Das Wort „Steuern“ leitet sich vom mittelhochdeutschen Wort „stiuren“ ab, das „lenken“, „richten“ oder „einen Beitrag leisten“ bedeutete. Es stammt aus dem Althochdeutschen „stiuren“, was ebenfalls „lenken“ oder „steuern“ bedeutete.

The video was a fascinating discussion about the potential of AI to enhance human capabilities and the ethical considerations that come with it. I particularly liked the metaphor of AI as a "bicycle for the mind", which highlights the potential for AI to amplify our cognitive abilities and efficiency. One of the key takeaways for me was the importance of building a science of inversion, where algorithms infer mental states rather than just predict behaviour. This is a crucial area of research, as it could lead to a deeper understanding of human behaviour and preferences, and ultimately more effective and ethical AI systems. The discussion around the gap between behaviour and preferences was also thought-provoking. The idea that algorithms might magnify certain aspects of ourselves that are not truly reflective of our preferences is a concern, and it's a reminder that we need to be cautious about the assumptions we build into our AI systems. Overall, the video provided a fresh perspective on the role of AI in shaping our society, and I'm excited to see the continued research and development in this field.

AGI is just a buzzword for something that will NEVER happen. You can define in anyway you want. The purpose of those buzzwords or fear-mongering....etc is to convince gullible investors to part with their money. As for Academia, many people who are involved in that now see Gold on the other side and for most the purpose is not to join an OpenAI-type company for the scale and more of the same at scale but more like for the financial rewards to be had in this one-in-a-lifetime opportunity for most. This bubble will burst once the realisation that AI models, very useful tools, can and do neither understand nor reason, they simply do statistical maths and surface patterns, as useful as that may be, everything will go back to normal.

We need such talks that touch people's lives not AGI & hype

This was one of the best AI interviews I've seen in a long time

ai is the new revolution its deffinitely here and its growing Thanks for the lecture🎉🎉🎉

0:27 😅😅😅😅

Estaré pendiente con Utes. Y aprendere

Endlich ist der Steuer Dieb tot.

This talk is very prescient, given the latest US elections. MAGA and Trump are back in power and could topple the very institutions that brought them there.

Sagt das mal den ü60 die aus dem Arbeitsmarkt aussiortiert werden.Mein Mann ist nun auch mit 63 ind die Frühpension, weil er nichts mehr findet von dem man leben kann...

Video kimin aşk

Time magazine is hardly an authority on this. 😄

Zum guten Glück war Hr. R. Eichenberger dabei um das Niveau zu erhöhen und eine interessante Idee in die Runde gebrart die weiter entwickelt werden muss!

Diese Moderatorin ist eine riesige Katastrophe, so eine Eu-turbo habe ich schon lange nicht mehr gesehen!

Also eine solche Eu-tubo-moderatorin müsste vermieden werden, glauben sie, dass die Wähler sowas zustimmen werden, niemals! Da kaufen wir die Katze um Sack, was dann noch auf uns zukommen könnte, wiessen nicht mal die Gotter, wenn die Scheisse stinkt,Hände weg von der Toilette!

Soo sad,Canadian claims he's a intellectual,we were told would overtake people,as they would lose their humanity, morals, hate god,dark forces have a hold on people as this sadly.another gay,went to the dark side.we must pray god reaches them

Real problem is the people pushing the climate change mantra are the ones who stand to gain the most from pushing the agenda. The Apostle Paul said “...love of money is the root of all evil” in his first letter to Timothy in the New Testament of the Bible. The phrase is usually shortened to “money is the root of all evil,” but it's important to note that the original quote refers to the love of money as a potential source of evil, not all money or wealth. Paul was a businessman who owned a tent making business, he wasn't writing against money or saying that people shouldn't desire to acquire wealth. He was warning that the real problem is the desire for money which can disguise (dress up) and amplify / expand the real problem and people who make making money are living a lie and using it to serve themselves ... for their own wealth and power. If these people were not being rewarded for their efforts (pushing the climate agenda) would they be pushing false narratives. Climate change is not the chicken little / Oh help me I am falling off a cliff issue but an issue / another issue to deal with honestly and directly put the bullshit and stop showing "model results which forecast hundreds of years in the future therefore can't be verified. I have PhD and MBA honors University of Chicago Booth school therefore I demand scientific rigor. I support taking care of the climate let's not allow long term forecasts provide the answers and incentives.

36:00 This exists in Colombia; they call it 'voto en blanco,' or white vote. Unfortunately, it applies to lower-level elections rather than the president.

