Пікірлер
@jakobthomsen1595
@jakobthomsen1595 Күн бұрын
Great video series! Ok, so if I understand correctly the magnetization recovery process can be described (omitting constants) by a differential equation f'(t)=1-f(t) where t is time, f'(t) is the re-magnetization rate which is proportional to 1-f(t) i.e. the difference missing to "fully magnetized", where f(t) is the current magnetization proportion (1 meaning 100% magnetized). Because the constant 1 vanishes when taking the derivative f'(t) must be -f(t) which means it must be the exponential function with negative exponent: f'(t) = -e^-t and f(t) = e^-t, because the exponential function is the only function that is its own derivative. And to account for the re-magnetization speed or respectively the re-magnetization time we introduce a scaling factor 1/T1. Which gives us the full formula 1 - e^(-t/T1). And because this function approaches 1 i.e. full re-magnetization only in the limit t -> infinity, we choose some finite time instead. With t/T1 = 0 meaning full de-magnetization the next obvious choice is to choose t/T1 = 1 i.e. t = T1 which gives us 1-e^-1 = 1-0.37 = 0.63 approximately. Phew, I think I got the math part 🙂
@sameerchandorkar365
@sameerchandorkar365 4 күн бұрын
Thanks
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 күн бұрын
Wow thank you so much!! Your support really means a lot, working on the next lecture now as we speak so stay tuned!
@jakobthomsen1595
@jakobthomsen1595 6 күн бұрын
Very well explained! BTW the 63% looks suspiciously like 1-exp(-1)
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 күн бұрын
Thanks for commenting! I actually did a deep dive on this 63% and did a little segment on it in the Q&A video here, check if out if you'd like to learn more kzbin.info/www/bejne/aYvNnmStqquibK8
@jakobthomsen1595
@jakobthomsen1595 Күн бұрын
@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Neat!
@minakshi2412
@minakshi2412 17 күн бұрын
Great video.. you made it super interesting to learn, thank you!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 9 күн бұрын
Awesome to hear it helped, thanks for commenting!
@julessoto137
@julessoto137 20 күн бұрын
STRONG WORK. Thank you
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 18 күн бұрын
Thanks for watching and commenting!
@DrMdAbdulHafeezMalik
@DrMdAbdulHafeezMalik 24 күн бұрын
It was easiest explanation I have encountered till now ,Plz post more videos
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 24 күн бұрын
More are in the works!
@DrMdAbdulHafeezMalik
@DrMdAbdulHafeezMalik 24 күн бұрын
Thank you y
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 24 күн бұрын
Glad it helps and thanks for the comment!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 29 күн бұрын
LINK TO CLINICAL FLOW CHART 👇👇👇 radiofreedia.org/approach-to-abnormal-restricted-diffusion/
@Obscure121gw
@Obscure121gw Ай бұрын
Local AM radio stations operate between 540 and 1700 kHz, not 68 MHz. FM radio stations operate between 88 and 108 MHz which is slightly higher than your example of a 1.5T magnetic field.
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment. This (should have been) already corrected with a caption that pops up during this segment saying the band is analog TV and into the FM range.
@sehrish9847
@sehrish9847 Ай бұрын
Waiting for more videos.Excellent explanation.
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Thank you! More videos are in the works!
@KokebGebremeskel
@KokebGebremeskel Ай бұрын
This is truly Amazing! Thank you so much!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Thanks for watching and commenting!
@interwebzful
@interwebzful Ай бұрын
that was good
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@keegansimyh
@keegansimyh Ай бұрын
Question: how were we able to localize in the Z-X plane before when we were also using gradient magnetic fields in both these axes?
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Hello, check out the lectures on slice selection kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGnNiGuBZt5ggac and frequency encoding kzbin.info/www/bejne/eorNYoaCg9Wjh68 where we go in-depth on how to localize the signal in the Z and X dimensions in you haven't already. If you still have questions let me know!
@keegansimyh
@keegansimyh Ай бұрын
@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED I'm confused about why we don't get the same problem at 7:55 in the Z-X plane. I can see that using frequency gradient in the X and Y axes causes the same frequencies to repeat and thus we can't resolve along (x+y=c). But why do we not get the same problem when using frequency gradient in both the Z and X axes? How are we still able to resolve voxels along those diagonals?
