does the bottom blade slightly go over the top blade when in fully pressed position?
@DavidPhamChannel2 күн бұрын
When fully pressed the top blade goes slightly behind the bottom blade. Here are some pictures i.postimg.cc/nFrpzvBJ/PXL-20250118-000740169.jpg i.postimg.cc/KGWFgRDg/PXL-20250118-000753234.jpg
@dedaltect72569 сағат бұрын
@@DavidPhamChannel same as mine, thanks for the reply
@skajstell3 күн бұрын
Hi, can you change the retrieve on these?
@DavidPhamChannel3 күн бұрын
I don't actually know, never had to when I owned it.
@carycar457 күн бұрын
Just received a YETI pitcher as Christmas gift. We enjoy using it. However having difficulty removing the lid to refill. Do you have suggestions? Thank you. Jean 01/12/2025 5:30 pm EST
@DavidPhamChannel7 күн бұрын
No, not really just hold the pitcher and lid firmly and turn counter clockwise.
@pocpoculat863810 күн бұрын
What is the distance between the jaws?
@DavidPhamChannel10 күн бұрын
1.2mm
@pocpoculat86388 күн бұрын
@@DavidPhamChannel thanks :)
@bigbear482611 күн бұрын
If I'm not mistaken the M18 series, it's a 18 volt battery. I do believe that 17.6 volts is in the threshold of being called a "18 volt battery". The amount of charge is the level that you see on the bars when you push the button. One bar has nothing to do with the amount of voltage rather the amount of charge in the battery.
@DavidPhamChannel10 күн бұрын
A fully charged M18 battery is about 20.5 volts, a fully discharged battery is 13.0 volts (when tool turns off). So depending on how many bars are left (when you press the indicator button) you'll get a voltage somewhere between 13 and 20.5 volts.
@mb477311 күн бұрын
Have had the 2500 for 18 years. Outstanding watch. Newer versions, while nice with movement, bracelet improvements, are too flashy for my taste, especially the garish bezel font, glossy bezel/dial finishes. Wears on the wrist nicer too with the thinner profile. Outstanding used market values, too.
@maitrehg5 күн бұрын
I just bought the latest version. Best watch I've ever had. For the price I paid, I like that it looks spectacular. But I see your point because I find the earlier versions very pretty too.
@renelopez224415 күн бұрын
Own the same watch. Great timepiece. Accurate too
@stealthyk461017 күн бұрын
Was thinking of buying this but couldn’t find a single review until this video. Thanks for the info!
@DavidPhamChannel17 күн бұрын
No problem, glad it was helpful.
@robertkiehn745917 күн бұрын
Starting a new job and all the guys at the shop rave about this knife, didn't even know that was an issue, we only use one specific bit for that piece. Glad to know there's a fix for if/when I need it
@DavidPhamChannel17 күн бұрын
More of a preventive measure than a fix for a malfunctioned knife. I'm sure Milwaukee will come out with a rev 3, they seem to listen to their customers.
@zachg906518 күн бұрын
Old one is better
@maitrehg5 күн бұрын
Absolutely not.
@Pr0toPoTaT018 күн бұрын
Ive had this issue happen on 3 different Milwaukee fast backs and figured maybe i just use it too much. Absolutely love the knife and i actually am headed to harbor freight otw home from work today lol
@DavidPhamChannel18 күн бұрын
Its a solid knife! Love mine.
@TC-u1j19 күн бұрын
Great video. I was looking for a carafe and saw this Yeti pitcher and wondered what it was like for heat retention. Your heat retention graph was awesome. Thank you for the time you took to review this product. Helps make my decision to commit to buy it. Yeti is it!
@DavidPhamChannel19 күн бұрын
Thanks, glad to help!
@kevinkausche322920 күн бұрын
Hey David, thanks so much for this video it’s helped me alot. I have a few questions on line selection and was wondering if you would be able to help me out? I also use Pieroway rods.
@DavidPhamChannel19 күн бұрын
Glad it was helpful to you! I may not be the best reference for lines as I have not bought a new fly line in years, I really have no idea what out there now but i can try. Good to hear you are using the Pieroways, still using my x-series today.