I don’t think I’ve seen a video of Brennan (and I’ve seen many) where he talks so much about epistocracy without mentioning it explicitly. I wonder if that’s a calculated decision for marketing reasons to make the idea more palatable for people.

It’s all good!

Support for the radical right in Europe is only growing. In some countries it's well over 30% now. It's only a matter of time before we win. )ews like Ziblatt hope that they can outlast us by continuing to flood our countries with their human bioweapons from the Global South, but they've been boiling the frog a bit too fast. Europeans are noticing things and )ews are beginning to panic.

It's always a member of the tribe that's saying stuff like this.

Ah yes, the radicalization of the Republican party. I guess believing men can become women isn't radical at all. Another "objective" academic.

American democracy started in 1965? No wonder it's dying. 1965 was the beginning of the end, especially for white America.

Why? Well, because the current elites want to replace the native demos.

Jason wants to take away my vote? Good, go ahead, but I don't have to pay a dime in taxes anymore. That's the deal.

There's nothing wrong with right-wing populism. The problem is liberalism.

32:53 climate club is a good idea but there is again this character free ride, when we increase the members. We can impliment trade sanctions to those who are not into the club, and those in the 37:26 group can pay the abatement cost. Penalty taarif will bring them to join the club

Und dasselbe geschieht in sehr "feiner gestrickter" Art hier. Vor allem im Öffentlichen Dienst.

Danke!

Excellent

Good discussion.

Verträge zwischen Staaten enthalten definitionsgemäß verbindliche Elemente, sonst sind es keine. Die Staaten sind dadurch nach Inkrafttreten weniger souverän als vorher. Solche Verträge brauchen unabhängige Streitschlichtungsregelungen, sonst ist anzunehmen, dass die Kontrahenten die Verbindlichkeit oder ihre Vertragsschlussabsicht nur vortäuschen wollten. Ein Land, das einen Vertrag nicht schließt, wenn eines dieser drei Kriterien nicht erfüllt ist, kann gar keine Verträge abschließen. Der Inhalt und die (apodiktische) Form, mit der die Vertreterin der SVP zu argumentieren versucht, ist unsinnig. Sekundärrecht setzen Parlament und die Mitgliedstaaten mit qualifizierter Mehrheit in bestimmten Bereichen, in anderen einstimmig. Einzelne Staaten können auch noch einige Monate nach Annahme einer neuen Regel die formelle und materielle Konformität gerichtlich überprüfen lassen. Das Gericht kann im negativen Fall die Regelung für ungültig erklären. Das ist seit mehr als 25 Jahren so, in denen viele Staaten der Union beitraten, aber niemand deswegen austrat oder austreten möchte. Wenn das mit "dynamischer Rechtsübernahme" gemeint sein soll, erscheint die Wortwahl bizarr und irreführend.

Very informative, you must include Islamic finance in it. How Islamic finance impacts it.

if we allow people have choice to exercise counter punishment, the altruistic punishment does not work.

With regard to normative questions at the end refreshingly neutral and balanced👍🏻

Bogus music..third class

Great talk!

Start watching from min 10

Es ist schon bemerkenswert, dass selbst ein Bundesrat a.D. nur über ein sehr schlichtes Bild von der Welt verfügt.

Wir haben uns mit Putin nicht getäuscht, er hat immer klar kommuniziert und Verhandlungen angeboten. Wir haben unsere Versprechen nicht eingehalten, die NATO immer wieder nach Osten erweitert. Ich bin da eher auf Mearsheimers Linie und stimme dem voll und ganz zu. So nah wie jetzt standen wir seit dem Kalten Krieg nicht mehr vor dem 3. Weltkrieg. Ausgelöst vielleicht im Mittleren Osten oder aber auch direkt in der Ukraine wenn der Westen weiter pusht. Noch haben wir die USA hinter uns, aber mit Trump wird sich das ändern. Dann stehen wir da, mit einem Konflikt der von den USA gepusht und gepusht wurde, aber ohne deren Rückhalt. Dennoch interessanter Vortrag, vielen Dank fürs Teilen.

Jawohl - wir schaffen das !!!

Mat I enjoyed your speech 👏👏 my father ALWAYS used to say that there is to much money in to few hands HOW Right he was I'm now 77 and still batting god you

Law students gather here

I really like this book and this lecture. May I ask where I can get the author's slides?

I guess that's why he wrote an article in 2016 titled "The problem with our government is democracy". lol. Clown.

Je veux le traduit en français

Wonderful lecture. I hate that this channel has less than 10k subscribers. Please keep going anyway.

It is really amazing that the organisers of this event could not get the technology to work properly.