The History of Indo-Iranians. Aryan ancestry from Sintashta in percentages. 2200 BCE - 2024 CE

[@KenanHasanH]

Amazing map. Thank you.

[@ShiblyMartin-yp6mj]

Nicely done, man 👍🏻 Thank you for putting so much effort 💝😊

[@jostnamane3951]

The Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry map of South Asia highly correlates with the linguistic map of South Asia except for some regions like Uttara Kannada (North Karnataka, India) which is linguistically mostly Dravidian but their speakers have similar levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry as people from Southern Maharashtra who mostly speak Konkani which is an Indo-Aryan language. Also southern parts of Chattisgarh which has one of the lowest levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but their people speak an Indo-Aryan language.

[@king_halcyon]

Apparently, afaik, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Odisha region was mostly occupied by various hunter and farmer tribals, and spoke various lost languages in the past, before they homogenized by switching to Kol, Munda and Prakrit tongues.

[@The_Geographer_Maps]

Alas, I did not find so many genomes in India, probably because I mainly used Vahaduo. For example, I am missing the genomes of Marathis, Konkanis, Sinhala, Assama and Odia. That's why I've outlined them roughly. I would be very grateful if you shared the sources from where you got the genomes.

[@iranian_persian_gorillas]

​@@The_Geographer_MapsIranians are arabic people, same genes and dna with arabs, this iranian arab made this un scientific imagination geographic youtube page 🐪🐫🐵🐒🍌🇮🇷

[@daredevil9820]

@@The_Geographer_Maps Also, malayali brahmins from the southern part of india, have about 20% sintashta ancestry even though they speak a dravidian language.

[@presidentpapillon2625]

ah good video i am proud of my alanic ancestry

[@danythrinbell1596]

alani were caucasia not siberia , and were just small tribes people they were part of sarmatians

[@presidentpapillon2625]

​@@danythrinbell1596why do you think i am siberian? i am not siberian

[@kylealexander593]

Im always amazed at the million different names given. It makes it appear that there's a million different races.

[@Niloufar1992]

Hello from Gilan-Iran , sending my love and good wishes to all , great video btw ❤

[@micahistory]

very nice video, I love these sorts of maps, nobody ever does them!

[@sahilsingh6048]

Pls do on one vedic anscestry.❤

[@jmab721]

It will basically be double of whatever Sintashta ancestry one has. So a Haryanvi with 40% sintashta will be roughly 77-80% Vedic because vedic ancestry essentially means 50% sintashta & 50% IVC.

[@spaghettiking7312]

I thank you deeply, king.

[@jmab721]

Thank you for making the Haryana, Delhi region as distinct and more steppe heavy than Punjab. Otherwise people often forget about it, Hindi comes from that core region. Also, you forgot to add Rors of Haryana, who are 40% Proto Indo Iranian, but rest of the video is fine. Great effort.

[@blikz8885]

Yes also Western UP I believe is more steppe heavy than Punjab

[@ashri3494]

This is fake information, highest steppe aryan ancestorry percentage is found in Nordic Europeans , original aryans looked like that not Delhi Haryana 😂

[@jmab721]

@@ashri3494 Aryan ancestry means Proto Indo Iranian ancestry, nordics don't have that. Pehle tu apna unpadd gawaarpana durr kar, fir baat kar.

[@ashri3494]

​​@@jmab721they have it who are you fooling around jackass 😂 , closest populations to sintashta are mostly Nordic phenotype European ethnicity groups not Delhi Haryana one

[@ashri3494]

​@@jmab721 ganwar Dravidian , check pictures of rors they don't look anything like Dravidian. They look more like kalash chitpavan etc types in terms of phenotype 😊

[@BellBeakerBloke]

Wow what a channel this is the future of archeogenetic geography This is how I have visualised it as flows of certain peoples, very refreshing depiction, not static

[@siyacer]

interesting, coming from the forests to the steppe, intermixing with the altaic people, then retreating to the mountains and plateaus of the south while the bulk of their proto ancestry gets spread across the continent by the turks and mongols

[@Ravie3]

Linguistics today doubt that Altaic is a real language family. They just say Turkic and Mongolic, a connection between the two families cannot be proven.

[@siyacer]

@@Ravie3 Sure they can. The word for arm/hand (these languages tend to use the same word for both): Proto-Japonic: ta(r)i Proto-Koreanic: tali Proto-Mongolic: gar Proto-Turkic: kar(i) In Mongolic languages the word for arm has developed a martial sense of flank or wing of an army, while in Turkic it has developed into a more merchantile sense of a unit of measurement, usually ranging between the length of a forearm (cubit) to the length of 2 arms. The divergence in connotation from a word that originally referred to the same thing suggests a common origin rather than a loanword.

[@Ravie3]

@@siyacer My dude, don’t do amateur linguistics research, leave it to the experts. Neighboring languages, through contact, can share vocabulary or even sound/grammar changes, which is why determining what’s a cognate and what’s a loanword can be so difficult to figure out. The professionals who study this for a living say that there’s no concrete evidence that Turkic and Mongolic stem from a common root.

[@siyacer]

@@Ravie3 Did you seriously just call a paraphrasing of an actual peer-reviewed article "amateur linguistics research". Sure, if you love your "experts" so much, here's an article on the topic. Search up "Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages"

[@hudai7994]

@@Ravie3 😂😂😂 aferin siz bu kafayla devam edin

[@CommunicateWithNate]

Amazing effort! Great job

[@zalqert]

Fascinating that central Asians have higher Indo Aryan ancestry than even Persians.

[@aliklc1970]

Yes

[@stsk1061]

It depends on what is meant by Indo Iranian ancestry. The people with the highest amount of steppe ancestry are Northern Europeans.

[@aliklc1970]

@@stsk1061 The first known peoples of the nomadic Aryans were the Scythians, Sarmatians and Yuezis. They are not Northern Europeans. They were Caucasian horse-drawn nomads who spread from Eastern Europe to the Mongolian steppes.

