11 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
5 жыл бұрын
6 жыл бұрын
6 жыл бұрын
6 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@sethiphotography Күн бұрын
just monetised you...oh and I own a GFX 100 II
@jdpst20 18 күн бұрын
Have you used the Hasselblad XCD 135mm 2.8? I think it rivals if not surpassed the GF110. Also, having a 1.7TC it makes it a duel purpose lens. I’m glad I found this video.. I was considering selling my X2D AND R5C to get ONLY the GFX100ii. But I really don’t think I’d be happy. Yes it’s still 100mp but I just LOVE the images I get out of the Hasselblad. I BARELY do anything to them in Phocus 2 on my iPad. They are just THAT good. I’ve owned Fuji’s in the past and had to use specific capture one for Fuji and yes images were ok but a bit off. Yea I could sell both systems and get the GFX and probably pocket a few 1000$ but every time I shoot the X2D I forget about anything else.
@matthewbushey9455 22 күн бұрын
Great explainer vid . . . . having professionally used both systems extensively, and now owning one of them, I concur with almost everything you say as both positives and negatives - except for 2 things (with some personal perspective as a fellow professional fashion/beauty shooter): 1.) Fuji Color science: I can relate to you having issues getting the "look" you like out of the GFX 100 II; but what I rarely see discussed - which makes me think most users don't take the time do this - is setting up color profiles/presets in your native software of choice (PS, LR, C1). I use C1Pro, and when I first purchase a new camera body, I shoot test frames in my usual shooting conditions (outdoors/with and without sun/with strobes, studio natural light/with strobe/LED constants), then use those test frames to build very controlled color profiles as presets. It usually takes me 30-45mins per profile to nitpick over and fine-tune. I then use these presets upon import or when tethered, and this get's me 90% of the way to my "look." Prior to doing this, when I would just white balance off a color checker and make adjustments by eye, achieving my "look" in post would become really frustrating if the SOOC color wouldn't match my taste (which, for most any camera, rarely does). Taking the time to create profiled presets around my preferred color science saves a TON of time and headache, and keeps things consistent. Retouch and final color grade come easy after that, and keeps my "look" consistent as well. 2.) Hasselblad Color Science: I also agree, the SOOC DJI (yes, DJI - not Hassy) colors are really nice . . . but not perfect. They're way too magenta, with some cyan-green tint in the shadows, and these files take a fair amount of tweaking . . . especially for skintones in shadow. Again, spending the time to develop one's own color profiles/presets is a game changer (hate that term), or even a life-changer. In a nutshell, after shooting both systems across 5-6 shoots each, I chose the GFX 100 II: less expensive, better eye tracking, vertical grip for extended shooting/vertical comfort, solid lens lineup, weirdly faster tethered support, robust build on location. The DJI/Hassy is awesome, GAS is real (like you mention), and I doubted for a minute whether I made the right choice after sending the DJI/Hassy back . . . but in hindsight, and after many more shoots, I don't miss the overly expensive DJI/Hassy at all. Glad you found something you're finally comfortable with, and hope you take the time to make your own profiles and save yourself a ton of color science frustration in the future. ;-)
@WILMORENO 22 күн бұрын
@matthewbushey9455 hey man thanks for not getting emotional at my choice. Lol ive had some wild comments. You know looking back at my pictures I now prefer the fuji for portraits. That 110 lens did more for me than the other portrait length X lenses. Also I really liked the colors from my 110. But the others were a non-starter. Thanks again for your very thoughtful and professional comment
@WILMORENO 22 күн бұрын
@matthewbushey9455 also ive gotten the strongest opinions from people who haven't owned either, lol. Thanks again. I really appreciate this comment
@matthewbushey9455 22 күн бұрын
@@WILMORENO Yeah, so many ppl ready to throw down over a camera choice! - and like you said, most haven't owned either LOL I also agree, that GF110MM is some sort of magic glass . . . easily also my favorite, too . . . .it joins the Pantheon of "incredible portrait glass that has secret sauce from another planet" (which, for me, also includes Nikon's first 85mm f/1.4 G, the Bronica 150mm F/4 Zenzanon-PG, and Fujinon 250mm f/6.3). I also found that, with the GF110mm, creating a color profile preset around this lens/GFX 100 II combo came quickly. I also second your hindsight revelation that the GFX might not be the best for landscapes; but that's really only if one has had a chance to use and compare both camera image files like you and I. I surely miss hiking with the X2D II, vs the GFX! hahaha Keep doing you man, your vids and relevant experience are great. Maybe it won't be another 5mos until the next one? ;-)
@photographiezautrement Ай бұрын
Hello @WILMORENO Have you tried the XCD "V" range of lenses? (25, 38, 55 and 90). We are still progressing in rendering quality with these exceptional lenses
@RyRch Ай бұрын
Great honest vibe on this video. 🫡
@JonAdams-v8p Ай бұрын
Looking at a used Hassy great video bro keep it up!
