Iranian and all Arya nations first was in ghafghaz and then immigrated to south of Iran an India and Europe, it's a Latest research, Iranian dont immigrated from russia.

1Turk😂

It seems that, ironically, the English conquerors and settlers in Ireland were more genetically Celtic than the Irish themselves

10 0 and they call the Turks 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😊

Turks are east asians like mongols and Chinese people

I'm not even gonna look at the comments

Best youtube channel 2024. People on TikTok like to steal your videos for edits, cant blame them tbh.

Then the Proto-Turks would be from Manchuria according to your intro text, the Xianyun and then Xiongnu would have other admixtures and not be 100%.

Why were Mongolian tribes included? Turks are very nationalistic and have no evidence. You can't change history like that. To be fair: Turkeys 1-5% Turkic, 95-99% Arab, Pers, Greek, Balkan, Iran, Kurd and other nations.

Even your modern population like Kurds is wrong

How did you measure Sintashta autosomal DNA among Khazars???

Шаадаг муу сааралууд худлаа түүх зохиогоод тэрэндээ хөөрөөд шаагаад. Хүннү бол цэвэр өнөөгийн монголчуудын өвөг. Пан түрэг үзэл бол цэвэр улс төр пропаганда. Түрэг улс мэ500 онд мөхөөд алга болсон. Байхгүй алга болсон улсыг манай өвөг гэж улс төр шаагаад. Хүннү түрэгийн өчүүхэн ч цус днк өнөөгийн турк улсад байхгүй. Бүр түй ч хамаагүй өнөөгийн туркэд. Чаддын бол ойлгоод уншаарай гөлөгнүүдээ.

What software do you use for these maps?

That's my family. I'm finno-ugric man. My father is Estonian, my mother is half Hill Mari half Merya

We aren't Turks 🇦🇿🇹🇷

This video is just ridiculous in so many levels but saying that bulgars and khazars have 0% turkic dna is just insane how tf they spoke turkic languages then and their culture was turkic as well?

The map is incorrect. I can only speak for the Hungarians: By around 500-600 CE Hungarians have completely lost direct contact with virtually all Uralic speakers according to linguistic and genetic analysis. They were not still neighboring their closest linguistic relatives the Khanty and Mansi. There is no evidence of a Hungarian-speaking group that remained in contact with the Mansi and Khanty until that late. There's archaeological, genetic and historical records claiming that Hungarians have lived around the rivers Volga and Kama, neighboring the Mari to the South, the Volga Bulgars, Chuvash and Bashkirs to the West. Recent genetic evidence suggests Hungarians have lived along these rivers before the Bashkirs arrived in the area in the 9th century, as modern West Bashkirs and Volga Tatars cluster the closest genetically with 9th century Hungarians. There's also arcaheological and folkloric evidence to support this in certain Mari and Chuvash folk music and certain Bashkir folk dances. Hungarians must have lived in the areas of modern day Bashkortostan and Tatarstan for long enough to leave a genetic and cultural marker there. All medieval chronicles claim Bashkiria as the original Hungarian homeland, archaeological and genetic research is increasingly backing up this claim. The current working hypothesis is that Hungarians have lived in Bashkortostan and Tatarstan for an unknown amount of time until about 800 CE before moving to Southern Ukraine. The date of this migration to Bashkortostan could have taken place at any time between 500 BC and 300-400 CE. Also, Hungarians made up a larger part of the Carpathian basin before 1541, the ethnic makeup shown here is more representative of the post Turkish-war situation which caused extreme devastation and population loss in the country.

Interesting but would like to see some sources on how "paleo-laplandian" was supposedly a non-uralic speaking people who had more uralic dna than the proto-sami who on the other hand spoke uralic.

....lot of small details wrong with timelines and territory borders. But in general, not bad.

Moğollar Türk değil diye biliyorum.

ALL Fakes..All Fake History of the Turks..all Fake s

Great video, proud to be Slav

U gonna make a part 2 till modern time ?

Iranians be like: b-b-bat saar, we are aryan european 100% saar

The horse people are coming Aslo started on volga to ended everywhere

4:20 what is this? seems like non-Indo Germanic nomads passing though

Pro-Islamic government of current day Turkiye tries to imprison and vision such peoples who are so diverse and have great experiences of living and habit of easy adaptation to all lands, within Arabic medieval desert culture. That is an oxymoron. Arabic desert culture will not give you anything but will take all the humanity from you.

Question is: did the iranians coexisted with the turkishs?

i really miss Latin America =(

The empire of the Burgundians were much larger !

Kazakhs more Iranian than Persians?

I'm happy my nation has so little Germanic admixture.

That looks so good, never seen something like that. Do you have plans to make video about Balto-Slavic peoples or Proto-Baltic peoples?

I read in old persian "Saka" was the name for Scythians (greek term, www.the-persians.co.uk/scythians.htm). This map separate both terms in two different tribes. I see you count Albanians (Caucasus) as Indo-Iranians but the Kurds (Huriti - Hittite Empire) much later. Why?

The juxta position of krishna and then showing spread of indo iranians through yamnaya culture 😂

do italy

By 1950 BCE the World has Andronovo Culture and BMAC Culture in full bloom (ref : Tocharian Tarim Mummies, Indo Aryan graves in Ganga Doab) There was a sudden explosion of Aryan military endeavours around 2250BCE - 1850BCE. This map is PLAIN WRONG

Finally a channel that debunks that proto-slavic nonsense, poles usually claim that they lived in central europe for milliennia based on it ... turns out the tuth is much more complicated with them being the bane of central europe from 300ad till their ethnogenesis about 600 years later ... and even after that they continued to attack german life in all its forms.

What happened in the early second century, Italian colonization?.

Nice video! Will you ever do austronesians in the future?

nice video, I’d like to see a video of the spread of semitic heritage

How do you know these people 'originated' that far east?

Again confusing languages with cultures and with genetics... Genetically Afro-Americans are still for the most part African with some European or even Indigenous DNA, but they dont speak any african languages, nor do the share the same african culture (any of the many for that matter). Moroccans share the same or at least a very close language with Saudis, but in terms of culture and genetics, they are not the same people! Modern Spaniards and Mexicans, share a very similar language, so similar that we call it the same, although it has some minor differences, but in terms of culture and genetics, Spaniards and mexicans are not the same people! The individual mix of these three categories is what makes a people, but at the same time, a single one of them can not be used to determine the other two.

The history of Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian and Romanian people.

One thing not correct is that the boundary in China(today's China)is not that north, it should reach the middle of China. Obviously that the north China 's land is also very suitable for nomadic life. Super vast plain. The nomadic people are living in the north China for at least 2000 years, nowadays the north Chinese are still very different from the south chinese in appearance. And today 's Turkish are not that Turkic actually, they are mix of Arabian and European. They have the turkic culture much more than the blood relationship.

Source: trust me bro

Real Turks have Aryan fathers and mongol mothers.

You have Caucasians in Aryans and Aryans in Caucasians. History of R1a J2a G2a.

There can be no saka without mongol matrilineage.

Hello from Kyrgyzstan, I am a haplogroup on my father's side R1A-Z93 Which is considered Aryan ❤