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
The beautiful thing about the slice select gradient technique is that we don't have to resolve the signal in the z direction, the gradient is turned on along the z-axis so that when we apply our RF pulse and tune it to the region of the body of interest along the z-axis, we know all the signal we receive is coming from that slice alone. We simply just then turn off the z-axis gradient, the protons in the slice fall back into precession at the Larmor frequency, and the problem then turns simply into localization along the x and y axes for which we do the frequency encoding and phase encoding techniques. Now in 3D MRI acquisition we do replace this slice select gradient technique with a true image encoding gradient along the z-axis, but that will require a little extra knowledge to understand which we'll cover in future lectures 🙂
@RayJacobsenJr
@RayJacobsenJr Ай бұрын
As an MRI Field Service Engineer, it is my job to ensure that all the intricate MRI Physics are functioning properly every day. I'm grateful for the "MRI Physics EXPLAINED" channel on KZbin, now I can direct people with questions to this resource. Your efforts are much appreciated, please continue to create valuable content.
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Thank you for the comment and for keeping these amazing machines running! We've got a whole set of advanced lectures coming that will get into some engineering topics so stayed tuned!
@josephdays07
@josephdays07 Ай бұрын
Hello, Great job👍💯. I have developed a new methodoloy to do Wavelet Transform, Uncertainty Principle Graph, X-rays..... I have wrote about it. These theories you can use in Quantum Physics: And with these theories I haved solved Prime Numbers and Riemann's Hypotesis. It applies to MRI... kzbin.info/www/bejne/pZO0oYWwpamsiKMsi=Fb0fiSavner-XHER kzbin.info/www/bejne/e2q3d6Vnh7Gge6Msi=b4FTZxePO7kChF8- kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpWbh2yJiZaFesksi=hEZSejrw5V6Yk-mB kzbin.info/www/bejne/pmG9lGylo7CEZrMsi=nb0yLS3_CoLnRS6L kzbin.info/www/bejne/aXbFp6ymn5pqbacsi=7iiGMVKOcnQlXiIo www.amazon.com/s?k=jos%C3%A9+mauricio+orellana+d%C3%ADaz&crid=9Y4AJXKYABD3&sprefix=Jos%C3%A9+maur%2Caps%2C294&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_1_9
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Hello, thank you for sharing!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
LINK TO CLINICAL FLOW CHART 👇👇👇 radiofreedia.org/approach-to-abnormal-restricted-diffusion/
@karlitadr11
@karlitadr11 Ай бұрын
Thank you, I appreciate your pedagogy and humor!!🧠😂💯 KEEP IT GOING!!!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Much thanks!! Check out the channel this weekend for a NEW lecture!
@matiaswindsor5793
@matiaswindsor5793 Ай бұрын
Why is it called "planar"?
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
That is a good question! "The echo-planar imaging (EPI) technique, proposed by Mansfield, overcomes this limitation by determining a complete two-dimensional image matrix in a single experiment. As the name implies, the method uses signal echoes to simultaneously acquire signal from the whole two-dimensional (planar) imaging slice."
@matiaswindsor5793
@matiaswindsor5793 Ай бұрын
@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Thank you very much!
@m7mdmeedo
@m7mdmeedo Ай бұрын
Great job 👏
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@farahsamer7130
@farahsamer7130 Ай бұрын
You're a genius! thank you so much
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Thanks for commenting and glad it helped!
@WalterPine
@WalterPine Ай бұрын
lol ceo jocks
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
🤭
@WalterPine
@WalterPine Ай бұрын
Hospital finances are important for the CEO LOL your hilarious 🤣 😂
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
Thanks for putting up with my bad jokes and I apologize if you're a CEO ha!
@WalterPine
@WalterPine Ай бұрын
Thank you so much, can you lecture on the parameters: fov, matrix and tr that influence time?
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Ай бұрын
We briefly get into factors that affect imaging time in the Spin-Echo lecture kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHyZgZh5hdWCgrs and Turbo/Fast Spin Echo kzbin.info/www/bejne/kIialapjr7Fsla8 if you haven't checked those out already but will keep the other factors in mind for future lectures. Thanks for commenting and supporting the channel, really appreciate it!