@kevinkausche322919 күн бұрын
Your video touches on something that others don’t is a Spey lines ability (or lack of) to overhead cast. One thing I find is the grains required to sustained anchor cast is way too many grains to overhead cast neatly, but I would love the versatility of both when floating in the boat. I use a 10’ 6wt that is probably more of a 7wt and I use a 300 grain head with a 80 grain tip so the whole system is 380 grains and it two hand Spey casts quite well. Is the outbound short fully integrated head and sink tip or can you change tips? Do you find both overhead and Spey casts decently achievable with it? Thanks so much for your time!
@DavidPhamChannel19 күн бұрын
I'm not sure I can answer this because all rods/lines are different but I'll do my best. On my 5wt and 6wt rod the lines I use are great for both overhead and single-hand spey casting. I feel the presentation is neat when overhead casting but that's very subjective. I use both setups to fish dries and feel the presentation is delicate enough (very subjective), of course I'll never know how many fish I'm putting down by using the heavier line, lol. My lines have a scandi taper so they are gradually getting thinner towards the end so its not an aggressive splash like you would get from a skagit taper. Also, the way you are casting plays a large role, if you are laying down line it should be relatively graceful, on the other hand if you are super charging the line with an abrupt stop at the end then that's another story. My main reason for using a scandi taper was for the versatility of both spey and overhead casting. Skagit heads are tougher to overhead cast but still doable, I have limited experience overhead casting them. The 380 grain head/tip on your 6/7wt seems excessive to me, of course this would all come down to many factors. For reference I'm using a 330 grain head (Outbound Short) on a fast 8wt rod. Everyone is going to have a different casting stroke and style so your setup might work perfectly for your gear/mechanics. I use the OBS primarily for overhead casting but can single-hand spey cast with it when needed, it's just not an ideal setup for both casting types with the setup i have. The Outbound Short is a single integrated line (no tip required), it does have an aggressive head so you can add a reasonably sized tip on the end if you need to. I have used it to single-hand spey cast but feel its about 5-6 feet too long on my 9' rod, I have to adjust my mechanics/timing quite a bit to get it to work. I have never tried it on a 2 handed rod so can't speak to how well it would do but it should be fine on the right rod. This line was built for overhead casting and turning over large flies (think pike streamers) and it excels at that. If you are thinking about using this line for delicate presentations you can also do that but you will need to a polyleader tip for sure. I hope some of that makes sense.
@kevinkausche322919 күн бұрын
Thanks so much for your reply, It seems like there is no silver bullet to both overhead and Spey but maybe I should look more at Scandi heads due to the more gradual taper, I could see how that would aid in overhead casting ability. I find all decent rods cast very well if properly lined, ii’s just lines are so expensive I want to get it right the first time haha. Thank you again for your reply and for making the video, I gathered alot of info from both!
@DavidPhamChannel19 күн бұрын
@@kevinkausche3229 Glad to help. Best of luck!
@alanb7624 күн бұрын
I started with the now old Honda 9.9 at 75 pounds which was an excellent motor (should have stuck with it), then went to a Honda 5hp at 60 pounds and found the vibration of a single cylinder was much worse than the twin. Later I tried a 15 hp honda and it was near 100 pounds and too strong for the inflatable motor mount. So I settled on the newer Honda Classic 8 at 78 pounds, a smooth twin and nearly the same motor as the older 9.9. I wish they made small lighter 4 stroke twins.
@DavidPhamChannel24 күн бұрын
That's a good point, the single cylinders do vibrate a ton. I heard the 8 and 9.9s are so similar that you can modify the 8s to be 9.9s.
@alanb7623 күн бұрын
@@DavidPhamChannel Well, the old 9.9 and 7.5 were the same engine, and hp was rated at the crankshaft. The newer (2004) classic 8hp was reportedly the earlier 9.9 but now rated at the prop. The later 9.9 was built on the 15 chassis which was larger displacement and was much heavier, in the 100 pound neighborhood. I had that 15 and it vibrated much more than the earlier 9.9. So from my experience the earlier smaller twins (7.5, 9.9 or classic 8) were the smaller cylinders and smoother running motors in the 75 pound range. I've kept the classic 8 but haven't run it in a long time.
@spineguy155326 күн бұрын
Bought the misses a new Rolex for Christmas. Dealer is 2hours from us. Bought Amazon kit for 12pounds and removed the links just as shown. Thank you thank you!
@DavidPhamChannel25 күн бұрын
That's great to hear!
