So when there is nothing the resistance to create something is low and once it takes off, bang!

Profound. A lot of folks might expect that 'profound' to be elaborate. Surprise.

E=E is simply 1=1. From this nothing new can ever be created.

"It from bit" and bit is mathematics. well done!

Then why are there not other universes we can see

0 is something and nothing at the same time .0 is nothing when placed before 1 .0 is something when placed after 1.like 10 ,100,1000 etc.0 is full of potential.

this don't make sense. How does one go and compare apples and oranges? In the 0 energy theory Gravity is fixed like energy thus it all equals 0 and in his example the KE is fixed yet the GE is variable. So this example doesn't work. Everything comes from a black hole. Where it is negative energy. Everything comes from negative energy. The universe is made up of electrons.

This is the same thing Krause and others are fond of pointing out. The problem is that from the moment of creation until at least after inflation, all the stuff of the universe is energy. The fact that now the universe seems to be in balance is therefore a red herring and irrelevant as an explanation of how the universe may have come into existence.

And also the problem with proving you can make something come from nothing is that you need stuff to do it with.

This simple video doesn't count Entropy, it would require a seconde video for that variable

ΔU = Q - W

MAN, 0 plus 0 equal 0 and 0 minus 0 equal 0, so universe from nothing, what a heap of #$%&, my calculation is here, mass plus black hole equal spews mass in order. LOL

A universe of nothing? I thought this was about something coming from nothing at all, no universe. So what caused the small fluctuation? Using this equation then my accountant could make a million dollars for me from no money. 2 +2 =4 but it never put $4 in my pocket.

You don't have fluctuations in "nothing". It is misleading to call virtual particles "nothing".

Beeresheet bara Elohim et hashamayim v'et ha'aretz.

Correct.

Buddhist Heart Sutra probably already knew this 1,500 years ago, as it says Emptiness = Form. Form = Emptiness.

all of your examples include both zero AND additional things. of course Nothing + something is something.

Yes, God made the universe out of nothing. But he didn’t use evolution to create man. That would mean death came before the fall.

Particles are something, not nothing.

perfect

So if everything just came about does this prove the law of conservation of matter and energy wrong? If that were the case we wouldn't have to even worry about gas prices because energy would be infinitely available.

Cannot wait to use this math, to replenish my bank balance

Fun fact: numbers are abstract noun.

From what Zero come the Spirit ?

Very good! 😇

Zero is not a fixed point. It is the imagined midpoint between 1 and -1. It is the point where the Light meets the Darkness and the Darkness meets the Light.

all is vanity except following God

You need to study some math. Division by zero is not allowed.

But what would cause it to do that. You can’t take something from all possibilities. It would have to be thought.

He literally proved that nothing is equal to nothing but just one side he used term zero and on other side he used symbolic alphabets, he is literally fooling himself as well his audience. 1-1=0 2-2=0 So it is literally nothing.... My question is where is something, there is no something literally NOTHING=NOTHING.

This doesn't prove anything. First of all, from a state of 0 (absolute nothing), an entity "x" cannot exist or suddenly pop up in polar pairs to create x -x = 0! Even the said Quantum fluctuations in empty space requires the existence of space in the first place! The state of absolute "Nothing" implies not even (Vacuous) space exists! Now if space (and time) itself is an emergent phenomenon of the said Quantum fluctuations, one is bound to ask what causes the fluctuation itself to begin with; because there is nothing that warrants it in the first place, when everything would be expectedly happy with the absolute state of 0 nothingness! In other words, you are simply replacing an inexplicable prime mover mechanism with spaceless , timeless mysterious quantum fluctuations!

Please don't make laymen stupid .. Cuz the Vacuum or quantum Field is SOMETHING not NOTHING. And still the question of why is there something rather than nothing can be asked because in this scenario at least there is quantum Field filled with energy . And by saying that NOTHING is UNSTABLE you your self are admitting that it has the property of UNSTABLENESS and real NOTHING doesn't have any property THUS in conclusion we can say that your NOTHING is not REAL Nothing rather it is PSEUDO-NOTHING.

