I have some movies in my hd for my plex server and im running out of space, ive done everything that i could possibly imagine. Some movies are just 700mb and i want to slow it to 500 at least, but when i try yo do it with h265 it goes full to 1.75gb ???? Even if i chose the same preset as source. And for 4k movies it goes terribly heavy. From 6gb to 40gb!!! I thouth that using nvenc was a better choice to convert it but didnt work…
@wright96dАй бұрын
That thumbnail really freaked me out. I thought you were going to suggest people actually compress to that level.
@rezvanbagheri19012 ай бұрын
I have a 1650S card with a 3800X CPU I tested different conditions You always seem to get better quality CPU output than NVENC Now I'm eager to test again, according to your review and result, I might have made a mistake somewhere, the amount of pressure on the CPU and the time it takes is too much, but according to your review, the difference was small. And it makes more sense to use NVENC I output videos in compression formats like ProRose MXF And I compress it with H264 codec in Handbrake to put it on my website server and display my products videos on the website. I tried very hard to maintain the MAXIMUM possible quality with the minimum Size I didn't use the RF settings because the bitrate fluctuation was too high Due to network limitations, I used bitret instead of RF, which has less bit rate fluctuations. For 720 with 25 frames of 3000 bitrate And for 1080 with a bit rate of 25 frames 7500
@rezvanbagheri19012 ай бұрын
Of course, I must also say that my videos are related to real estate and there is a lot of movement in the image. I should have reached the sweet spot between volume, bit rate and image quality.
@rezvanbagheri19012 ай бұрын
It is possible for Settings like Progressive scan (no interlacing). High profile. 2 consecutive B frames. Closed GOP. GOP of half the frame rate. CABAC. Chroma subsampling: 4:2:0. Make an educational video? Advanced options section Like bframes=2:ref=3:g=15:keyint_min=15:b-adapt=2:cabac=1
@rezvanbagheri19012 ай бұрын
Thank you, it was wonderful
@PauloRobertoFh2 ай бұрын
What about AMD gpus
@realLestarte2 ай бұрын
Thanks a bunch!
@theendurance2 ай бұрын
very good videos, make more
@paulosilva24523 ай бұрын
@Anitomicals any chance of an update with recent updates and maybe AV1 comparison / 10 bit comparison?
@justinfoster10403 ай бұрын
very informative and thorough! Thanks!
@Katniss00004 ай бұрын
With a quick experiment I tried with a 14.1 MB file Iphone recorded video. h265 CPU 30RF FAST result: 16 seconds 3 MB (encoding time and output size) h265 GPU 40CQ SLOWEST result: 6 seconds 2.965MB (encoding time and output size) almost the same file size but almost the same quality. Can't be notice when playing the video. BUT FASTER ENCODING. Even pausing it is almost unnoticeable unless you zoom in. this is for people who keep saying the Size is smaller for using CPU. Almost the same. but pausing will make some details noticeable.
@tomasrestrepo88334 ай бұрын
So helpful! Thanks
@Katniss00004 ай бұрын
You really did this? this is high quality analysis video for a 7K sub. keep up the good work!
@ziizoraka49854 ай бұрын
1:04 i think its worth mentioning that older generations support hardware decode, but not encode
@KausJan4 ай бұрын
How to compress .mp4 to small size without loosing quality?
@GhostRider012505 ай бұрын
INCREDIBLE video my friend you literally showed what each of them do and also showing comparisons and graphs of how much difference they make unlike others who just say put it to 23 quality and let her rip😆🤣
@Nobodyie5 ай бұрын
incredible info
@imovideocanal5 ай бұрын
Very nice dude =). I use handbreake a long time... this is star info.
@timothyvandyke95115 ай бұрын
Very helpful, thank you
@franciscopacheco70036 ай бұрын
More than excelent perfect
@roykale91417 ай бұрын
Amazing video, but could you make one for av1?
@moneytar7 ай бұрын
This is the best video explain on youtube thanks man.
@jjdizz1l7 ай бұрын
Still waiting for an update 🥴
@Viewer131288 ай бұрын
4:55 Am I misunderstanding the video? How come it looks lower quality at ultra fast but the recommendation is to use ultra fast?
@danielwebb96217 ай бұрын
@tor13128 You can look the graph 4:49, the H265 Ultrafast got around 98 VMAF, whereas H264 Fast lower (96.7), and even worse, H264 at Ultrafast the VMAF as low as 88. That’s why the recommended setting is H265 - Ultrafast. Not much of decrease in quality.
@Viewer131287 ай бұрын
@@danielwebb9621 thank you for replying. He is talking about using CPU -> H265 -> Ultra Fast giving better quality than all H264 combinations? 4:53 Which of these screenshots are H264 and which are H265? They look very bad at Ultra Fast.
@G.Menounos8 ай бұрын
Thank man! What a exceptional video! 👏👏👏 Really thank you for that ❤
@Goalsey8 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you!
