Thanks😊❤

Brokuta

shut, the, fuck, up, you know nothing

I would say, more aggresive

*From future

@@aayushchauhan8937 yeah, but dark

Sadly false, and not even close. Garou litrally copies power lvls so it would be a low dif

@@Ceoofedging Dose not matter, DBS scales multiple tiers higher than OPM and theres nothing showing that he could copy the direct power of somebody that many tiers above him in power scaling. Garou quite literally gets one shot by Vegeta in base.

@syl62 no not even close, garous serious punch at the start of the fight was universal (no ki). The best physical strength feat the dB universe has is gokus full power mui punch which was planetary. Garous physical strength can 1 shot most db characters but even if that's not the case the man litrally copies power lvls so its irrelevant

@@Ceoofedging This is either bait, or you are one of the worst scalers I've ever seen. DB characters were Planetary since the Saiyan Saga, and were Star Level after Namek. The fact that you think he is "planetary" in UI is insane, and shows either how much copium you are on to meat ride one punch characters, or just have a burning hatred for DB entirely. Please, get help, and learn how to scale. DBS characters, top tiers, were Universal bare minimum by the start of super and the Buu Saga was Galaxy to Multi-Galaxy. Cosmic Garou's serious punch was NOT universal, and was Galaxy to Multi-Galaxy depending on how you scale it.

Thanks❤😊

Nah ssjb enough

@@User-d4p2j-gp no lo

However, one can show that for size quantifications, that match our intuitive understanding of size, there is no such function if one really wants to define the function on the entire power set. Hence the function is instead only defined on a certain subset of the power set, the elements of which are called the measurable sets. But instead of choosing just some random subset of the power set we want that subset to be sufficiently rich in sets to properly work with it. This motivates the definition of a σ-Algebra: Let S be a set and A be some subset of the power set of S. U is called a σ-Algebra if: 1. S is in A. 2. If some U is in A also S\U is in A. 3. If for any, up to countably infinite many, sets in A also the unification of the sets is in A. Measure A measure is the aforementioned function that projects the subsets of S, or more specifically the sets in the σ-Algebra A of choice, unto the non-negative real number that represents their size (or unto infinite). A measure has to have to following properties: 1. The size of the empty set is 0. Or intuitively spoken the size of nothing is 0. 2. The size of the unification of up to countably infinite disjoint sets in A is equal to the sum of their individual sizes. That means intuitively spoken nothing, but that if one puts multiple separate objects together the size of the resulting object is equal to the sum of the sizes of the objects it was created from. As one can guess from how general these properties are, there are many different measures on many different σ-Algebra and most of them don't classify what we imagine under a volume, even if they give something similar to a size. Hence we have to further specify which measure we want to use if we talk about size. The Hausdorff measures In order to have a measure that quantifies our understanding of size we wish to demand two more things than just basic measure properties. This things are: The n-dimensional size of an n-dimensional cube with side length 1 equals 1. Moving or rotating something doesn't change its size. Some measures that fulfill this properties are the n-dimensional Hausdorff measures, if defined on the fitting Borel-Algebra. The Borel-Algebra is the σ-Algebra one gets by starting with all open subsets in the n-dimensional real coordinate space (or all closed sets, compact sets or half-open cubes) and adding in all sets necessary to make it a σ-Algebra. This Algebra is sufficiently extensive to quantify the size of pretty much any real life object. Hausdorff measures have another property which makes them size wise intuitive. An m-dimensional submanifold is a smooth lower-dimensional object that is within an higher-dimensional space. If one applies the m-dimensional Hausdorff measure to a submanifold it gives the correct sense of size. That means that for example the surface of a sphere in 3-D space would get its area as size if measured via the Hausdorff-measure. Hausdorff dimension How to classify the dimension of subsets of higher dimensional space is no easy question. However one elegant solution comes due to the fact that, as priorly suggested, one can apply a lower-dimensional Hausdorff measure unto a subset of a higher-dimensional space (for example a submanifold). Using this the Hausdorff dimension is defined as follows: "The Hausdorff dimension of some subset of the n-dimensional real coordinate space (where n is some arbitrary natural number) is the lowest number d so that for all d', that are greater than d, the d'-dimensional size of the set (using the Hausdorff measure) is 0." Or equivalently: "The Hausdorff dimension of some subset of the n-dimensional real coordinate space (where n is some arbitrary natural number) is the highest number d so that for all d', that are smaller than d, the d'-dimensional size of the set (using the Hausdorff measure) is infinite." In easier terms the dimension of an object is chosen so that from any lower dimensional perspective it appears infinite and from any higher dimensional perspective it appears to have 0 size. This dimension term does match what one would expect the dimension of objects to be, for example the Hausdorff dimension of the surface of a sphere is 2 and the Hausdorff dimension of a cube is 3. One interesting thing to consider if one wishes to get a sense on how large the difference between dimensions could be is the following: Measures have the property that if one puts up to countably infinite separate objects together the size of the resulting object is equal to the sum of the sizes of the objects it was created from. That means that the size of countably infinite objects of 0 size together have the size 0. According to the first version of the definition of the Hausdorff dimensions one easily sees that the dimension of the unification of countably infinite n-dimensional objects is also a n-dimensional object. Or in other words stacking countably infinite objects together never reaches a higher dimension.