thank you sir

Thank You Professor! Can you please lower the sound of 🔔 icon.. Quite irritating & beats your voice

Thank you for the great video!

Hi Djordje Romanic, I observed your KZbin Channel and analyzed that your content qualities are great but the problem is that you are not getting views because of 9 problems, like 1. Non-SEO friendly Title 2. Non-SEO-friendly Descriptions 3. Non-SEO-friendly Ranked Tags 4. Non-Algorithm Friendly Content 5. SEO Score 55 out of 100 6. Overall score 28.8 Out of 100 7. Social Engagement "Bad" 8. Video and Thumbnail Metadata Missing 9. Video Optimization Problem If you are interested in solving those problems then please contact me. I will try my best to grow your channel and give you the best results for your channel growth. Kind Regards, Abdur Rahman

They do it bc the feathers 🪶 and they are soft like a pillow so they can go to sleep they also stand on one leg

Thanks a lot Prof. for explaining the subject in a simplified way. Can you make videos to describe dynamics as practically used by operational NWP models (dynamics practically applied to NWP)

4:15 two wild can crazy marbles

I agree with you, that you say about people 9-5, as me, to accommodate Climate Change. I agree with you, that governments must concentrate more to industry. I agree in general with you. But when you say (at 5:00) that to answer about if a particular catastrophe caused from Climate Change or not. And that is a complex question that you are not able to answer. I think with that answer you give, the deniers have a very good excuse to continue deny Climate Change and the anthropogenic nature of Climate Change. I think Scientists can give an answer, but reporters and deniers will not like at all. When is not possible to give a precise answer, then I think two issues may apply. One of two, or both. First, we must think if this question has meaning. Is this question correct? No, this question is not correct. Because Climate Change is a danger for our Civilization, there is a possibility to wipe us out of this planet. So, is not meaning to discuss about Climate Change - a Global phenomenon - and ask questions about local phenomena. Is not possible due the chaotic nature of climate to make a direct link, as you very well know. A catastrophe happen now in Canada or elsewhere due of Climate Change is irrelative, relative to the behavior of the entire troposphere. We care about all catastrophes are happening or will happen, all around the Globe, for all the upcoming years and how all these increases in number and severity all around the globe. This is the meter or measure of comparison of how Climate Change is linked to catastrophes. Second, you can give a statistical answer to that question or you can do both as I did above. Say that is wrong question (or not absolutely correct) but also give a statistical answer, but one that is not "absolve" us out of our beardlessness to resolve Climate Change, but highlights our poor performance in efforts to find a solution, those especially of the policy makers... Thank you!

Very clearly explained and I have subbed.

Thank you sooo much for your time! im a student of hydrometeorology and you're incredibly helpful. Oddly enough, at my uni they dont really require that we know all this theory - they never ensure that we do - although we clearly are supposed to. I want to be a decent specialist nonetheless

I calculate: N1= 7.51e+25 N2= 5.64e+25 ΔN= 1.88e+25

what is name of the book ?

I’m in nyc and the sun looks red today 8/16/24 888

One day in sa allah❤😊

I love how yhis is the ferivation process the hypsometric equation for geopotential height: Z = - (RT/g)*ln(P1/P2). Fun little equation.

The explanation of upper level high being actually lower in pressure than the surface low it rose from and that the designated high was so with respect to surrounding area of low pressure, was very clarifying. One question though: Was that surrounding low pressure due to heating by Latent heat converted to sensible heat?? or due to inherent property of atmosphere to be lower in pressure at 200hpa levels?

I love how Americans need a Russian to make a believable science demonstration. Don’t get me wrong, this is correct science. Ironic in DJT era you need to hear a Russian to believe it. Anyway, keep up the good work for science and reality, some criticize for being called the truth.

Russian Castile. Physics sends the demons away! 😅

Excelent content! I've been introduced to this concept just on the master's degree and you clarified a lot!!! Thanks man

You have a deep knowledge professor. please upload a video for tropopause parameters like thermal tropopause, dynamical thropopause , chemical tropopause, if its already upload please share me the video. thank you

Does anyone actually think about what’s going on here. If this can happen then a helicopter should be able to hover and watch the earth rotate below it

Professor, the angle of incidence & angle of reflection need to be measured from the Normal, don't it?

Fantastic explanation! I would love to see an analysis and explanation of the common erroneous demonstration of Bernoulli's principle in which the teacher rapidly inflates a tube by blowing not directly into it, but from a small distance

single-cell has a dash because single is a word. "multi" and "super" are just prefixes so you don't need a dash

I will die knowing for sure I will never be as cool as you

Great

Absolutely superb. Your multiple RH definitions are very welcome and helpful. Thank you. What textbook(s) do you use or recommend, please?

Did you forget to add mass of one air molecule to the equation

Patrijarh Pavle je bio slavonac Ponosni smo i na Romaniće lepo ih slušati

Thank you very much for this explanation, Sir! Contrary to your concluding remark, I actually found this video really easy to understand, even easier than geopotential for some odd reason.

Thank you for your lectures!

Nice video! Very informative, thank you :)

fucking legend XD

Try it in Sport or Sand mode. Sport sends more power to the rear and turns off traction control. Sand mode locks the rear differential and holds gears longer 👌🏾

Oh dear,

Air is a mixture of different gases? Oh, dear.

No idea what this is about.

Oh, dear, what is this all about?

This has nothing to do with the physics of effusion. Effusion is the molecular movement of gas through a porous media or through tiny openings of the order of the mean free path of the molecules. This demonstration with balloons is caused by gas escaping through a large opening similar to a nozzle on a rocket motor. Thermodynamics tells us that the exhaust rate of a gas through a nozzle (i.e., the opening on the balloon in this case) at a constant temperature will be inversely proportional to the square root of its relative molar mass. You remember that helium has a relative molar mass of about 4, and air has a relative molecular mass of about 28. Therefore, helium will exhaust approximately 2.65 times faster than air because of its lower relative molecular mass. Yes, it is the same result, but it is due to the wrong physical reasoning. This demonstration has nothing to do with Graham's law of effusion.

saluting you from bangladesh

i become shocked that the lecture so underrated 😢😢

I just wanted to say that I really appreciate this video. I didn’t study engineering nor physics as an undergraduate but I’ve always been fascinated by science and ever since I learned about meteorology in middle school I’ve been fascinated by thunderstorms. I will have to see what the future holds but hopefully I’ll be able to study something physics related when I go to get another degree. The explanations in this video were easy to digest and very fascinating. Thank you and well done.

Thanks for sharing

Tks

Amazing as always. Can you please make a video on the heat wave?

what if the control volume is moving?

thankyou sooo much!! you're a great teacher

Hello I can’t understand why the normal stress has to do with viscosity, isn’t viscosity acting only in shear ?