Hallo Martin, gute Lösung für einen raumsparenden Startwagen. Wo hast Du den her? Oder selbst gebaut? Gibts nen Plan zum Nachbauen? Viele Grüße Andreas
@nathanroberts355 Жыл бұрын
When I go to perth next week and maybe I go to buy this plan at perth hobby centre in perth Australia
@billstewart5421 Жыл бұрын
BEAUTIFUL MODEL!!!! GREAT FLIGHT!!!!
@billstewart54212 жыл бұрын
OUTSTANDING!!!
@MrMaradona753 жыл бұрын
Oh my God, the model aircraft that I love the most and that I am building myself as the first fantastic and beautiful plane.
@carlosmurphy4u15 жыл бұрын
Good flight, nice plane, Mickey Mouse camera work....
@centerfloat5 жыл бұрын
Pretty arrogant comment. It was my 10year old nephew who filmed with an old camera of his father. Otherwise I would not have a film about this plane....
@iamrichrocker5 жыл бұрын
fantastic Sir...must have been plenty of long arduous hours...but a smile on your face each time you worked on her...
@centerfloat5 жыл бұрын
Some 800 hours, but to be honest my face was quite serious.Owed to the fact that I haven't flown twin engines before. But nonetheless everything was worth the time and effort put into this wonderfull lady, The smile is allways there thinking about flying it :-)
@burritowyrm65305 жыл бұрын
majestic yo
@johnroddy87565 жыл бұрын
lovely plane great landing
@CarlosFuentes-fk8md5 жыл бұрын
¡El P38, el avión de Saint Exupery!
@herminigildojakosalem86646 жыл бұрын
Very nice plane, very good flying...
@AnOhioPatriot6 жыл бұрын
Go to 3:25 to get past all the 'build up to launch"............
@mroger29sh6 жыл бұрын
mark r danke wonderbar
@mroger29sh6 жыл бұрын
mark r pa usa the better counter was always better 4 the stabilization thx so much 4 the vid excellent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@monkfry7 жыл бұрын
Best part is not having to put your feet together when throttling up 😆
@HarryPotter-gw6ee7 жыл бұрын
Really nice plane. Can you put an engine simulated sound card on it? This would make a world of difference I think! Anyway good job! I like it!
@choumann17 жыл бұрын
Will it still fly with one engine out?
@trevor52906 жыл бұрын
Not for long. But a good gyro might save it.
@martinstromeyer14675 жыл бұрын
@@trevor5290 Absolutely no save through gyro. I lost the plane throgh one side engine failure. It went immediately into a flat spin on the back. I was able to recove just before it hit the ground flat belly. The engine failur e was about 70 m above ground. So as emergency procedure there is only ONE WAY. Throttle idle both engines immediately and glide back to the ground after recovery.
@robrams4844 жыл бұрын
@@martinstromeyer1467 First of all, very nice job and wonderful airplane, congratulaciones. You are quite right best way to avoid an accident always go to minimum throttle and land as soon as possible.
@carlosdanger46487 жыл бұрын
T
@davesaldana72637 жыл бұрын
in your opinion do counter-rotating props really make a difference
@ToddBreda7 жыл бұрын
As a massive P-38 nerd I can say absolutely not. There is no discernible difference that I have experienced flying a P-38 both standard and CR. Torque was never an issue either way.
@trevor52906 жыл бұрын
I believe the one reason they did the CR props was because it made for a more stable gun platform... but as Todd stated, otherwise it don't mean crap. Would like to know from Todd if when he says his flying experience with the P-38... Is that full scale or RC
@RR678906 жыл бұрын
Counter rotating props have nothing to do with stability, or anything during flight.It only comes into play when loosing an engine. With engines that wide on the wing if the left engine quit and the right had standard rotation the thrust on the right wing plus the torque from the engine would make the aircraft uncontrollable. By rotating the opposite direction the torque helps counter the thrust.
@warbirdflyerF4U Жыл бұрын
Absolutely beautiful aircraft and a great job flying her
@centerfloat9 жыл бұрын
That is truly correct.. I used DA 50 engines that do not come in counterclockwise rotation. When they turn you do not see the direction of turning anyway. The momentum that would make the plane more to the left was compensated by almost no offset of the engines. As you see that worked just fine 😊
@claudiomedalha856710 жыл бұрын
Lindo voo
@CarolinaCustomKits10 жыл бұрын
I do custom kits for any plane. I have plans for a P-38 with a 98" wingspan and I scale up or down to any size. I am also starting a custom build on a P-38 with a 20ft wingspan. The guy wants it big!!! Email me for more info. [email protected]. Thanks
@rayrod121910 жыл бұрын
Great looking plane!
@OsceolaLongBeard10 жыл бұрын
where can i buy the kit for this?
@tomruecker11 жыл бұрын
WOW! Was für ein Traum...! Ich würde mir sowas von in die Hose machen beim Fliegen. Bleibt die große Maschine denn noch innerhalb der 25kg-Limits? Toll!
@centerfloat11 жыл бұрын
Die Maschine hat 22 Kg voll betankt. durch ein großzügiges Clark-Y Profil mit großer Flächentiefe und sehr großzügigen Flaps fliegt sie auch im Langsamflug gut kontrollierbar. Sie schwimmt dann lediglich ein wenig. Beim langsamen Vorbeifliegen - mit ausreichend Höhe - habe ich beim Erstflug aber herausgefunden, dass sie sehr langsam gleitend in den Stall geht. Das Seitenruder hat dann wenig Wirkung, was dem Flugverhalten beim Langsamflug entgegen kommt. Unsere Runway hat 150m. Mit Hilfe der Bremsen waren auch Landungen nahe der Mitte der Bahn kein Problem.