So instead of going to a place and helping in the way that the local churches specifically ask (like building homes, helping bring supplies, clean water, etc), it's better to go and do, nothing?
@thispersonrighthere902410 күн бұрын
sorry, i can't really recognize religion as anything more than something man-made.
@E-pistol15 күн бұрын
The Bible is a Catholic book ♥
@bmgmusa0723 күн бұрын
Church keeps changing with the times and it won't be anything like a church by the time Jesus returns. By definition Christianity is exclusive. We are worried people leaving the church that we let go of essential truths. The church will continue to lose members as generations go by. But it is also gaining members especially to traditional Christian church like Catholic and Orthodox churches. Focus on Jesus and the truths of the Holy Bible. Some will leave some will stay but being ashamed of the Word of God is dangerous.
@Jace.gotjokesАй бұрын
A big reason I left the church for a short time is because I did not believe it helped me have an embodied faith. The gospel at times felt flat and very superficial always about winning. It felt like a place either feel good or bad about yourself but not make you a disciple, challenge you, or actually cultivate the world. A favorite book of mine that touched on this is “The Call to Conversion” by Jim Wallis. I have found a church that has embodied this better but I do think it’s hard to find.
@jesusvsamerica29 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing your experience! A big part of why we do this podcast is our belief that so many churches in the United States are teaching a heavily enculturated version of the faith, and it sounds like that felt off to you as well. We’re glad to hear that you put in the work to find a church that did a better job at following the way of Jesus. Many might not have made the effort and simply walked away, so it’s encouraging to know that you landed in a good place on the other side of what is often a difficult search.
@MaxRamos8Ай бұрын
Very informative discussion. Btw I'm all for hydrogen cars because electric cars still produce much waste with the way batteries are made, plus EVs don't have the option of using an ICE whereas Hydrogen can do both 😊
@MaxRamos8Ай бұрын
I'm surprised that christians are afraid of this topic. To me it just makes sense that we should care for the animals and earth at least on the same level as caring for strangers, the poor, or caring for the homeless. Important issue that we should always keep in mind but we don't need to be activists although that's not a bad path.
@georgenelson8917Ай бұрын
No Jesus spoke of servicing 2masters : he was bluntly talking of MAMMOM ( private property, land, money ). You can serve one or the other not bothLOOK IT UP. He was a Jewish COMMUNIST, he was speaking again and curses a RICH MAN who wanted to follow him , Jesus told him to go give all his property to the poor. IT IS EASIER FOR A CAMEL ( canle ) to pass through the eye of a needle then a rich man to enter kingdom of heaven. “Hypocrites ( Christ) now totally reject Yesuha s commands and curses about private property . And the “ Christian now follow Rich man Trump like Germans followers of. Hitler
@tylerw.42213 ай бұрын
My question on the matter of 1 Corinthians 6 is: Would God, no matter the translation, allow His Word to be wrong or mistranslated in any way? Would He not want His word to be perfect and if every translation is saying the same thing and other connections in the Bible also address this issue in the same way, would it not be correct?
@andreamoreno55303 ай бұрын
Absolutely not he would not go to a gay wedding especially in the church his Holy Sanctuary it is against his teachings .period.
@CasperLCat3 ай бұрын
I support your First Amendment rights to believe and speak about Christianity being the only way. But do you support the same rights for those who reject your faith ? Because our Constitution gives the SAME rights to ALL. THAT is America 🇺🇸.
@tylerw.42214 ай бұрын
What do you mean there were no ceremonies in ancient times? There are Galilean weddings that Jesus talks about in the Bible
@arthurplant59624 ай бұрын
Here is the answer to the question. YES! A better question is why would people believed in a god that allowed his children to owned his children as property?
@longcastle48634 ай бұрын
Christians are worshipping and proclaiming as “God’s chosen one”, the one person living today who most resembles the Beast of The Book of Revelation. Aren’t they just a little bit worried about the Lake of Fire, which is the final resting place of all who believe in and follow the Beast? And they wear his mark (his red MAGA hat) on their foreheads.