Have u died sir😥

He is trying to prove mathematically that the entire universe came into being from nothing. This is just the latest attempt of non (or anti) theists to explain away a creator. Dr. Hubble and his telescope disproved the Steady State Theory, so what or who caused the Beginning?? I wish for all who read this to check out a very renowned mathematician named Dr. JOHN LENNOX. KZbin Videos and books.

You can’t just randomly assign numbers to E or x buddy. 🧐🤨

Where did the E+ -E come from? Nothing is nothing. Where did you get your degree Kmarts. Lol

Awesome

so can we create something out of 0's

So, there was no positive energy and no negative energy, and this was equal to 0. Then, there _was_ positive energy that was balanced with negative energy, and this state was also, of course, equal to zero. How did we get from no energy at all to having an equal amount of positive energy and negative energy? *Magic* .

Matter of fact, Nothing could not have ever existed, because Energy cannot be created , it cannot be created by anyone or by anything so that means logically It did not come from anywhere as it had existed all along and shall prevail forever and ever, since we cannot see energy as in its purest form (the form it is in before it created matter) so scientist do not know much else about pure form of energy as their observations and instruments are unable to detect this purest form of energy at the moment, only we can model it in our heads which is the most powerful tool we have at our disposal in the universe , our ability to think, and often think outside the box as we say. Do the scientist even acknowledge that a spiritual world exists? no because they cannot detect spirituality, they first of all have no instruments that can detect spiritual energies at the moment, secondly if we cannot detect something it does not mean it cannot exists, take the Higgs Boson, which at first was a suggestion by Mr Higgs that for objects to acquire mass, there must be a sea of field of bosons, through which an object experiences a mass, objects at rest have no mass, they acquire mass only when they sail through a field of bosons, it is no different to electromagnetic concept, where a conductor only produces a current flow when it moves in a sea of magnetic field, as it cuts through magnetic lines of force, at rest there is absolutely no flow of current, of course tiny vibrations can effect some current flow as in moving coil microphones which produces tiny electrical signals proportional to sound waves striking it. So the point is until we were able to make a giant hadron collider, we could not prove that Mr Higgs was right, indeed the experiment succeeded so we are told by the scientist, we have to take their word for it, that little blip they saw on their monitors we are told was proof of Higgs field, or Higgs Boson, we accept that in good faith, but still no one is able to see Higgs field with their own eyes and feel it with their own senses, we have to see it indirectly, yet we knew all along that objects do not have mass when at rest, and somehow they do acquire mass when in motion. We took it for granted that something influences objects when they are moved, and you need energy to create a motion, law of conservation of energy says energy cannot be destroyed so that energy is converted into kinetic energy in an object on a move. Similarly, God is no different to Higgs field, oh at one time they almost called it a God particle, well that would have been too soon, they are heading that way, one day they shall prove the existence of God, even if just through a blip on a tv monitor, but you know what, we don't have to spend so much money in creating another giant hadron collider just to prove that God exists, instead of seeing a blip on a monitor, look around you, what you see everywhere, in others, in yourself, in the heavens, life on earth, its all evident of a creator, this evidence is more real and much better than a flimsy blip on a monitor, it is a living real proof of God's existence, the universe itself which was created out of Pure divine energy, the divine intelligent energy of God, and scientist have been trying hard to study the nature of things, without realising that indeed what they are unfolding is the nature of God himself. That is where the difference lies, in accepting that indeed God really does exists, there is a living proof of it everywhere, its how you realise the concept of God in your head, Higgs field is one of millions of parts of God's creation or properties, energy itself is part of God, all those quarks and what not is part of God, God is indeed everywhere transformed into matter and crude energy from his pure form, to all other physical forms of matter and energy. Those trying to see evidence of God as an old man with a white beard, sitting up in the skies, they need to look elsewhere and you will find is foot prints everywhere. we are merely studying how did he do it and why things happen the way they do, what makes them tick, why atoms behave the way they do, we are indeed exploring God, Science is merely a study of God and his creation.