@SmaugMedia8 ай бұрын
if anyone in the future watches this AV1 will allow you to drop to 36 from 30 with darn near lossless footage - i had a 15.5GB file in h.265 compressed with AV1 3.36GB couldn't tell the difference with quailty AV1 is 1000times better than h265
@Bleeplo9 ай бұрын
The video was absolutely breathtaking! The information is very useful, and your time & effort is greatly appreciated! I'm going to leave a link in my blu-ray video to this video for compression advice!
@elixier339 ай бұрын
Thani you so much. Now thar my RTX 4080 is doing it, its taking 1 hour instead of 6. Crazy! thank you so much!
@bardoomguy9 ай бұрын
This was surprisingly thorough. Well done
@md31010 ай бұрын
Fantastic - Informed - No BS
@sorel9310 ай бұрын
Great video! Clearly explained! This must have taken a lot of research and trail&error.
@toto9930310 ай бұрын
Exactly to the point. Clear and easy, thank you!
@meolessi522710 ай бұрын
This video is pure gold. Thank you very much!!!
@HydeFromT70s10 ай бұрын
"Set audio coding to MP3" I heard enough... <facepalm>
@kiSABREWULF00710 ай бұрын
So I did it with the method you show us but from 61 mb short move file it became 87mb
@nuclearmango502510 ай бұрын
thx for this in depth vid. have a good day.
@flythereddflagg11 ай бұрын
Well I probably won't re-encode my entire library with h265 understanding that moving forward will make a huge difference in what I choose to use. Thanks for the great information!
@SeeJayPlayGames10 ай бұрын
I realize it would probably be a huge time burner (depending on how big your library is) but it would probably allow you to shrink the storage space by half and retain the same quality... which may or may not be worth your time. At least there's batch processing with Handbrake, and I noticed that according to Task Manager, one encode wasn't utilizing the GPU's video encoder but about 40% (though the CPU was pegged) so I decided to set it to do 2 simultaneous encodes. With the newest NVIDIA drivers, even more may be possible. I've got a lowly GTX 1050 and an i5-4590. Literally the lowest card able to do NVENC and it can handle two simultaneous encodes without trouble. I can only imagine what a newer system could do.
@flythereddflagg10 ай бұрын
@@SeeJayPlayGames actually handbrake wouldn't be the bottleneck for me. The GPU encoding goes pretty quick. It's the fact that I would have to extract all the physical media into digital media that would be the bottleneck and then encode it to the right settings
@SeeJayPlayGames10 ай бұрын
true, true... takes a while to rip a BD I suppose @@flythereddflagg
@mat_max11 ай бұрын
could you make a tutorial on how to use vmaf?
@whiteshadow24711 ай бұрын
This video is extremely helpful! Thank you so much! Question: If Using Ultra Fast speed gives the worst quality why are you saying that we should use it?
@magnuswootton6181 Жыл бұрын
dip it in, and get it out, and then u get all the high speed compression gremlins.
@marcocretella9348 Жыл бұрын
What also can be interesting for people trying to save the clips in as good of a quality as possible, without using up your Disk space is this: I'd like to my videos upscale to 8k (nearest neighbor) using ffmpeg and then upload it to youtube. Why 8k? Because it allows youtube to retain more quality because of the bitrate, and it also enforces youtube to use the AV1-Codec, which means more quality for the same bitrate or same quality with less bitrate. It works well with rec709 stuff, but It doesn't work on Videos with Log-Profiles. You'd have to colour grade your footage to make it work. I also use my Laptop GPU (RTX 4070 Mobile) to encode it directly to NVENC_AV1 (still at around 200mbit bitrate though), in order to get very good quality, smaller filesizes than with other codecs to reduce upload time. I also use a custom script to iterate through an entire folder including subfolders to re-encode videos. Now i just have to figure out how to upload them without actually being at my computer:
@b2i Жыл бұрын
Great. What's the best setting for AV1 code.?
@nabil03 Жыл бұрын
this is the most informative video i have ever seen on video compression, amazing work, love it.
@Fromega001 Жыл бұрын
i've got a probl the n vidia encode never exist on my handbrake
@OriBengal Жыл бұрын
Just wanted to say thanks -- I've been using Handbrake for over a decade, but defaults and the occasional experimentation was fine. Was unaware of hardware encoding. And was getting really fed up with all the youtube videos that only make big Handbrake claims, but basically just show you how to download it, pick a preset, and hit go. Your video is very in-depth, insightful, and useful.
@codname125 Жыл бұрын
Never ever use MP3 for anything. It's been outdated since the late 90s. AAC has the same compatibility and much higher quality. For extreme size savings OPUS is a great choice too
@Director-M Жыл бұрын
My goodness... Thank you for this gem. Commenting to help the KZbin algorithm recommend this fantastic tutorial!