Nope buddy They are just better

He's actually not a bad coach. Probability has ruled the bad coach theory out. Now it's clear to everyone that the players are dog poo.

@@gilcraftsource "Probability has ruled the bad coach theory out" what does that mean?

But he’s the leader now right? So any leadership problems should be put on him?

​@@SonnyK248leadership from the top, every organization needs a structure, if the head is rotten the body will not survive. Man UTD under Glazers has been a disaster, focused on milking the club, a commercial brand built by Fergie ....

@@shiningstartomoro6772 excuses excuses 🤣 Everything to do with performances on the pitch is in the control of the manager. Also aren't Ineos running things now? Why are you still blaming the Glazers?

@SonnyK248 like really, in a company we don't talk about a minority shareholder, everything they do is confirmed by the majority shareholder who is responsible for the direction of the club. Right now we are discussing macro issues, you want us to deal with micro issues, at micro level yes we blame the coach and all, but there is always a relationship between the macro and micro, at macro level if you do not see how the Glazers have ruined the club then you can't be helped. Our problems are structural, we have made a pattern of bad decisions, we have not been evolving with the times, we need a total revolution, from ownership. All these bad contracts, indecision, behaviour problems are all symptoms of bigger problems, no matter how hard you try you are absorbed, however there is small progress, unfortunately everyone else is also improving , so we are in a long haul.

@ dude these excuses are endless. The boogey men owners have been your excuse ever since Gary Neville created them and you’ve all been parroting everything he says ever since 😂 let’s break it down. You all wanted Ole to get the job full time. All United fans were campaigning and telling the Glazers to get the contract out. So they did. Then you all said he needed money and time. So that’s what they gave him. Then when your great idea blew up in your faces you were all enamoured with Hag and said he should get the job so they gave it to him. You all said the squad needed a complete overhaul and time and lots of money would need to be given and they did that. They even gave Hag 100% control of transfers because you all moaned that all United do is buy big names to sell shirts 🤦‍♂️ and then your Ten Hag idea also blew up in your face. You even all begged Jim Ratcliffe to come and save you from the owners who have only been following your orders and they even went and stepped aside at your request and gave Ineos the reigns and even that blew up in your face because they have taken the club to new lows 😂 so I ask you. What is it that you think the Glazers should have done differently? You’re all quick to blame them and use Gary Neville’s leaky stadium excuses but what is it exactly that they should have done?

Bit of both past appoinents have been shockers tbh. Ralf who, Erik tenth place, now this guy. Need a old skool bastad of a manager who can break the rot in tht side. Ruud was probably your man to finish this season

Yes

Changed your thoughts?

@ Nope.

As a portuguese and benfica fan i can say that, if not for his injuries, he would still be competing at a very high level late into his 30's. Above everything else he was a very smart player with consistent skill added on top. He hadn't insane skill, but at his prime he had very high skill and the best thing was that you could put him into like 4 or 5 different midfield/wing postions and he would always deliver the same consistent high-quality performance (except full-back😁)

@@tnightwolf Thank you for the info or analysis. Compliment of the season.

@@alhenzyemma2957 Thank you for the message! But honestly don't (better do in my potuguse veib

🤔🤔

???

No

Lol no

City fan.

Was Rui Costa the director at the time? If yes then he must be wise because throwing Amorim into the lions' den at Benfica would've horrific