@HotSauceStainАй бұрын
I ordered the two ended spring bar pliers because this regular technique isn’t working with my Longines. Will tape my lugs before I attempt the impossible tomorrow
@ianandrew7010Ай бұрын
Have you the link please for your 1mm wide screwdriver 🪛 please 🙏
@DavidPhamChannelАй бұрын
Sorry I bought it years ago and have never seen it online
@Aj-vg7fpАй бұрын
This is a pain in the Ass 😢i cant even push up on the Longines
@HektorBandimarАй бұрын
Helpful video thanks. Please, what size is the fork tool to remove those spring bars ?
@DavidPhamChannelАй бұрын
I don't know the size I just know the model of the tool. Bergeron 6767F
@evh4611Ай бұрын
Polished
@andrewsnape1705Ай бұрын
5 years on David and still a very useful video. Thank you
@DrHartzАй бұрын
I would choose the Full Size. I own a 42mm Omega Diver Chrono and a Planet Ocean Chrono 45,5mm. After a while wearing the large PO the 42mm Diver seems like a watch for ladies.
@yusakufudo367Ай бұрын
Yeah also I think the 45mm is from 2005 originally, the 42mm is from 2008
@dondalio2Ай бұрын
Thank you
@FTOTF1Ай бұрын
Im going to try this one just need to find something for rope management. Thanks for the vid very helpful
@DavidPhamChannelАй бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@dirtyrat5158Ай бұрын
6 HP good choice I went with Suzuki 52 lb. at my age that is plenty to lift on & off the transom it moves my 10.6 Briss air boat fast enough great for trolling also a 5 year manufacturer warranty going great 2nd year of use and starts easy 1 pull has a 1 gallon tank and can switch to a 3 1/2 gallon remote tank for the long day have yet to use just runs all day on a gallon
@jrclark10542 ай бұрын
Great idea. I improvised by cutting out the palms of outgrown hockey gloves and glued 2 pieces. One on the outside and another inside.
@DavidPhamChannelАй бұрын
Sounds like a pretty solid solution.
@brafya2 ай бұрын
2500 is pure class, what were they thinking abandoning that design
@IgorBagayev2 ай бұрын
Not showing them on a wrist is a crime against humanity
@DavidPhamChannel2 ай бұрын
lol
@Awertylife2 ай бұрын
I use battery leaf blower
@DavidPhamChannel2 ай бұрын
I recently picked one up. With a leaf blower I have the boat read in half the time.
@eksund19002 ай бұрын
Thank You. Useful!
@222jimrice2 ай бұрын
Hi David, Did you consider the Mercury 6hp? If so, what made you choose the Yamaha. Thanks
@DavidPhamChannel2 ай бұрын
No I didn't. Main reason is because my favorite local shop only carries Yamaha, and at the time I picked it up they had a nice sale going on too.
@222jimrice2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your prompt reply, David. I don’t have any experience with outboards. I like your logic that if it’s too heavy to carry, you won’t use the engine, so it defeats the purpose of the extra horsepower. I'm in favor of a handle on the Yamaha. Did you add a permatrim performance foil to help? There is a danger of splashing out money unnecessarily when you lack knowledge. I’m at the early stages of thinking about a True Kit Discovery 3.3 for days out on Sydney harbour; speed isn’t my greatest motivator. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
@DavidPhamChannel2 ай бұрын
@@222jimrice No problem, I've had the motor since 2017 and glad I choose the Yamaha. Yamaha are solid motors and in my opinion worth the premium, generally higher resale values too if you decide to part with it. No, i didn't add a permatrim foil, never had the need to, I only fish small lakes so speed isn't something I need. The motor is very fuel efficient, with a full internal tank (1 liter), you can go full throttle for about 30 mins. In a season (a dozen outings) i use less than 5 liters of fuel, keep in mind I'm mainly fishing and not cruising or exploring. Hopefully that info helps you out.