[@stsk1061]

@@aliklc1970 The Aryans were just Steppe people mixed with Neolithic Europeans. This is basically the same population that exists in Northern Europe today.

[@aliklc1970]

@@stsk1061 No way. Unlike northern Europe, it is a mixture of eastern European steppe nomads and indigenous northern European hunter-gatherer people

[@vichael]

Such a great video

[@superboy3633]

Wow very accurate map.

[@ferrothorn9022]

Such a great video even if its not 100% accurate, deserves more recognition

[@AW27007]

It's interesting to see how far these people have gone. Influencing the Mongols and the Turks in more ways then one. Invading India, the Middle East and even Eastern Europe and Korea possibly. Love to the Aryans/Indo-Iranians. ✝️❤️

[@fighter-nj7vl]

😂😂😂

[@AlexanderVasilyev-cf4ec]

What about Mitanni? They came to the Middle East around 1700 BC.

[@sunilkumarpsunilkumarp3724]

A sub branch of Indic Aryans , who separated around 1600 bce from Vedic Aryans

[@fighter-nj7vl]

no

[@qpdb840]

Oh nice. As a Persian Kurd Azeri I find this very interesting. thank you very much for your work

[@tanhukim9963]

Persian Kurd Azeri?

[@qpdb840]

@@tanhukim9963 yes I have diverse ethnicity

[@tanhukim9963]

@@qpdb840 Azerbaijanis= Turk

[@qpdb840]

@@tanhukim9963 Not Oghuz Azeri Azeri Iranian

[@tanhukim9963]

@@qpdb840 If Azeris are Iranians, Hazaras are Turks. Does race look at DNA? Even Mongolians have more Aryan DNA than Azeris. Are they Iranian too? Also, Mongolians mostly have Turkish DNA. But we do not come out and call the Mongols Turks.

[@polis1705]

Can U pls make about sino Tibetan ancestry?🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@sahilsingh6048]

Perfect accurate✅✅✅

[@Liam-eo5dy]

Your spelling is not very accurate curry boy india 🦃😂

[@sahilsingh6048]

​@@Liam-eo5dythanks for correcting me mehmet.

[@sahilsingh6048]

​@@Liam-eo5dy🤜🤜🤜🪳🪳🪳🪳

[@iamgaynamogachogacho4188]

​@@Liam-eo5dy🦃 Turk imagine not being indo european

[@iamgaynamogachogacho4188]

​@@Liam-eo5dynorth indian stepe ancestry goes upto 50% while turk have no steepe ancesty

[@Tornout-e7i]

How did you measure Sintashta autosomal DNA among Khazars???

[@insectilluminatigetshrekt5574]

Do one for semitic ancestry

[@anti-anti-matery891]

Semitic and afro-asiatic are linguistical things, not genetically things

[@insectilluminatigetshrekt5574]

@anti-anti-matery891 there must have been an original population that spoke proto semitic, and said people must have had a unique genetic makeup

[@YeastCartography]

Amazing work!

[@TUNC66]

What an amazing work, the video is wrong and not correct from beginning to end.

[@YeastCartography]

@@TUNC66 Are you Turkish by any chance?

[@TUNC66]

@@YeastCartography Yes,i amTurk, what's the problem?

[@Piast_Oracz]

@TUNC66 Denying facts because of your national insecurity won't make scythians turkic

[@serkankinden5150]

Sakas are turkic, look at tagar, tianshan, tasmola etc. saka cultures' autosomal dna inspections. Scythians (western sakas) are a mixture of steppe nomads and old europeans. Indoeuropean languages have some linguistic connections to uralic-altaic languages over eurasiatic macro family theory. Linguistics will show it more in time.

[@AncientRelicTales]

Yous have have added gypsy as well since they bought R1a Z93 and Indo Iranian Ancestry In Europe as Well Gypsy Is Missing other wise based vidoe very informative

[@BOOMkingGold-e6l]

Hello from Kyrgyzstan, I am a haplogroup on my father's side R1A-Z93 Which is considered Aryan ❤

[@tanhukim9963]

Arian? Haplogroups do not determine race, brother, stop these ridiculous thoughts.

[@BOOMkingGold-e6l]

@tanhukim9963 Yes, I know that haplogroups do not emphasize the race of a people, I am not stupid not to know about this, but our ancestors were Aryans according to Chinese sources and Persian

[@user_18789]

yes kyrgyz people"s haplo is mostly from scythian Iranic Tagar culture

[@Ufthak]

Love the Medieval 2 Total War music!

[@ghoguan8471]

is it possible for you to make one on the spread of indo-european genes in america next?

[@jostnamane3951]

Ladakhis have no Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry? Phenotypically they look mostly East Asian unlike their Dardic Kashmiri neighbours but even Mongols have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but 0% for Ladakhis?

[@Hindustaniyoddha089]

Mongols have some indo European ancestory because andronovo or some other culture migrated around Mongolia before the rise of mongols there. Ladakhis are mostly just tibetians whom indo Europeans rarely encountered thats why I think they have no aryan ancestory

[@jostnamane3951]

​@@Hindustaniyoddha089 makes sense, but then how do you explain Nepalis having comparable levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry to Uttarachalis and Biharis? Nepal is 30% Tibetan ethnically. Likewise, Ladakh is 51% Tibetan, 48% Indo-Aryan ethnically, and 1% other ethnicities. The similarity in Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry between Nepalis and Indians can be attributed to the fact that intermixing between Tibetans and Indo-Aryans is common in Nepal, especially in the Kathmandu region. Similarly, there would likely be some degree of Indo-Aryan influence in Ladakh and therefore among ethnic Ladakhis.

[@Hindustaniyoddha089]

@@jostnamane3951 ladakh is very difficult place reach even more than nepal maybe thats why also nepalis are pahari people and mountains were scarcely populated by proto dravidians thats why aryans didn't intermarry also look at example of himachal pradesh where many people are fair skin and have. Caucasian features

[@The_Geographer_Maps]

Maybe I should have added Ladakhis. They, unlike other Tibetans, have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry. Apparently Ladakhis can be considered to be 30% Burusho

[@barguttobed]

⁠@@The_Geographer_Maps Hey man, can you tell me your source for the claim that Ladakhi have 30% Burusho like ancestry

[@binderchannel9454]

Fascinating illustration of the language and people spread over the land over time. Thank you.

