Пікірлер
@nigelharvey640
@nigelharvey640 2 ай бұрын
This was everything a person could possibly want when putting all this together. This video was like wiring together all these separate parts and pieces I’ve been collecting in my brain for at least 3 years now. Like constant flashbacks to old concepts & things I’ve learned from just studying all over. You didn’t miss a single component & I am so glad with how you did it, starting from roots and working your way into what Cybernetics is with FULL context. I haven’t seen a single video put them all together like this in one clear way. Thank you so much for this!
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 ай бұрын
@@nigelharvey640 Thank you❤️
@GERARDEDWARDSIII
@GERARDEDWARDSIII 2 ай бұрын
change the title to, "Why I stopped listening to music". just trust me.
@margaretfahey8090
@margaretfahey8090 4 ай бұрын
WHAT I BELIEVE BUT CAN NOT PROVE. The following are a list of those who I believe have become enslaved through having remote controllable and injectable technology fused with their bodies and brains. Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Anthony Fauci, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, King Charles 3rd, Kier Starmer and many others. I don't know who is remotely controlling them but I am also a victim of a similar system. My name is Gretta Fahey and my postal address is Newbrook, Claremorris, Co. Mayo, Eircode F12 Y560, Republic of Ireland. For further information of fusing human brains and bodies with injectable and remote controllable technology please read a book called 'Project Soul Catcher' by Robert Duncan and the mind hacking strategy group.
@seneketh
@seneketh 4 ай бұрын
Super helpful content! Could you make a video about how cybernetic systems interact and reduce degrees of freedom among each other? Self-Organization inherently limits entropy, Synergetics (Haken) has studied this, but I cannot find comprehensible material on it?
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 4 ай бұрын
@@seneketh Hey thanks! I am not familiar with Synergetics but I will look into it. I recently uploaded a 3 part video course on the fundamentals of cybernetics so I think you might also find this helpful.
@seneketh
@seneketh 4 ай бұрын
@@siirmartin403 Saw it just after typing the comment. Will check out naturally.
@Bobbyhiddn
@Bobbyhiddn 4 ай бұрын
As a Devops engineer, I knew the origin of kubernetes as ship related, but I never put together that it was literally cybernetics. Blows my mind.
@Ideagineer
@Ideagineer 5 ай бұрын
Got to love unrelated b-footage with words written on it as a great demonstration of the concept!
@Pastorius23
@Pastorius23 7 ай бұрын
The Watts Steam Engine segment, which begins at 21:40, is exceptionally well-worded. I effing love science.
@yasennedkov9972
@yasennedkov9972 Жыл бұрын
I remember when we used the 3,2,1 counting before a flip xD Nice guide
@markballyk
@markballyk Жыл бұрын
Tight
@ilyas_claymore
@ilyas_claymore Жыл бұрын
I'm a psychology student and I Adore Cybernetics, although it was hard to get into but it's incredibly rewarding
@jasonilioski3461
@jasonilioski3461 Жыл бұрын
Is there no sound?
@curiodyssey3867
@curiodyssey3867 Жыл бұрын
Wow, this was an incredibly fascinating and refreshingly new topic. Keep it up big dog, the algorithm will pick you up in no time I'm sure of it
@petevenuti7355
@petevenuti7355 Жыл бұрын
Nows as good as a time as any.
@neuroplexity4653
@neuroplexity4653 Жыл бұрын
Awesome video, with just the right balance between good explanations and their underlying mathematics!
@JohnSmith-yw3zw
@JohnSmith-yw3zw 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@rootjay
@rootjay 2 жыл бұрын
Very informative and absolute
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@frun
@frun 2 жыл бұрын
The most interesting question is: what are the operations(gates)?
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Yes. In a sense, every quantum mechanical transformation of state can be regarded as a computation (the physical substrate of which is a 'gate').
@frun
@frun 2 жыл бұрын
@@siirmartin403 Yes, but i meant in the ensemble interpretation.
@neuroplexity4653
@neuroplexity4653 2 жыл бұрын
Once again, a video, that penetrates a difficult topic in an intuitive manner. Thank you! ~ from your biggest fan
@mykobe981
@mykobe981 2 жыл бұрын
👍🙏
@das_it_mane
@das_it_mane 2 жыл бұрын
Great video and summary! I just wished they had used a different term instead of "observer" because woo-woo people latched onto that and won't shut up about it
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, and true. I would've gone for "recorder".
