QUANTUM FIELD THEORY - The Prototype Theory of Everything

[@mjmulenga3]

This is a great video for someone who's already familiar with a lot of these concepts and just wants a good explanation of what QFT is. You've earned my subscription!

[@dimitarberkov1193]

Good work Marti. Bravo! Simple and clear. Understandable and not too long and complex. Keep that way in penitrating into quantum science and soon you will become real influencer and even contributer to a new knowledge in this field.

[@siirmartin403]

Thank you. Means a lot. 🚀🚀

[@alexiskaplan]

Wow that was one of the best videos I have seen in the field. Stunning, thanks!

[@siirmartin403]

Thank you ❤️

[@mikeharper3784]

@@siirmartin403 doesn’t it seem that the combination of the great mass of all the energetic quantum fields, moving at the speed of light, in open space act together as an ocean of intertwined “force” which acts upon any matter introduced into it, like a bowling ball dropped into water as an example, to surround it and encapsulate it, in a gravitational manner of dynamic equilibrium, neither being able to overcome the other, and so they remain in a static state of opposing forces that create what we call “gravity”?? And the larger the surface area of the mass or spheres (as we see in space, probably due to constant movement, which accounts for their simplest and natural shape for movement of mass through a medium) the larger the force of gravity upon it due to the greater surface area of the interaction between the two. Which is probably why we as tiny humans, in relative terms to the masses of stars and planets and moons, only feel enough of that (gravitational) force upon us to keep us on the ground, and not crushed as we would be from the exponentially greater force on a larger area of mass like, say, Jupiter, or floating off into space from a smaller mass like an asteroid, which has less (gravitational) force applied to it due to its relatively smaller surface area? And since denser mass and matter in the universe make up a small fraction of the whole universe, as opposed to the the less denser open vacuum of space which makes up the vast majority of space, then the two balance out in a dynamic equilibrium of two forces, mass and space acting upon one another in a cosmic dance that metaphorically speaking looks like a dog chasing its own tail in a circular motion and manner that accounts for all the movements in the universe and gives the signature appearance of our galaxies spiraling down into a whirlpool?? But how can empty massless (but energetic) space put force upon mass? Well, the inventor of the barometer was burned at the stake for using his invention to show the world that air had mass. And the irony is that they kept the barometer and still use it to this very day. I may not be bright but it seems to me that the dark matter that everybody is looking for is just open space (the entire mass of it in combination as a whole) and that the force it applies to mass is dark energy, or the gravitational force we have all been looking for. Let me know if the Nobel Committee wants to honor me as I plan to use part of the financial prize to buy a Porsche. Mike Harper. July 2022.

[@arandomguyontheinternet756]

Great video, explained a lot and for the quantum gravity theory it means applying quantum mechanics to gravity but Roger Penrose argues that for the unified theory we need to change both quantum mechanics and general relativity. Sorry if i misspelled something

[@tanakitkaewprasit3656]

I really thought i wasnt seeing it right seeing that you had only 62 subscribers, so glad i came across this channel you have some great content here

[@siirmartin403]

Thanks!

[@ysts3452]

now 369 subs more and more is coming

[@Panda_436]

Your explanations are absolutely top tier!!! The algorithm has blessed my curiosity lol

[@jojoe2379]

nice job，nice graphic. I am quite enjoy your video, thanks for bringing us the knowledge.

[@fergusmgraham]

Excellent summary (as far as I can tell).... Approaching QFT from a historic perspective really helps ground it for me. Highlighting the groups in the standard model while you talked about them would have been helpful but that is a minor gripe. Thanks for the excellent explanation.

[@siirmartin403]

Thank you, and thanks for the feedback.

[@PetraKann]

Aristarchus was the first to propose a helio centric model of the cosmos in about 400 BC. In fact Copernicus cited the work of Aristarchus in the draft version of his book but edited out the reference in the final version.

