My good friend and brother in Christ just died and he had niv . I’m sure he is in heaven with Jesus Christ now but now it’s not difficult to believe that lucypher is the bright and morning star with the perverted bibles. So you must stick with the kjv only!!!!!!!!!!!!! This satanic Vatican heresy is extremely big and dangerous. I’ve seen this firsthand in Poland. I was raised in catholic religion. It’s like octopus and it’s satanic to the core. Still have lots of family bound in this mess 🙁🙁

This is a false interpretation of Gal 3:1...O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? What this actually means is people that were saved by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, now believe they have to do the works of the law to keep their salvation. Context is both Gal 1 and 2 which clearly says Pauls Gospel is how we are saved and anyone that preaches(and by extension believes) any other gospel, are cursed!

34:50 lol

Thank you for posting this!

It's crazy how people will get on here and defend those two heretics and will put down the KJV.

This is so interesting. I grew up being taught all about Easter all my life. It's nice to be able to learn the real meaning of Easter. I want to thank you so much for teaching the truth on this. My husband and I listen to your ministry and your church services every day. Wish we had more ministers willing to teach this. God bless you and your ministry. Our pastor does teach and preach from the KJV Bible only. It's nice to hear you explain it as you read and preach the word.

Unreal! Great stuff. Love Ol' Brother-Pastor James Knox.

I once heard a guy defend Westcott and Hort's beliefs by saying that Erasmus probably also believed some things you also don't agree with. First, this was a veiled attack against the Textus Receptus. Second, if Erasmus had been an apostate and occultist, liberal scholars would have attacked him with that by now. Third, Erasmus lived before the Protestant Reformation and helped start it because he was a reformer, but Westcott and Hort abandoned Christ and went back to that false religion. Forth, this guy never addressed their bizarre beliefs because it's indefensible.

James is one of the best around . Met him in Holley NY a month ago. Such a humble guy

Thank you for uploading a valuable teaching sister!

This must be referencing the same Oxford Movement that was so influential in the creation of Alcoholics Anonymous.

Revision Revised by John William Burgon The importance of this book cannot be underestimated. There is no one book that exposes Westcott and Hort's false Greek Text and false Greek theory behind that text any more thoroughly and convincingly than The Revision Revised. Dean Burgon defends the traditional text of the New Testament. He shows clearly the defects in both manuscript "B" (Vaticanus) and manuscript "Aleph" (Sinaiticus). It is very important to see the arguments contained in this historic volume because virtually the same Greek text of Westcott and Hort (1881) FORMS THE BASIS OF ALMOST ALL OF THE MODERN VERSIONS www.goodreads.com/book/show/810746.Revision_Revised

LOVE Pastor Knox... one of my favorite preachers/teachers... THANKS for posting! :)

What could possibly bring a human being to go against Jesus Christ our loving saviour??? I can't figure out this one.

Do not trust the King James version because only the Massoretic Jewish text was used, and it is the corrupt. Maybe you don't want to trust Westcott and Hort, but at least they went to the Greek Septuagint. Something the the King James Bible didn't do. That is why there are so many flaws in the King James Bible.

His preaching is a great blessing

Let me get this straight, Knox rejects Westcott and Hort's work because they had bad theology, but he accepts Erasmus' work? Does he realize that Erasmus was a full-bore Catholic?

So westcox believed in Darwinism yet still put in creation King James is said be a homosexual yet the KJV speaks against homosexuality. Seems like there was problems on personal beliefs. Concerning the NIV. We can point out people's sin faults and weird belief on a passage of scriptures. But if it doesn't affect the translation of scriptures then all you have is a empty argument. If everyone with a NIV is going to hell then I guess the majority of people saved will be the English and the Americans. And a large group of foreigners like the Japanese will go to hell with that argument. The NIV has creation, Jesus, the forgiveness of sin the resurrection and hell. Which in the video you said they didn't believe in. Every translation has errors even the King James Bible. There is Hebrew Aramaic and Greek. Anything short of that has errors (Some still have misspelled words). Someone told me that Erasmus filled in some parts of his Greek manuscript with the Latin Vulgate Bible. So if that's true under this man's argument the King James would be considered corrupted. Out of this entire video I don't remember hearing any direct quote with page numbers more than less all I got from this video was someone's option. If creation forgiveness of sin grace or hell was removed by anybody then yes I will agree it is false.

www.amightywind.com/events/halloween.htm

EASTER is pagan ISHTAR WORSHIP

This was a great sermon!

