That's odd, check your spam folder. If it's not there contact me via the page. You should also get a direct download link on the page after checkout.

Glad to hear that! Thank you for taking the time. Have a wonderful day!

If you have other options you find as nimble or if you can't see yourself using it personally - Sure. But I think of everyone buying a new camera or getting into video to extend battery life with a power bank they probably already own. And I could see this as a great backup to have in your bag if your NPF, V-Mount or regular batteries are getting low. Slap it on with your own power bank or borrow one on set. Personally I also like the sheer size of it along with a smaller power bank for those times when you really want to slim down your camera to as little as possible. It's great to have options for those and other occasions ;)

@@thomasfransson That's ok. In my case, I have two powerbank holders and two NPF battery plates already. So all I need is the arca foldable mounting plate. Buying the Smallrig 4696 which is about 70 Euros in Germany, while knowing that the NPF plate is completely useless to me just doesn't make sense. And the plates on it's own accounts for about half or more of the price.

Great that you've fond a powering solution you like.

It's a power bank clamp attached with a super clamp. I've updated the links and added a super clamp there as well. Thank you for reminding me.

It's a shame they missed that. Hopefully they will offer an updated version. It's a really great product for cameras like the FX3/30 built run for a while. And it do work, but it would have been nice to be able to keep it fully upright without it resting against the camera.

​@@thomasfranssonyes all my cages are from smallrig, great company. Im sure V2 is on the way. I wonder if this thing would fit under one of my cages, thanks for the heads up

If you have a cage with a straight end at the rail section it will fit. I have an older cage for my X-T4 where the bottom arca rail morphs into the grip and on one side and a 3/8 thread rail on the other end (instead of nato) This sadly makes it impossible to slide the arca QR on to that cage. So just make sure you have an open end and it should work.

Don't we all ;)

Very basic, things, I converted everything to be tool-less so I could transport it in a regular camera bag. A smallrig cage, nato top handle and nato QR monitor mount. In this video there's also the Atomos Shinobi II and Sirui nightwalker 16mm along with the matte box mini from smallrig. I use the matte box when I shoot with cine lenses mainly as they are more prone to flaring and vailing. I do have a video covering the parts in more detail if you want to see them up close. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nZe9c2SfabWqY6c Thanks for stopping by!

@@thomasfransson thanks

You're most welcome, let me know if I left some information out

@@thomasfransson I’m trying to go around to different creators and see there rigs so I can get an idea of how I want mine

Soon to be a content creator it is my dream

Good to know, do you know the model name/number of that power bank in case someone consider this combo.

ROLLEI Powerbank 20.000mAh 65W

Thank you. Glad to hear

@@thomasfransson really like the vibe the video had

Thank you those kind words made my day!

Thank you Gabriel - I appreciate it very much!

Don't know, I'm still running the same FW, you should reach out to Feelworld if you're having issues. .

​@@thomasfransson Thanks. Have tried. I had no choice, it came with firmware v5. Their website has not been updated. I can't even get a full screen image like I can with my old F6 1.0. Any tips there? "Pixel to pixel" just blows the image up, it's not true full screen. Sigh. They really mashed this thing up...

They seem to be pretty active on their facebook page. And there might be a user group on FB too. I'm still running fw 2.5.1so I have no clue what settings and things that might have changed in the more recent updates or if it's a combination of new features and camera settings that needs to be dialed in. Sorry, but I can't offer any advice since I'm not running that same firmware.

@@thomasfransson Thanks - yep you were right, they were quite responsive. The newer iterations of the device actually can't run the firmware shown in your video, but I was given advice about how access false colour (it is hidden by default now) and full screen - although full screen is minus display info as you have here - and that's probably a Sony thing. Anyway, Feelworld people do respond and helpfully...

Cfexpress cards gets hot.

Thanks. All of them? My friend with se same camera use Lexar and hasn’t this issue. Maybe I’ll try a Lexar or something else

Yeah pretty much, that's why they're made out of metal to help with heat dissipation. It's basically a big heat sink. There's lots of information about this on google if you want to learn more about how CFExpress cards work and that sort of stuff. It's also why some newer cameras don't always have CFExpress card slots - to prevent them from internal heat issues.

@@thomasfransson thanks. I did hours and hours of research on Google to try to understand if the strong heat was normal or not. I didn't find much. The most interesting thing are some articles on PetaPixel where they warn about CFs that are NOT VPG certified. There is also a list of brands that have the certification and Pergear is not there, this made me very suspicious... I will do other tests with a friend's Lexar