@mugaldo14 ай бұрын
Very well done
@CoachNoahDavid4 ай бұрын
For all of you who claim to follow Christ, but answer this question with anything besides, “yes,” then you ain’t a Christian. It’s as simple as that. If you ain’t a Christian then you don’t believe that Jesus is the only way. Either you follow Christ and believe he’s the only way, or you don’t. It’s that simple. No need to have a whole hour podcast about an answer that is given by Jesus Christ himself in scripture. This is a very ignorant conversation being held by people who don’t even understand scripture.
@jesusvsamerica4 ай бұрын
A lawyer, a pastor who went through seminary and a religious studies degree but okay. We're exploring these questions because it's the questions young people are afraid to ask out loud. Simply dismissing the entire question arrogantly in a paragraph comment on youtube without grace, patience and understanding is why young people are leaving the church.
@CoachNoahDavid4 ай бұрын
@@jesusvsamerica my point of view is from having experience and knowing this already so forgive me for misunderstanding the targeted crowd. It’s good for new believers to hear this. I assumed this was for seasoned believers so I apologize for making that assumption.
@noway90815 ай бұрын
This was an incredibly intelligent, thoughful and faithful episode. It addressed the issue honestly and respectfully. Thank you.
@cygnusustus5 ай бұрын
"All of our view on civil rights, and equality, and anti-discrimination would not have been possible but for the movement that Christ began." This is typical of Christian arrogance. Sorry, but "no". Jesus did not invent the concept of being nice to each other. The fact is that Christians had to borrow from Humanist philosophy in order to oppose slavery, whereas they only needed to read their scriptures to support it.
@cygnusustus5 ай бұрын
What the issue of slavery in the Bible demonstrates is that the Old Testament was not the inspired word of a perfect God, but merely a product of the culture that created it. The New Testament was not the inspired word of a perfect God, but merely a product of the culture that created it. The Bible is exactly what we would expect to be written by ignorant, superstitious, barbaric, bronze-age goat herders.
@cygnusustus5 ай бұрын
"The Bible didn't advocate for it [slavery]" Yes, in fact, it did. The Bible explicitly promotes chattel slavery. The enslavement of conquered peoples is codified into the Mosaic laws. That is advocating slavery.
@nickbrasing87865 ай бұрын
This is officially one of my favorite, if not absolute favorite videos on this subject I've ever seen done on this difficult topic by a Christian site. Refreshingly honest, and obviously well researched. If only more Christians took the time to delve this deeply, as difficult as it may be. I know I've personally done something I've never done before here. I liked and subscribed. If this video is any indication of how you handle all subjects, it's a worthwhile channel to listen to. I do wish you had gone more in depth on the bad apologetics regarding Biblical slavery that are out there though. You mentioned how those arguments fell apart as you read, but most if not all people are not going to take the time to read Dr. Bowen's book. It would have been very helpful to lay out the inaccuracies, misrepresentations, and outright falsehoods spread by less learned videos on this topic that I hear repeatedly regurgitated over and over again by Christians. They need to know these things so they can come to their own conclusions from a position of knowledge, rather than ignorance. Something sadly lacking these days. I know through my own study that my opinion and respect for many apologists was either greatly reduced, or fell by the wayside when their ignorance or outright dishonesty was laid bare with actual facts. As you seem to have concluded as well. As I myself have said until I'm blue in the face, the question isn't "Does the Bible Condone Slavery", the answer to that is an obvious yes to any honest person. The question videos should be about is "Why" the Bible condones slavery. The more pertinent and honest question that should be asked, debated and wrestled with personally. But from a position of knowledge and not the ignorance so common these days. Perhaps you could do a follow up video explaining the fallacies and misrepresentations of the bad arguments on Biblical slavery that are so prominent today? And from the likes of Frank Turek, J. Warner Wallace or Cliff Knectle for example. Who are all just so completely horrible when it comes to this. And yet are so popular and well respected. Bad and dishonest apologetics need to be called out by Christians more than they are these days. In my humble opinion. I hope the tact you've taken here catches on, and I applaud you for blazing the trail. Well done.