[@rickprice7919]

Can there be more on MOND theory? In my mind quantum fields could just be another aspect of quantum entanglement. Since there is that spooky action at a distance, what goes on between? Also, the concept of fields and of particles that interact with them, or do the particles or field create them? Space itself is not a nothing since it can be shaped and expands. Plus, the quantum fluxes we observe. Are the fluxes aspects of entanglement? More questions than answers, and I have a lot of them.

[@BraveNewWorldAH]

Great video! You explained it so well.

[@adamgray8996]

Anything that has mass cannot travel at the speed of light, i.e. anything that interacts with the Higgs field cannot travel at the speed of light. Could it be said that as anything with mass approaches the speed of light, that an ever-increasing resistance to motion is created in the Higgs field, manifesting as mass,?

[@siirmartin403]

Yes 👍👍

[@DirtPoorWargamer]

I still don’t understand how everyone overlooks the fact that time must have more than one dimension for the Theory of Relativity to be true. The only way for us to part and experience different amounts of time passing before meeting again is if we’re traveling on more than one axis (assuming neither of us can move backwards). How can time be one dimensional and curved if a 1D object is a straight line by definition?

[@martifingers]

Is this explanation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle correct? Is it not an explanation of the observer effect?

[@siirmartin403]

The explanation is of the thought experiment, by which Heisenberg came to the uncertainty principle.

[@martifingers]

@@siirmartin403 Indeed but it isn't really a correct explanation for HUP. This from From Libretext's article "It is important to mention that The Heisenberg Principle should not be confused with the observer effect. The observer effect is generally accepted to mean that the act of observing a system will influence that which is being observed. While this is important in understanding the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, the two are not interchangeable. The error in such thinking can be explained using the wave-particle duality of electromagnetic waves, an idea first proposed by Louis de Broglie. Wave-particle duality asserts that any energy exhibits both particle- and wave-like behavior. As a consequence, in quantum mechanics, a particle cannot have both a definite position and momentum. Thus, the limitations described by Heisenberg are a natural occurrence and have nothing to do with any limitations of the observational system."

[@siirmartin403]

@@martifingers I see. Apologies for the mistake.

[@denzali]

At the end of the day it’s still suggestive of a substrate from which all modalities arise. Aether never went away.

[@schmetterling4477]

Yes, it did. In 1632, to be precise, when Galileo formulated the relativity principle in "Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems". Physics DK is hard to shake. :-)

[@denzali]

@@schmetterling4477 I’ll check it out.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

Aether was debunked long ago. Unless you get your research from uneducated flat earthers it is not hard to research this in the internet age.

[@ptgannon1]

So, when do we start talking about the implications of all this? Where are the god, devil, soul, ghost fields, forces or particles? How can the things we are comprised of (quarks/electrons), be interacted with by these "mysterious forces" from outside space and time? Curious minds want to know...

[@michaelccopelandsr7120]

My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar TIME! (Mikey's Time) Think of it like Alvin and the chipmunks. "Vyger's" message is fine. It's just sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or "Terran Time." It would be faster still if "Vyger" sent a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. That name is still up for grabs. Outside the Local Group TIME is open, too. Now that "Vyger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar TIME or "Mikey's Time." •Our sun's TIME bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured. •Milky Way's TIME bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until Vyger is outside the Oort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. •Local Group's TIME bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. •Outside any influence in True interstellar TIME: Name still open and unknown. ???? Here is where surfing time is SO choice. A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about. Pass it on, please and thank you.

[@lesliedean8029]

Vary good! Very well done mix of the likely known with the by hopfully coming known (s)!

[@romaincorthesy6896]

Great video! Thank you!

[@sonarbangla8711]

100 years after QM and quantum fields, talking without mentioning coherence is like not recognizing QM and GR are the same, missed by Copenhagen interpretation as gravity and entanglement are dual as Maldacena proves duality of QFT/ADS correspondence.

[@NovaWarrior77]

My main man. awesome video.

[@das_it_mane]

148 subs? Think I've found a channel about to blow up here.

[@ministryoftruth8499]

I keep hearing that a theory of quantum gravity is the key to a theory of everything but what evidence do we have that gravity manifests itself at the quantum level? I'm just a layman btw. Hopefully your channel is about to experience a period of cosmic inflation very soon. You deserve it.

