So this is why they discontinued the other face tracker. People are forced to buy fewer headsets for face tracking instead of a universal accessory. Now you need a vive focus 3, XR elite, or a quest pro. There's probably a few others that I don't know, but it's still a small number compared to other headsets.

great vid

PLEASE DO A SLIDER!! That would be so cool! Also amazing tutorial!!!

PLEASE do a SLIDER in VR!! That would be so cool. And great tutorial!!!!!!!!

Ok, but is it possible to combine that with the quest 3 passthrough?

VirtualRook, Your videos always make me happy, so I subscribed!

Lol

Does this have Up down left right tongue tracking like the face tracker on the Vive?

First comment

Please link videos and things you reference in the description of your video.

I might just get an XR elite jsut for face and eye tracking along with vive trackers and index knuckles

Nooo I’m late!!!

lol

The button to activate the light meter on the battery is nice. The lights on the older version are just always on.

Saw some comments saying that the full face tracker narrows the field of view and blocks the mute icon in the lower left corner in vrchat?

Excellent tutorial! Tip: In the next videos, avoid looking at the camera, your voice decreases a lot as it is far from the microphone. Or place another microphone to your right.

Not the police alarms 😅

So many size related innuendos. Must. Fight. Urges.

VirtualRook, You're so cool! Let's be friends and have fun!

Game name?

I’m playing through half life two car and to be honest I don’t think I will be beating it

Ah yes. A REDO.

Not really the best solution. the button jumps. How can we make this smoother?

How about a microphone attachment

The last part 😳

Is there any Good Boxing VR Games.

VR is the Future, nothing will come close to it.

Byeee

I want to see your game…😮😊

content warning has been out for a while, and is not VR and help wanted 2 has been out for even longer

I think you’re right, there was a pretty unexpected “long road” ahead to VR actually becoming enjoyable enough for every household, but I’m pretty optimistic we’re making strides to get there. I mean there’s a few companies coming out with their own headsets so that says something!

Turn-based combat in VR looks wild.

pop 1 is much more fun. this one the map is to big and its just blah

Just found your channel. Hearing your opinion was interesting but I fundamentally disagree with you. AVP and spatial computing are definitely not the solution. The biggest problem with VR is that not enough people will buy a headset because the content on offer (at least how non-users perceive it) isn't compelling enough to justify the price of the hardware. For someone who hasn't tried VR, getting into VR means paying hundreds of dollars to play games which look worse than their PC/console games. The only options to resolve this problem are 1) improve the perceived quality of the content, or 2) reduce the price of the hardware. Ideally the industry would tackle both. On the first point, the perceived quality of content could be improved by either actually improving its quality, or by improving the public's perception of it. Improving the quality of software isn't easy since the current VR userbase isn't big enough to justify the large budgets which high quality content often requires. However I think there's an obvious way for game developers to produce better games without increasing their budget: Find someone who's already made a game with the mechanics you want, and license their code from them. There's far too much reinventing the wheel going on in the VR space; and at the end of a multi-year development cycle, most developers don't wind up moving the industry forward, they just wind up with a shittier wheel. Their time and effort would be much better spent refining/differentiating the solid foundation they've licensed and building compelling content. Mighty Eyes' VRAF framework for Unreal could be a big step in this direction. On the other hand, perception of the quality of content could be improved with better marketing. Unfortunately VR is very difficult to advertise, since the things that make it great can't easily be conveyed via any other medium. It also doesn't help that most VR games don't look particularly good, especially since the market almost entirely shifted to standalone headsets. Still, better marketing campaigns which show off some of the more visually impressive VR games could help in this area. But by far the best marketing strategy for a VR headset is having public demos in places where normal people can give it a try. The pandemic put a damper on such things for years, but now that we've returned to a relative state of normalcy, platform holders should start doing this again. Sony did it extensively with PSVR 1, and I think that's one of the reasons it was the best selling headset until the Quest 2 (the other reason was price). As for hardware price, a lot of it's already pretty cheap. The Quest 2 just got dropped to $200 (presumably to clear out stock), and prices couldn't really get much lower while still providing decent hardware. Or could they? What if VR hardware manufacturers (particularly Meta and/or Sony) adopted the cellphone business model? Most people have no idea how much their cellphone actually costs, since they got it either cheap or free when they signed up to a multi-year service contract billed monthly. Their service provider subsidizes the cost of the hardware, knowing they'll recoup their costs and make a profit over the course of their contract. Both Meta and Sony have monthly subscription services (though Sony's currently includes next to no VR content, but that could change). They could similarly subsidize the cost of their headsets if users signed on to a multi-year contract billed monthly. The platform holder would have to integrate software which would ensure users are keeping up on their payments, but such things wouldn't be very difficult. And the upside would be huge. They would lock users into years of their subscription service, and in exchange could carve hundreds of dollars off the price of their VR hardware. How many Quest 2's would sell if it was free on a monthly plan which also gave you free games? How many PSVR 2's could Sony sell if it cost $300 instead of $550, and all you had to do was sign up to a few more years of a service that most PS5 owners already want or have? These are the ways to move VR forward. Produce better content by standing on the shoulders of giants rather than trying to start from scratch. Market the hardware effectively and give people the chance to try it. And finally, drop the price as low as possible by subsidizing it via a monthly service contract. Thank you for attending my TED talk 😜

i would like weekly news and updates, please and thank you

your video is most helpful for the information, thank you! I saw it has tongue tracking, does it move in-out, left-right like the facial with vive pro? and is a wireless battery connection possible for the headset?

Where can you buy this?

For the sake of this tutorial, how do you close the door?

You walked past a free makarov in the tower to the right

Carry empty ammo boxes so you have somewhere to put single bullets you find. Else you end up with a mess 'o singles.

Safety is on

1857 is almost 7pm

Do you know where the giant hand prints come from?

Have you recovered all 8 of the framed pictures that can be transported home? Have you found all 3 plushies, or all 4 of the white objects?

Cant wait to join a vr game in 20 years and pull the "back in my day...."

Dude you have vr mask face. Take a break dude