[@ahemenidov1900]

Basically this diagram shows: 1) Uzbeks = Yagnobo-Kazakh mix 2) Crimean Tatars = Kazakh-Osseto-Slavic mix 3) Bashkirs = FinnoUgro-Kazakh mix

[@khab1bullayevv_1]

Qoʻtoqdan oldingmi buni

[@Abdullatif-pj7wq]

Bro kazakh used to part with Medieval Uzbeks😂😂. We are almost same how tf we came from you. But Yagnobo-Northeast asian correct

[@VremennyiGuest]

Барлығы түптеп келгенде бір атадан уакыт өте бір жерде ұзақ тұрған қарудың дамуымен 🔪темір өңдеу кезеңінен кейін соғыстар жаулап алулар басталды бір таза халық жоқ даже аралда тұратын жапондарда ол аралғабарғанда олжерде айндертұрды олар африкалыкьар кейін малайзиялықтармен араласқан кейін Жапонияға барған тазахалық жоқ даже Англиядада африкалық казіргі сирия египеттік қанбасымрим империясы кезінде римдіктер ол жерді қолынан шығармау үшін солтүстік африкадан әскер алып барған сол үшін бүгінгі англия түрінен немістерден өзгешелігі байқалады арабтарға ұқсас белгілері

[@iszb5339]

Bashkirs and Tatars almost same as Hungarians (genetically). Volga Hungaria or Donau Bashkiria like the old-Bolghars.

[@ahemenidov1900]

@@iszb5339 Not at all. Hungarians are more than 50% Slavs. Slavic R1a-Z283 and I2a1-L621 comprise more than 60%.

[@GreyMatter-mf4pb]

Hello, author. I have a question: Why qazaqs,kyrgyzes,altaians,bashkirs and other turkics don't have proto-mongolic ancestry, like buryats,kalmyks and khalkhas? These turkics have a lot mongolic tribes, especially qazaqs and kyrgyzes

[@Abdullatif-pj7wq]

Eyes looking like asian doesnt stand for being asian. But yeah you are right they are more NorthEast Asian but not Mongolic.

[@iamzeus7368]

I am iranan i love Aryans ❤

[@iamzeus7368]

@yxzhvw348 none of your business

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

So do I as an Indian

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

​@@iamzeus7368great response to that good job

[@VerbalWarrior162]

@@soumyajitsingha9614 During the Neolithic, East Iranian farmers settled in northwestern South Asia and mixed with the native South Asian hunter-gatherers, creating the Indus Valley Civilization. Eventually, the people of the Indus Valley Civilization finally managed to adapt to the more humid and tropical areas of South Asia and migrated south, absorbing extra South Asian hunter-gatherer DNA, creating the Dravidians as we know them. The Dravidians also have some Sintashta steppes, though much less than the Indo-Aryans.

[@AriArian-it1wk]

I love ayran with mint 🐫🐵🇮🇷🐪🐒

[@calvinle9009]

This is the real ancestry of the Buddha

[@Hindustaniyoddha089]

Why do haryanvis have higher percentage than punjabis punjab plains were where aryans entered they should have higher percentage.

[@jostnamane3951]

Haryanvis do not necessarily possess a higher Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry; rather, it is the Eastern parts of the Punjab region 🇮🇳🇵🇰 (encompassing Modern-day Haryana, Indian Punjab, Pakistani Punjab, and Himachal Pradesh) that exhibit a higher percentage of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry compared to Western Punjab 🇵🇰 (Modern-day Pakistani Punjab). The map illustrates the overlap of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry between what is represented as Punjabis (or Eastern Punjabis🇮🇳) and "Hindis" (or Haryanvis🇮🇳). My theory is that Aryans who settled in the Punjab region (especially Eastern Punjab) were less prone to mixing because of the already fertile landscape of the region and low population. Whereas Aryans who settled in Central (Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh) and Eastern parts of India (Bihar and Madhya Pradesh) were more prone to mixing because of the already high population of these regions.

[@jmab721]

​​@@jostnamane3951Haryana is literally the core of Vedic expansion. Himachalis do not have high PII ancestry, they are a max of 25% PII, whereas Haryana max PII is 43%. Hindi, Prakrit, Sanskrit all expanded from the core area of Haryana, Delhi, northwest UP so it is not surprising that the heaviest steppeMLBA is also here. Other variables like Punjabis becoming more liberal wrt to free mixing, or being at the forefront of attacks, are also responsible why PII is slightly less in Punjab. It's a direct continuum where Pakistan Punjab is 25-30% max PII, Indian Punjab is 35% max PII, and Haryana is 43% max PII.

[@ashri3494]

​@@jmab721fake information , Haryana don't have high steppe just the jats and rors who are high steppe mostly stay in Haryana they have elevated steppe due to being Scythian heavy mixed , other haryanvi normal

[@champion1928]

​@@jostnamane3951 Jat's were Indo Saka desendents (all Jat's were High Steppe) including North Rajasthan, haryana, West up, even two North district of Gujarat.

[@HuleguKhan-z2n]

​@@jostnamane3951 That could explain why many UP brahmins have Haplo H.

[@АнтонДемидов-д7м]

I wonder, what do you mean by "Indo-Iranian ancestry?" 🤔 Very much looks like adjusting genetic to desirble turkic languages map configuration in the north part.

[@AW27007]

Love these videos

[@sahilsingh6048]

Can you do one on vedic anscestry pls❤

[@ganglosaxon1488]

How is the Germanic progress going my friend?

[@The_Geographer_Maps]

I've just almost finished the Migration Period. There is more work to be done on colonialism. Maybe in a month map will be ready.