@lucaya
@lucaya 2 ай бұрын
Great. Thank you!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@samgatin
@samgatin 2 ай бұрын
Hello from Kazan, Russia! Big thanks for your videos!!!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 ай бұрын
Hello there and thanks for commenting! Cheers from the USA my friend!
@lucaya
@lucaya 2 ай бұрын
Amazing!!! Best MRI lectures on KZbin!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 ай бұрын
Too kind! Thanks so much for commenting and the support!
@lucaya
@lucaya 2 ай бұрын
Your lectures are the best on KZbin yet. Thanks a million!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 ай бұрын
Too kind! Thank you so much for watching and commenting!
@vohuynhminhtuanvng
@vohuynhminhtuanvng 2 ай бұрын
🎉🎉🎉 thanks. It's very understandable. Could we have video about Steady state, Mister?
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 ай бұрын
Great suggestion! Will look into it, do you use this sequence a lot in your daily work?
@vohuynhminhtuanvng
@vohuynhminhtuanvng 2 ай бұрын
​@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED yes. In my hospital it's used to do a quick check of the abdomen. And it's also used in Cardiac study. It was called "Trufisp" in Siemen app. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. You help me so much! At school, I was just only taught about the surface of this such as listing the name of some sequence but not diving into it.
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 ай бұрын
@@vohuynhminhtuanvng Awesome, so glad to hear the videos are helping! Will keep the steady state topic in mind for future videos!
@MinaRahmani-dh4nx
@MinaRahmani-dh4nx 2 ай бұрын
Your videos are awesome!!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 ай бұрын
Thank you!!
@vohuynhminhtuanvng
@vohuynhminhtuanvng 2 ай бұрын
Thanks so much. 🎉 I have some stuck with this kind of knowledge. I have been reading many lectures about MRI. Could I ask you some question, Mister? 1. Some of people said that: The flip angle is determined by proportion of spin state "up and down" after exciting pulse. Is that correct? 2. After 90 RF pulse, a number of spin up will be equal to spin down. The spins which is resonated will be in phase. It is explained by quantumn machenics. But it seems to confuse me. Maybe is there something force them to be in phase? Also I don't know why 180 RF pulse cause it too. Somewhere in the internet, they explained understandably in the vector frame that the fast spin will catch up the lag spin and despend on the direction you put 180 pulse in. But when i try to apply it into the picture of spin-state, it makes me impossible to understand. 3. About 180 RF pulse in spin echo, after 90 exciting pulse, the transverse magnetization will gain conherence a little bit then dephasing with T2* decay. When we do a series of another 180 RF pulse, we have some coherence peaks. However, they gradually descrease magnitude and when we connect these peaks, we have T2 Decay. What make these peaks become smaller and smaller after 180 RF pulses. 4. After 90 RF pulse, we add a RF 180F Pulse. Now the vector B1 maybe >180? Is that mean the more spin up state becomes spin down? Could you do me a favor? 😭 I stuck with these problems a few days.
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment and great questions my friend! I think you are getting at a really frustrating point in that yes all of the physics governing magnetic resonance imaging are indeed covered by the laws of quantum mechanics, but trying to visualize what is going on at the quantum level is near impossible and for good reason! If the position and spin are mere statistical quantities resolved at measurement, how can we truly know their precise number and position/orientation? I think at best we can say a statistical number of these spins will be more aligned with the magnetic field B0 than randomly, our RF pulse will imbue a statistically higher number of these spins with a coherent precessional frequency and flip angle to produce a signal and so forth. But I think the visuals we use to depict these in a classical sense still hold a great degree of truth of what's going on. As to question #3, what makes the peaks become smaller is the ever increasing disorder of the system that begins as soon as we apply our initial RF pulse. Think of it like friction in the real world, we will always have irrecoverable energy loses with any system we put energy into whether it be your car or an MRI machine (excluding semiconductors!). We actually talk about this in the Turbo-Fast Spin Echo here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kIialapjr7Fsla8 Hope this helps!
