nah, I'd never max out my speakers. Can't remember exactly, probably was around ~65-75%.
@KonjikiNoYami66613 күн бұрын
what number should i use for FPS games?
@yezivid12 күн бұрын
I would just stick to level 3, that worked out for me pretty well, even at variable refresh rate.
@leandrovargas61520 күн бұрын
1080p with rtx 4080 wtf. Pretty obvius the difference. 1440p minimum.
@yezivid20 күн бұрын
@@leandrovargas615 That would be a GPU benchmark. You missed the point entirely.
@rdocАй бұрын
I think it's interesting that I am getting almost the same framerate, maybe a bit higher with the same settings using the same card. The only difference is I am running a I5 12600k. So much for that fancy expensive AMD CPU you are running. don't need it.
@yezivid27 күн бұрын
That's just how things work. If you're playing at a high resolution, with high graphics settings, it's usually the GPU that matters the most. The vast majority of gamers definitely don't need a 7800X3D like CPU. Also, the 12600K is a pretty decent chip for gaming, especially when paired with some high frequency/low latency DDR5 memory.
@Dr.PurpulaАй бұрын
Nehéz volt de sikerült….
@leonidspasskij926Ай бұрын
How did u run it ? My drivers dosent support it and my videocard dosent support new drivers also
@4bodeyt646Ай бұрын
What the difference in warzone 2k?
@yezividАй бұрын
Depends on the settings, but probably not that much. The 4080 is already at 65-70% usage with the Ryzen 5 7600, at 1080p DLSS Balanced. So at native 1440p, probably the 4080 will be the bottleneck, even with the Ryzen 5 7600.
@4bodeyt646Ай бұрын
@@yezivid can u pls check it with 7600 on native 2k low settings on rebirth and check the avg fps and 1% this will be life save for me 🙏
@yezividАй бұрын
@@4bodeyt646 I don't have the Ryzen system, nor the 4080 anymore. But I don't think that you should be worried, you'll easily get 144+ FPS, probably even 200+ with a setup like that. Just make sure to pair it with a good 6000 CL30 memory kit, and apply Buildzoid's timings.
@4bodeyt646Ай бұрын
@@yezivid thx men that really so helpful i gonna build 4070ti super w r5 7600 it seen work so much better than 4070super w 7800x3d what ur opinions about that ?
@yezividАй бұрын
@@4bodeyt646 The R5 7600 is plenty enough for any game, especially if you play at 1440p. Definitely get the better GPU, the difference will be much more noticeable - and also, you'll get that extra VRAM, it will come in handy in the newest upcoming games.
@GOPALSINGH-uj2fmАй бұрын
How is the bass in s2000mk3
@yezividАй бұрын
@@GOPALSINGH-uj2fm Have no clue, never tried that one. Tho the S1000MKII was pretty good in that regard for it’s size, guess the S2000 should be at least on pair with that, probably even better.
@GOPALSINGH-uj2fmАй бұрын
Thank you.
@leonewade4980Ай бұрын
teve gargalo?
@yezividАй бұрын
I mean, you can clearly see it on the overlay. GPU was pretty much maxed out all of the time.
@leonewade4980Ай бұрын
@@yezivid aht át
@504TreyАй бұрын
What monitor is this?
@yezividАй бұрын
MateView GT 34
@HecTechYTАй бұрын
Can you test it with the 1080p all low? Or something like competitive mode? Please
@yezividАй бұрын
I don't have that 4060 anymore, tho I think it should be easily capable for at least 200+ FPS at 1080p Low. Game isn't really demanding at low, even the 7600X's iGPU can get around 70-80FPS at 720p low.
@oktofio96902 ай бұрын
you should test side by side in 2k resolution...
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
@@oktofio9690 That would be a GPU test, not a CPU test. The whole point of it is to make the game CPU bound by lowering the render resolution/settings, so you can see how much is the difference between them.
@get-in-2-get-out774Ай бұрын
Yeah, maybe in 4k too... lol only that this is a CPU benchmark/comparison, not a GPU one.
@qwest19952 ай бұрын
What ssd do you have the game installed on?