Here, here brethren... For more in-depth resources on the good ol' KJV, here we go: www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/1611_authorized_king_james.htm Amen! ~ Sincerely, Bro. Jed

The only thing they are right about the deity of Christ is this quote: "He never speaks of Himself directly as God, but the aim of His revelation was to lead men to see God in Him." - This is proven that Jesus is the IMAGE of the invisable God. John14:9, Hebr. 1:3, 2 Kor. 4:4-5, Coll. 1:15

Greg Settle Easter is not a mistranslation they are different events.

Thank you so much for the sermons you sent. I watch one and it helped me so much. Ty. Im cutting off my internet to fight this. Not sure why you deleted me. Either way i appreciate what you have done for me. You have my number, call or txt me. God bless you.

Thank you thank you thank you!! I just got myself a large print KJV & AMP Side by Side Bible. Amplified with Greek Hebrew and Aramaic so that is the best way to go. Nothing added or subtracted!!!

Early settlers were ENGLISH, not Celts - no tradition of the old New Year's day. Why do you insist on promulgating fallacies and falsehoods? It boggles the mind at how shoddy the "research" is here! Quite frankly sloppy and improper 'scholarship' makes Christianity as a whole look very deceitful and deceptive. Satan is a Judeo- Christian-Islamic concept/deity. You can't look at Samhain (that's "SAU-in", by the way, not "SAM-hane") through the narrow-mindedness of fundamentalist Christianity and ever hope to begin to understand the cultural and religious significance it had to the people who celebrated it. The Druids were the learned class among the Celts. They were religious priests who also acted as judges, lawmakers,poets, scholars, and 'scientists', not the 'bloodthirsty satan worshipers' you seem to want to believe they were. Before posting such utter dribble and nonsense, do some reputable research!

Amen!Thank you for shareing!

what's sad, the Christians using the newer bibles ignore the problems and hush you when you share it.

brilliant as always ,thank you brother.

Amen, ain't that so? 'He that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest he fall', you can't fall away from salvation, but you can sure get yourself back under the burden of sin if you will it to be so. You can't fall away from salvation but you can sure mess up your Christian walk and have a sorry time down here, we've all been preached to, we believe it, we're orthodox, now let's get to orthopraxy, and not just be a bunch of hypocrites but DO IT, get out and witness to some lost people, get on fire for Jesus and let your fiery light shine, don't hide it under a bushel, Amen, amen.