@dansdiscourse49575 ай бұрын
"It's just faster to leave the faith." Way ahead of you, my dude
@Ema1223-t7b5 ай бұрын
Semoga kita dimanapun berada . Kita bisa saling meng hargai sesama dan bisa menjaga teloransi umat beragama Amin
@Ema1223-t7b5 ай бұрын
Maaf aku gk bisa tulis disini dgn bhs ingris. Semua Agama didunia ini mengajarkan kita untuk percaya kpd tuhan yang maha esa mengajarkan budi pekerti yg baik terhdp seama dan lingkungan dimanapu kita berada Amin
@intent2modulate5 ай бұрын
I have been enjoying this podcast, but this one had a couple of misses for me. There's the point that @jenna2431 made, which I think should've been the crux of the episode, but I don't think we ever really got there. My other concern is that Y2K absolutely was a thing. Maybe it wouldn't have been as cataclysmic as some were saying back then, but Y2K mitigation efforts were part of what kept my dad employed in the 1990s. It was largely a non-event because enough people listened to the experts and finally paid software engineers to develop upgrades to their systems. Most companies took care of things in advance, but there were definitely systems that failed... they were just smaller and we missed them because the big news stories were basically "hooray, the banks didn't implode". That opened the door for people to mock the initial concerns as having been illegitimate. I see a similar situation when people whine about how air quality regulations are overbearing and unnecessary, because the ozone layer has recovered quite a bit from the scare a few decades ago... presumably on its own. As far as I understand, the ozone layer recovered BECAUSE we actually did something about it, and it worked. Again, overall, I like the podcast, and I will keep listening, but please make research a priority, even if it means slowing down the cadence of the episodes. Otherwise, you might be contributing to spreading misinformation.
@WISEwomanWONDERSlifestyle5 ай бұрын
Wow this podcast really found me at the right time. I found it as an ad on another video, but it really related to my journey with weed. I self medicated for around 9 years with weed and explored psychedelics a fair amount of times too. I began feeling a push from God to quit after having multiple negative experiences with drugs that led me to my current perspective - it no longer serves me and life is worth living sober minded. I 100% became addicted/ dependent during my course of use and it always turned into stronger doses and more ways of consuming it to be higher. From homemade strong edibles to smoking pieces and everything in between. I was needing stronger and stronger doses and feeling as if my only joy was from weed. I positioned my life around weed and how / when I could use it. Cancelling plans because I’d rather be high or preferring to be home every weekend high than visiting family and doing otherwise healthy things for myself. I would try to have balance and set up schedules of usage, mainly on the weekends, then later binge for a week straight going through a huge amount of product. It got to a point where I felt like I was going to die after an extremely strong edible that I made. Heart palpitating, white lips and pale face, losing my vision. I was dehydrated from being so high I forgot to drink water throughout the day. I felt ridiculous that I let it get to that point. That was my final time of consumption after I decided Gods messages were getting louder and louder to me, it went from anxiety during smoking to now full blown near death experiences in my opinion. It felt like God was going to continue to provide me negative experiences with the substance I loved until I decided to give it up. So I have. It’s been about 2.5 weeks. I’m proud of myself but it’s been hard. I used weed to cope with various traumas I went through as a child and young woman, I’m also the child of an alcoholic. Substance abuse is in my DNA and a subsequently normal response to my traumas. But I don’t want to abuse it anymore, I don’t want to be addicted. I don’t want to center my life around being high. Blessings to yall for this video. I also want to share that this video related to me as someone who doesn’t identify as a Christian. I’m a believer in God, and have my own unique relationship. But I appreciated how this video resonated with me and the variety of perspectives shared. It would have been nice to have a cannabis smoker on too, but well done regardless.
@jesusvsamerica5 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for sharing this with us! Hopefully we can revisit the topic again in the near future with a guest that can add further perspective.