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
Kingston KC3000
@todayisgood78362 ай бұрын
kzbin.infoX2bqmbSjMZg?si=jH4a93Fj-U1gGhVX
@hquan12 ай бұрын
Something's very strange with my new 4060, I pair it with R5-5600 (and old motherboard B350 with 16gb ram 2667Mhz), with mixed settings I have same fps as yours but the GPU seems not to utilize max 99% of the card. Does my CPU bottleneck the card? Or should I re-test again with all settings set on high-ultra?
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
Are those 16GBs of RAM made out of a 2x8GB kit? 2667MHz is pretty slow, you're definitely losing some performance compared something like a 3600MHz CL16 kit, so I'm pretty sure you're just simply CPU bound with those mixed settings - nothing to worry about, the game can b pretty heavy on the CPU. You could upgrade to some faster memory (tho I'm not sure how well B350 manages high speed memories), or maybe get some undervolt + OC via PBO. However, if you're satisfied with the FPS you're getting currently, just increase some graphical settings to utilize more of the GPU and get some extra visual fidelity.
@hquan12 ай бұрын
@@yezivid Yes, it is 2x8gb. For new ram I will probably try to get a new dual one with 3200Mhz CL16 next month. After testing again, I can reach max GPU utility by setting the game at ultra, but yeah I think mixed settings should be fine since it makes the card run cooler, thanks for the info! Keep up with your benchmarks.
@aaroufit2 ай бұрын
Psu?
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
Full specs in the description.
@mohsensaffar93712 ай бұрын
hello. are you still playing on mateview gt? Are you satisfied with it while gaming ?
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
I've replaced it a few weeks ago with an Odyssey G8 OLED and gave the Mateview GT to my little brother, but I really enjoyed my time with it. It had pretty good motion clarity for a VA panel, never had issues with VRR flicker (unlike the Xiaomi Mi Curved 34), had decent colors and plenty of brightness. Good quality stuff by Huawei.
@mohsensaffar93712 ай бұрын
@@yezivid thank you so much. I want to buy one, still doubt on ghosting. Do you have any problem? and did you play on 144 or 165hz ?
@mohsensaffar93712 ай бұрын
@@yezivid g8 is definitely better of course, however please tell me about how much are the differences.
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
@@mohsensaffar9371 G8 OLED is just another world, with true blacks, awesome HDR performance and pretty much perfect motion clarity, it's like night and day from the Mateview GT, tho it costs like 2 times more. However, OLED still has it's problems with burn-in, ultrawide screens especially could suffer from that if you're watching lot of 16:9 content, with black bars on the sides - just like me lol, that's why I've hooked up a secondary display for basic tasks, I only use my OLED for movies and gaming. Now I can only hope that it will last for at least 3 or 4 years without major issues. Ghosting, or more like black smearing IS a problem with VA, no doubt about that. The Mateview GT still has some black smearing, but with the Overdrive profile set to Level 3, it never really bothered my. Noticeable, but I got used to it in a few days. Nevertheless, IPS still has it's own flaws with the garbage contrast ratio/black levels, and it's definitely more annoying for me than VA's smearing issues. It really just comes down to personal preference - choose your own demons.
@an221952 ай бұрын
Is the bass stronger than in Logitech z623??
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
Definitely not, since the bass in the Z623 is already too pronounced, combine that with the high crossover frequency, and in the end all you get is a muddy mess. The Z623 is nowhere near of a good speaker. However, the S3000 on it's own has plenty of bass, with a decent low-end that bottoms out at around ~38Hz.
@an221952 ай бұрын
Do this speakers have more bass than logitech z623??
@Hasanzu017Ай бұрын
i have z623 also ordered s3000pro. whenever it come i will make test video ))) but after 2 month ) s3000 not sold here in our country. it comes from america )
@45eno2 ай бұрын
Almost exactly what my five AM5 builds have. Two 7600X and Three 7800X3D.
@45eno3 күн бұрын
The 7800X3D is hitting the boost cap but not the 7600X. I now have all in the house builds on AM5 and my AM4 parts are selling quick. Very very cheap to upgrade to AM5. 3x 7800X3D 1x 7700X 3x 7600X 1x 7600 1x 5700X3D
@necdeterhan57582 ай бұрын
how comes i play 80 fps with same card it doesnt drops less than 78. 14900f 64-6400gskill ventus 4080super
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
It has been 3 months since I uploaded this video. The game probably got some optimizations, they also added a toggle for Async Compute, if you disable this it boosts your FPS a bit on 40 series cards. Also, different maps performs quite differently, so for a fair comparison you must test on the same map as I played on.