Really? I just googled "CFExpress Type A gets hot" and got about 307 000 results, most of them explaining the works of these cards and confirming the fact that they do get hot. Even when Idle or just sitting in a card reader. Even my Sony gets hot. There's a a bunch of these new cards coming out on the market and just like one could expect not all, especially manufacturers of more budget friendly options might go through all the licensing and certification, this would not mean it's a bad card. Just that they made a card and didn't care about the proper certification. Just like with third party batteries that will work just fine even if they won't have the same certification and your camera might say that It can not guarantee the functionality of a battery as it's not an OEM... the camera isn't able to verify that it's not OEM and therefore... And if you are a big content creator and you have a choice to recommend products that won't have any issues (most likely) or recommend a card, battery, lens, accessory that may work perfectly on 97% of all cameras. But you don't want the risk of getting complaints from those 3% Well then you stick with the safe bets... It's just like in camera groups where there's people that's afraid of even using third party lenses and make it very clear as often as they could how superior OEM is and how they'd never buy third party options. Sorry about the rant. All I can say is that I've used this card for 90% of everything I've shot on my Sony since I got in in early 2024 and not run into any issues or have seen anyone reporting any issues on any Sony group or KZbin. I was worried when I got it as it got hot - did some quick reserach and discovered that these cards do get hot and I didn't think more of it.

Sure thing! The one I use in the video and for most slider shots is the smallrig video head with a leveling base - amzn.to/3XRx3KI It's nice to have more than one way to make fine adjustments to your camera ;) If you want something even more budget friendly I'm sure this one would be able to get the job done too - amzn.to/3TE3z0i Hope this helps But I'm sure something

I can't answer on everyone's behalf but I've owned DRS for a couple of years and I open it every once in a while. But I'm still nowhere near as efficient in Resolve as I am in Premiere and despite all these years, I haven't had the time to put in the time and effort it would take to become as efficient in Resolve or at least get to a point where I'm able to make a decision on which NLE that fits me and my workflow the best. The coloring in DRS is great and the only reason why I've kept it installed. Although I've only graded a few test clips and based on my current knowledge of Resolve obviously took me way longer than it would have done in Premiere and as the results weren't better (again because I don't feel at home in Resolve) I can't defend myself going over to Resolve. And I can only assume this is the reason why alot of people stick with Premiere, they either don't have the time to migrate or maybe they're happy with their current workflow and don't see a reason to switch. On another note, there's a lot of Davinci Resolve users using Dehancer.

Both work fine as can be seen in the gimbal test at 10:22 so unless it's specifically for gimbal use I would look at what lens ticks the most boxes apart from that. But you could also revisit "The Picking" at 14:03 to hear my thoughts on what lens works best for what situation.

I believe they have a LR plug-in actually.

Glad that lens gets you what you need. Thanks for watching

You can't convert LR presets to picture styles. Picture Styles needs to be built in a software that corresponds with the cameras color processing

Ah see, yeah that's the one annoying thing with Sony cameras. I rarely have the info display turned on. But if I do, I normally just pinch zoom past the "junk" to fill the screen ;) And pinch zoom out or just swipe up or down to glance setting and info. The frame guide options available is 80, 85, 90, 93 and 96% so no free form for that tiny little image patch.

Ah bummer. Yeah I hate the way Sony does their info out, but I still need it in some cases. This seems to be the only feature this monitor is missing. If it had that I would buy it no doubt.

Yeah, I don't know why they can't add that as an option. It blows when shooting anamorphic if you want the on screen values and counter...

Thank you Jose, it was shot on the Fujifilm X-T4 and probably the Sigma 18-35 and or the Viltrox 23mm f1.4

@@thomasfransson Hey Thomas! Thank you so much!

Hey, anytime! And I just remembered that I might have shot some b-roll shots with the Canon 50mm f1.8 STM and a close focus filter/diopter. Have a great one!

Thank you, it just keeps getting better and better. And I feel like I barely scratched the surface.

Yes, for a few projects and things dating back a few years. As we've been in a similar field in terms of product development when it comes to film looks. So there's a history there for sure. But quite a complicated and none traditional one in the sense of now being an affiliate.

Haha! The old lazy filmmaker - this will be quick 🤣

@@thomasfransson -- Is that what it's called? I am asking a serious question. Whatever that is that's holding up your camera, it looks awesome.

Ah! I'm so sorry, I thought you were teasing me. But, the tripod I used can actually be turned into a monopod. But there's no monopod tripod foot for it to make it stand by itself. If that's what you’re looking for I can highly recommend the Innorel VM70CK that I reviewed here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mqazYpSrq9h7hJosi=F2LSDqVlxwZ19x3u It's basically a more affordable version of the iphoto monopods. Or the smallrig CT-195 that you saw in the video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/o2XPaWh_hKuMppIsi=z1tFrgpSpsU-h5qk

I've only shot with a 45mm 1.5X But given the fact that a 1.5X anamorphic lenses will have a field of view similar to a 23mm lens (if you’re shooting on a full frame camera) and that smallrig claims this matte box to clear up to 15mm wide angle lenses without any vignetting. We should be able to assume that 35mm would work without any vignetting.

@@thomasfransson thank you

If you’re planning on switching between different cameras on the fly I guess it could be somewhat annoying. Otherwise I don't see an issue with mounting the right one, sticking the rest of them in a drawer for any future gear changes. Lol

I never hide this one. I've done a few tests at home but nothing was a stand out solution. You could tape it to the inside of a button down shirt collar, glasses, brim of a cap that sort of stuff... Anyplace you can place it where it won't be moving around and nothing will rub up against it.