[@Yokina-kana]

Will be in germanic peoples videos migration of the new world?

[@ganglosaxon1488]

@@The_Geographer_Mapshow long until it gets released?

[@Liam-eo5dy]

​@@ganglosaxon1488you are iranian arab wanna be white western people, you were born dark skinned middle eastern, forget imagination, live real

[@AriArian-it1wk]

​@@The_Geographer_Mapsdon't do germanic, you are arabic, do your arab brothers kurds persians syrians

[@diegoragot655]

I love seeing the evolution, but I also wpnder why we didn't see the Hyrcanians and Cosseans (I know the latter aren't Japhetic/Indo-European BUT we saw the Cadusii here too)

[@RaphaeL1000Kazan]

Tatars are classified as both Turkic and Indo-Iranian languages. In the end, who do they belong to?

[@based4560]

😂

[@MitousPoulos]

"Non-Indo-Iranian speakers" are marked in grey.

[@thatonecrusader7209]

Turks

[@serkankinden5150]

Tatars are turkic. Whole map shows most of turkic people tough.

[@nicolatesla4876]

do you know anything about khasas ?

[@RobertMuha303Lmao]

As a former Iranian 🇰🇿 support Iranian brothers 🇮🇷🇦🇫🇹🇯

[@sanzhar6399]

Қазақ емессің

[@RobertMuha303Lmao]

@@sanzhar6399 сонда кіммін? Мы арийцы 🇰🇿

[@RobertMuha303Lmao]

@@sanzhar6399 үнді еуропалық > түркі

[@sanzhar6399]

@РабочийСтол-я9ы ахаха

[@sanzhar6399]

@@RobertMuha303Lmao хххехах

[@AHogammer]

hey geographer, can u do research on the genetic relation between slavs & proto-aryans? it seems to me unrealistic that slavs have 0% sintashta ancestry, i mean the scythians inhabited such a large area of ukraine & southern russia for such a long time, it just seems crazy to me that ukrainians & russians have 0% sintashta ancestry, unless the eastern slavs had a cultural thing like some germanic tribes like the heruli & the rugii had where they avoided mixing with other ethnic groups.

[@r.v.b.4153]

Nearly all Northwestern, Northern, Central and Eastern Europeans are more closely related to the Sintashta than Central and Southern Asians. These Europeans simply do not directly descend from the Sintashta, but to closely related groups (like Corded Ware).

[@Secular_Turkish]

Proto Turks are not Iranians. The video is incorrect wtf

[@tanhukim9963]

Knk dikkatli izle irani demiyor zaten.

[@Secular_Turkish]

​@@tanhukim9963 Soy diyor. O da yanlış?

[@tanhukim9963]

@@Secular_Turkish knk silik yazılan yazılar var, bir de koyu yazılanlar var. Silik olanlar Hint İran olmayanlar zaten, sadece onların dnasını taşıyanlardır.

[@Secular_Turkish]

@@tanhukim9963 onu anladım zaten. Ancak Proto Türklerin coğrafyası İrani coğrafyadan çok ayrıydı. Proto Türklerin taşıma olasılığı çok düşük ve yanlış

[@scarymonster5541]

Turks originate from modern day mongolia

[@cbont7]

Question is: did the iranians coexisted with the turkishs?

[@dogaozdemir7763]

No, but the first possible Turkic homeland was in the Altai Mountains and the eastern half of modern day Mongolia. So, the western half of Central Asia wasn't the Proto-Turkic homeland. Indo-Iranians existed there before the Turk(ic)s. But ,since the 5th century there are Turks in the Western Half of Central Asia as a majority. Both people got mixed. Turks and Indo-Iranians are not coexisted but both people lived together for thousands of years and connected to each other with strong ties.

[@SlaveOfDevas]

Bro can you make a video on indian caste dna specifically because it might look like all indians have similar dna however many indian castes have very high steppe ancestry and some have none therefore castewise is much better represents indo iraninan dna rather than geography

[@jmab721]

Geography wise is also correct. No need to bring your casteism here. This map is mostly correct.

[@ShiblyMartin-yp6mj]

There would be millions of dots in the map if he try to do so 😅

[@SlaveOfDevas]

@@ShiblyMartin-yp6mj That's true. That is why a column chart is correct

[@SlaveOfDevas]

@@jmab721 Let me tell you the reason. Irula a lower indian caste does not have any steppe ancestry while the Iyer brahmin has one of the highest steppe ancestry in tamil nadu. The problem is that dna is in extremes not similar

[@jostnamane3951]

​@@jmab721 caste wise is more relevant. Here in Maharashtra, Chitpavan Brahmins can sometimes score 40-50% Steppe MLBA. Whereas Tribals who are mostly related to Dravidians and Austro-Asiatics score only 5-10% and 1-2% steppe MLBA respectively.

[@Geoguy678]

So, Achaemenid empire wasn't Indo-Iranian?

[@INGUSCHIMAMAEBISILA]

Я Алан АсТуал Ирон ❤ Приветствую всех Ариев из Алании г.Цхинвал

[@alwaysright3943]

Greetings from Iran bro ❤️

[@INGUSCHIMAMAEBISILA]

​@@alwaysright3943Приветствую Брат! Иран ❤ Раздавите эту сатану израиль

[@INGUSCHIMAMAEBISILA]

@@alwaysright3943 Иран 🤝Ирон💖 Братья 💪🤝

[@Roranlogic]

Why did you ignore Rors? They're more Steppe shifted than Jats... Why the hell did you ignore Rors?

[@jmab721]

Not anymore. Some recent Jaat samples have showed some of the highest sintashta ancestry ever (~45%)

[@kirillluzgin2858]

Mannai no irans, they is pre-irans

[@alwaysright3943]

The percentages are all over the place. Persians from Eastern Iran have 20-25%, Persians form the center have 20%, and Lurs and Kurds have 15-20%.

[@Eastern_Egale]

Iranian Sailors also migrated to East Africa, such as Zanzibar, Madagascar Commors and Somalia

[@MitousPoulos]

That explains why some East Africans show Caucasoid features.