@dlsspy Ай бұрын
Your pictures are amazing, but please look into pronunciation a bit.
@julioestebanperezescudero6246 Ай бұрын
As far as I know Hasselblad is having a very slow and costly service. Firmware updates also suffer a slow release. While Fuji is a better option in all fields, except in flash synchro. But still you can buy a Hasselblad H lens and use the central shutter speed in those lenses via an adapter only losing autofocus in the process.
@WILMORENO Ай бұрын
I think the old H lenses only sync to about 800 instead of 2000/4000 like newer ones. There are some "orange dot" h lenses with faster sync but they cost as much as the new lenses. The fuji is a fine camera, and continuous autofocus is so nice to have on a medium format camera. I just wanted to share my experience. Wasn't expecting 30k views that's for sure thanks for your comment
@julioestebanperezescudero6246 Ай бұрын
@ Yes normal H Hasselblad lenses go up to 1/800 sec. For me it is good enough compared with the 1/125 sec maximum native on the GFXII 100. Sorry I forgot to thanks you for a great review.
@bernios3446 Ай бұрын
It is honestly a bit silly how people are making absolut claims about Hasselblad being better. Fuji is sought after by many pros for their colors and the "malleability" of the 16bit files. Which proves.... well: Nothing. "Good color" is highly subjective and I say that after shooting in many different formats since more than 20y. Saying tha the Fuji cannot make good images is almost funny. I just downloaded a number of Raw samples from both cameras underneath a Matt Granger video on YT, there are differences, but once you dial down the magenta (for those who do not like it) in the Fuji files, skin tones are scaringly similar to the Hasselblad files. Surprise, it is the same sensor. I vastly prefer (I said "prefer") Fuji colors, and often find the Hasselblad files or too cool/ a too greenish pie/ too something else. Never as pleasing as Fuji's - Been a Fuji guy since my first Fuji DSLR in the early 2000s. I suggest you just go on enjoying your Hasselblads and get over the fact that color is a matter of preference. One thing that the X2D clearly has over the Fuji: it is a more beautiful camera. But you have to pay that quite a bit.
@WILMORENO Ай бұрын
@bernios3446 Who said fuji can not make good images? Did you just make that up to win a statement against...yourself? I liked my gfx fine. I've been using many formats for over 30 years now. All brands. I also have a background running flexographic printing presses. In flexo, color output is measured by a spectrodensitometer. Color accuracy is paramount. It's the difference in getting paid or throwing away products. You could say im partial to a certain standard for color. Not everyone will choose your favorite camera brand. You need to accept that. "I suggest you get over the fact that color is a matter of preference" That sounds like advice for yourself... I'm not interested in anyone else's preferences. If im spending over $10,000 ill choose whichever I find better. This video wasn't sponsored. There's enough youtubers out there reading spec sheets and shilling. Im sharing my opinions for the people out there who want to hear them. Unless you've owned and shot both systems extensively, your opinion on the matter doesn't hold any water. Downloading someone elses files isn't the same as the research I put in. But thanks for the comment. It helps views I am glad you at least noticed the magenta issue. I'm currently having a lot of fun with the nikon zf and vintage glass. Nikons colors aren't as good as hasselblads imo. But I'm still enjoying the system a ton
@bernios3446 Ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO Actually I misheard twice the passage about sync speed followed by "it can make good images" - which I heard as "can't make good images" + the comments who about the presumably bad Fuji colors. Only after your comment I went back to that passage and now heard "can make". (I am not english native speaker). Fair enough. I also processed the same raw files (with the Magenta cast) in Capture One which converts the gfx files much nicer, quite clos to the Hasselblad files and without that cast.
@WILMORENO Ай бұрын
@bernios3446 all good man. Much respect for the clarification here. Sorry if I came on a little strong. Yeah capture one seems to be the way to go with gfx. I always just use lightroom so that's where I want my camera to perform. Cheers
@bobhathaway529 2 ай бұрын
I hate to laugh but your hike into Haleakala was a great reminder of a few I have done into the crater. Most of the times I have done the hike was as a one way while parking in the lower parking lot and hitching a ride to the top. Either way it can be a miserable hike depending on weather and the elevation change is pretty extreme. Add on starting elevation of 10K plus and it makes for a brutal day. I did it in my 30s, 40s and 50s and believe me, age is your enemy! My brother and sister in law almost killed me when they joined on my last hike. Love the reviews and we love Hawaii and you gave me a few ideas for future trips. Personally, I would have abandoned the crater hike with that weather but I get out there every few years so have more opportunities to be picky.