From Fuller's, Which Bible? - “The paragraphs in [Hort’s] "Introduction" on “The neutral text and its preservation” are a model of obscurity and of theorizing but nonetheless of dogmatizing. There is absolutely no proof of the neutrality of this so-called Neutral Text. It is best represented by two uncial manuscripts of the fourth century, Vaticanus (B) and Sinaiticus (Aleph). The practical result of this classification is that Westcott and Hort relied most heavily on these two manuscripts, especially on B, as the foundation of their own text. (p147) If the Westcott and Hort theory can be disproved, it can be seen that the Traditional text is closer to the original autographs than any other. (p147-8) ... “Earnestly have I desired, for many years past, to produce a systematic Treatise on this subject. My aspiration all along has been, and still is, in place of the absolute Empiricism which has hitherto prevailed in Textual inquiry, to exhibit the logical outlines of what, I am persuaded, is destined to become a truly delightful Science...” (Dean John William Burgon) The writer is soundly convinced from years of reading and thinking upon this question that the Westcott Hort theory is false and misleading! (148) ...It is hard to see how God would allow the true text to sink into virtual oblivion for fifteen hundred years only to have it brought to light again by two Cambridge professors who did not even believe it to be verbally inspired. (149) A bible-believing Christian had better be careful what he says about the Textus Receptus, for the question is not at all the precise wording of that text, but rather a choice between two different kinds of texts, a fuller one and a shorter one. One need not believe in the infallibility of Erasmus, or his sanctity, or even his honesty; because he merely followed the type of text which was dominant in the manuscripts, although he probably was not aware of all the implications involved. He undoubtedly could have done much better than he did, but he also could have done a great deal worse. If some regret that the Vatican manuscript was not available to, or was not used by him, one may reply that it may yet be proved that the mercy of God kept him in his ignorance from following a depraved text that had been rejected by the church at large for at least a thousand years before his time. (149-50) ... The present generation of Bible students, having been reared on Westcott and Hort, have for the most part accepted the theory without independent or critical examination. To the average student of the Greek New Testament today it is unthinkable to question the theory at least in its basic premises. Even to imply that one believes the Textus Receptus to be nearer the original text than the Westcott-Hort text is, lays one open to the suspicion of gross ignorance or unmitigated bigotry. That is why this controversy needs to be aired again among Bible-believing Christians. There is little hope of convincing those who are unbelieving textual critics, but if believing Bible students had the evidence of both sides put before them, instead of one side only, there would not be so much blind following of Westcott and Hort.” (151) Alfred Martin at the Dallas Theological Seminary, May 1951, in David Ottis Fuller Which Bible?

Very good message.

The [Westcott & Hort] theory is supposedly proved by eight readings, which are in two books! (Eight verses out of 8,000 in 2 books out of 27!!) These are Mark 6:33, 8:26, 9:38, 9:49, and Luke 9:10, 11:54, 12:18, and 24:53. There is more evidence that Pope John XXIII was a Moslem. (Dr Peter S Ruckman, The Christian's Handbook of Manuscript Evidence). Westcott & Hort's textual theory, used to "justify" the use of the Vaticanus manuscript instead of the Traditional Text (Matjority Text) of the Church of Jesus Christ, was exposed as a fraud within a couple of years of it's publication (Dean Burgon (1882), Bousset (1894), Burkitt (1904), Voobus (1947), and Hills (1950). See Edward Hills, The King James Bible Defended (Des Moines: The Christian Research Press, 1956), chapter 4.) As Anglo-Catholics they had more in common with the Oxford Movement, Pusyism, and Tractarianism than with the Reformation Movement. They were Counter-Reformers and the modern counterfeit pseudo-bibles which they've inspired are weapons of the Counter-Reformation. If you don't know these things right now it is because you are ignorant of history or you don't have the Spirit of Christ or both.

Greg, the KJV has it right. Stop and think about it. Why would Herod, an unsaved man, want to celebrate Passover? As an unsaved man he was looking forward to celebrating the pagan holiday Easter.

Great. I am thinking of doing audio messages myself. Sub'd your channel.

Great teaching! Where can I find the next part? :)

Q. What is the longest line in Heaven? A. The line waiting to see Jesus! Q. What is the 2nd longest line? A. The line waiting to apologize to Wescott and Hort!

You do realize that no one on planet Earth were celebrating anything called Easter when Luke penned the book of Acts! There was no such thing! Acts 12;4 "Easter" is a wrong translation, it should be "Passover"

One of the few good preachers left

Good to have bible believer and Christian soldier 2 Tim 2:3-4

Loved this sermon. Also, its been awhile since the last upload. Keepem coming. Thank you for posting :)

Great sermon! Thank you brother James!

your welcome

thanks for the Knox videos :)

Yes he is ! Amen!

This message has been transcribed and can be found on Bro. James web site.

YOU CHANNEL MADE MY DAY...I LOVE BROTHER JAMES..WISH HE WOULD COME TO TORONTO

Your welcome. God Bless you too

Amen!