@222jimriceАй бұрын
@@DavidPhamChannel Thanks David, What is the pull start like? …….I tried a Suzuki 6hp and it nearly pulled my arm off with the kick back , I’m told this is normal for a Suzuki until you get a technique sorted out. I didn’t realise the cost of servicing, it costs more than my car. Have you stayed with the internal fuel tank? I was thinking of a 10 litre jerry can and topping it up periodically though out the day. Thanks for all your previous advice - very valuable. Jim
@DavidPhamChannelАй бұрын
@@222jimrice I don't have experience with Suzuki so cant comment on if the pull start of the Yamaha is similar. I personally never had a problem with the Yamaha pull start, fairly easy to pull, much like a lawn mower. Servicing costs her in Canada aren't too much. I use mine less than 10 hours a season and take it in for a tune up every couple years. I also store my motor in doors but wouldn't say i baby it. Works out to be about a $100 season if I work it out. I've stay with the internal tank. The internal tank is 1 liter in capacity and works well for me. I don't do much cruising just fishing so don't have a need for a large tank. I carry with me a 5 Liter jerry can, which I fill up at the start of the season and lasts me all season. These smaller motors are incredibly good on gas.
@greenerick2 ай бұрын
It is going to be 8900 because of the anti magnetic properties and longer power reserve
@hawzdurv2 ай бұрын
Thanks for this man
@BritishCat77882 ай бұрын
I just bought Datejust 41 Fluted white dial with Jubilee bracelet. The first rolex for me
@DavidPhamChannel2 ай бұрын
Enjoy it!
@manilavinyl56803 ай бұрын
Very helpful for a first timer. Thank you!!!
@DavidPhamChannel2 ай бұрын
Glad to hear it!
@AdamSmith-fe9jf3 ай бұрын
Well presented, thank you! I would like to ask you, because you mentioned this is meant for Rolex and not Omega, could this tool also work for any other brand which uses the double-shoulder spring bar? Or, is there something else that makes this specific to Rolex? I have a watch with spring bars that look identical to those of your Rolex. Could this work for that? Also, the generic tool that comes with many aftermarket straps could not be used to remove the spring bar from my watch. Is that supposed to be able to remove spring bars on high-end Swiss watches or does it sound like something I am doing wrong? The fork appears to be too thick and keeps slipping when trying to grip the shoulder of the bar. Would this tweezer-style solve that problem?
@DavidPhamChannel3 ай бұрын
The tool should work for spring bars with a double collar but you need to make sure the prongs can fit between the bracket or strap to reach the spring bars in question. The spring bar tool should work but you need to learn how to use it. I have a video on how to remove an Omega bracelet which has some tips that may help you, definitely takes getting used to. Best of luck!
@AdamSmith-fe9jf3 ай бұрын
@@DavidPhamChannel I will certainly check your other video. I appreciate the advice.
@Not_Mark_Twain3 ай бұрын
Props for this video and for your skills. Not sure why it took me so long to get help on my technique -- this makes a massive difference. Excellent teaching.
@davewelch19323 ай бұрын
Like a tent.
@joevanwyk3813 ай бұрын
Great, honest review and advice. I was in exactly the same position, and after lifting the 9.9 and carrying it around the shop, i turned around and got the 6hp Tohatsu. This video just confirmed why I made that choice! Thanks
@Bart_noplease3 ай бұрын
Thank you
@Autos3893 ай бұрын
A difference you didn't mention is that the 2500 has the faster 28,800 VPH movement, while the 8900 is a slower beat movement.
@DavidPhamChannel3 ай бұрын
This isn't exactly true. The original 2500A and B versions may have a higher beat rate but the C and D versions have the lower beat rate. The watch in the video is. 2500D.
@mrb65973 ай бұрын
2500 wears too small in diameter 8900 is too thick Both nice, but i didnt keep either.
@jadc2a3173 ай бұрын
fake rolex
@Area_man1153 ай бұрын
Terrible lighting
@adventurelover69553 ай бұрын
I bought a Honda 6hp just because of wheight and portability. 9.9 is a big motor, bot only because if additional 10kgs but also a bigger mass. A motor you think twice to use because of wheight is not a good choice.
@MaxNaves4 ай бұрын
Best video of all, congrats!
@DavidPhamChannel3 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@revolution9094 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review, really useful.
@icychap4 ай бұрын
What is the correct size to use on the president bracelet?
@DavidPhamChannel4 ай бұрын
Sorry I don't know that.
@aquilifergroup4 ай бұрын
Thanks
@truxton10004 ай бұрын
I got the 43.5 8900, black with orange and on the rubber strap. Which bracelet is on the one in this video? I have trouble finding the bracelet reference numbers, could go to the AD but prefer to get one second hand.