@Jace.gotjokes5 ай бұрын
I like the approach yall did showing different sides. I would see myself in the middle. That it needs limits just like alcohol does. There are some good benefits especially those with mental illness. The recreational shouldn’t be a free for all situation because that can lead to addiction. I do not think it possible to control weed by smoking the way you can via edible. I am very nuanced on this topic. That this thing can be causing terrible harm not controlled and there can be benefits when controlled and not made into an idol.
@winifredgrantges71405 ай бұрын
Are you saying that the eirld is flat? Thank you for replying!
@the5stacys5 ай бұрын
Jesus always visits me during my sessions.
@CocoQTpie4u5 ай бұрын
Personally I believe Christianity attracts fearful people, it is exactly that fear that religion exploits. It truly is sad.
@jesusvsamerica5 ай бұрын
Our community and comment section is defined by thoughtful discussion. We want to encourage asking questions and allow others to feel safe wrestling with uncertainty. If we feel your comment is one of harsh judgement or arrogant certainty, we'll remove it. This is a space for dialogue and process. Thank you.
@jesusvsamerica5 ай бұрын
Our community and comment section is defined by thoughtful discussion. We want to encourage asking questions and allow others to feel safe wrestling with uncertainty. If we feel your comment is one of harsh judgement or arrogant certainty, we'll remove it. This is a space for dialogue and process. Thank you.
@jesusvsamerica5 ай бұрын
Our community and comment section is defined by thoughtful discussion. We want to encourage asking questions and allow others to feel safe wrestling with uncertainty. If we feel your comment is one of harsh judgement or arrogant certainty, we'll remove it. This is a space for dialogue and process. Thank you.
@garyt-of6yb5 ай бұрын
STAY AWAY FROM DEMOCRATS AND LET GOD COME BACK!
@dhfocus75 ай бұрын
I don't think there is any way that Jesus would go to a "gay" wedding. He met with sinners to call them to repentance, but we have no record of Him hanging out in the midst of a sinful activity in order to reach people. The closest example I can think of is the woman at the well. He called out her infidelity, and she brought people to hear Him in a publicly neutral place.
@eloiseramsey92765 ай бұрын
I've always Seek God for confirmation and he confirms. Especially if you're seeking his will and not your own. I think today our desire are too personal. I find the more I pray for his will to be done in world events the more it helps me.
@dejophilon26205 ай бұрын
🙏 ❤ Truth
@justanothersephardi5 ай бұрын
Thank you for tackling this. The overwhelming message people outside of Christian circles are hearing is that Christianity defines itself almost primarily through LGBTQ issues, to such an extent that people who aren't sure what churches believe assume Christianity is about not being gay and little else. Christians, I think, have sent the message that this is the primary issue they're interested in.
@dhfocus75 ай бұрын
I think it's because they are the only group seeking to change how believers think about what God has clearly spoken of as sin. Adulterers, fornicators, thieves, etc, aren't forming groups to do this.
@justanothersephardi5 ай бұрын
@@dhfocus7 surely we aren't the only sinners. This really is different, though, because if we so much as ask for prayer we're kicked out of most evangelical societies. Speaking from experience -- I'm forever grateful that G-d isn't like human beings. At least I know I'm a sinner, but many people like you genuinely believe you are holy on your own merits. From what I understand of theology, self-righteousness is a very unsafe place to be spiritually.
@Stephan-ix8me5 ай бұрын
Ironic because I believe Jesus was gay. He never or had any kids.
@brendalundy82546 ай бұрын
No
@dansdiscourse49576 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing some of the content of Randall Balmer's book
@dansdiscourse49576 ай бұрын
"To be fair, I don't think these are beliefs that are specific to Christians at all." Absolutely. Gullibility and stupidity are universal human traits found the world over. My problem, as someone who once believed and doesn't anymore, is that Christians so often declare themselves to be the recipients of divine wisdom, so much so that they figure that they get to tell other people how to live. And then it turns that they can be some of the greatest fools. I say some of because, again, foolishness is universal. But with Christians it's worse because they take the stupidity and then use faith as a weapon against, well, lots of people. It's just all kinds of bad. Good luck with your church thing. I suspect it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.