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
All good, I didn't have much trouble getting down into the crater. Hiking up out of it was an absolute test of mettle. I don't think many can comprehend how brutal it is w/o experiencing it. Hawaii is probably my favorite place to visit. So many incredible experiences peppered across those islands. It's a beautiful as it is dangerous. Thanks for your view and comment. Cheers!
@GKhanKutar 2 ай бұрын
You just said Fuji colours are not good enough compared to Hasselblad. The image quality is not good enough as Hassy? LOL . GFX100 II has better dynamic range compared to Hassy. Color are much more cinematic. If you don't know how to you use, do not put it on the camera!
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
Imagine not knowing that colors are different than dynamic range... You can pick whichever you like, most who have tried both agree with me. I'm willing to bet you haven't owned an x2d for a year to come to your...dynamic range = colors argument I know how to use both, clearly. Let's see your work. Either way thanks for the view
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
I think I mightve found you,. If you're istanbul you've got some nice pics. Doesn't change the fact that hasselblad gives better and more consistent colors. yeah you can fix stuff in post. some people prefer not to do the extra leg work and your last sentence makes no sense.
@GKhanKutar 2 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO i was born in Istanbul. Yes it is me. Thank you for your compliments. If you shoot fashion and landscape , you have to play with the colors for every mood. My last sentence addresses this. And you said image quality is not good as Hasselblad and I addressed to that. Fuji dynamic range is better. i know “a bit “ about cameras and photography:) Fujifilm colors are top. Film simulations gives you great starting point. They are very cinematic. Hasselblad is beautiful camera and good colors too but it is way far away from Fuji technology. I will like to buy one day if they make it faster and add joystick
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
@@GKhanKutar Haselblad need more lenses too. I agree fuji has more bells and whistles. I got much better photos, (for my taste) with the Hasselblad though. But this video has made me want to stop making more lol. I personally dislike film simulations, I never used any of them. We're clearly different tastes, and that's fine. You do take great photos. Honestly I don't find many photographers impressive but you do great work. Cheers. I was almost in istanbul this week.
@GKhanKutar 2 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO you need to do more videos. I love watching camera videos on KZbin! Don’t forget to eat havuc dilim baklava and kokorec if you go to Istanbul. Cheers!
@porter6311 2 ай бұрын
Just a consideration for Hasselblad vs fuji. Hasselblad leaf shutters are second to none if you are dependent on making studio work with flashlights no doubt about that, But…. The quality and sharpness of there modern lenses are not better or worse than other brand lenses. And then the elephant in the room…. Non of the Hasselblad cameras or there lenses have an IP rating, meaning they are not water resistant, so good luck if you are a landscape photographer or take the camera out into damp or dusty areas. And Ok color science, it's a matter of opinion, but in my opinion you can make a fuji image look like cannon, Nikon or Hasselblad with a minimum of effort by building presets in your editing software, but by all means if Hasselblad colors are the only thing that works then choose hasselblad, but please remember that their lenses are about twice the price and the selection is very limited. Also the autofocus on Hasselblad is slow like he…. I loved Hasselblad in my film days but now 2024 they are ways behind and in my opinion color science is more a marketing gimmick than a real difference, color is more about feelings and opinion than an exact science.
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for this educated take. I just moved on from the hasselblad system.. It's really nice but not so practical for my needs. I didnt even think about the weather sealing. Also theres almost no availability on new lenses. Still love the camera but had to move on!
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
Also I gotta disagree on the autofocus, it might not be ligbtnjng but its crazy accurate. I just moved to a zf with their fancy new af And my x2d was so much better for portraits. Along with much better ibis. Id just frame my model and let them move around. All my images had sharp eyes This nikon shows the focus box on their eye but a much lower hit rate
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
Oh also, i always shot strobes for like 11 years. With my x2d I probably used strobes 1% of the time. And now I miss the leaf shutter
@porter6311 2 ай бұрын
Is not to be educational but more a reminder to os all, that as a creative photographer we should focus on the use case for the camera gear it’s after all a just a simple, but expensive, medium to express and capture our vision and intent in a picture, to make it appealing for our customers If your a pro, and if your an amateur then it’s to satisfy yourself. And no amount of sensor color magic, brand name or technology can make a bad vision, execution and composition look good. It’s the person behind the camera that create the picture not the 100 fps, the 102 Mpix or an autofocus that are optimized and have different settings for a train, animals and bikes etc.. It’s motivation, hard work and more work + experience that result in grate pictures and yes sometimes luck, So Fuji or Hasselblad or cannon Nikon or an IPhone it dose not matter. it’s the person and there knowledge + vision that will produce grate pictures not the brand / price / hype of gear in the closet or in the backpack that gives the result.