[@siirmartin403]

Thank you. Indeed, it is very difficult to even measure gravity at the quantum scale. In quantum systems with very little mass, the exerted forces from the fluctuations overwhelm the force of gravity.

[@SmellyNutz]

To put it in simple terms, we cant combine gravity with what we know about almost everything else. Which is a big problem if we want a unified theory of everything. Its really interesting, Im sure youll love it if you look stuff up on yt

[@kashu7691]

it might be possible that qft needs to be upgraded to a geometric theory to match GR rather than quantising gravity, but this would require a massive overhaul of our understanding of the nature of quantum mechanics as a predictive mechanism

[@SmellyNutz]

@@kashu7691 And therin lies the issue. The combining is the really hard part.

[@SmellyNutz]

@@davidrandell2224 Thanks for the info!

[@rationalbelief4451]

A new raising star. When you get million subscriber plz dont forget us

[@ruffrider2626]

Great video. Keep up the good work.

[@siirmartin403]

Thank you 🚀

[@ruffrider2626]

@@siirmartin403 Do you plan on getting into making more content? Was this just a one off?

[@siirmartin403]

@@ruffrider2626 Yes, I just uploaded a new video on Cybernetics and I plan on making more in the future (especially about physics and engineering).

[@ruffrider2626]

@@siirmartin403 Awesome! I'll be watching. Wish you the best in this endeavor.

[@michaelccopelandsr7120]

Black hole's effect TIME just like forces, energy and matter. (Not light, no mass) We already know, TIME is effected just like everything else. If black holes can focus all it collects to one point, by the same thinking, black holes are focusing all that it collects into one TIME. Pushing (or pulling) down, INTO TIME. Until pieces exist in past, present, and future at the same TIME, in TIME. (QUANTUM PARTICLES, Duh!) Makes sense to me. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a force, it might not be just a causality. Before you out yourself as a, "stuffed-shirt expert," know where I come from, crazy is a compliment. So to those who think me crazy, Thank You.

[@g12196]

Since all that exist in our 3D universe can be described on a 2D surface, perhaps we are living in a simulation and gravity doesn’t exist at all. It’s not a fundamental force but the effects are emergent from the information.

[@michaelccopelandsr7120]

I truly LOVE how it's not 100% impossible for the movie, "Star Trek: the Motion Picture," to actually still happen. Go, Vyger, Go! Before you out yourself as a "stuffed-shirt expert" please know; 1. It's close enough to Voyager 6, let it go. 2. Granted, there's a better chance of politicians becoming honest or monkey's flying from my butt. And 3. Where I come from, crazy is a compliment. This is for that 0.00- a googleplex of 0's -01%, NOT mathematically impossible chance that you never know. Let the dreamers dream. As it should be

[@filippo7143]

Wow, amazing

[@siirmartin403]

Thanks

[@davidrandell2224]

TOE: “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon.SR wrong due to reference frame mixing and bad math.

[@missbstuurman]

great video thank you ❤

[@timothy8426]

Time doesn't slow down. Time is illusionary fluidity maximum momentum velocity in resistance. As maximum momentum velocity in resistance gets entangled in magnetic fields of forced motion holding mass together, it cycles foward momentum into cycling circulation patterns reducing distance vibrating in forward momentum. Maximum momentum velocity is maintained in magnetic fields cycling thermal energy singularity frequencies in resistance producing illusionary solidity cycling patterns in resistance of mass. Resistance is always constant in and out of entanglement. Maximum momentum velocity is also constant in resistance. In magnetic fields of forced motion holding mass together, this contained force of outward pressure in resistance to cold space is outward force of pressure known as weight. Cold space is neutralized in mass as outward pressure of forced weight. The energy of maximum momentum velocity contained in cycling magnetic fields of forced motion holding mass together. Hydrogen absorbs thermal energy and expands into helium. Helium occupies more area than hydrogen and contains more thermal energy cycling. More weight of outward vibrating momentum at maximum velocity cycling. Hydrogen has more distance momentum than helium in forward momentum. Conservation of maximum momentum velocity of thermal energy singularity frequencies in forward motion in resistance. Mass is entanglement in magnetic fields of forced cycling circulation patterns of maximum momentum velocity in resistance in magnetic fields. As mass macros, forward momentum is reduced by cycling. The more mass, the more cycling of forward momentum, the less distance in forward momentum traveled through space.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

Anyone who has a problem with this and has an alternate theory or hypothesis.. kindly show your work like Einstein or any other physicist would be required to do. Otherwise we can only assume you are just making shit up which is not part of the scientific method.