EDITED 13/10/2020 From a start galaxies and all of creation isn't Energy, they are the product of Energy, all the matter in our universe was created or composed by Energy, so what exactly is the definition of ENERGY ? or is it different from the energy of the universe? When I am speaking of pure Energy I don't mean kinetic or potential or electric or nuclear energy, Can you define Pure Energy before matter was created? We know universe energy in terms of heat and light and radiation is essential for our existence, possibly not for the matter that already exists, such as rocks and stones, mountains earth soil, etc can physically all exists once they have been created without further need for any more Energy, only life or living things needs heat and light Energy. You see where I am coming from is that when our Sun which is part of our universe, when it runs out of fusion material, it will seize to emit heat and light and become a giant red dwarf, then there after it will remain inert rock, or just dead matter, not emitting any more heat or light, it would just be a cool giant planet. Though we would have long gone, no life on planet earth, but think of the energy that created the Sun to begin with is no longer there but has been spread out into the universe, what happens to that energy since energy cannot be destroyed, how is that energy going to create more matter? well it cannot ; can it? because the initial energy that created the Sun, which then started to emit heat and light through Hydrogen fusing into helium, and eventually running out of fuel ends up as a cold rock, may take several tens of billions of years but never the less the original source of energy is now sitting locked up as a giant rocky planet. So eventually all the stars in our universe will end up getting converted to rocky planets, no suns, energy completely gone and transformed into matter, that would be it, the end of universe. Can anyone see how these billions of galaxies each with billions of dead cold stars going to awake up again and or get annihilated back into pure energy once more? Or perhaps, even non life matter also needs Energy , one guy I don't know his name asked a question once, regarding electrons orbiting the nucleus of an atom, where are they getting their energy from which any moving things requires, why do these electrons not come to a grinding halt as they meet resistance and other forces from nearby objects, by their force of gravity or magnetic field influence and so on, so surely these electrons orbiting nucleus are getting some energy from somewhere from around the surrounding space. Without pure Energy, the initial Energy, nothing would ever have been created, this of course depends on if at all things did come from Nothing, or from this so called Pure Energy, which I believe we so far cannot detect or know much about, what does it consist of and what made it and where did it come from? how far is it spread? is it infinite? does it occupy space? how did it create first of the physical matter? As a matter of fact if you say it comes from NOTHING, you are actually doing us a favour because Noting can be defined as something that cannot be proven to exist but may well actually exists but is beyond our current ability to detect positively, Does it occupy space and time, so that is exactly the definition of this pure Energy? Can it be the illusive God? Because you cannot prove the existence of Nothing , many scientist have conducted experiments to create Nothing, one using mercury in a tube and a bowl of mercury inverting it to create vacuum at the top of that tube, but that space or vacuum still contained many things which we could not see but sure were there, waves of gravity occupying that space, light, other fields must still be present in that empty space, so after all that space scientist created could not be totally void of anything. It may have solid matter missing encased by walls of glass tube, but other energies must be waving through it, including radio waves. So this proves that Nothing cannot exists. you cannot create Nothing and it does not truly exist, but if you insist Nothing can prevail, then Energy which cannot be destroyed or created where do you think it came from? From Nothing???? so if we cannot create Nothing or nothingness, it surely points to one thing that matter or space or pure energy always existed by default, such that there was no room for Nothing or nothingness. Galaxies are made of physical matter including gaseous matter which i believe was created by this pure invisible and undetectable Energy. Can you the scientist create matter from universe Energy in a lab? for example can you convert electricity into new matter? Perhaps you can do it but not as of yet, Of course you would be able to create matter from Energy only if first of all you knew what truly is pure Energy, and secondly how to use that Energy to create matter out of it, gravity is not energy either, it is a product or properties of matter, all matter that was created by Energy inherits the properties of mutual attraction so called gravity, quite simply because all matter came out of one common common source, or was created from a single source. So it has a mutual linkage to every particle its parent source created, in a way of mutual attraction, as all atoms share the common source. Why not simply resort to calling pure Energy as God then you don't have to answers questions I raised, because that entity or thing which I call pure Energy is self sustaining and was never created by anyone and had always existed, because that is the conclusion we reach about pure Energy, apart from many more things we don't, know about it, and it cannot be destroyed nor created, but it can be transformed into different things including matter, by default it had always existed as opposed to it not having been in existence and having had the need to have come from somewhere or from something. If it came from somewhere, or something then there must be something even greater than Energy, so what is it? or did it come out of Nothing....is there such a thing as Nothing? I believe the pure Energy was responsible to have created our universe through various stages and processes, that is why I can call it as God, and you may call it as the Energy of Universe . God indeed is the definition of Energy, its not any different. Energy is just a scientific label for God, the master and ultimate source of Energy that was able to create small imperfections just by its conscious or thought, or word for that matter, by influencing its own pool of infinite energy to spring into action to get creative, So according to my opinion, we do not yet have the ability to detect purest form of energy, so we can only speculate, that it must exist to have given birth to our universe, How was Higgs Boson found? Did anyone ever thought that there must be a Higgs Field? before Mr Higgs did, so only because he first believed that there could be a Higgs field that was responsible for matter to acquire mass, then we went about trying to prove that such fields could be true, and may well exists, and it was proven in our Hadron Collider,. take black hole, there are various theories about it, since no one can actually go inside and collect samples and test them in labs, or take a video camera or send in a space craft and beam back pictures, that is because black holes sucks matter due to intense gravity and that it scientist believe its gravity is so intense that even light cannot escape, that may be true or not, its another speculation, scientist do believe that as matter starts to get sucked in, it starts to stretch rapidly and shreds in long pieces, and that is possibly another reason so you cannot see any light from it possibly the matter simply stops to exist and so will not emit any light, and gets converted to Energy, that is why whilst you cannot see any light being emitted yet you have shooting columns of energy shooting out of it. If gravity was so intense and it would stop light coming out, then equally it would have also prevented gamma rays shooting out of it too. Suppose I tell you that the reason why no light can escape a black hole is because all matter becomes disintegrated and so cannot produce light, hence it stops shining, or its internal nuclear reaction simply seizes, its like if you throw a lit candle into a bucket full of water the candle would extinguish, so no light would come out, you cannot say that a bucket with water has intense gravity, hence we cannot say that black hole stops light coming out because of intense gravity, all matter sucked in it gets annihilated back into true form of Energy, so there is no intense gravity, matter just stops existing and reconverts back to pure energy, which may explain why we get shooting beacons of gamma rays. we must continue to search for the truth, which must exists just as we proved Higgs field is responsible for mass.