@brocktonbensch1356 2 ай бұрын
Wouldn’t be surprised if you come back around to Fuji.
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
@brocktonbensch1356 ended up going to zf with sdapted m glass. Still prefer x2d over fuji, but I get why people like the gfx
@moamaralsafadi4710 2 ай бұрын
Aber wo ist der Vergleich? Das ist ein Video für dein Gesicht!
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
@@moamaralsafadi4710 Es ist alles hier, in einfachem Englisch. Danke für den Ausblick
@bigrobotnewstoday1436 2 ай бұрын
Hasselblad is a Chinese Communist company. When you buy anything from DJI more money gets put into the CCP. Did you know the CCP is funding the democrats that are pushing transgenderism in schools today? F%ck China.
@jordanebner8476 2 ай бұрын
That Haleakala sunset photo is incredible. Seriously good work man.
@WILMORENO 2 ай бұрын
@jordanebner8476 I really appreciate that, thank you. Hopefully I'll get to go back soon
@rodriguezahr 3 ай бұрын
I thought there’s nothing more to learn about this camera and some of its lenses but your review proved I was wrong. Thanks for putting together this awesome video of this awesome camera.
@WILMORENO 3 ай бұрын
thank you for this comment!
@rodriguezahr 3 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO shooting with an awesomely designed camera is so addictive, I know that because I’m a Leica M owner. I’m sure the X system must feels the same, Special.
@photographiezautrement 3 ай бұрын
These two cameras are not comparable. Hasselblad is much better for colors, the lenses are of much better quality to say the least, the lenses are all central shutter which allows flash sync up to 1/4000th for XCD lenses. The X2D allows to use Hasselblad H lenses with central shutter and flash sync up to 1/800th (which is their normal exposure time). The Fuji only shutters up to 1/125th and has a focal plane shutter, while the X2D (like other Hasselblad cameras) does not have an integrated shutter. Not to mention the very nice "tiltable" screen allowing the viewfinder at chest height and the integrated storage of 1 TB and the quality of the finish of the body and lenses, and the superb integrated software (which all camera manufacturers should take inspiration from). There is certainly a price difference but it is totally justified and we are not playing in the same league ;)
@WILMORENO 3 ай бұрын
@photographiezautrement did you even watch this lol 😆 only like 3 lenses have the 4000 shutter but thanks for the comment.
@photographiezautrement 3 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO Sorry, actually I wanted to reply to @davidpalermo4695
@photographiezautrement 3 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO Ho sorry, this message was initially for David @davidpalermo4695 Talking about the shutter speed synchro flash, I've been using Hasselblad H every day for years (H5D-60), and therefore flash sync at 1/800. At this point I would say that the 1/4000 vs 1/800th is "a detail". What I meant by talking about the flash is that the 1/125 in x-sync of the Fuji is so limited that it is almost unusable outdoor (as we saw in your video). Even with a sync limited "only" to 1/800th of a second, you can shoot in full summer sunlight and have 1200 ws usable (with for example a Profoto Pro b2, Pro b3 or Pro b4 generator). In Ibiza in June, 1200 Ws and the 1/800th -100 iso gives me an aperture of ƒ/4. Impossible to do without a central shutter. The problem with the ND filter is that it compensates for ambient light (that's ok) but also for flash light. It is therefore not comparable to a central shutter which does not affect the flash (a Profoto ProB2 delivers a flash of 1/12000th of a sec, much faster than the shutter). Another difference: the XD2 delivers files in 16-bit Native, which is not the case with the Fuji. All this to say that these two cameras are not comparable. Their only common point is that they are MF cameras with a small MF sensor.