@dansdiscourse49576 ай бұрын
Also, you could have mentioned the Millerites from 1844
@JonHurley-o4o6 ай бұрын
wow, certainty is faith, just wow
@tylerw.42216 ай бұрын
In my opinion, both parties have major flaws and should not be trusted. Instead, I wouldn’t take your party’s advice, but instead, look at what the Bible says. ALL men and women are flawed and will fail, but God’s word has no flaw and cannot be changed.
@jenna24316 ай бұрын
A recent study came out that showed that believing one incomprehensible thing paves the way for you to believe more even more incomprehensible things. It's not that you're less intelligent. It's that you choose to not demand evidence, which is entirely common among religious. They're EVEN TOLD that to demand substantiation for a claim is "faithless." You hear it all the time. Well, it's not FAITH if you want proof. The concept of faith has gotten twisted into a measurement of loyalty by gullibility. But the actual point of putting your faith in anything - be it the government, education, or pretty sparkly ponies, is your experience, not your ability to override your own reason.
@noway90816 ай бұрын
Alright, so taking the reliability of the gospels as an account of Jesus's life, words, and work as a given, I wish you would address the fact that throughout his teachings (as recorded in the Gospels) Jesus never once took a stand against slavery or even said it was wrong! Slavery was rampant in the ancient world, including the areas.whete Jesus lived and taught. Slavery is also mentioned in other parts of the Bible. So is makes perfect sense the Jesus understood what slavery was and probably saw examples of it all around him. Yet, as recorded in the gospels he never once said slavery was wrong or even once called for a master to free their slaves. In my mind this is the biggest ethical omission in all of Jesus's teachings and a significant argument for him not being in any way devine. I can understand how the records of philosophers such as Aristotle and Socrates do not condemn slavery (in Aristotle's case he actually justified "natural slavery). As wide as they were, theses philosophers were fully human and no one later claimed otherwise. But if Jesus was devine and here to save our souls then it doesn't make sense that he would simply ignore slavery, a great wrong that destroys the human spirit. All I ask is that in addressing this issue you don't take the common position that somehow the slavery that Jesus saw was somehow a "good form"of slavery or at very least better than slavery as we understand it today. I'm sure that any ancient historian will tell you that slavery in the time of Jesus was just a cruel and dehumanizing as any form of modern slavery. One of the reasons I hate bringing up this argument to Christians is that their first resort is almost always to justify slavery and create in their minds the horrible concept of "nice slavery" or "better slavery" as the slavery that Jesus saw and said nothing about. They are more willing to redefine something they know to be awful and wrong as less wrong rather than address a massive ethical and spiritual omission on the part of Jesus. No Christian in their right mind would ever say: "I want to bring back slavery, not the bad kind but the better kind that was around when Jesus was alive and felt no need to say anything about!" But in defense of Jesus's glaring failure to address slavery, they will almost immediately take the position that somehow the slavery that Jesus was "better". Please address the issue of Jesus's silence on slavery.
@jesusvsamerica6 ай бұрын
Yes! It's on our list to film in the next few weeks. We will definitely not be taking the position that it was a "nice" form of slavery.
@noway90816 ай бұрын
@@jesusvsamerica Thank you. Especially about not taking the "slavery Jesus saw was a nicer kind of slavery" position! It never made sense to me how saving a woman from being legally stoned for adultery and throwing money changers out of the temple (when there is no indication that they were illegally there) fell within Jesus's mission but somehow saying that slavery is wrong did not. In both of these instances Jesus took a stand against legally sanctioned actions (the stoning of a woman for adultery, and changing money in the temple) on the basis that they were wrong for reasons beyond the laws that allowed them. So Jesus definitely took a stand against actions that he felt were wrong even when they were legally sanctioned. So right there the argument that Jesus's mission did not include addressing legally sanctioned wrongs falls apart. And yet he says nothing to condemn or even address slavery! Slavery is by its nature dehumanizing and directly harmful to the human spirit. So the fact that Jesus seemed to just ignore it is a strong rebuttal to the idea that he was divine. How could a divine all loving being sent to save humanity see slavery, a wrong that denies people their basic humanity, and say nothing?