[@vitocorleone9456]

So there is no genetic influence of Indo-Iranian nomads on eastern Europe?

[@justperson7551]

Hmm, well, I heard that the Indo-Iranians and Slavs seem to be genetically close. And the same Eastern Slavs (Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians) had contact in ancient times with the same Scythians

[@AriArian-it1wk]

​@@justperson7551slavs habe white skinned eurooeans, iranians dark skinned asians, 2 different races and 2 different continents, i heard it 😂😂 it is not about what you hear, go to school arab boy

[@MuhammadFazil-xs9gg]

​@@AriArian-it1wkaverage history stealing turk :

[@AriArian-it1wk]

@@MuhammadFazil-xs9gg i am from armenia, you are liar iranianarab

[@userWesttartani]

@@MuhammadFazil-xs9gg The fatherland of both proto slav and proto iranians is around dniper river. Proto iranians move eastwards while proto slavic stay around not far. They both are part of the "satem" language. satem=hundred proto germanic and celt went westwards.

[@Skibidi-Rizzlerz]

Funny how the flexing 'Aryan Iranians' who make fun of 'Non-Aryan N. India' are very quiet after this video.

[@KurtusCobainus]

Indo-Aryans who aren't Jats aren't much more steppe either. Outside of Jats, Iranic speaking Yaghnobi and Pamiris easily beat you guys easily.

[@user-ys2st1eo9o]

@@Skibidi-Rizzlerz we’re not quiet because you have the stinking AASI Dravidian genes 🤣

[@Skibidi-Rizzlerz]

@@user-ys2st1eo9o Atleast we don't have unconsential arab and Turkic genes😬

[@Skibidi-Rizzlerz]

@@KurtusCobainus I am talking about Iranians. Plus u can see on the map.

[@user-ys2st1eo9o]

@@Skibidi-Rizzlerz all those "aryan" genes and iranian farmer genes in indians are unconcential. and keep dreaming because we have no arab ancestry, infact ancient persians had more than modern persians 🤣🤣🤣

[@iroquoianmapper]

Another great work from you!

[@sahilsingh6048]

Turks have got high percentages bcz they mixed with the already living indo iranins of central asia on the mother side, otherwise there were no turks in central asia.

[@ChristopherTanne-se3pz]

Tocharians and iranic scyhts dominatet you tousend of years 😅

[@sahilsingh6048]

​​@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzyes as i say iranians>>>>... You people

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

Wannabe Aryan spotted

[@sahilsingh6048]

​@@soumyajitsingha9614understand my comment first

[@MatiasMorales-oc7mf]

@@soumyajitsingha9614 No, he's right, Anatolian Turks genetics studies proves it.

[@ugurkurshad]

Mannai? Please send me articles which proves that this ancestry of Mannaeans came from same origin with Iranic people.

[@RichardEdwards40]

why not add russians and ukrainians? iranians used to live in much of ukraine

[@Eastern_Egale]

They are Slavic

[@antonival50]

Because the channel holder is ihnorant.

[@antonival50]

​@Unknown_Iranian_Soldier1 The Slavic are one of the major Aryan group in Europe.

[@Persian_iranian_Kebab]

No iranians only lived in arabia, not in europe

[@Persian_iranian_Kebab]

​@@antonival50slavian people are different race, you iranian arab, slavians are europeans

[@nicolaocornelio170]

Kazakhs more Iranian than Persians?

[@sanzhar6399]

Yeah, haha!

[@ganglosaxon1488]

Amazing new video, I would like to see the same for Proto Germanics, particularly pertaining to the Settlement of the United States (Hint if you do that don’t go by census reported ethnicity because it’s super inaccurate just go by “White Americans” or “Euro-Americans” instead. Same with Brazilians, Argentinans, and Australians

[@ganglosaxon1488]

Because almost EVERYBODY has some proto Germanic DNA in the Americas because of European Colonization, even if low like in Mexicans and Peruvians due to the Visigoths in Spain

[@The_Geographer_Maps]

I’m already planning to make a map about the spread of proto-Germans, so I’m already studying the history of Latin America. However, I made maps about the colonization of the USA and Australia precisely because of this map. I put off making maps about the peoples of Western Europe precisely because of colonialism, which is a really complex topic. Therefore, I planned to complete the eastern Indo-European direction first. I prefer to divide the people of America according to the American Census, as well as according to the "Racial map of the world2" from Masaman. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ancestry_map_of_the_United_States,_2016.png commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Racial_map_of_the_world2.png That is, I will designate mixed groups as mestizos, mulattoes, etc. But I will designate peoples who are not particularly mixed, by their European nationality, although this may be accompanied by many inaccuracies, but I will try to have as few of them as possible

[@Liam-eo5dy]

He doesn't know anything about europeans, he is iranian, do your arabic roots

[@Liam-eo5dy]

​@@The_Geographer_Mapswikipedia is pookipedia, misleading information all mistaken, edited by jews, it is not real history

[@AHogammer]

@@Liam-eo5dy i thought everyone here atleast have as basic knowledge of anthropology to know that iranians aren't arabs & but apparently not. unless ur joking which i hope u are, on both of the statements.

[@aqebrax]

Thank you

[@megaclesdeorcomenos3198]

So, turkics from central asia are ethnically more iranian than persians? Thats crazy

[@user_18789]

If the Turks had not come, we probably would have had more iranian in central asia persians of afghanistan and tajikistan have highest genetic of sintashta on earth

[@Eastern_Egale]

Turks are from Mongolia and aren't Netive of central Asia

[@hudai7994]

@@Eastern_Egale İran'da Türk topraklarıdır

[@AHogammer]

not rly, honestly i expected even more proto-aryan ancestry from kipchaks & uzbeks bc their lands were once inhabited by scythians.

[@MrrishWealt]

​@@Eastern_EgaleAnd you're not Aryan but pre-aryan Iranian

[@Arya_N700]

I am East Persian and I got 30 percent Andronovo, balanced by my copper age ancestry.

