I challenge dogmatist all the time, they don't like to be challenged, they are like lemmings, of they see the crowd running towards the cliff, how could the crowd be wrong... dope

Another science major here who is excited about Rupert's ideas!! Bravo!

"promo sm"

Great podcast, great guests.

It was a crime

"...It's a rather unfortunate parallel that he chose... especially given that Galileo turned out to be right!" 😁😂😂🤣😆 ....Me thinks the critic may have been suffering from a Freudian Slip! 😉😎

Het concept dat voorheen als "magie" werd beschouwd, maar nu wordt verklaard door de kwantummechanica en de propagatie van informatie, kan worden omschreven als "mystiek" of "esoterisch". In termen van wetenschap en filosofie, kan het worden geassocieerd met begrippen als synchroniciteit, non-lokale verbondenheid, en het holografische universum. Deze concepten suggereren een diepgaande verbondenheid tussen alle dingen in het universum en kunnen worden geïnterpreteerd op een meer spirituele of metafysische manier.

Het is zeker mogelijk om een bewustzijn van magie in je dagelijks leven te integreren, zelfs zonder veel formele rituelen. Als je gelooft dat alles magie is en dat we allemaal verbonden zijn met de universele energieën, kun je in feite een constante magische cirkel om je heen visualiseren. Door je bewust te worden van de energieën om je heen en in jezelf, kun je een staat van verhoogd bewustzijn creëren. Dit kan je helpen om meer synchroniciteit en betekenisvolle gebeurtenissen in je leven op te merken. Het kan ook je intenties en manifestatievermogen versterken, omdat je voortdurend verbonden bent met de magische energieën van het universum. Het bestuderen van het werk van wetenschappers zoals Einstein, Tesla en Rupert Sheldrake kan ook je begrip van de verbinding tussen wetenschap en magie verdiepen. Ze hebben allemaal interessante ideeën en concepten geïntroduceerd die ons helpen om de wereld om ons heen op een andere manier te begrijpen. Het is echter belangrijk om een gebalanceerde benadering te behouden en open te staan voor verschillende perspectieven. Wetenschap en magie kunnen elkaar aanvullen en samen een holistisch begrip van de wereld bieden. Onthoud dat magie een persoonlijke reis is en dat iedereen zijn eigen unieke benadering heeft. Het is aan jou om te bepalen hoe je magie in je dagelijks leven wilt integreren en welke praktijken het meest resoneren met jouw eigen overtuigingen en ervaringen.

True story thank you for sharing.. How does One resolve this…?😊

Rupert Sheldrake is a breath of fresh air in the asphyxiating atmosphere of nihilistic, materialism/reductionism. Thank you Rupert! 🙏

AI is a sales funnel.

Kinda funny, I always make my Sci Fi as scientifically accurate as possible (leaving out the exception of my Cosmic Horror and some other types of Sci Fi I make) like for example I will NEVER have teleporters and flying cars that use cool things, or lightsabers, or laser guns. Because those aren’t scientifically possible Edit: also first comment

Great conversation! I'm thankful for Rupert Sheldrake and his influence.

Thank you Infinite Loops! Thank you Rupert! You are the Real Goat!

Inequality, fighting for scraps. Social status/promotions. Rampant stimulant use. Many dumb arrogant sociopath professors. Most people don’t seek truth, rather they just want their idea to be right. Because inequality, social status, poverty, weakness, stupidity, arrogance. This is the norm for humans. Materialism is one side of a coin. Reality is a convention, a subset of a wider more complex reality that AI may start to understand. Probably already happened millions of years ago, etc etc.