@jorriffhdhtrsegg
@jorriffhdhtrsegg 2 жыл бұрын
Originally the main proponents latched onto that too. They weren't right, and it was more reducio ad absurdum but in the first few decades it was actually a bit woo-woo. Weve moved on heavily and not a place for that in last..say...60 yrs or so.
@neuroplexity4653
@neuroplexity4653 2 жыл бұрын
This was the most detailed and comprehensive introduction of the Gaia theory out there. The topic is often misinterpreted and it is nice to see the cybernetic explanation in this video. Awesome editing, can't wait for more🌍🦠🌎
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! 💚
@mikip3242
@mikip3242 2 жыл бұрын
This is a very nice presentation. But one should stress the fact that the Gaia hypothesis was never in the scientific consensus and has failed in it's few predictions after years of scrutiny. For example, the first trully testable non-teleological idea inside the Gaia community was that of the Daisy World model. It turns out that when you include evolution by natural selection in the Daisy World simulation Gaia simply dies (so Daisy World is somehow possible but It is not planet Earth). There are also these so called medean events in Earth's history, which basically show that the biosphere is not acting to mantain itself as Gaia proponets argue. With this I don't mean that the idea that the atmosphere is in chemical disequilibrium and life largely influences It, is not part of the current scientific consensus (because It really is). Rather I wanted to point out that the idea that Earth is itself a self-regulating organism is wrong. Life influences the Earth but has almost no control over It, and It certainly has no foresight. In any case, that was a very nice video. And the editing was wonderful. Nice job explaining It.
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. One can rather see that the Earth is not a full self-organizing system as it is an open one. However, it is a strong approximation as external (astronomical) factors stay relatively constant. With natural selection as an external factor I'd still say that Lovelock's model countered the criticism that some "secret consensus" would be required for planetary regulation by showing how in this model thermoregulation of the planet, beneficial to the two species, arises naturally. Also, regulation here is a form of closed-loop control.
@mikip3242
@mikip3242 2 жыл бұрын
@@siirmartin403 Yeah. I also consider Daisy World as the first trully non-teleological and scientific modelo for Gaia. But It is also true that It is too simple and It appears that any amount of complexity you add to the model makes It go out of self-regulation. In the real world Gaia is not the Earth. For example, in Daisy World simulations you can add Darwinian natural selection to the mix and find that the planet "dies". The model relies on the black and white species having always the same invariant growth-temperature relation. But suppose younare at the beggining of the simulation, when the planet is mainly covered by black daisies and the stellar temperature is still low. Imagine a random mutation that makes a white Daisy to have a slightly higher growth rate at those cold temperatures. That gene Will quickly spread among the White daisies until It is fixated in the population. Whith time (and since we are dealing with geologic timescales we have plenty of it), we will see the White daisies getting more and more cabale of replicating on those cold conditions. What would prevent that? In the simulations the temperature drops until both black and White daisies are anihilated and the planet's ecosystem colapses. This is indeed because nature has no foresight. Daisy world can work if you ignore Darwinian evolution.
@ShahramDadari
@ShahramDadari 2 жыл бұрын
Good reference but much too brief and fast for the layman
@ready1fire1aim1
@ready1fire1aim1 2 жыл бұрын
Monad (Greek for "singularity", or "alone") has the same definition as Quark (strong nuclear force). No spatial extension. Zero size. Exact location only. 6 thousand trillion trillion trillion (39 zeroes after 6) times stronger than the force of gravity. Our ten numbers are 0, 1, 2, 3,...9 Our ten dimensions are 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D,...9D 1 is not the beginning. 0 is the beginning. 1D is two points. 0D is a representative dot in a theoretical circle (point). 1 is contingent. 0 is necessary. There is no 1 without 0. Leibniz is our Universal Genius. Match up definitions from Leibniz's works 300 years ago with quantum physics definitions today. 0D (point) is "One with Everything", literally ". with 0". 0D (point) is Quark is Singularity is Soul.
@lesliedean8029
@lesliedean8029 2 жыл бұрын
Vary good! Very well done mix of the likely known with the by hopfully coming known (s)!
@rickprice7919
@rickprice7919 2 жыл бұрын
Can there be more on MOND theory? In my mind quantum fields could just be another aspect of quantum entanglement. Since there is that spooky action at a distance, what goes on between? Also, the concept of fields and of particles that interact with them, or do the particles or field create them? Space itself is not a nothing since it can be shaped and expands. Plus, the quantum fluxes we observe. Are the fluxes aspects of entanglement? More questions than answers, and I have a lot of them.