[@user_18789]

باید 7 8 تا بچه بیاری 😂

[@Μιχάιλ]

Sintashta weren't just Pure Indo-Europeans they descended from mostly pre-Indo-European North European Cultrual Complex, who became indo European speaking and later companion to later Corded-Ware cultural complex in europe which many Indo-European languages like germanic and celtic and indo-iranic , slavic decended from, Pre-Indo-European North European cultural complex referred as Pit-Comb Ware Culture they thought to be first ppl who carry R1a-z93 Haplogroup which later shown up in sintashta culture. Pit-comb ware assumed to be Proto-Uralic Speaking, which you must take it into consideration sintashta were mostly uralic decent rather than Indo-European who carry a lot Mesolithic Caucasian Ancestry.

[@Nastya_07]

Pit-Comb Ware/Comb Ceramic didn't have R-Z93, that was the later Fatyanovo which was part of the Indo-European Corded Ware culture And Comb Ceramic is too early to be Proto-Uralic, Uralic only started spreading in around 2000 BC Another thing is that while there are Indo-Iranian loanwords in Uralic, there are no Uralic loanwords in Proto-Indo-Iranian

[@LamaStraus]

It started in modern Kazakhstan🇰🇿

[@Hylean_Way]

Russia actually

[@ササキ-v5q]

The poor Turks who believe in pan-Turkism are gushing about the Scythians and Saka people being Turkic peoples, but historically this is impossible. It is certainly possible that the Mongoloid ancestors of the Turkic peoples interacted with the Scythians, but it is a far-fetched argument to say that they were Turks. The western dialects of the Scythian languages ​​had experienced an evolution of the Proto-Iranic sound /d/ into the Proto-Scythian sound /ð/, which in the Cimmerian and Pontic dialects of Scythian became the sound /l/. Scythian shares the evolution of Proto-Iranic sound /d/ into /ð/ with all Eastern Iranic languages ​​with the exception of Ossetian, Yaghnobi, and Ishkashimi; and the later evolution of /ð/ into /l/ is also present in several Eastern Iranic languages ​​such as Bactrian, Pashto, Munjani, and Yidgha. The latest research has shown that the Proto-Iranian language is related to the languages ​​of the Scythians and Saka people. The Turks will think, "The research material is shallow! DNA tests are unreliable!" However, the oldest record of the ethnic name Turkey or Turk is Goktürk. The record of Goktürk dates back to 552. There are some fools who say, "The Xiongnu are the oldest records!" but there is no historical evidence that the Xiongnu were direct descendants of the Turkic people lol. Well, even if the Xiongnu were the ancestors of the Turkic people, the record was written around the 2nd century BC, so they are from a different era from the Sakas and Scythians. There are similarities with the languages ​​of primitive nomadic and hunting tribes. The characters of the Germanic peoples of Northern Europe, the ancient Greek characters, and the American Indian characters are similar to the ancient Turkic characters. However, they are only similar, and the pronunciation and meaning are completely different. Despite this, the Turks make the outrageous claim that their ancestors were the Turkic people. If most Turks believe in pan-Turkism, they are the stupidest people on earth, so to speak, Turkey🦃. In the first place, the genes of Turkic peoples have no relation to the current Turks and are closer to the peoples in the Ural Mountains and the Mongolians.

[@tanhukim9963]

Kürt take 🧠

[@user_18789]

chechens and all south and north caucasians have alanic scythian ancestry that"s cool

[@insectilluminatigetshrekt5574]

Why does Assam only appear in 1500 when indo aryans moved there in 200?

[@CPlusPlusOpenGLMan]

Nice video, but modern people with 20%, 30% Western Siberian hunter gatherer ancestry? I'm so sorry, but perhaps with the exception of Saami, there is no one alive with such high percentages of this ancestry.

[@The_Geographer_Maps]

I wonder why Mansi is then considered to have one of the highest ANE ancestry? i.imgur.com/Rdx1whi.png This is what Vahaduo shows: Saami: 68.2% Erzya; 16.9% Nganassan; 15.0% KAZ_Botai. Mansi: 30.5% Erzya; 40.8% Nganassan; 28.7% KAZ_Botai. Ket:584_R01C01: 3.6% Erzya; 53.0% Nganassan; 43.4% KAZ_Botai.

[@CPlusPlusOpenGLMan]

@@The_Geographer_Maps Please search the 2023 scientific research "Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant" by Elena Essel, ..., Svante Pääbo (Nobel Prize winner) et al. In this scientific research, they managed to extract human DNA from a Paleolithic pendant found in the Denisova cave in Siberia. It was concluded that this DNA belonged to two women who were part of the population that became known in the scientific circles as "Ancient North Eurasians" (ANE). Table 7.2 of the supplementary information from the same research shows the genetic affinities that these two women had with the current people of the world (the higher the value, the greater the genetic affinity): (I sorted the values in the table in descending order) f3-statistics A B C f3 Pima DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.271 Pima DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273 Surui DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.271 Surui DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273 Quechua DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.27 Quechua DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273 . . . Saami DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.263

[@diyartokmurzin7154]

Khamag mongols occurred on the map too early, they initially consisted of Jalair and Qiyat tribes. Tatars also chnaged their name and initially were an amalgamation of tribes. Naimans were Sekiz-Oghuz initially

[@SpateHicks]

based

[@mytube236]

n imagination, dreams to be western and white man 😂

[@oussamatalha1903]

Do the Berber language brother

[@maseehwardak6055]

Yup, I'm a pashtun and got 34 percent steppe ancestry in my DNA test. 22.6% European in illustrativeDNA

[@vaibhav_Jat]

I am Jat from west uttar pradesh bijnor district I have 42% stepee ancestry

[@maseehwardak6055]

@@vaibhav_Jat jats have more haha, I had a huge chunk of zagros and anatolian. BMCI

[@vaibhav_Jat]

@@maseehwardak6055 yeh you have Anatolian farmer dna also but in india haryana and west uttarpradesh jats have very high stepee ancestry and in some ror community also in haryana and west Uttar Pradesh side other Indian are Iranian neolithic farmer only jats and some ror have high stepee ancestry in india brother

[@maseehwardak6055]

@@vaibhav_Jat here's my full illustrative DNA 38.4 zagros 22.6 Europe. 18.8 anatolia 7.6 amur river 7.2 ancient Indian 5.4 Caucasian

[@Makaveli2000]

@@maseehwardak6055 really high Amur for a Pashtun

[@User-vbhhnvgjmt]

This map is not really correct, and not complete either.