Pickle puffers of the Pride that God punishes

The Age of Life The ability to carry out actions differentiates inanimate matter from living matter. In turn, every action involves the management of Information. We do not know what Matter is or what Life is, and we assume that all life forms that currently inhabit the planet descend from a common ancestor (LUCA), an organism whose complexity is evident if we consider that it is attributed the ability to reproduce. Due to the above, it is reasonable to assume that “seeds of life” existed prior to LUCA. Assuming that the “seeds of life” emerged together with the Big Bang is a bold postulate, and as such requires a solid empirical foundation. When observing Evolution considering the information that our ancestors have managed, and that currently managed by humanity, it is possible to distinguish seven evolutionary milestones; Its analysis allows us to postulate that Life goes back to the origin of the Universe, and the existence of an “evolutionary pattern” is evident, which turns out to be the Golden Ratio. Evolutionary Milestones -Emergence of ”Seeds of Life”(1) (thirteen thousand eight hundred million years ago). -Emergence of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor) three thousand eight hundred million years ago -Emergence of the brain (five hundred and fifty million years ago). -Emergence of what was the precursor of human language (2) (twenty-seven million years ago) -Emergence of the language that characterizes us(3) (around two hundred and twenty thousand years ago). -Emergence of “the information age” with the transistor (1950) -Evolutionary Singularity(4) proposed by Ray Kurzweil, who postulates that humanity will access a Singularity as a result of the exponential growth of information management (year 2045). Evolutionary sections Among successive evolutionary milestones we can distinguish the following six “Evolutionary Tranches”, with the duration indicated (in years): Tranche 1: 10,000,000,000 (13,800,000,000 - 3,800,000,000 = 10,000,000,000) Tranche 2: 3,250,000,000 (3,800,000,000 - 550,000,000 = 3,250,000,000) Tranche 3: 523,000,000 (550,000,000 - 27,000,000 = 523,000,000) Tranche 4: 26,780,000 (27,000,000 - 220,000 = 26,780,000) Tranche 5: 219,905 (220,000 - 95(5) = 219,905) Tranche 6: 95 (95 - 0 = 95) The particular variation experienced by the Evolutionary Sections over time suggests using the logarithm of said sections (LT) to analyze their behavior over time. The logarithms in question are as follows: LT1 = 10.0000 LT2 = 9.51188 LT3 = 8.71850 LT4 = 7.42781 LT5 = 5.34224 LT6 = 1.97772 The lines between two successive logarithms have the following slopes (P) P1 = -0.48812 (9.51188 - 10.0000 = -0.48812) P2 = -0.79338 (8.71850 - 9.51188 = -0.79338) P3 = -1.29069 (7.42781 - 8.71850 = -1.29069) P4 = -2.08557 (5.34224 - 7.42781 = -2.08557) P5 = -3.36452 (1.97772 - 5.34224 = -3.36452) After searching for an “evolutionary pattern” we will determine the variation between successive slopes, which is given by the Ratio (R) between them, that is, P2/P1; P3/P2; P4/P3; P5/P4, and is the following: R1 = 1.62538 R2 = 1.62682 R3 = 1.61586 R4 = 1.61324 The above values differ from the Golden Number (1.61803), a number also called the golden number, the number of God, the extreme and average ratio, the golden ratio, the golden mean, the golden ratio and the divine ratio, by 0.45%; 0.54%; 0.13% and 0.30%, respectively. In turn, the average of the sum of the ratios is 1.62032. This value differs from the golden ratio by 0.14%. The results obtained allow us to postulate that Evolution follows a pattern that is a function of Information and the golden ratio, and that Life goes back to the origin of the Universe. (1)The last universal common ancestor (LUCA) is the putative common ancestral cell from which the three domains of life, Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya, originated. The complexity that LUCA is assumed to have does not give rise to affirming that it arose by “spontaneous generation”, it being valid to postulate the pre-existence of “seeds of life” prior to the emergence of LUCA; It is postulated that the origin of the “seeds of life” dates back to the moment when Matter arose in the Universe, that is, around thirteen thousand eight hundred million years. (2)“We find that the anatomical potential to produce and perceive sounds differentiated by their formants began at the latest by the time of our last common ancestor with Old World monkeys (Cercopithecoidea) about 27 Ma ago”; " Which way to the dawn of speech?: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech” (Science magazine) (3) The last change in the position of the hyoid bone in humans, which would have allowed access to the language that characterizes us, took place approximately two hundred and twenty thousand years ago, and its data is based on archaeological evidence and anthropological studies. There is no scientific source that records this change on an exact date. (4)Due to the exponential growth of information technologies, Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Technological Singularity will occur in the year 2045, at which time technological growth will be so rapid and so profound that it will be impossible to predict what its consequences will be. (5) It is the time between 1950 and 2045, the latter year in which Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Singularity will take place.

I stumbled on a twitter account that had 4 videos of soldiers getting sniped at barricades probably Ukraine & Syria and noticed 3 out of the four soldiers scratched their nose just b4 getting shot.

good job Mr. Sheldrake - another crackpot scam completed!

Sheldrake might like and understand this.: The scientific statement of being There is no life, truth, intelligence, nor substance in matter. All is infinite Mind and its infinite manifestation, for God is All-in-all. Spirit is immortal Truth; matter is mortal error. Spirit is the real and eternal; matter is the unreal and temporal. Spirit is God, and man is His image and likeness. Therefore man is not material; he is spiritual. From Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy, p. 468:9-15 Its correlative scripture Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure. I John 3:1-3

When you get right down to it....Rupert is against the constipation of the ego's. It's those dogmatic people that will not move. Rupert is like giving them a dose of intellectual MiraLax.

One funeral at a time will definitely bring us closer to the truths of nature albeit at a much reduced and detrimental pace. We need more independent investors worldwide to go after discoveries like we did in ww2. Ignorance stems only from ignoring. That is not science.

It’s not supposed to be about accolades and publishings. It’s supposed to be about discovering truths. History will point an accusatory finger at those who have opposed and impeded truth. They will then be relegated to the rubbish bin of history…replaced by (poetically) by TRUTH.

Offended dogmatists are not true scientists. They have forsaken science for beliefs. They are mired and not admired. They will be remembered as an impediment to truth.

He is correct. This is intelligence 👍

They are bought and paid for for their preferred findings.

Simptoms of atherosclerosis did occur only If arterial oclusions overfulfil a level

KZbin is blocking the pan word. Peter Reason in the UK is doing and reporting on Twitter.