@hectortiman71512 ай бұрын
Song/Artist pls
@yezivid2 ай бұрын
It's right there, in the description. "Music: Witchouse 40k - BAYONETTA"
@Mabeylater29322 күн бұрын
You call this “music”??
@yezivid22 күн бұрын
@@Mabeylater293 Yes. It is called "music", even if you don't like that particular genre. If you're a grown adult, you shouldn't be surprised that we have different taste. Like, I hate country music. If you like it, well, then enjoy. I don't care. Don't be a prick.
@felixkjelberg30042 ай бұрын
how havy is helldivers 2 again? -yes
@user-dd6gp6cd2v3 ай бұрын
I want to see frame gen on dlss off.
@yezivid3 ай бұрын
Without DLSS it would only run around 30-40FPS, frame-gen is basically useless at this low framerate.
@user-dd6gp6cd2v3 ай бұрын
@@yezivid dlss on graphic blur
@Andrey-cc6qt3 ай бұрын
look like a mobile game but runs like alan wake 2, amazing stuff
@yezivid3 ай бұрын
Technically I don't think that it looks bad, but imo it's just sooo generic, soulless and unappealing. But hey, at least it also runs like crap lmao.
@Defffman3 ай бұрын
70fps?😢 my 1070ti its 55-60fps and 7years old😅😅😅😅😅
@yezivid3 ай бұрын
Well, then you are definitely not playing at native 1080p Ultra, cause even a 1080 Ti can only manage around 65FPS at High preset. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKKvgKyYhtOpsMUsi=1u0x3sbHXwCNawny
@konubi3 ай бұрын
Weird too, I still have an I9 9900K from 2018 with originally an RTX 2080 Super that I replaced with an RTX 4080 Super. However, this test is not very realistic. Maybe I have a gold sample??? but my I9 9900K with a Tdp of 95watts. at stock, at 1.15V-1.2V max, never exceeds 60 watts in games. It does not heat up much and in oc, it can reach 5.1 gz at 1.3V. It is a very good CPU. Unless you play Counter Strike and you want 600 fps and more in 1440P. In 2K, 4k ultra setting, there is very little difference between all these CPUs. If you have at least a 6C/12T CPU like an I7 8700K or a Ryzen 3600+ or better an 8C/16T with at least a Ryzen 3700+ or an I9 9900K, no need to change cpu + mobo+Ram. Change first, the graphics card. I then plan to change the CPU (if I I'm still alive until then) but not before the New Intel Arrow Lake or Ryzen 9000 with DDR5 and PCI Gen 5.0. Otherwise for this test, some say that Hyperthreading (HT) reduces performance in games. Sometimes, it must be deactivated. For information purposes, the next Intel 15th generation CPUs which will now be called Intel Core Ultra 2xx will no longer integrate Hyperthreading (HT). )
@konubi3 ай бұрын
Strange on other tests the i9 9900K is more efficient kzbin.info/www/bejne/fmrKY3SFiKirjJY. I have the impression that concerning the CPU game tests. Lots of tests, leads us into error. in reality, in addition, all these CPUs between 6c/12T and 8C/16T and above there is almost no difference in 1440P, 4K Ultra. Don't forget that all these games are coded using the PS5 CPU which is mini Ryzen 8c/16T. (equivalent to a ryzen 1800x because only 16 mb of cache)
@yeshwantkethineni36943 ай бұрын
Could you test low core count/disabled cores (3-5?), maybe in CP2077 at Medium 1080p DLSS (and maybe even 50/60fps cap if it can reach/saturate that)? I'm not sure what other typical games would stress the CPU more than the GPU
@yezivid3 ай бұрын
I think 50-60FPS in Cyberpunk is absolutely possible, even with like 4 cores/threads. A few months ago I did a few benchmarks with a 5800X3D at 4 cores/SMT Off, it was genuinely surprising how capable it still was even with that low core count: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmbXfmiQd9-Ma9ksi=4RE_sXo6LFDz3DDu I did want to run a few benchmarks with my 7800X3D downcored to 4/6 cores, but I got rid of the CPU before I had the time to do it lol. Now I'll stick to the 7600X for at least a few months, so I'll definitely gonna upload some stuff with lower core counts (maybe even compare it to something like a 5600X). One thing I really wanted to test is how the L3 cache would scale with lower core counts, maybe the extra cache could help to somewhat eliminate the lack of cores - tho I' would need both a non-X3D and a X3D chip (or preferably a 7900/7950X3D) to make that happen.