[@userWesttartani]

Persians have today 5 to 10% proto indo iranian ancestry. Iranians haplogroup is in average 30% R1A/R1B . How can you explain this?

[@presidentpapillon2625]

male conquerors marrying more local women

[@NoK2L30]

The Iranian speakers that came into iran/Persia were more mixed race with BMAC people, so if we include BMAC admixture it will probably higher.

[@Tornout-e7i]

​@presidentpapillon2625 Exactly wrong. Even maternal Haplogroups of Persians is like 15% 😂

[@muhammedjaseemshajeef6781]

You should make native American ancestry

[@Яш_Алава]

Will there be a similar video about romancers?

[@king_halcyon]

No. Romance languages almost entirely spread via elite dominance, aka the adoption of the tongue of the elites by the masses. Even if a vid is made about 'em, it won't show any genetic mixings.

[@The_Geographer_Maps]

Yes, after the Germans

[@AjayShira-lw1vf]

​@@The_Geographer_Mapswho is jat 🤔

[@Furki3434]

Biz türküz Hint avrupalı değiliz europoid (caucasoid) ile mongolidlerin orta asya bölgesinde çiftleşmeleriyle oluştuk biz Hint Avrupalı değil Ural altaylıyız

[@Abdullatif-pj7wq]

Comment that i looking for😊😊

[@andrejflackov3974]

Turkiye 💪💪💪

[@elidesportelli325]

0:07 I love the history of the people of the central Asia.

[@Shtf132]

Interesting, I heard the Achaemenid Persians only had around 5% steppe ancestry based on the few examples they had.

[@rb98769]

I haven't checked the data, but it makes sense. That general region was already quite densely populated by the time the Iranian tribes got there, probably because it was very much tied with Elam and Mesopotamia. So actual replacement was just unlikely to happen.

[@user_18789]

no that"s impossible because today persians from that region(while they"re more mixed with elamites than ancient persians) have 18% sintashta so ancient persians I think were more than 25% sintashta

[@Shtf132]

@@user_18789 impossible. The 20-30% is not really steppe ancestry. It's steppe_mlba ancestry, which is significantly admixed with european farmers. Steppe_EMBA is the real 'steppe ancestry' and it is this kind of ancestry which northern europeans have ~50% of. Yamnaya, Afanasievo and early CWC ancestry basically. Steppe_mlba are the Sintashta / Srubnaya / Andronovo populations. Basically 70% steppe_EMBA 30% late neolithic farmer. The peak is with Rors and Haryana jatts who have like 30-35% steppe_mlba or 21-25% steppe_EMBA. But most South Asian Indo-Aryan speakers have significantly less than that, even the Brahmin. Its less in Armenians, Kurds and Iranians. Armenians have like 5% steppe_EMBA ancestry, depends on individual and if they have ancestry from elsewhere, as some groups in the Caucasus have higher steppe ancestry (peaks around 35-40%) but funnily enough those groups are not Indo-European speaking. In Iran it depends on the ethnic group but its mostly around 10-15% (EMBA), similar for Kurds. East Iranian have the highest amount of steppe_mlba of Indo-Iranians, around 40% give or take a couple percentages. Or 28% steppe_EMBA roughly.

[@user_18789]

@@Shtf132 yes I mean steppe _EMBA or sintahsta Also just armanians have 4% steppe EMBA but iranian have between 10_33% steppe(sintahsta) forexample: kurds have 16% sintashta Azeris 12_25% persians 15%_33% baluch 22% lur 10_17% gilak 15% you can check it yes it depends where region are you from

[@erwinner8929]

Aint no way Kazakhs are on average more Indo Iranian than Indians and Iranians lol

[@aayushjha2023]

kazaks are more chinese

[@حيثلاانت]

Thats on genetic basic

[@Ümid_TuranTürk_Dövləti]

Qazağlar Türkdür

[@erwinner8929]

@@حيثلاانت yeah, I know, and?

[@presidentpapillon2625]

i mean come on kazakhs live in the same land sintashta formed

[@Mr.Leonardo-q5y]

Do Kazakhs and Kyrgyz belong to Aryans?

[@Hylean_Way]

only partly.

[@sahilsingh6048]

From mother side only , . Otherwise they are turkick only from fathers side.

[@sanzhar6399]

By mother side. The huns mixed with Scythians and that's why it showing

[@NoK2L30]

No they're turkic people, not indo-iranian speaking.

[@dionisiodussart5629]

Afanassievo Culture is ignored in this video. Such complex matters cannot be described just by an animated map.

[@Yokina-kana]

Because the Afanassievo Culture didn't carry indo-iranian ancestry they were related to indo-iranians but not identical and they spoke in proto-tocharian language(they are both indo-european) only maybe in iron age and bronze they interacted each other and intermixed and tocharians in this time started to have dna from sintashta gene pool

[@iacko12345]

@@Yokina-kana many Indo-Aryans carry afanassievo genetics. As an example, my steppe admixture is 22% sintashta type and 6.5% afanasievo type.

[@Yokina-kana]

@iacko12345 The admixtures between both happened several centuries later after Afanassievo Culture with the migration of indo-iranians in tarim basin

[@danythrinbell1596]

[@auraledgereal]

Afanassievo was most likely Proto Tocharian. Distantly related to Indo Iranian Andronovo. Because both derived from earlier Yamnaya. Linguistically speaking, Indo Iranian languages are Satem & Afanassievo derived Tocharian languages are Centum branch of the Indo European family.