@vohuynhminhtuanvng
@vohuynhminhtuanvng 2 ай бұрын
@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED I'm really grateful to you. Hope your channel would be well-known ❤️❤️❤️
@kanamala
@kanamala 3 ай бұрын
Probably one of the best mr teachers out there. Thanks so much dude.
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
Too kind! Thanks for watching and commenting!
@lucaya
@lucaya 3 ай бұрын
Excellent
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@9678willy
@9678willy 3 ай бұрын
lettice
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
😂
@lucaya
@lucaya 3 ай бұрын
Amazing lecture. Thanks so much!!!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for commenting and supporting the channel!
@latebrain8488
@latebrain8488 3 ай бұрын
Hell yeah, been waiting for a DWI video 🙏
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
Hope it was worth the wait! Cheers!
@gissellev.18
@gissellev.18 3 ай бұрын
You have made understanding MR Physics so easy! Your sense of humour is icing on the cake. Feeling confident taking the ARRT after watching your videos. Thank you so much!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
So happy to hear they helped and thanks for putting up with all the bad jokes! Best of luck on your exam, you got this!
@HawtStyle3000
@HawtStyle3000 3 ай бұрын
My only regret is not starting my MRI training later so that I have all your videos to watch. You're a legend!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much!! Comments like this keep me going, working on the next lecture now so stay tuned!
@HawtStyle3000
@HawtStyle3000 3 ай бұрын
@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED let me tell you that I truly appreciate how much work you're putting in. The script is concise, simple and whimsical and the animation is keeping me engaged. It might only look like 10 to 20 minutes of work on the screen but it's definitely hours/ days of work.
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
@@HawtStyle3000 Many thanks and thank you for putting up with my bad jokes 🤣
@globalcitizen74
@globalcitizen74 3 ай бұрын
I have watched several videos and read material from various sources on phase encoding. Your content has been the easiest to comprehend which otherwise is a challenging topic. The other sources either don't go into much detail or they go too much into the weeds. You have kept it simple with good animation and even the math has been simplified so it is easy to understand. I commend and appreciate your efforts, your knowledge and presentation skills. Quick question - do you plan on doing a presentation on Receive Bandwidth, sampling time, relation to frequency FOV, Nyquist theorm etc. Oh, and K space too :D
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for the comment! I definitely have a whole set of lectures dedicated to k-space and how we truly build an image which involves getting into the math but I think I can present it in a visual heavy way still that will be intuitive. Not sure how deep we'll go into Nyquist theorem and such, always trying to find that balance between keeping it understandable without going too deep into the weeds but we will see! We very briefly touched upon the idea of Receive Bandwidth, I believe in the frequency encoding lecture but if you have more questions please send them my way! kzbin.info/www/bejne/eorNYoaCg9Wjh68
@RobertWilliamsserving
@RobertWilliamsserving 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for this! I noticed at 6:23 in video you discussing spinning after RF pulse, wouldn't they be "wobbling" around a vector pointed in the y-xis? As opposed to circling all the way around like that? Sorry probably dumb question
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
No question is dumb, thanks for the commenting! It can be really hard to picture how this process plays out in 3D space but the axis of precession is the Z-axis. The net magnetizations in each voxel are vectors that can be oriented in any direction. At first, right after our initial RF pulse, they are aligned i.e. "in-phase", all precessing coherently about the z-axis, but naturally they begin pointing in different directions as time goes on and they became more and more disordered i.e. "dephased" but the axis of procession as a group remains the Z-axis. What is important when considering signal generation is how these vectors project into the XY-plane, as shown in the mentioned animation. Hope this helps!
@RobertWilliamsserving
@RobertWilliamsserving 4 ай бұрын
Thank you!! What I needed was to go back to your earlier excellent videos on t1 and t2 decay contrast from about a year ago 😅
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
@@RobertWilliamsserving Awesome glad they helped!
@rik4351
@rik4351 4 ай бұрын
I'm working my way through these lectures and it's insane to me we still haven't arrived at k-space yet. My teacher started working with k-space at lecture 1 about 1D MRI...
