ALL the people who spoke in that game had red names. You gonna infer Roebuck and Chernov were bad guys too?

Unit 731? Stalingrad? D Day? Eastern Front?

I know this is bait, but you cannot be anything but a bot to make such a false and idiotic statement. The difference between the brutal you say of WWI, and the deadly and destructive nature of WWII, was that WWI didn't start with soldiers occupying towns from within, or bombing cities from the beginning, or the use of eugenics to incarcerate- and later systemically kill- multiple groups of people. (The Jewish people are the ones we remember when we think of the Holocaust, but the physically and mentally disabled, non-white Europeans, "Gypsies", and anyone else the Axis powers chose to persecute were also put into concentration camps.) WWII affected everyone, everywhere, regardless of their neutrality or location in the war. If you didn't have troops from your country involved, chances are high that you still had battles take place in your country or territory. In 1924, the U.S. Department of War (now Department of Defense) totaled all killed, wounded, and missing by cause of WWI to be 59.5 million. WWII had 60 million *killed* alone. Adding the other factors into those casualty numbers dwarfs the total number of WWI casualties. So, no, WWI was not worse than WWII, but it was certainly fought over a less defensible reason.

What about all the dictatorships the US backed after WW2 ?