@yeshwantkethineni36943 ай бұрын
@@yezivid I was thinking with PL and/or more busy areas it would be harder to run, IIRC I remember you needed like a 5600X3D or a 3700 (basically 8 core or very good 6 core lol) to get ~60fps
@akatosh92983 ай бұрын
А если тени и глобально освещение на максимум выставить?
@KS-LOMO3 ай бұрын
monitor ?
@NextGenCeoTV3 ай бұрын
1440P no differences.
@45eno2 ай бұрын
Nope there is. Depends on game, settings and fps targets.
@NextGenCeoTV2 ай бұрын
@@45eno yes bro definitely. Because i got this cpu too and yes difference is depending for the games.
@PatoChu4 ай бұрын
Dude, you should make the game less GPU intensive and more CPU intensive, realistically there should be like a 30-50% FPS difference... Disable RT, lower the graphics to low and you'll see a huge difference. CPU upgrades specially for gaming should mostly be competitively based... no one is playing competitive Fortnite with RTX on.
@yezivid4 ай бұрын
You will never see 50% difference on average, maybe not even 30% - in HUB’s day one review, they’ve measured a 16% difference between the 7800X3D and 7600X, while in the Intel 14th gen review, it was 28% on average. It really depends on the game, some games benefits hugely from the massive L3 cache while others doesn’t really care about it. I admit that I had some GPU bound scenes, tho it was mostly in just Returnal/Starfield, the other games were nearly always CPU bound. I realized in the end that I could have used lower settings, but I started testing with the 7600, since I only had this CPU for like 2 weeks, while my 7800X3D was under warranty-process. Talking about RT - I usually turn up CPU intensive graphics settings, and while RT puts a decent load on the GPU, it’s also pretty heavy on the CPU too - if I remember correctly, there was a much less difference in Cyberpunk without RT, but Marvel’s Spider Man’s RT is also really CPU intensive if you max out the object range slider. You can test CPU performance in a lot of ways, and I don’t think there is only one correct way to do - that’s just how I prefer to test.
@megadeth85923 ай бұрын
rt effects cpu......
@PatoChu3 ай бұрын
@@megadeth8592 but it still relies more on your GPU
@Psyfurious4 ай бұрын
Overclocked?
@yezivid4 ай бұрын
Yes, as you can see on the in-game overlay too. CPU at 4.5GHz, GPU at 1455MHz.
@Andrei_Belozorovich4 ай бұрын
All my life I dreamed of playing on a 4080 card in resolution 1080P
@kaponecko4 ай бұрын
it is so its only cpu limited which is point of the video.
@lunator100hd2 ай бұрын
@@kaponecko Well nobody with 1000$ gpu play games on 1080p, so these benchmarks are pointless.
@kaponecko2 ай бұрын
@@lunator100hd point of the video is to show diference in cpus not gpus. Thats why they use strong gpu on low ress so there is no limitation from it. How is it pointless when this video is About cpu not gpu?
@lunator100hd2 ай бұрын
@@kaponecko its pointless because in real life scenarios a gamer with a 4080/4090 will most likely play games on 4k or at least 1440p ultra, so running benchmarks on 1080p would be irrelevant for 99% of us.
@oktofio96902 ай бұрын
@@lunator100hd I agree with you.. no one buy 7800x3d only to play in 1080p...
@a-125324 ай бұрын
Would adding the T5 subwoofer make much difference or not much?
@yezivid4 ай бұрын
Adding an 8" sub to a pair of 8" speakers is just stupid imo, obviously you would get more bass (tho the 2850DB can produce plenty of bass on it's own), but it wouldn't expand the frequency range, since the T8 can only go as low as ~38Hz. You'll need at least a 10" or 12" sub to get some worthy improvements in the low end.