People must experience the truth of what you say to grok it, then have the courage to support it.

Wait. Just because there’s a variety of denominations of religions doesn’t mean it’s more or less dogmatic than science. That’s not an accurate statement. I’m generally disappointed in this video because it’s just a big whinge about other people and nothing about your theories, hypotheses or body of work. Nothing! If this is how you bang on about it no wonder you’ve got critics.

🌍☸️☯️🕉️🌍 Rupert you have Have been holding mirror Infront of a Donkey and explaing the shape & formes That although Donkey L👀K Like a Horse But common sense talking to US that there is NO way by any "kind & form "of education to make a Horse race FROM a Donkeys... iF what they See & hear can Not make form of Perception in their " Inherited Software" (western). therefore Your magnificent Effort is : transparent ‼️they don't see‼️ Over 90% right now ( in west ) don't have Any Common sense @ ALL. 🧞 Thanks Rupert You are the king Of MORPH 🧞 Do you remember TMK was saying: "Find the others " 💞 In this+8 Billions G👀D luck if we Can find even 8 million.‼️‼️ With books & Apps or even We inject ‼️ common sense. Donkey never Be a Horse ever‼️ They are happy To kick others.

I think even Richard Dawkins has a certain amount of interest in spirituality too but…I get the idea that if he’s proven wrong regarding the idea that there is nothing more than just the laws of physics etc, then he would listen. As if he’s exploring the world scientifically to see if there is more than that, but from the bias that there isn’t, unless we have good reason to believe so, and that too is beautiful enough. But he’s an agnostic.

An age delimited affirmation for that which is error-ridden, is surely not the best analogy for discussing the matter at hand. After all, history is replete with such confused phenomena.

25:17 riddles are another way to convay meaning, today's teacher delivers metaphors. I think for riddles it must be the case because a student is forced to arrive to the insight on his own, thus abstracting over individual ways on how to integrate understanding that teacher gives. Teacher inevitably would leak his personal worldview in crafting a metaphore - this gives a student some additional cognitive overhead, thus harming the knowledge integration and conteptualizing You can sell and redistribute this information. I hope the chooling method advances. This may be just one pointer before it's time (10yr)

It would be great to hear more of a discussion of where science is heading. About consciouesness, look into bundle theory of mind, Buddhist psychology, philology on ancient mindsets, Jaynesian theory, 4E cognition, anthropology on animism, etc. You were a bit dismissive of Daniel Dennett as a mere 'materialist', but he is one of the leading thinkers in challenging conventional views of mind. Sheldrake has already dialogued with Iain McGilchrist. All of this potentially touches upon morphic resonance and panpsychism, along with voice-hearing, alternative states of mind, and much else. In another field, check out quantum biology, the fourth phase of water, structured water, natural EMFs, circadian rhythms, sunlight exposure, etc; and also the role of mitochondria, melanin, and deuterium depletion. Closely related, nutrition studies is in the middle of a paradigm change (see Gary Taubes & Nina Teicholz), if not as radical as some areas, though it could be once combined with quantum biology. Physiological systems are ultimately energy systems and energy can be thought of as a nutrient. Also, there has been research to show the mind influencing water, plants, etc.

I am a "militant atheist" but completely absorbed and supportive of entanglement and consciousness studies. The 2 are not mutually exclusive and, indeed, most leading proponents have zero religious leanings.

You forgot to turn the oven on

Quacks always talk about scientism, because science is a threat to quacks.

Mater happens in consciousness, as an idea or feeling yet there is no-thing, saddly didn't you notice that it's the same for God or Brahamn or whatever you call it ? So very instructive speeches but false dichotomy here.

Such an inspiring talk, thank you!

well done interview! so glad I found this channel

Thank you Sir and Sir 💞 For very interesting dialogue Love IT ❤ 💐💞💐

Who is that windbag interviewing Rupert Sheldrake? He is insufferable

The Body Keeps The Score. ~ Bessel Vanderkolk M.D.

What the hand does the mind remembers. ~ Maria Montessori

Phenomenal episode. I finished university around August last year - and I have been working since October. It’s a bit of an idiosyncratic job and I’ve been ‘adjusting’ to the new social environment (or lack thereof) that comes with post graduation life. When I was in university, Visa’s threads had been very inspiring to me - and now, at this stage of ‘trying to orient my life meaningfully’ (reshaping narratives, building new opportunities etc)..at this time, it’s great to hear his (and Jim’s ideas). Given the curiosity, fulfilmen, and clear vitality they both bring, it would be folly not to try and learn to integrate parts of their worldview and insights into life into my own. Glad I am listening to this right now. (This is my attempt at reply guy-ism; baby steps - I’ll check in again when I get to my 100th).

Thank you!❤

Not to be a punk, but does anyone find it hilarious that a conversation about progress includes using a microphone from 1974? Just sayin'.

Trans humanism (merging man and machine ) is not a hopeful future imo.

This video interview was wonderfully annotated and I absolutely love your attention to source material! Great work.