@WILMORENO 3 ай бұрын
@photographiezautrement ah that makes sense. I was like why are you telling me this haha. Thanks again man. Its a shame they discontinued the H series. Even bigger sensor is always attractive. But the x2d is way easier to carry around. Cheers! 🍻
@photographiezautrement 3 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO In fact, I was worried about the evolution of the Hasselblad range. I didn't know what to take in case my H5D broke down. Of course, the "small" CMOS sensor is not completely comparable to a 43x56 mm CCD like the Dalsa that equips my H5D, especially in terms of colors and rendering (especially for the rendering of the skin in beauty photos). The X2D is not quite at the same level yet. But with these new lenses and the update of the body I am now reassured, because I have a credible alternative to the H. I found Hasselblad as I knew it and that is obviously excellent news. And then I still have solutions: there is a second-hand market for H bodies and H lenses. The H was far too expensive for that to be viable. I'm not surprised they stopped it. As for lenses, the brand new XCDs that have just come out have finished reassuring me for the future. Here again, I find the "Hasselblad spirit" So I think I'll take an X2D with the 25 mm and the 38 mm for outdoors (fashion, street portraits, photographing Paris for fun), then my H lenses for the rest (80mm, 50mm, 120mm macro and 210 mm). For the studio (I mainly do cosmetic beauty and fashion) it will mainly be the H which is still "ahead" in pure quality. But the X2D is quite credible and will ensure the future in case of a problem with my H5D. And it will be better for my shoulders and my back! (the H5D-60 + 50 mm equivalent to 35 mm in 24x36 weighs 2.8 kg!)
@HelloStudio-x9c 3 ай бұрын
I feel the same way about Fuji gfx100II. Colors are terrible. Particularly over saturated reds and magentas in the skin tones. Even when I color correct for a neutral white balance the colors just look off. Not natural or rich. They feel thin and synthetic. Does anyone have a good capture one icc and film sim combo they like for color?
@WILMORENO 3 ай бұрын
Thank you for commenting this. I've had so many people tell me there's nothing wrong with fuji colors. I definitely saw too much trouble to want to fix all the time.
@HelloStudio-x9c 3 ай бұрын
Anyone else out there feel this way and has anyone found a solution they like? I feel like I process the Raffles in adobe raw. They tend to look a bit more natural, but I have to use Capture one for work.
@dakotaxu4792 3 ай бұрын
Will…… I can see that MODESTY is not one of your hobbies, but aside from that I can beat you in chess each and every day and twice on a Sunday….. and that is a fact!.
@WILMORENO 3 ай бұрын
let's play then?
@1800luxuryhomes 4 ай бұрын
Great videos! I shoot X2D as well (my real estate) so its nice to see your travels. Keep it up! AND my wifes a hairstylist, hair industry is carzy and fun! Also we understand your feelings for your dog, its very sad. We love our animals.
@WILMORENO 3 ай бұрын
@1800luxuryhomes real estate seems perfect for the x2d. Im eyeing the 30 and 25, not sure which one to spring for. Which do you tend to use for your work? Thanks for the kind words 🙏
@matthewtoothbrush 4 ай бұрын
One reason why pros don’t use this camera and likely never will is because Hasselblad won’t take their head out of their a$$ and open up the file system to capture one. Tethering them becomes a nightmare and phocus is terrible. Otherwise I’d buy the camera and I’m sure thousands of others would too
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
@matthewtoothbrush lol fair point. Ive heard a few people mention this
@MartinV. 4 ай бұрын
Great Video!
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
thank you
@adrianjao3078 4 ай бұрын
Just took the 25v to haleakala! Definitely recommend bringing it there
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
oh nice man, I'm getting that lens next. Did you do the hike??
@adrianjao3078 4 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO did you already get it ? I only have the 90v and the 25v. Did not do the hike I was there for the meteor shower
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
@@adrianjao3078 nah they're never in stock. I wanted the 90 as well. But I sold my zoom and just use the 65 right now. I'm getting my best portraits ever with it so go figure. Had the 80 for a long time as well. Hoping for a 65 25 combo to be all I need. Do you have any of your pics from the meteor shower? I bet it was crowded? Cheers
@adrianjao3078 4 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO where are you located? Not as crowded as it would be it's such a trek to wake up that early
@DennisBater 4 ай бұрын
it is just you....
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
@@DennisBater the comments say otherwise 🤠
@josephlai1078 4 ай бұрын
Wil. Great video. I have this lens with my M11-P. However, when I turn the focus ring to infinity, I find that it is not sharp and I'd have to make some micro adjustments. is this an issue you've noticed? I am not sure if it is chromatic aberration? focus past infinity? or simply a faulty lens. I have not been able to find much on this. Cheers.