@fergusmgraham
@fergusmgraham 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent summary (as far as I can tell).... Approaching QFT from a historic perspective really helps ground it for me. Highlighting the groups in the standard model while you talked about them would have been helpful but that is a minor gripe. Thanks for the excellent explanation.
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, and thanks for the feedback.
@sonarbangla8711
@sonarbangla8711 2 жыл бұрын
100 years after QM and quantum fields, talking without mentioning coherence is like not recognizing QM and GR are the same, missed by Copenhagen interpretation as gravity and entanglement are dual as Maldacena proves duality of QFT/ADS correspondence.
@timothy8426
@timothy8426 2 жыл бұрын
Time doesn't slow down. Time is illusionary fluidity maximum momentum velocity in resistance. As maximum momentum velocity in resistance gets entangled in magnetic fields of forced motion holding mass together, it cycles foward momentum into cycling circulation patterns reducing distance vibrating in forward momentum. Maximum momentum velocity is maintained in magnetic fields cycling thermal energy singularity frequencies in resistance producing illusionary solidity cycling patterns in resistance of mass. Resistance is always constant in and out of entanglement. Maximum momentum velocity is also constant in resistance. In magnetic fields of forced motion holding mass together, this contained force of outward pressure in resistance to cold space is outward force of pressure known as weight. Cold space is neutralized in mass as outward pressure of forced weight. The energy of maximum momentum velocity contained in cycling magnetic fields of forced motion holding mass together. Hydrogen absorbs thermal energy and expands into helium. Helium occupies more area than hydrogen and contains more thermal energy cycling. More weight of outward vibrating momentum at maximum velocity cycling. Hydrogen has more distance momentum than helium in forward momentum. Conservation of maximum momentum velocity of thermal energy singularity frequencies in forward motion in resistance. Mass is entanglement in magnetic fields of forced cycling circulation patterns of maximum momentum velocity in resistance in magnetic fields. As mass macros, forward momentum is reduced by cycling. The more mass, the more cycling of forward momentum, the less distance in forward momentum traveled through space.
@ptgannon1
@ptgannon1 2 жыл бұрын
So, when do we start talking about the implications of all this? Where are the god, devil, soul, ghost fields, forces or particles? How can the things we are comprised of (quarks/electrons), be interacted with by these "mysterious forces" from outside space and time? Curious minds want to know...
@made_of_stardust
@made_of_stardust 2 жыл бұрын
I am 100% sure that you will definitely become a big youtube channel, If you keeping posting quality videos like this. Good luck for your future success👍
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you ❤️
@DirtPoorWargamer
@DirtPoorWargamer 2 жыл бұрын
I still don’t understand how everyone overlooks the fact that time must have more than one dimension for the Theory of Relativity to be true. The only way for us to part and experience different amounts of time passing before meeting again is if we’re traveling on more than one axis (assuming neither of us can move backwards). How can time be one dimensional and curved if a 1D object is a straight line by definition?
@BraveNewWorldAH
@BraveNewWorldAH 2 жыл бұрын
Great video! You explained it so well.
@mjmulenga3
@mjmulenga3 2 жыл бұрын
This is a great video for someone who's already familiar with a lot of these concepts and just wants a good explanation of what QFT is. You've earned my subscription!
@Panda_436
@Panda_436 2 жыл бұрын
Your explanations are absolutely top tier!!! The algorithm has blessed my curiosity lol
@y5mgisi
@y5mgisi 2 жыл бұрын
I'm loving your videos.
@arandomguyontheinternet756
@arandomguyontheinternet756 2 жыл бұрын
Great video, explained a lot and for the quantum gravity theory it means applying quantum mechanics to gravity but Roger Penrose argues that for the unified theory we need to change both quantum mechanics and general relativity. Sorry if i misspelled something
@michaelccopelandsr7120
@michaelccopelandsr7120 2 жыл бұрын
I truly LOVE how it's not 100% impossible for the movie, "Star Trek: the Motion Picture," to actually still happen. Go, Vyger, Go! Before you out yourself as a "stuffed-shirt expert" please know; 1. It's close enough to Voyager 6, let it go. 2. Granted, there's a better chance of politicians becoming honest or monkey's flying from my butt. And 3. Where I come from, crazy is a compliment. This is for that 0.00- a googleplex of 0's -01%, NOT mathematically impossible chance that you never know. Let the dreamers dream. As it should be
@michaelccopelandsr7120
@michaelccopelandsr7120 2 жыл бұрын
My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar TIME! (Mikey's Time) Think of it like Alvin and the chipmunks. "Vyger's" message is fine. It's just sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or "Terran Time." It would be faster still if "Vyger" sent a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. That name is still up for grabs. Outside the Local Group TIME is open, too. Now that "Vyger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar TIME or "Mikey's Time." •Our sun's TIME bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured. •Milky Way's TIME bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until Vyger is outside the Oort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. •Local Group's TIME bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. •Outside any influence in True interstellar TIME: Name still open and unknown. ???? Here is where surfing time is SO choice. A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about. Pass it on, please and thank you.