@noway90817 ай бұрын
If Jesus was devine then why didn't he condemn the slavery that was all around him? Slavery existed in the ancient world, especially in areas that were under Roman rule, including ancient Israel. So Jesus undoubtedly saw slavery all around yet he said and did nothing. It doesn't make sense that Jesus would throw money lenders out of the temple, protect a woman about to be stoned for adultery and yet say nothing about the institution of slavery that was widespread and legally existed all around him. Slavery literally dehumanizes people and reduces them to property, yet Jesus said nothing! So either Jesus just didn't see slavery as a problem worth his time or the people who wrote the gospels and chose what would and would not be included in the Bible decided to edit out things that he may have said about slavery. If the former is true (Jesus just didn't think the problem of slavery was worth his time or part of his mission) than I cannot accept that he was devine. Because If Jesus was God and there to save the human soul then how could he just ignore slavery, a system that crushes the human soul by literally reducing humanity to property? I can understand how philosophers like Aristotle and Socrates didn't stand against slavery. They were fully human and subject to human error. But if Jesus was God than it does not make sense that he would throw money changers out of the temple and protect a woman about to be stoned and yet just kinda ignore the slavery that was all around him. To simply overlook slavery or just view it as outside his mission to save our souls while at the same time preaching to love our neighbors does not make sense. And the excuse that Jesus didn't address slavery simply because it was legal at the time (give unto ceaser) paints a picture of Jesus (and through him God) that is absolutely not all knowing and definitely not all loving. Put simply, a God that would come to earth to save the soul of humanity and yet not say a word about slavery, one of the worst, if not the most soul crushing thing ever invented by humanity is either deeply flawed or incredibly evil. The second option is that Jesus did say things against slavery but for whatever reason the people that recorded his life and words edited that part out. If that is the case then it begs the question of what else did Jesus do that they decided to edit out or even worse what things did Jesus not do did they decide to add in? This would mean that the sources we base our beliefs in Jesus on are inherently unreliable at there core. If we accept that some of Jesus's words and actions may have been edited out (ie the stuff he may have said about slavery were edited out of the gospels) than we have to question the accuracy of the gospels in their entirety. Jesus's silence on slavery in the ancient world is one of the greatest spiritual and ethical flaws in the position that he was in anyway devine and/or that the gospels are a reliable source as to his existence. Jesus's silence on slavery was not only wrong and inconsistent in an abstract sense, but was also used as part of the Christian justification for slavery for the two millennia following his death. I cannot believe that Jesus was God when he couldn't even take the time to just say "slavery is wrong". And if he did say these things, then I cannot trust in the reliability of gospels that decided to edit that part out.
