Look for OffTweenDuration in Chaingun.rules. Change it to something like 100. Now you're chaingun will spin up like usual and continue firing for 100 seconds or until you run out of ammo. I think the Dev screwed the pooch as it would only fire for 5 seconds at full speed regardless of crew count or ammo throughput. A single deck cannon can deal more DPS over a 10 second window unless you change that value.
@SauceGodGamingАй бұрын
While you don’t have many videos i like your style you’ve got one fan out there hahaha
@SauceGodGamingАй бұрын
You still making videos?
@zanthraswАй бұрын
When the inspiration strikes me or I feel I have something of value to share. I don't make videos to any sort of schedule. Thank you though.
@antoneeee9284Ай бұрын
You gotta make your ship more manuverable. You can fit a lot more thrusters, and add a lot more shields to that ship man.
@NickAndriadzeАй бұрын
Cool design, but in the end of that station attack *7:15* you should have really targetted the leftover control room instead of the reactor. That way you'd have a lot of materials leftover to salvage. Also the chaingun reload is pretty lackluster, you definitely could have improved on that.
@zanthraswАй бұрын
Thanks. Definitely some crew assignments and priorities would go a long way if nothing else. On the other hand I found one of the really interesting things about large magazine chainguns is that the speed of the reload is actually not as much of a concern as for other weapons. With a large magazine you can load it. Get into a fight and even with a skeleton crew/inefficient layout have a pretty decent duration of fire until the magazines are dry. Either you win the fight or back off to repair/reload. Some minimally crewed chain gun based support ships is something I had some interest experimenting with, but didn’t really have the time.
@yuribn68864 ай бұрын
You create much more economical and versatile ships 😭😭😭, but mine are gigantic and I have to save a lot of money
@kajoma17826 ай бұрын
one of the oldest yt shorts
@glitchy_weaselАй бұрын
I didn't even know we had shorts 12 years ago
@bruhder58546 ай бұрын
This doesn't that good. It's kinda like an ion beam where its a constant stream of dps but it takes up too much magazines to be effective against bigger ships. Because of the space constraints, you also can't make it into a narrow funnel with many shields protecting it like ions.
@zanthrasw6 ай бұрын
Yeah,, Ions are the ultimate scaling weapon, as a large Ion core can be built deep in the ship and can fire for full DPS with 100% uptime. Railguns don't have any firing arc to worry about occluding, and only need to be pointed at the enemy ship briefly.
@NicNock6 ай бұрын
*where are the sounds*
@jaimelock39667 ай бұрын
LMAo you took out one small ship
@zanthrasw7 ай бұрын
I can't tell if you found the video amusing, or me amusing, but I am glad I could entertain!
@TeracomConsulting7 ай бұрын
I actually wonder if it would be better to feed ammo to the segments similar to the way you feed power to a railgun. Lots of ammo stations along the way instead of a big cache at the end. Your thoughts?
@zanthrasw7 ай бұрын
Folly loaded chainguns can put out a great deal of damage without having to reload, in fact incapable of being reloaded until they stop firing. This makes it less critical to have a fast reload. If you keep the 2 space gap between the two magazines, crew would have to move 6 or so tiles at 50% speed for some reloads equivalent to about 24 tiles in moving walkway. It might be an interesting experiment. You will probably need more crew though, since you can't have those crew at the front of the magazine wander all the way back to refill a storage at in room 50% speeds.
@TeracomConsulting7 ай бұрын
I liked the opposing directions of the feeders. I didn't know that you could do that they could be "upside down".
@timidapollo7 ай бұрын
Hadn't crossed my mind that putting chain guns on a diagonal ship would make the magazines more manageable, nicely done!
@feardieshogun81537 ай бұрын
@ViggaTron7 ай бұрын
Cool ship 😃
@Lopitez7 ай бұрын
This short has no sound!
@herobrineslayer15858 ай бұрын
i didnt know youtube shorts was this old how does this even exist
@zanthrasw8 ай бұрын
This was a video that was automatically converted to a KZbin short due to the 1:1 aspect ratio. That was late March 2021.
@kp2k5 ай бұрын
and the video is less than a minute
@glitchy_weaselАй бұрын
@@zanthraswoh interesting, so that's why
@bipashasemwal39889 ай бұрын
where is the code
@rafciopranks357010 ай бұрын
No cool sorting sounds :(
@Diamondsigmaspaceb10 ай бұрын
Wow, a 11 year old video being turned into a short
@zanthrasw10 ай бұрын
Well merge sort was first described in 1948, and Quicksort in 1961, so relatively speaking, this video is effectively brand new.
