Пікірлер
@Gerry363c 2 күн бұрын
Confusing in finding the sum of the moments..more explanation needed. Thanks by the way
@studentengineering Күн бұрын
Watch this video and see if it helps: TRIANGULAR LOAD Shear and Moment Diagrams EXAMPLE PROBLEM kzbin.info/www/bejne/n56vhmaFbJ5khrM
@Gerry363c Күн бұрын
@ thanks
@kitkatkatsuki8629 4 күн бұрын
i didnt understand the moment centroid part in the solutions i had for the question i was doing, and i do now so thank you for the clear information :)
@studentengineering Күн бұрын
You’re welcome!
@Ibvkvn 18 күн бұрын
Sorry please at the moment, why did you do M(6) and not M(10.5)?
@Ibvkvn 18 күн бұрын
Or M(9)
@studentengineering Күн бұрын
I guess I don’t understand what you’re asking
@seylynao3524 19 күн бұрын
1k liked
@studentengineering 19 күн бұрын
Yes!
@tridiprjarts5040 23 күн бұрын
Hello sir, what if supports are at same level and subjected to multiple concentrated loads, will there be same tension at both the supports ?
@studentengineering 23 күн бұрын
Great question! If the loads are placed symmetrically and the loads are symmetrical then yes, the tension will be the same at both supports
@tridiprjarts5040 23 күн бұрын
@studentengineering ok thank you
@Uygʻun-q2c Ай бұрын
BEST EXPLANATION
@studentengineering Ай бұрын
I’m glad you found it helpful!
@youssefmostafa2063 Ай бұрын
you are such a legend man
@studentengineering Ай бұрын
Haha thanks!
@JadeAxelEnesperos Ай бұрын
thank you
@studentengineering Ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@LogicSolves Ай бұрын
11:08 doesn't the formula for W is equal to mg or mass multiplied by the gravity acceleration. Why did you put the mass values there?
@studentengineering Ай бұрын
I guess I don’t understand your question. If mass is in the equation, why wouldn’t I put the mass values there?
@kevinplug6059 Ай бұрын
thanx bro
@studentengineering Ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@KiraDias-jo3hc Ай бұрын
Awesome video!
@studentengineering Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@blackflamegaming9495 Ай бұрын
Why i'm getting a result of 1535.9 N in the Force (P)? Even though i used the same solution as yours.😅
@studentengineering Ай бұрын
Haha well I’m not sure without seeing the steps you took to get there. Did you double check your work?
@Ddongae0210 Ай бұрын
Thank you very much!
@studentengineering Ай бұрын
You’re very welcome!
@jasperatrens8088 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the excellent explanation. This is the only video I found that uses integration and it's so much simpler!
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
I’m glad you found it helpful!
@natecheckit3960 2 ай бұрын
Yo why do you not double the force of B since it is being clamped on both sides
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Great question! Essentially it comes down to Newton’s third law. It’s hard to explain here in the comments but if you try to understand this law I think you’ll understand.
@sanforyouu 2 ай бұрын
thank youuu sooo muchhh for thisss you don't understand how helpful this video is as a first year engineering student 🥹🥹 i almost had a mental breakdown until i find this vid, alsooo the way you explained it from a calculus standpoint makes me interested in learning more about calculus. i still have so much to learn. thank you once more i hope both sides of your pillow is always cold 😁
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
I’m glad my video helped!!
@tanyfly5502 2 ай бұрын
Waaoow what is your major? ❤
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Structural engineering
@tanyfly5502 2 ай бұрын
@@studentengineering ı just fell in love with you just now🤣🤣
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
😂
@tanyfly5502 2 ай бұрын
@@studentengineering 🥲🥲
@mallk238 2 ай бұрын
Thanks man, this helped a lot!
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
I’m glad!
@kevinplug6059 2 ай бұрын
I commented❤
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
I’m glad you liked it
@projectmageiv8934 2 ай бұрын
you're a lifesaver man!
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
I’m glad!
@miguelarias5253 2 ай бұрын
10:47 you used your Th as 1267 instead of 1267x10^3 because of the kilo in KN, just a heads up to the people that are reading the comments (The angle theta is still correct)
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Good catch!
@Pedro-j-27 2 ай бұрын
I love you bro
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Haha thanks bro
@brendandom 2 ай бұрын
Hi, could you explain why when drawing B, you didn't write it as BX, BY?
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Great question! I answer that question in the video at about 2:45. Basically it is because of the dimensions that we have.
@KierbyRavelo-y5b 2 ай бұрын
What the process in the final getting value of s?
@KierbyRavelo-y5b 2 ай бұрын
What the process in the final getting value of s?
@KierbyRavelo-y5b 2 ай бұрын
What the process in the final getting value of s?
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Great question! The video explains it. Watch carefully.
@youssefelbanna711 2 ай бұрын
Hello, I love your videos they make this topic so clear! However I have a simple question. When you write the equation w(x) for the triangular distributed load, when is it -300, not 300? I am talking about the intercept or whatever you are going to call it. How do you decide on the sign?
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Thanks! I’m glad! When the force is going down I write it as negative and when it is going up I write it as positive.
@youssefelbanna711 2 ай бұрын
@@studentengineering Thank you for the response. Usually all distributed loads go downwards, does that mean that I will always have the w(x) intercept as negative?
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Yes
@TusharPrasad-se5tn 2 ай бұрын
Wow sir you have explained very well thank you ❤😊😊
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
I’m glad you think so! Thanks for letting me know!