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
K-space is by far the most challenging concept! It's frustrating how courses introduce it out of nowhere as if anyone has an idea of what it is or how it plays into the MRI image building process. Unfortunately, to really understand it you have to dive deep into the math and really understand 3-4 subjects in parallel so the initial lectures present a general idea on how this all works while avoiding the math. I will cover this subject and all needed to understand it in a future Advanced MRI Physics lecture series so stay tuned but don't fret, if you asked an MRI technician to show you K-space, they wouldn't be able to. It is only relevant to those literally building and coding the MRI machines, but nonetheless a cool and interesting topic when explained well!
@rik4351
@rik4351 4 ай бұрын
I love how little this focuses on the maths, which is a great point of confusion for myself. Students will get taught that the time to repetition is related to the T1 weighting because of some parameter in a formula, but it is never actually explained what the real world effect of that would look like. Great video series!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
Thank you! I struggled myself trying to piece together where these numerical T1 definitions fell into the imaging process until I realized we have no control over it, only TR!
@nicobartolome3995
@nicobartolome3995 4 ай бұрын
Nice really helpful
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
Glad to hear it helped and thanks for commenting!
@mateuszskrzypczyk3563
@mateuszskrzypczyk3563 4 ай бұрын
It's a shame that channel like this, get this many views, while "educational" videos in this subject get way more. Finally understood the situation fully before Medical Imaging Techniques retake exams. Keep up the good work doc! 😎
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
Thank you! Yes the whole algorithm thing has been frustrating, it seems like no matter how many subscribers I get or how much I advertise on social media, every video is just a slow creep from the moment it's released until it slowly makes its way up the ladder with views and likes. Maybe KZbin isn't a fan of my jokes 🤷 But thanks for commenting and please do share with anyone you may think would find these helpful! Good luck with the exams!
@mateuszskrzypczyk3563
@mateuszskrzypczyk3563 4 ай бұрын
@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Thank you very much, my whole year already watched your videos, so dont worry, you'll get there eventually 😁
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
@@mateuszskrzypczyk3563 Awesome thanks!
@philipd.7286
@philipd.7286 4 ай бұрын
Okay so question. If we do frequency encoding with a gradient like this. When we go to measure our FT’es signals like at 7:36. We are looking for a difference in amplitude as our contrast. Ideally this difference in amplitude comes from T1 or T2 depending on what sequence we have set up. But here the difference in amplitude is also coming from the fact that we are measuring waves with two different frequencies at the same time point. I.E at 7:36 we are measuring the peak of Fat but not the peak of CSF. So our contrast is slightly influenced by how strong our Gx gradient is.
@philipd.7286
@philipd.7286 4 ай бұрын
Do we just assume the frequency changes induced by our Gx field are small enough to ignore their effects on Amplitude? Is there another way to frequency encode?
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment and love to see the critical thinking here. I think what you are honing in on is that there is a relationship between frequency and phase, and that this will affect our contrast. You are absolutely right, but it's a little more complicated. The theory unpinning these initial lectures is designed to understand the commonly taught concepts of frequency encoding and phase encoding that you would find in an MRI physics course for medical professionals, and then tie these concepts into how we build an image and image contrast while avoiding the high level math needed to really understand the true image building process (we will cover this in the future)! Highly recommend checking out the next few lectures in the series on phase encoding (kzbin.info/www/bejne/pHenq4usn6tqnck), T2 contrast (kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z53Nq3-gpsyCfcU), T1 contrast (kzbin.info/www/bejne/bqu3dYmOpJxjpc0), and tying it together (kzbin.info/www/bejne/pKm0eHWPi6-oo6c) to get a better grasp of these and will probably answer more of your questions along the way!
@philipd.7286
@philipd.7286 4 ай бұрын
@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINEDthank you :) They’re next on the list!
@CharacterDeveloper
@CharacterDeveloper 4 ай бұрын
Slice thickness = frequency range Good.
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
Pretty elegant right?
@CharacterDeveloper
@CharacterDeveloper 4 ай бұрын
@@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED Very much so. Thank you.
@nikiclodi6839
@nikiclodi6839 4 ай бұрын
Amazing 🎉😮
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@latebrain8488
@latebrain8488 4 ай бұрын
Been waiting for this, thank you!
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED
@MRIPhysicsEXPLAINED 4 ай бұрын
Hope it lived up to expectations, thanks for the support!