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
Hey! Thanks for your comment. I haven't had this lens in a long time as I moved to the hasselblad x2d last year. But one thing I learned with mf lenses is that the infinity hard stop was always too far. If you look at the distance chart on your lens make it to where infinity is just at the end of your selected f-stop. Like f11 is probably 1 meter to infinity. Instead of making the infinity symbol dead center. You can google "hyperfocal distance" that should help as well. I learned this the hard way at the grand canyon, I'd just slam my lens all the way to infinity hard stop. When I got home I noticed so many pictures were soft. Oh well, always learning. Thank you for the kind comment and enjoy your camera in good health! -WM
@josephlai1078 4 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO thanks for the response 🙏
@1967McQ 4 ай бұрын
Wish my eyes didn’t suck. I’d buy this combination.
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
My right eyeball is trying it's best to crap on me right now. The visoflex made shooting a leica much easier. Also practicing hyperfocal distance goes a long way. Thanks for your comment!
@1967McQ 4 ай бұрын
Great videos. Love the size of the M11 and lenses. At 56 my eyes suck. Have a Z9 for wildlife going to nab a X2D 100C for walk around
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
The X2D is like a dream. I still miss my q2 at times just for how small and snappy it was. FWIW the 65mm lens is my favorite and I've tried almost all of them. But every single lens is a stellar performer. They're all best in class, but the 65 is best in show!
@1967McQ 4 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO glad I found your site. I will nab the 65 and possibly the 38 and 90? I did see a great review on the zoom. 35-75.
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
@@1967McQ I used the zoom for a long time, optically incredible. It's heavy, but pretty much all you'd need. I took it to hawaii and got some of my best landscaped ever. After hiking with it for 13 miles, I sold it for something lighter. My back is still cranky from that hike. I shoot a lot of portraits and that 4.5 wasn't enough light or bokeh for so much of what I was trying to do. Sometimes separating your subject from the background is a nice option. I had the 38 for a spell, took it around my city to do some snap shots. Too many times I wanted something wider. I think the 65 and either 30, 28 or 25 would be a stellar combo. I've been waiting on the 25 to be in stock for months. Also from corner to corner; the 30 is probably the sharpest of the three. However it doesn't focus very close if that matters to you. For the wide angle lens. It's pretty much down to your biggest priority. If you want compact get the 28, fastest aperture and close focus 25, or over all image quality 30. Good luck with your search. The leica felt great in my hand, but the x2d feels even better. Plus, much bigger screen
@Mike-qo8nm 5 ай бұрын
Almost at 1000 brother keep rocking. Great content!
@WILMORENO 4 ай бұрын
thank you!
@ozzozz3529 5 ай бұрын
can u make video x2d 100 c vs x2d 50c
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
I can do a quick review right here, if you're talking about the X1D Mark II. I like the feel of the X1D body better, but the lenses seem to focus slower on that body. Also the flip screen and image stabilization has been a huge help on the newer model. If you're just doing landscapes/still life you could probably save a lot and get the X1D Mark II. If the X2D is in your budget, I'd just get that and start torturing myself over lens options.
@ozzozz3529 5 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO ❤️thank you.
@ozzozz3529 5 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO last question. What about colour science and image quality difference?
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
@@ozzozz3529 color science is the same, image quality is right on par as well. Of course you get more cropping room with 100 megapixels. But with in body image stabilization, you stand the chance to get more keeper images handheld. Also the X2D has PDAF which works slightly better with the new lenses. There’s rumors of a continuous autofocus firmware update. If that is a new firmware update, the new lenses will be pretty nice to have. Also I forgot to mention, the face tracking on X2D is incredibly nice. It’s not a feature the X1DII has. So if you like to shoot portraits, just get the x2d. From all im seeing, the older XCD lenses have a tendency for better image quality, especially at the edges of the frame. It’s the price you pay for a smaller, lighter lens. I’ve tried the 35-75 28, 38, 55, 65, 80 & 120. While not doing any scientific tests. I did find that I always preferred the older xcd lenses image quality. But I almost broke my back carrying that zoom around Hawaii lol. It’s splitting hairs, but if you want the absolute best image quality I think the X2D with the older lenses is the way to go. But either camera with any of these Hasselblad lenses will give you great results. It’s just about that extra 5-10% Currently I’ve gotten rid of all my lenses except the 65. It focuses as fast as the new lenses from what I remember. In my own opinion the 65 and zoom renders the best quality images from everything I’ve tested. I’m going to test the 30 out next, I believe that could be my kit. The 65 and 30. Also interested in that 25 but I got a feeling the 30 is the way to go. Good luck! -WM
@ozzozz3529 5 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO thank u so much
@yogi4fitness 5 ай бұрын
Where did my comments go?