@noway90817 ай бұрын
If Jesus was devine then why didn't he condemn the slavery that was all around him? Slavery existed in the ancient world, especially in areas that were under Roman rule, including ancient Israel. So Jesus undoubtedly saw slavery all around yet he said and did nothing. It doesn't make sense that Jesus would throw money lenders out of the temple, protect a woman about to be stoned for adultery and yet say nothing about the institution of slavery that was widespread and legally existed all around him. Slavery literally dehumanizes people and reduces them to property, yet Jesus said nothing! So either Jesus just didn't see slavery as a problem worth his time or the people who wrote the gospels and chose what would and would not be included in the Bible decided to edit out things that he may have said about slavery. If the former is true (Jesus just didn't think the problem of slavery was worth his time or part of his mission) than I cannot accept that he was devine. Because If Jesus was God and there to save the human soul then how could he just ignore slavery, a system that crushes the human soul by literally reducing humanity to property? I can understand how philosophers like Aristotle and Socrates didn't stand against slavery. They were fully human and subject to human error. But if Jesus was God than it does not make sense that he would throw money changers out of the temple and protect a woman about to be stoned and yet just kinda ignore the slavery that was all around him. To simply overlook slavery or just view it as outside his mission to save our souls while at the same time preaching to love our neighbors does not make sense. And the excuse that Jesus didn't address slavery simply because it was legal at the time (give unto ceaser) paints a picture of Jesus (and through him God) that is absolutely not all knowing and definitely not all loving. Put simply, a God that would come to earth to save the soul of humanity and yet not say a word about slavery, one of the worst, if not the most soul crushing thing ever invented by humanity is either deeply flawed or incredibly evil. The second option is that Jesus did say things against slavery but for whatever reason the people that recorded his life and words edited that part out. If that is the case then it begs the question of what else did Jesus do that they decided to edit out or even worse what things did Jesus not do did they decide to add in? This would mean that the sources we base our beliefs in Jesus on are inherently unreliable at there core. If we accept that some of Jesus's words and actions may have been edited out (ie the stuff he may have said about slavery were edited out of the gospels) than we have to question the accuracy of the gospels in their entirety. Jesus's silence on slavery in the ancient world is one of the greatest spiritual and ethical flaws in the position that he was in anyway devine and/or that the gospels are a reliable source as to his existence. Jesus's silence on slavery was not only wrong and inconsistent in an abstract sense, but was also used as part of the Christian justification for slavery for the two millennia following his death. I cannot believe that Jesus was God when he couldn't even take the time to just say "slavery is wrong". And if he did say these things, then I cannot trust in the reliability of gospels that decided to edit that part out.
@rexrickss7 ай бұрын
A lot of people were “slaves” in the sense of butlers to wealthy people. That was their only living. Jesus saw everyone the same no matter what their class was. [28] There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.(Galatians 3:28-29). Also, the Bible condemned threatening slaves. ”Remember that the Lord will reward each one of us for the good we do, whether we are slaves or free. Masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Don’t threaten them; remember, you both have the same Master in heaven, and he has no favorites.“ Ephesians 6:8-9 NLT. Slavery during these times wasn’t like how it was in the 1800s towards black people, where certain Bible passages were used to control slaves. They weren’t allowed to understand their freedom in Christ Jesus or that they were being treated unfairly.
@noway90817 ай бұрын
The idea that somehow slavery in the ancient world was different from slavery in the 18th and early 20th century is ridiculous! In both cases the master was considered a human being and the slave was considered property. And no, slavery in the ancient world was not the equivalent of being a butler or maid. A butler or maid can quit whenever they want to. A butler or maid can marry, own property, and have legal rights equal or at least on par with their employers. The ridiculous idea that ancient slavery was somehow "less bad" than slavery in the 19th and early 20th century is a great example of how Christians try to deal with the fact that Jesus never challenged slavery (telling a slave master not to mistreat their slaves or that there are no slaves in heaven is not even close to the same as saying slavery is wrong). We know that slavery is wrong. We know that it crushes the human spirit and diminishes the human soul. So in order for Christians to justify in their minds Jesus's silence in the face of the great wrong that is slavery, they have come up with the concept of "slavery that isn't as bad as slavery". That somehow the slavery that Jesus saw wasn't quite as bad as "real slavery". They paint ancient slavery as something akin to being a butler or maid, even though everything we know about ancient and written history tells us that slavery in the ancient world was no different than the slavery that we know. Honestly, if I asked you to describe life in the ancient world compared to the early modern world you would immediately say that ancient life was much harsher. Famine, disease, and bare subsistence were the norm. And yet when it comes to slavery, that you just somehow accept that that institution was somehow less cruel! Let that one sink in for a second. You immediately recognize that everything else about existence in the ancient world was harsher than the modern world, but you make an exception for ancient slavery! For some inexplicable reason ancient slavery was somehow "better" than modern slavery! Oh come on! On a basic level you know that ancient slavery was probably just as cruel as modern slavery if not more so. But you can't reconcile that idea with the fact that Jesus did not directly oppose it even when he took the time to protect a woman accused of adultery and threw money changers out of the temple. So Christians came up with the idea of a not-quite-as-bad slavery that Jesus rightfully ignored. Btw, the slave-owners who used the Bible to justify modern slavery said the exact same things about ancient slavery that you did. The only difference is where you say modern slavery was different from ancient slavery, they said modern slavery is exactly the same as ancient slavery! Let me put it this way. Imagine if someone came to you and said: "I'm all for bringing back slavery, but not like it was in the 18th-20th century but the way it was in ancient times. You know, like the way slavery was when Jesus was around!" I really doubt you'd be cool with that! Because on a basic level you recognize that ancient slavery was slavery! But you can't reconcile your faith that Jesus was devine and all good with the fact that he did not challenge slavery, something that was not just fundamentally wrong but soul crushingly so. Look at the end of the day, I have no doubt that you will probably just ignore this glaring omission in Jesus's teachings by just repeating the ridiculous idea that ancient slavery was the equivalent to being a maid or butler or at very least somehow not as bad as "real slavery" because that's way easier than recognizing this massive omission. But at very least recognize that this idea of "better slavery" is complete BS! Or at very least if anyone ever says to you that they want to "bring back slavery the way it was in Jesus's time", please don't agree with them!