@michaelccopelandsr7120
@michaelccopelandsr7120 2 жыл бұрын
Black hole's effect TIME just like forces, energy and matter. (Not light, no mass) We already know, TIME is effected just like everything else. If black holes can focus all it collects to one point, by the same thinking, black holes are focusing all that it collects into one TIME. Pushing (or pulling) down, INTO TIME. Until pieces exist in past, present, and future at the same TIME, in TIME. (QUANTUM PARTICLES, Duh!) Makes sense to me. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a force, it might not be just a causality. Before you out yourself as a, "stuffed-shirt expert," know where I come from, crazy is a compliment. So to those who think me crazy, Thank You.
@gene4094
@gene4094 2 жыл бұрын
The sun is not standing still.
@PetraKann
@PetraKann 2 жыл бұрын
Aristarchus was the first to propose a helio centric model of the cosmos in about 400 BC. In fact Copernicus cited the work of Aristarchus in the draft version of his book but edited out the reference in the final version.
@g12196
@g12196 2 жыл бұрын
Since all that exist in our 3D universe can be described on a 2D surface, perhaps we are living in a simulation and gravity doesn’t exist at all. It’s not a fundamental force but the effects are emergent from the information.
@filippo7143
@filippo7143 2 жыл бұрын
Wow, amazing
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@jojoe2379
@jojoe2379 2 жыл бұрын
nice job,nice graphic. I am quite enjoy your video, thanks for bringing us the knowledge.
@davidrandell2224
@davidrandell2224 2 жыл бұрын
TOE: “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon.SR wrong due to reference frame mixing and bad math.
@adamgray8996
@adamgray8996 2 жыл бұрын
Anything that has mass cannot travel at the speed of light, i.e. anything that interacts with the Higgs field cannot travel at the speed of light. Could it be said that as anything with mass approaches the speed of light, that an ever-increasing resistance to motion is created in the Higgs field, manifesting as mass,?
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Yes 👍👍
@ministryoftruth8499
@ministryoftruth8499 2 жыл бұрын
I keep hearing that a theory of quantum gravity is the key to a theory of everything but what evidence do we have that gravity manifests itself at the quantum level? I'm just a layman btw. Hopefully your channel is about to experience a period of cosmic inflation very soon. You deserve it.
@siirmartin403
@siirmartin403 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Indeed, it is very difficult to even measure gravity at the quantum scale. In quantum systems with very little mass, the exerted forces from the fluctuations overwhelm the force of gravity.
@SmellyNutz
@SmellyNutz 2 жыл бұрын
To put it in simple terms, we cant combine gravity with what we know about almost everything else. Which is a big problem if we want a unified theory of everything. Its really interesting, Im sure youll love it if you look stuff up on yt
@kashu7691
@kashu7691 2 жыл бұрын
it might be possible that qft needs to be upgraded to a geometric theory to match GR rather than quantising gravity, but this would require a massive overhaul of our understanding of the nature of quantum mechanics as a predictive mechanism
@SmellyNutz
@SmellyNutz 2 жыл бұрын
@@kashu7691 And therin lies the issue. The combining is the really hard part.
@SmellyNutz
@SmellyNutz 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidrandell2224 Thanks for the info!
@das_it_mane
@das_it_mane 2 жыл бұрын
148 subs? Think I've found a channel about to blow up here.
@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306
@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306 2 жыл бұрын
Anyone who has a problem with this and has an alternate theory or hypothesis.. kindly show your work like Einstein or any other physicist would be required to do. Otherwise we can only assume you are just making shit up which is not part of the scientific method.
@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306
@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306 2 жыл бұрын
No need for a mythical overlord confirmed. Granted many still prefer belief over reality because they can't handle the truth. Cry me a river.