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
@@yogi4fitness what comments
@KonstantinGabriel1978 5 ай бұрын
For the love of god …it is mind boggling for me to see the number of subscribers ( so low) against the quality of content you put up . Just saying . Keep up the good worm man , love your shots and as a plus , the way you tell the story is on point
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
@KonstantinGabriel1978 Thank you. I like to think it's a quality over quantity situation haha
@rencohatenboer9684 5 ай бұрын
Hasselblad lenses are manufactured by Fuji so I think it's not a coating problem for the colors, but the software. Landscape looks very realistic on my Fuji GFX 100 II, but skintones are better on the Hasselblad without tuning. Maybe they use the DJI technology. I heard from a lot of camerashops that there are a lot of problems with the Hasselblad camera's. It's not the real Hasselblad anymore. Also the service was not good. So I keep my old 501 CM and the Fuji 100II
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
I had 5 total x2d bodies, 2 were perfect. I think they've fixed a lot of issues now. I'd like to take some credit for the quality control, by calling out everything I didn't like. Also I think Hasselblad won't be sending me any units for review because I was a little too honest. RIP my wallet. It's kind of hard to tell right now, it seems hasselblad is listening and trying to fix issues. I just wish their lenses were in stock more often. It's like Rolex. you can buy your favorite model from a reseller, with a hefty markup. No thanks. I used lightroom for both m gfx and x2d. Way way happier with the x2d files. Fuji camera is fine but if you're a perfectionist like me, the x2d creates less headache. in my opinion. the 500 series cameras are great, I'm saving up for xcd lenses, otherwise i'd be shooting film too. thanks for your comment
@NickDelDuca 5 ай бұрын
What software were you editing the Fuji files with?
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
@NickDelDuca lightroom only. Maybe if I used other programs the fuji would be okay. Hadselblad works perfect though so im still happy
@NickDelDuca 5 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO Oh yeah man that's 100% your problem, Adobe and Fuji have never played well together. Fuji partners with Capture One and all of the film sims are inside capture one as well as Capture One's Pro Standard profile that they manually create for each camera which IMO is some of the best color you can get out of any camera especially on the GFX files. Adobe is cheap and refuses to work with brands so they keep things proprietary. No one even the camera manufacturers know what happens under the hood of Adobe's raw processing. Adobe just guesses at their profiles which ends up being a complete mess. Not to mention Adobe's raw processing is extremely outdated. It would be too much work to overhaul it since it's integrated into so many things so they haven't fundamentally changed it for years. Unfortunately there's still some bad blood between Capture One and Hasselblad because Capture One used to be owned by Phase One which was one of Hasselblad's main competitors. That's okay with me though because Hasselblad is about done. DJI has driven them into the ground. It's not the same company it was before the acquisition. Most of the pros that were shooting with the H6 have left and their customer service and support is now horrible. I was always thinking my end game would be Hasselblad but DJI ruined that which is super sad. Fuji is a much better company that actually stands behind their products.
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
@@NickDelDuca damn that all makes sense. also fuji at least replied to my posts when I tagged them on ig lol. I'm pretty sure hasselblad hates me. But, I love this camera and hopefully it'll be supported for a very long time. I really don't want to change systems again
@NickDelDuca 5 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO Who knows, A lot of people speculate that DJI just bought Hasselblad for some of their lens patents they wanted to use for their inspire drones and don't really care about continuing making cameras. They really screwed over H6D-50C owners because they refuse to do a new run of the 50C backs and they have a high failure rate. So lots of photographers have expensive bricks now. I've also heard wild rumors that DJI is planning on using the Hasselblad brand to enter the full frame market and compete with Sony but with as much as they have been neglecting support of current products I don't see that being the case. Hopefully you don't have any issues with your X2D, I've heard repairs have a 6+ month turnaround and people get their cameras back still broken.
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
@NickDelDuca im not much into drones but i heard theyre getting heavily regulated. Like some areas law enforcement can override a persons drone signal. Im definitely not a fan of how all the new v lenses are still out of stock. But im pretty much set for now. Thanks for the information
@petrolabkilla 6 ай бұрын
Man, I was about to pull the trigger on the hasselblad…. And then I realized you can’t use capture one… WTF!! What do you use? This is killing my whole plan
@WILMORENO 6 ай бұрын
@petrolabkilla I've been using Lightroom for the past 10 years. Stuck in my ways now. I've never even tried to capture one before. I know its been an issue for many. The fuji isnt bad. At least w.fuji you'll have generally better focus. Fwiw i still pick up my x2d just to hold it. Love this camera
@mariojaurbano951 6 ай бұрын
i am sorry for your dog 😞
@gurugamer8632 6 ай бұрын
Do you prefer M11 or Hasselblad X2D
@WILMORENO 6 ай бұрын
The X2D is my favorite camera ever. I tested everything worth trying. It's a little slow and a little heavy but it's a dream to own. And the photos have a certain X factor that keeps me wanting to use it. Thanks!