[@ready1fire1aim1]

Monad (Greek for "singularity", or "alone") has the same definition as Quark (strong nuclear force). No spatial extension. Zero size. Exact location only. 6 thousand trillion trillion trillion (39 zeroes after 6) times stronger than the force of gravity. Our ten numbers are 0, 1, 2, 3,...9 Our ten dimensions are 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D,...9D 1 is not the beginning. 0 is the beginning. 1D is two points. 0D is a representative dot in a theoretical circle (point). 1 is contingent. 0 is necessary. There is no 1 without 0. Leibniz is our Universal Genius. Match up definitions from Leibniz's works 300 years ago with quantum physics definitions today. 0D (point) is "One with Everything", literally ". with 0". 0D (point) is Quark is Singularity is Soul.

[@EugeneGaufman]

If we recognize Metacognitivity as an integral part of the physics of the material nature of reality, then scientific knowledge about the cognitive function of human consciousness becomes an obvious system-forming essence (quintessence, according to Aristotle) ​​of the conventional humanistic worldview that determines the ideology of secular individualism, the vertical tendency of a human being to adapt to the universal variability of the horizontal evolution of physiology the information space of the noosphere of planet Earth, which constitutes the material resource of memory for the transformation of replicators of individual and collective knowledge of globalizing humanity. Such an idea of ​​the unity of oneself and the circumstances of one’s existence can form an informational basis for formulating a unified scientific theory of everything as a formal navigation system for individual and collective behavior of people in the name of overcoming the risks of humanity’s self-destruction due to the biological failure of the mechanisms of cognition in the environment of an increasing array of information impact on the functional the system of consciousness in the networks of information technologies of social communication of the planet Earth in the Anthropocene era. The mathematical abstraction of such a theory can be the energy of Allostasis (according to Feynman, for example), calculated by the sum of Planck's constant during the formation of the action potential during the depolarization of the cell membrane of the neuron, the function of which is reflected by the transformation of the Homeostasis energy of the internal environment of this element in the time of the physical implementation of the function and the functional system subordinated to the principle hierarchical reductionism (according to Richard Dawkins). Etc.

[@siirmartin403]

I agree largely with the things you've written. The integration of both subject and object, observer and observed, organism and environment, self and reality should be acknowledged by the physicists. And it really has been, to a degree, through the physics of information, as you have said. There's a famous paper on that - Information, Physics, Quantum: the search for links. It's by John Archibald Wheeler, who set the foundations for the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics.

[@ShahramDadari]

Good reference but much too brief and fast for the layman

[@gene4094]

The sun is not standing still.

[@felipegmrqs]

Quantum Field Theory is just a formalism, a game. The world is nothing.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

Says you.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

No need for a mythical overlord confirmed. Granted many still prefer belief over reality because they can't handle the truth. Cry me a river.

[@schmetterling4477]

Very flashy and completely useless. ;-)

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

You have the right to claim it is useless but some of us like to learn new things and figure out how the natural world works... or.. we can just say it is all a mythical wizard and screw thinking? I guess to some, thinking and learning is useless but not for all of us.

[@schmetterling4477]

@@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306 You didn't learn anything from this. If you want to learn about quantum field theory, then you have to grab a textbook. :-)

[@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591]

A load of rubbish.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

Oh yeah that comment really debunks all of theoretical physics. Send us the link to your Nobel prize or peer reviewed work... "work" LOL!!!!!!

[@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591]

@@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306 Nobel Prize, and peer review is a con.