[@cbadaik9498]

Iranian hunter gatherer were Indo-iranian speaker from Iran not Dravidian. More likely these hunter gatherer were earliest Indo-European language speaker in India who founded Indus valley civilization. South Asian hunter gatherer ancestry were Dravidian which found in majority among Dravidian tribals (70-88%).

[@MrrishWealt]

What a joke! Then why do Europeans score almost zero Iranian hunter gather?

[@boiled_fish_with_rice]

Bullshit Heggarty et al , yang et al 2024 disapproves indo Iranians being from sintastha petrovka , adna doesnt co relates with sintastha petrovka either, ancient vedic samples lack any mlba related ancestry, this is further backed by finds pf royal chariot burials in sanauli and excavation of burzahom, both lack any steppe Also Metspalu and moorjani et al perfectly concluded that steppe-mlba ancestry in modern indians arrived only prior to 1000 bce , which is too late to be a be a source of vedic Mittani Aryan genome from alalakh sample in syria , doesn't has any source of steppe either , mede parthian genome lack it too , So i better recommend you to be updated and not misinform people by providing old sources to back your thoughts

[@jostnamane3951]

"Ancient Vedic samples lack any MLBA-related ancestry". Rakhigarhi sites aren't ancient Vedic sites. Steppe MLBA ancestry arrived with the migration of Vedic Aryans, around 1500-1200 BCE. Implying that it arrived around 1000 BCE or later suggests a desire to portray Vedic Aryans as natives of India, which they were not. Proponents of Indigenous Aryanism are just like Sub-Saharan Africans who lived in huts contributing little to no to the development of any modern civilization until very recently but still claim that Cleopatra was black.

[@boiled_fish_with_rice]

@@jostnamane3951 well mr. Smartass vedic languages are attested before 1000 bce , and 1000 bce date for vedic arrival is too late for anything too be true

[@boiled_fish_with_rice]

@@jostnamane3951 rakhighari isn't vedic but sanauli and abhaypur, kalibangan and vadnagar is vedic indeed

[@jostnamane3951]

​@@boiled_fish_with_rice your point?

[@Mahdi-zp2ut8qt5x]

Brother, what is the source of these last photos?

[@9hkofficial234]

No research paper no evidence showing only myth concept 😂😂😂😂😂,,, just look cell it's international genome sceintist research paper center,,,,,, (anyway I'm an aryan from sanatan vedic dharma)🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

[@Regendorf]

Archeology has not found a difference in material culture between the Cimmerians and Scythians. In Assyrian sources, the Scythians in the northeast of their empire and the Cimmerians in the northwest appear simultaneously. Herodotus’ story that the Cimmerians came to the northern Black Sea region earlier and then were replaced by the Scythians is most likely not true. The Scythians and Sakas formed a single cultural community. At the same time, both of them could be very different ethnically. It is possible to divide them into Sakas and Scythians - this is not entirely correct. If we also follow the division into European Scythians and Asian Saks, then the Sarmatians are definitely not the descendants of the European Scythians. They came from Central Asia from the Sako-Massogetian tribes

[@АндрейДегтярёв-т4р]

The Sintashta culture, descends from the people of northern Europe, the Corded Ware culture from the upper Volga (Fatyanovo culture) .

[@sahilsingh6048]

Corded ware✅ *of northern Europe❌

[@superboy3633]

😂😂😂😂.

[@suhnih4076]

Highest ancestry 40% 💀

[@aayushjha2023]

🗿🗿

[@theresponsibleuser90]

This map is wrong 🤷‍♂️

[@Mojtaba-r5b]

We Are Aryan 🇮🇷🇮🇳🇦🇫🇬🇭🇹🇯🇵🇰🇳🇵

[@RobertMuha303Lmao]

Lmao Ghana

[@23tv74]

But where did the Celts camr from

[@danythrinbell1596]

central europe a ,mix of lbkl , cimerrians - aka thracian aka hittites armenian georgian tribes that kurds are part of

[@presidentpapillon2625]

​@@danythrinbell1596what?

[@danythrinbell1596]

@@presidentpapillon2625 test your dna , and match it with ancient samples , your people today 5000 years ago probably was living thousand kilometres away with different identity, we all know that first civilizatios were formed in near east , trying to say that there was civilisations in siberia 10.000 years ago is misleading so far there is no evidence of it just evidence of some kinda of homo sapiens that got lost in that lands of snow nothing else the oldest writing systems were found all in west not in east

[@superboy3633]

All Europeans are mixed. But North and East Europeans are mix of Yamnaya males + European females.

[@DHARABHISHEK]

Indo aryans had entered indus valley earlier,by 1700 bc - refer to gandhara grave culture.

[@hassanelberbouch]

Do arabs

[@sanzhar6399]

Iranians be like: b-b-bat saar, we are aryan european 100% saar

[@user_18789]

Iranians are aryan between 15_20% in west and 20_33% in east and khorasan region even europeans are not above 50% Iranians say they are aryan but don"t say we are european most of Iranians think aryans are native to Iran but that's not true even europeans are not above 50%

[@sanzhar6399]

@@user_18789 yeah..

[@Tornout-e7i]

Video is wrong. Even for modern population like Kurds !!!

[@onkarjadhav980]

Indo aryans are hindu 🕉️😊❤

[@sahilsingh6048]

No , but , there religion was close to arya samajists of today

[@based4560]

​@@sahilsingh6048Vedic religipn then became brahmanism which became hinduism

[@sahilsingh6048]

​@@based4560 im saying about which Sect of hinduism is most similair to vedic religion in Todays time , mostly Arya samajists and Smartism are similar and still follow very similar ideology.

[@EmirateOfHind]

so you agree Hinduism is not native to india, instead it was result of looting and colonization and genocide, that the Hinduism got formed in india by invaders

[@kylealexander593]

Sintashta main haplogroup is r1a followed by r1b the main mtdna is u

[@-3ccis534]

Carduchii☀️🦅