This is the footage of the cameras that are installed in the capsule. If you want to see footage where the camera looks out of the window, then you need some video of one of the passengers who had a camera by themselves. For example in later flight a member of the KZbin channel "Dude Perfect" was one of the passengers and had a camera with him. Watch the video "Dude Perfect goes to space"

"Why aren't they reacting as if experiencing heavy g-forces? " Because they experience up to 3 G, I think. You feel that. " Why did they not release the full footage from every, single onboard camera?" Are you serious? So we have these flights, that are a regular thing. It is a ten minutes carnival ride, there were meanwhile 24 flights, six with passengers. It is all well documented, all launches are streamed live, so you have them uncut. And there are also some videos from the inside, some are not published official by Blue Origin, but by the passengers. So for example there is a video on the "Dude Perfect" channel with many views because on of them was a passenger and he filmed it with his own camera. And then there is this video here, pubslished on the channel of one of the passengers of this flight. I don't know if all passengers get the footage of the internal cameras as a memory? However, so we have an uncut video of the entire flight! When I first saw it I thought "wow, how cool!" And now you really complain that it is not actually uncut but that it switches between the cameras? Seriously? Why do you expect to get the full raw footage of all cameras? Maybe they don't even want to spoil to much...

@@sebastiannolte1201 "Why do you expect to get the full raw footage of all cameras? Maybe they don't even want to spoil to much..." Uhhh, they supposedly gave us raw footage from all cameras with transitions. What about those of us who want to watch the same raw footage from each onboard camera without any transitions? It makes no sense and you know it. What exactly would that spoil? According to you the footage was raw, therefore there's nothing to spoil. I want to watch launch to touchdown from one camera angle. Then from another camera. Then another, and another. You expect me to believe they couldn't give us that footage? How incredibly naive. Oh well. We can't all be free thinkers.

They're in a zero g plane that's why there's so many cuts. There needs to be solid separation between Earth and the supposed vacuum of space. There's also nothing to push off of in the supposed vacuum of space, therefore outer space and space travel are fake and lame.

What is "actual zero g enviroment"? You said it yourself, earth's gravity keeps satellites in orbit. Because the range of gravity is infinite. There is no place in the universe with no gravity. The weightlessness, that they experience here, is the same that you would have in a space crafts on your six months trip to Mars. There is not "real" and "fake" weightlessness.

Blue Origin's New Shepard rocket doesn't experience extreme heating during reentry because it follows a suborbital trajectory that doesn't reach the same velocities or altitudes as orbital rockets like space x falcons. The lower speed and altitude result in less intense atmospheric friction, reducing the heat generated during reentry. Additionally, New Shepard's design and materials are optimized to manage the heat generated during reentry efficiently, further minimizing any flames or extreme heating.

In addition some actual numbers: New shepard just dropped from 107 km. Although the burning that you mentions happen in the area around 70 to 90 km it is not the case here, because it is slow. But object in orbit fly around the earth with 28,000 km/h! The Apollo Spacecraft from the moon entered the denser atmosphere with even nearly 40,000 km/h.

Very small rocket and there are tons of videos..why not learn about it first before you hate on random people

Of course, a company with 6000 employees offers a tourist attraction that you can book on their website, that had meanwhile 24 launches since 2015, all launhes were streamed live... but is all a giant scam... All engineers in the world are stupid, you are smarter than all of them. Please use common sense. There is no reason to fake this and everything adds up. What's your problem with 2.2 G? You experience that in roller coasters for kids. In big roller coasters you get 4 G and more

Untested? This was the 19th launch.

I don't understand this comment among your others. So you admit that the flights are real?

Very ! Well said , how can anything better the creation of life 🥰

Imagine being so stupid to think that "going up to 100 km" would be a good or necessary way to find out the shape of the earth...

I'm pretty sure the goal of this flight was not to prove to a few morons that the Earth is a sphere.

Don't even get me started on how much fuel is wasted to go 100km up.

She’s the daughter of the first American in space and fifth man on the moon

So people who can play the piano aren't musicians unless they are employed to play the piano professionally? The distinction would be the same for a musician. If you're PAID to be a musician, you're known as a WORKING musician. These people are astronauts. They just aren't WORKING astronauts.

If you're the one going supersonic, you are the shockwave. You don't hear it. It was likely a chute deployment.

@@Helicopterpilot16 okay I understand, that makes sense, thanks for the answer 👍

This video obvious is from the fixed cameras in the capsule, you can see one in the video. So how should the point out? But there are videos of the passengers filming with their own cameras of some of these flights. At least Coby from "Dude Perfect", who was a passenger in flight NS-22, made a video and pointed the camera out of the window.

@@sebastiannolte1201 it always has to be ambiguous and people wonder why others question space.. I'm pretty convinced this world is not not not not not not not what we are taught there are a lot of things about this world that most people will not accept as truth but unfortunately it's not as black and white as many think.

@@dinopharis2876 What does "question space" even mean? I have the impression that the problem with all these "sceptics" is, that they think that space is something special. It is not! We live in space. Usually we say "out of the atmosphere" when we mean space. But the atmosphere becomes thinner fluently, so you cannot say where it ends. The most used definition is 100 km, and as they reached 107 km they can say that they were in "space". But the 100 km definition is arbitrary (it has to do with aviation)! Nothing happens when you are higher than 100 km. The experience and the view would be more or less the same from 90 km. BTW US Air Force definition for the beginning of space is 80 km. I guess you don't "question 25km", although you have never flew with a SR71. So why do you question 107 km? And if you want to see how it looks at 25 km, you can just look up. And you also can look up to 107 km. You even can see the moon that is 384,000 km away. At what altitude do you become sceptic and why? What is so special about it? Meanwhile i prefer to avoid the term space. Why is it important if something is in "space" or not? Why should that matter? Things are just at a certain altitude/distance to earth, that's it. So easy. And I don't know what you mean when you think "the world is not what we were taught". By whom? As I said, you probably have no problem with anything that count as "aviation". But why is "space" suddenly something special? Satellites are a regular business, run by normal companies, that offer services to normal customers. There are many startups in that field, also when it comes to rockets. Work there or found such a company! And astronomy is one of the most "democratic" sciences. Just by a telescope. Many discoveries were made by amateurs. It is really weird to hear that you expect something special to see when you look out of the window when you are 107 km high - what should that be?

They reached 107 km, most used definition for the beginning of space is 100 km. Of course that is an arbitrary definition and there is still some atmosphere beyond 100 km, but what altitude would it need so that you would accept it as "space"`?

And still, the earth looks flat through the windows 😂