Lawrence Krauss, who also argues for a universe from "nothing," writes, "...it would be disingenuous to suggest that empty space endowed with energy, which drives inflation, is really nothing (Krauss, 2012). Indeed, not only is empty space endowed with energy _not_ "nothing," it isn't "empty," either. If you aren't going to adhere the established, consensual usage of a term and instead arbitrarily manufacture your own definition for a term, one might as well argue for a universe from "creamed corn." Krauss, L. (2012). A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing. pp 153. Atria Books.

This is the bookkeeping theory of the universe. For every debit there is a corresponding credit. For every asset there is a corresponding liability. Nice idea but no how low a level you go in QM there has to be an action. For every action there is a corresponding reaction.

Unintentional asmr..damn

Nothingness is Indefinite and thus has no origin or one state. It has many states, all states and all possibilities of existence at once. Because it is nothing, no-thing, it can't be defined as anything, even as nothing. That is the mystical paradox of the universe. Nothing is infinite, Everything is finite. Nothing becomes something, in exchange the something has to return to nothing. Energy is neither created or destroyed. So if ultimately all things that exist must die and return to nothing. Did they exist? Does anything really exist? The universe is nothingness having a big imaginary party.

Old age problem!

So to summarize, there was nothing, then something magical happened that no one can explain and there was suddenly a shit ton of something, and here we are. But it doesn’t explain why I keep running out of beer.

Paedo

nothing is nothing , something is something. calculations created by human being can never show that something is come from nothing. rather than thinking about the things that are making confusion, it is better to think about super natural power who created this confusing world.