@김효신-w9k 2 ай бұрын
I really appreciate to provide us!❤
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@sweet_bbq7567 3 ай бұрын
Okay, so it definitely works, but what I don't understand is the reason for flipping the curve, can someone explain the reasoning? Thank you, excellent video
@studentengineering 2 ай бұрын
Great question! I made a video all about that: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mJubm6mQa6hropY
@kaursingh637 3 ай бұрын
excellent amarjit india
@studentengineering 3 ай бұрын
I’m glad!
@KINO.mp4 3 ай бұрын
Why do we still use d for the 35N force as the diatance between the 35N forces when the distance d is not perpendicular to the force 35N
@studentengineering 3 ай бұрын
Great question! They actually are parallel
@KINO.mp4 3 ай бұрын
@@studentengineering oh i see it now, thank you!
@beyond297 3 ай бұрын
❤ thanks for your educational videos about frition❤
@studentengineering 3 ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@kenmalacinski8442 3 ай бұрын
I am confused on why 3 is being plugged in instead of 6. I am getting different boundary conditions but ending up with the same max moment of -2250. I see you are defining the part where the triangular distributed load starts as 0 on the x axis? Why isn't this defined as 3 on the x axis?
@studentengineering 3 ай бұрын
I think we just summed moments about a different point. Does that make sense?
@youcefbacha623 3 ай бұрын
THANK YOU
@studentengineering 3 ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@pestifygaminghacks4713 5 ай бұрын
Thank you sir
@studentengineering 5 ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@lastname3680 5 ай бұрын
Name the book plis?
@studentengineering 5 ай бұрын
Engineering Mechanics Statics by R C Hibbeler
@nightmovieshorts 6 ай бұрын
thanks, next time solve integral too please.
@studentengineering 6 ай бұрын
You’re welcome
@meteoriter1647 6 ай бұрын
Hi, thanks for the great video, I am trying to find the volume of a an entire tree, picture a silhouette of a tree, let's say a pine tree, I am thinking of a 21m high tree, the trunk is 0.4m diameter with a taper of the trunk at 0.8% on each side and the branches start at 1.8m off the ground and then there is a parabolic taper to the top of the tree from that point on to zero. The largest width of the tree, where the branches first start is 12m wide. I am thinking to revolve half the silhouette and so half of trapezoid of the trunk at 0.2m tapering to 1.8m high and then 6m branch start going parabolic to the top. Could you perhaps kindly outline how because I want to get this exact? Can this be done with an equation of the edge of the silhouette, or is it better to spin the area of half the silhouette, I'm not sure. Thank you.
@studentengineering 6 ай бұрын
Sounds like an interesting problem. I think that your problem would be solved the easiest by just finding the cones and partial cones that make up the tree and add up those volumes. I don’t think many of the equations in the video need to be used because you are revolving the area in a full circle and the lines you are using are all straight.
@meteoriter1647 6 ай бұрын
@@studentengineering I've done Pappus Guldinus theorem volume calculations in Calculus in high school, and wanted to do it once again, as the tree volumes, need to do a bulk density check for the entire enclosed volume of the trees, quite important because I have to analyze a parking garage roof slab with trees on top acting as additional loads on top of a thick soil overburden. FYI, the tree outline is sometimes parabolic and not always straight because there is a mix of maple/pine etc. Yes, I do understand that I could do cones and cylinders but preferred to do it in one shot. Not a problem but tks for the quick reply.
@nhat-ld8bq 7 ай бұрын
My question is if these 3 objects are not connected, why would we have 1 centroid instead of 3
@studentengineering 7 ай бұрын
Great question! They actually are connected but in order to find the centroid of all of them we break them up into more manageable parts. Does that make sense?
@pepito8685 7 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@studentengineering 7 ай бұрын
What’s so funny?
@kevinplug6059 2 ай бұрын
You @@studentengineering made it easy🎉🎉
@Himax55555x 7 ай бұрын
This is great . Thank you again ❤ .
@studentengineering 7 ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@Himax55555x 7 ай бұрын
Thank you very much ❤ .
@studentengineering 7 ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@MuhammadHafiz-vf8bm 8 ай бұрын
Fantastic explanation. You saved me hours of time from reading hundreds of notes when you summarised the information i need in just a few minutes. Truly a life saver!
@studentengineering 8 ай бұрын
I’m glad!
@WersiyCollins 8 ай бұрын
So clear
@studentengineering 8 ай бұрын
I’m glad!
@hishamsaadaldeen6717 8 ай бұрын
Hello there, can u plz explain how did u get the second equation? (ln (T1/T2) = mB )
@studentengineering 8 ай бұрын
Great question! I go over that in this video: Frictional Forces on Flat Belts Explained // Equations and Explanation kzbin.info/www/bejne/d3OQgKupodxso6s
@riyadh921 8 ай бұрын
Hi, sorry, what was C?
@studentengineering 8 ай бұрын
Great question! This video explains what C is and the other variables in more detail: CATENARY LOADED CABLES (Free-Hanging Cables) // How To Solve For The Unknowns // Equations Included kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqK6kmh_o5p9otk
@quailland1982 8 ай бұрын
very good video, I understand this a lot better now, its actually not that hard at all!
@studentengineering 8 ай бұрын
I’m glad!
@kaursingh637 9 ай бұрын
very good - i am under stood - thank u sir
@studentengineering 9 ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@kaursingh637 9 ай бұрын
EXCELLENT- WHICH UNIVERISITY ? AMARJIT- INDIA
@studentengineering 9 ай бұрын
Thanks! Utah State University