@gurugamer8632 6 ай бұрын
Is the GFX 100 II better than X2D?
@WILMORENO 6 ай бұрын
It's up to the user. I went BACK to the X2D after using the GFX100II for a while. I like the build of the hasselblad better. I generally get better colors in the x2d as well. i wish hasselblad had a 110 f2 lens like that fuji. It's a toss up. I personally like the X2D better.
@gurugamer8632 6 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO I just ordered the X2D + 38XCDV + 90XCDV luckily the Hasselblad website had 90mm in stock.
@GurmeetSingh-fr8uo 6 ай бұрын
X2D better than Fujifilm medium format ?
@WILMORENO 6 ай бұрын
I like the X2D better. The fuji is still fine but when you're spending this kind of money, the camera really has to sing to you. thanks
@ignaciocruzatcorrea3595 6 ай бұрын
Please a little bit slower video. The rest was awesome. Thanks!
@WILMORENO 5 ай бұрын
@ignaciocruzatcorrea3595 yeah I agree, thanks
@Mocha_122 6 ай бұрын
I've been considering between the gfx 100sii and the x2d. I haven't held tried the x2d yet but I just tried the gfx100sii in store and it didn't feel right.
@WILMORENO 6 ай бұрын
Everyone that's held my x2d has commented on how nice it feels in the hand. I still dont miss my fuji at all
@brookstorm9789 6 ай бұрын
great
@davida5296 6 ай бұрын
its the SAME sensor.. any difference can be corrected if you shoot raw
@WILMORENO 6 ай бұрын
You have no idea what you're talking about. Respectfully
@davida5296 6 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO ok buddy. It's the same Sony sensor on both. be well
@WILMORENO 6 ай бұрын
@davida5296 you too buckeroo
@davida5296 6 ай бұрын
@@WILMORENO if you want any more information, it's available on the web. It's the same sensor and the readout times are better on the Fuji. Now with the gfxs ii it's not even a close comparison with the x2d. The one thing the Hass does have over the Fuji system is the leaf lenses so conceivably, if you needed to synch and really high speeds, you could. I can point you to some good learning material if you need
@WILMORENO 6 ай бұрын
@@davida5296 sounds like you should make you own video
@neildickie6278 7 ай бұрын
Well congrats on having the guts to make a clear statement on the comparative image quality of these two cameras. That is much appreciated, and in line with a favorite pro photographer of mine, Gavin Newcastle aka Fototripper.
@WILMORENO 7 ай бұрын
Hah thanks, I still do not miss the Fuji one bit.
@Mash.Bonigala 7 ай бұрын
Video cuts too fast. Slow down. Great photos! Love the X2D! (PS: You look like you will be 30 next year - not 40!)
@WILMORENO 7 ай бұрын
Hey man, you're totally right. This one kinda got away from me. I had a perfect take but a wardrobe malfunction that was super distracting. That led me into a million other takes, and it got a little messy. Thanks for watching. X2D is a beauty. And my back aches like a 40 yr olds!
@bradl2636 7 ай бұрын
These quality issues are non-starters for me. Not at this price.
@WILMORENO 7 ай бұрын
Definitely underwhelming quality control. I'll probably never get sent their newest stuff to review because of my transparency. maybe I should've rethought this approach 😅. I'd rather them see their customers have high standards. Thanks for watching!
@LeHung-sr9qd 8 ай бұрын
my x2d had hot pixels too but it's all gone after completing calibrating the sensor.
@andyeighttre 8 ай бұрын
This dude deserves an army of subs! Great content!!
@WILMORENO 8 ай бұрын
thank you very much
@luissalazar2021 8 ай бұрын
Hey thanks for sharing your pain, I hope you doing better, my nephew had the worst experience about his dog too, and he went to solitary for over two years and just getting back into the normal life. Please take care Great shooting, amazing camera.
@WILMORENO 7 ай бұрын
I really believe that was Clark coming down from heaven. Couldn't have picked a prettier day for a miracle. I'm doing well and spoiling my pups very much these days. Thank you for the kind words.
@gotminnam 8 ай бұрын
Nice video. And REALLY HANDSOME