You are welcome!

I hear you, it's definitely one of my favorite lenses for sure. I got the 50mm f1.4 recently but haven't decided if I actually like it more or not. How's the 100mm macro?

Thank you! Cheers!

That's great to hear you're still putting them to good use. I think I bought mine around 1999 with a couple of zooms. I use the leases alot and the P30n gets out now and then too.

No, I'm actually holding the 200D in my hand during my talking head segment. It's was shot on the Fujifilm X-T4.

Should be similar to the FX30 and the examples you see in the video. The a6700 uses the same sensor and therefore probably the same ibis system as the FX30 That said, no stabilization will replace a gimbal, but it will take out those micro shakes and that sort of stuff.

@@thomasfransson ok I think I might get the eony 18 105 f4 cause of the oss

OK, hope it works great for what you have in mind

I haven't gotten any confirmations on that model but if you look at the list of confirmed installations in the description I think the earlier 600D is there...

I'm not familiar with the features in capcut, but there might be a "handheld" effect

@@thomasfransson thanks for the reply, ya I’ve tried a few effects alright but seem to loose a good bit of quality

Maybe shoot at higher resolution. The effect need to crop in to have room to move around the footage. The more motion the heavier the crop will be.

It's a standard arca type quick release plate. Hope that helps

Yes, a tiny little rubber piece like this. But atleast it's relatively cheap and easy fix. And for the sake of compatibility it good to have a little extra room in that mount for a wider variety of microphones.

@@thomasfransson That's true. I sorted my Rode NTG out on the mount this morning, was clearing out an old draw and came upon some old Fitbit watch straps, cheap yokes off the internet - so cut them to size and bada bing bada boom - whadda ya know? Roll!

Unfortunately Adobe hasn't discovered the greatness of these profiles yet. But if you want to process RAW files you can use Canons software Digital Professional which will allow you to apply the profiles to your RAW files. As the base idea was to make something that would offer a type of limitation by only applying to jpgs that's the only way atm

I would recommend checking out my installation tutorial before giving up. Technically they should work.

Have you tried Porta and/or Crowdak?

​@@thomasfransson I think the above comment describes Crowdak 💪 . It's warm and has very strong shadows, and in portraits I think it does very well.

Thank you

Have fun with them!

To provide a better idea of what the lavalier sounds like, the talking head is boom and the parts marked "Audio samples" is the lavalier. This so your ears won't adjust and get used to the lavalier sound.

Could be worth looking into on those cameras for sure

Thanks! 😁 I'd call it first propper 😉

Thank you for sharing your experience. I wish I could have made just one profile, but had to break it up in two to make it easier in the end.

Sounds like you might have gotten a lemon or maybe the a6400 wasn't able to properly communicate with the lens due to age? But then again like I mentioned in the video - different type of shooters will favor one over the other ;)

@@thomasfransson um... Sony a6400 is a relatively new camera, that's A 6300 it was worse. But there 18-105 were stable so much that I got used to such a view, and 17-70 I did not get it. The second time I would not buy :(

As it works fine on the FX30 that was just an assumption that the older a6400 (released in spring 2019) might have something to do with it. As for the comparison with the 18-105 it's possible that the stabilization would work better as it's a Sony lens, a longer lens and thus possibly offer more stops of stabilization. The f2.8 aperture on the Tamron might also be a limiting factor when it comes to this what type of stabilization is possible to implement along with decisions on size, price and so forth. As I've never looked into why Tamron refers to their lens stabilization as Vibration compensation (I'm thinking micro jitters) rather than gimbal smoothness but that is another aspect to consider. After all these are photography lenses and both ibis and ois will certainly work better for stills than video. And while we're at it I think a lot of newer less experienced shooters might have their expectations set to high when it comes to stabilization whether it's in camera, lens or a combination of both. Let's also put into perspective the vast difference in shooting styles, shooting scenarios, people in general as well as technique. Personally I have rather shaky hands and even with Ibis it's hard for me to shoot steady once I approach 35mm on an aps-c camera. 23mm or wider is where I feel the most comfortable. Some people might have their cutoff at a wider focal length while others might be quite comfortable at 50mm for short takes. I can obviously shoot at 50 or 70mm but that will result in some jerks, no matter what setup I'm using as my hands are quite twitchy. Anyway - It looks like we have different experiences using this lens on our respective cameras and for what ever we've used it for. Personally I think it's a great lens for the right type of shooter and types of shoot. And as you've made quite clear, you're not overly enthusiastic about it based on your experience and shooting preferences.

@@thomasfransson you're right, everyone's styles are different, but I'm so outraged because I never expected to see shaking at Tamron's minimum focal lengths when I got used to a stable 18-105 picture at the same focal lengths. In any case, even the built-in Sony camera stabilizer is not such that you can shoot video, for a photo it is normal. thank you :)