@knubivandubi57974 ай бұрын
finally a test that shows what i wanted , no fake shit, well abit OC is ok :) Thank you very much
@reeeformat38435 ай бұрын
ive got the same setup runing at 1440p ultra settings and used to get sround 100-110 fps but now has gone down to 60-70fps for some reason in the last few weeks. Tried re-installing the game, same thing. No idea what happened or if some update caused it
@yezivid5 ай бұрын
Try disabling Async Compute in the graphics settings, tho it shouldn't cause that much of a difference.
@reeeformat38435 ай бұрын
@yezivid figured it out. Just goes to show how buggy this game still is. I was testing a 4k monitor a couple weeks back and I guess its when the issue started to happen when I switched back to my 1440p monitor. Even though I have it set at 1440p even re-installed the game didn't fix it. So I simply set it down to 1080p resolution and then back to 1440p and now it's showing around 110fps like how it supposed to.
@l4zyyy.-4825 ай бұрын
Thank you very much bro,good to see 150+ fps
@l4zyyy.-4825 ай бұрын
Can you pls do 1440p ultra dlss set to quality and no rtx pls,i will buy this set up and i want to know how much fps will it get on ultra and dlss set to quality
@yezivid5 ай бұрын
Will do it tonight.
@l4zyyy.-4825 ай бұрын
@@yezivid and pls test in conquest 64 players mod
@yezivid5 ай бұрын
@@l4zyyy.-482 There you go, bud. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmPUaKtrnc-Lo80si=K_6mVdzksLsmac7G
@l4zyyy.-4825 ай бұрын
@@yezivid thank you very much
@ChainingFilly75 ай бұрын
I’m playing on 3440x1440 with the same cpu and gpu as you. Getting around 80-90 fps. But that’s probably because of the 3440x1440 ultrawide
@Tekilafiend335 ай бұрын
What’s the pbo on the cpu?
@yezivid5 ай бұрын
Nothing fancy, CO -30 on all cores, Boost Override 200, and I think I also got PBO Enhancement at 90 Level 5. Getting an average of ~4964MHz effective clock speed while running Cinebench R24.
@Tekilafiend335 ай бұрын
@@yezivid nice! Thank you for the info. Have a good day 😊
@pt69985 ай бұрын
I get about 60-70fps with a 3070FE, 12700k setup at 1440p ultra settings. 🤔 Really surprised the 4080S can't run this over 120-140fps.
@yezivid5 ай бұрын
At 1440p Ultra, I'm getting around 130-140FPS. Also, I just realized that now they added a toggle for Async Compute. Now that with this turned off, the game runs even better, going from 90-100FPS to 100-110FPS at Ultrawide 1440p.
@blond_slut4 ай бұрын
@@yezivid what is that new technology?
@canpehlivan24975 ай бұрын
360mm aio and 80+ degrees on 7800x3d? Something must be wrong
@yezivid5 ай бұрын
High room temp, low fan speed and no offset mount, guess these combined did the trick lol. Now that I got the offset mount, the 7800X3D maxes out at 82C under Cinebench R24.
@canpehlivan24975 ай бұрын
@@yezivid l have thermalright phantom spirit Se 120 and it never reaches 80c in cinebench
@yezivid5 ай бұрын
@@canpehlivan2497 Thats weird. What is your average clock speed and package power while running Cinebench?
@just_OsaMa234 ай бұрын
@@canpehlivan2497I'm going yo buy it.. do u have any problems with it?
@userbunny144 ай бұрын
@@canpehlivan2497 temps can vary because of a WIDE range of things. Room temp, case airflow, fan/pump speed. A CPU will run hotter with a low quality AIO in a 30 degree room if the AIO is on low settings, then a great air cooler on MAX speed in the same room. Then there is always variance between regardless. Several degrees is probably weird if it was running the EXACT same set up, but barely anyone is.
@nolandderlugner13515 ай бұрын
how do you use it, which video palyer etc?
@yezivid5 ай бұрын
Both clips was played in Chrome, using the sites own player. Cowboy Bebop (360p) was at a site called Indavideó, while Bleach Opening (480p) was on KZbin.
@SoundBubble5 ай бұрын
Very nice comparison. Anime is the primary thing I've been using it for. It smoothes out a lot of liveaction movies (skin details etc.) unfortunately and makes them seem unnatural, but as anime is already "smooth" to begin with, that's hardly an issue.