@Axcille10 ай бұрын
2012 vid?!
@Ritbulau11 ай бұрын
Hello from 2023
@casev79911 ай бұрын
It's been 11 years and this is now classified as a short.... Time
@zanthrasw11 ай бұрын
Anything taller than it is wide, or with a 1:1 aspect ratio like this rendered video was classes as a short when shorts started :)
@casev79911 ай бұрын
@@zanthrasw Yeah I forgot that they would've done it that way but I think I've seen some videos that somehow aren't considered shorts despite meeting the requirements for it. Maybe vid length? Idk
@DistrosProjects11 ай бұрын
why was this recommended to me… cool tho
@nathnolt Жыл бұрын
Couldn't you also work from the top down using another thread in merge sort?
@zanthrasw Жыл бұрын
You could be right. However you would have some synchronization losses and complexity as the threads must communicate how many elements are left to be sorted in each array.
@ZeroSmokes Жыл бұрын
Should be a loading screen icon. So cool
@awsomeangus24802 жыл бұрын
R/place be like
@bitter56832 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain to me what this is actually doing
@pranavnyavanandi97102 жыл бұрын
Can someone please explain this to me? I have knowledge of QuickSort and MergeSort sorting algorithms, but can't relate to what is being shown in the video here.
@zanthrasw2 жыл бұрын
The X postion is the index in the array, and the Y position is the value being sorted. Notice that with quicksort the elements larger than the pivot on the Y axis are swapped to the higher side of the X axis on each iteration. Both algorithms are being done in-place. That's normal for quicksort, with the only operation being to swap two elements of the array. Mergesort on the other hand has to shift the lower subarray up by one index to make room for the head element of the upper subarray at the end of the sorted subarray during the merge. Usually Mergesort would be done with extra temporary array space for the merging to avoid this.
@PRIMEVAL5432 жыл бұрын
Why not others like insertion sort? I know, captain obvious, don’t say it XDD
@gerioSB2 жыл бұрын
0:00
@wesleysilveira56923 жыл бұрын
kinda ShORT (sort)
@CurrentlyObsessively3 жыл бұрын
Moar.
@tachytita13723 жыл бұрын
Idk seems kinda gay man
@AndreasToth3 жыл бұрын
There's something not right about the quick sort: it slows down the closer it geta to completion. But why?
@zanthrasw3 жыл бұрын
Pivot choice. Determining the optimal pivot would require sorting the list to find out which one is in the middle. So instead, the first, last, and the middle element of the array (by index) are chosen and the median of those three is used as the pivot. A incorrect pivot choice is worse with many worker threads (compared to a single thread implementation), as the imbalance will casue the smaller side to be completely sorted before the larger side is finished and can distribute the sub arrays to the workers. So thread utilization is lower than with optimal pivot choice. Mergesort on the other hand can just divide all the objects up evenly, so avoids that problem.
@wahyutriwibowo18033 жыл бұрын
Why this is on shorts? not that I complain though this is quite interesting
@zanthrasw3 жыл бұрын
Probably because it's short.
@zanthrasw3 жыл бұрын
I looked some stuff up, and I think I know why. This was a computer generated video with a 1:1 aspect ratio, which is probably the limit for the video to be considered "vertical" and be classed as a short.
@wahyutriwibowo18033 жыл бұрын
@@zanthrasw so probably any content with that screen ratio and short duration even from beginning of YT will be on shorts then. I thought shorts only contains recent videos, But this is quite nice.
@ko-Daegu3 жыл бұрын
How can we visualize something like that I would love to see it written in python for example
@prashanthkumar03 жыл бұрын
seeing this i forgot what sorting even means :/
@everope3 жыл бұрын
But can it sort my life out?
@zanthrasw3 жыл бұрын
Sadly no. These are comparison sorts, so you need to have a method to determine if one thing is greater than another. Too many things in life are incomparable!
@user-lm8px8eg4v3 жыл бұрын
调距对焦速度的关系,每放大0.001倍,距离,对焦速度加快2%以上,需要计算
@tomikun80573 жыл бұрын
Where's the sound of sorting?
@Fine_Mouche3 жыл бұрын
What is sorted ? Pixel ? And by wich criteria/criterion ?
@operator80143 жыл бұрын
It's not FUN without the cool woop wooop woooooooop sounds!
@Kitsune_Dev3 жыл бұрын
Compare it to single thread
@ragnarok79763 жыл бұрын
The end result looks more like a single threat to me. *badum tsss*