@rexrickss7 ай бұрын
@@noway9081 Jesus didn’t come to be a social philosopher. He came to fulfill the law and the prophecies about Him. There are cases where slaves are treated unjustly but the Christian thing to do is to show the love of Christ despite those who do you wrong. The Bible also tells the slave masters to be conscious of their own master which was God. After the death of Jesus he fulfilled the law and everyone could experience freedom in Him. Ancient world slavery often had rules in place to prevent oppression of slaves. The Bible has several passages condemning treating others harshly. For example: (Deuteronomy 24:14 “You shall not oppress a hired worker who is poor and needy, whether he is one of your brothers or one of the sojourners who are in your land within your towns). At the end of the day God desired every man to be free which is why He sent His Son to die and be a perfect sacrifice. “Slave” or not, anyone can be saved through Jesus which is what matters most at the end of the day.
@rexrickss7 ай бұрын
@@noway9081 Slave ownership was a common practice long before the time the Mosaic Law was given. So, the law neither instituted slavery nor ended it; rather, the law regulated it. It gave instructions on how slaves should be treated but did not outlaw slavery altogether. Slaves were essentially like a child. If they made a mistake then a punishment was given to correct them. 20 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property. Exodus 21:20-21. God allowed slavery but didn’t condone killing them or treating them unfairly. As controversial as this may sound, slavery had its benefits and wasn’t supposed to be misconstrued as a system of unfair treatment towards another Human. Jesus knew of unfair treatment and said to “bless those who persecute you” and to “pray for those who abuse you”. In Christ we are all one blood and should love thy neighbor as ourselves. God wouldn’t send His only son to die for us if He didn’t love us. He made a way for eternal life despite our own human shortcomings.
@rexrickss7 ай бұрын
@@noway9081 Whatever you are, you can rest in the fact we are all equal in Christ. No one can claim superiority over each other: There is [now no distinction in regard to salvation] neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you [who believe] are all one in Christ Jesus [no one can claim a spiritual superiority]. (Galatians 3:26-29). Jesus sees past whatever our social role is and saves us regardless of our earthly troubles. This I will always believe.
@NotANameist7 ай бұрын
Very interesting conversation!
@richardburton-7777 ай бұрын
I John 2:15-17. Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever. Love of Anything above God is unacceptable. Loving God Allows us to Properly love our neighbors, our family, our wife or husband.
@bennyrenaissance85497 ай бұрын
When it comes to "American culture" what parts are not congruent with Christianity? To broad stroke American culture and Christianity is careless. Church and Christianity in general is not a one size fits all. Neither is American culture. I hear nothing but rambling and nothing very specific. Just my observation.
@jesusvsamerica7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment. This is the introduction episode talking broadly about the mission of the show. If you want to hear more about those specific pieces of culture, we'd recommend watching an episode talking about a topic and examining the American culture's influence in that area.