Crazy how Germany has a 5% threshold for its national parliament but not for its EU parties...

Great video. Really hope this new energy and approach will work out in the end.

Loved the video !🤩

Seems to be such a smart and nice guy😍 People like him are exactly what we need for our future!

Great Video!!

No idea how this ended up on my feed but I'm so glad I'm here! I just know that your channel is going to blow up big in the coming months/years.

The reforms on removing the VETO towards majority voting is definitely needed. Hungary will find itself in a very difficult spot if Orban keeps going like this, i have NO idea what he has to gain from playing dumb games for his own benefit instead of making steps towards either negotiating with the EU or just flat out leaving the EU. And since we know that Orban isn´t really that much of a great negotiator or a fair politician to take other perspectives into consideration them i´m afraid he will drag his own country into a dark small corner and left to be undesired by the rest of the EU. The next elections in Hungary will not be fair and neither democratic in the media and towards other groups that he resents or simply hate.

The pigheaded approach to migration risks almost destroying Europe and gives extraordinary wide room for maneuvering to extremists. If these clowns 🤡chant about "protecting christian values" from the "homosexual takeover" of Bruxelles, almost nobody takes them seriously. But uncontrolled migration is different, it strikes at a deep core of the national and tribal instincts in people, and the vast majority of citizens agree we need strong borders to secure our way of life. Migrants are welcomed - it they pass the filter, can sustain themselves and respect our great society; no matter how compassionate you are, you cannot accept law breaking as a legitimate way of getting the practical benefits of EU citizenship. The recent, migrant instigated, antisemitic and gang violence we saw only adds insults to injury. At the core of the issue with quotas and "multicultural" iron fist was that the EU was using law to legitimize something that most citizens saw as unlawful and illegitimate.

I wish the EU had an American style constitution

I don't see anything positive in taking the nations sovereignty, it only creates more centralized power which undermines democracy at the base level and thus the will of the regular people, while leaving more room for lobbying. One can only hope that Poland becomes a net payer one day, as their economy is steadily growing, and then hold back the money on their part like was done with the money owed to them.

Good vid :) My (Czech) mom always said "Better to be ruled by a foreign Emperor from far away, than a local King close to home". It gives up more national sovereignty, but it makes sense, given that so much of our history was just puppet politicians building up their own little power base for the benefit of a single foreign power (usually Russia, and sometimes China a little) instead of integrating with the wider European world. From my perspective, it's a much safer bet than the petty tyrants we raise here.

you could use something to stop echo in your flag room - something big and fluffy.. a blanket may do the trick.

So shamed to see such a low numbers of subscription for a channel like this. Best wishes for your works.

If you think that gerrymandering isn’t unfair since the disadvantaged minority still can vote and could theoretically outvote the bias with 100% turnout, then the EU is perfectly democratic. However, if you don’t think the above you cannot escape the reality that the EU system is MASSIVELY rigged against the possibility that a popular vote dictates policy. One such mechanism is that the parliament isn’t allowed to draft bills. So whenever the Council wants something, they make it a package deal with something the parliament wants so they can’t vote for the one thing and against the other. That just isn’t democracy by 21st century standards!

Imo you focus too much on the obvious, on the structure, and less on the incentives and the optics. The EU has been "abused" by national politicians many times as the best way to push through unpopular policies. They cry on national TV about how upset they are and how much they want to stop certain changes, only for their own party colleagues to lobby and vote for them on the EU level. Because once something has been established on the EU level there is 0% hope to fight it on a national level. In addition to that the EU "mainstream" is extremely leftist by international standards. While every group should believe what they want, the EU actively points out democratic backsliding in countries that are anti-LGBT or against Muslim refugees, while not doing anything about authoritarianism massively increasing in France and Germany for example. Those countries that are not part of the EU, but have certain market-conformity deals with it, have the best of both worlds and should not make the mistake of cannibalizing the little amount of democracy they still cherish by joining the EU.

Excelent video!! You deserve more subscribers!!!!

I always vote KKE/ΑΝΤΑΡΣΥΑ

socialism both

This is very true, in 2022 there was a election in sweden and at my school we had a mini election. 51% voted for the nationalist sweden democrats. It is a male dominant blue collar school

To say the artist would vote Green and mechanic vote Nationlist is a big assumption

Very informative, more videos like this, please! There is a void in the youtube space that channels such as this can and shouls fill

14:10 what is that dot all the way up voting seemingly 30% nationalist???

Likely she will Vote for the Greens. He might vote for the Socialists if he is living in the Capital or a thriving Industrial town. For the old School Conservatives if he is from a smaller town that is doing fine or for the nationalists if he is from an area of the country that is struggling.

Today's humanities don't promote critical thinking, let's not kid ourselves, universities are anyhing, but progressive echo chambers that create conformist status-quo thinkers who sheepishly accept any narrative that is promoted by the 'right' labels of democracy, human rights, diversity, equity and inclusion.

Woman: Green Party, Man: AFD

The fellow would vote conservative, while the lady would vote socialist.

The girl "the Greens", "Socialists", the boy "Conservatives", "Nationalists"

Violet probably greens, but this makes most sense if she votes for the socialists. Peter votes the nationalists. I am rational and calculating and I vote the socialists. I am in the 3rd poorest 10-percentile therefore it is a rational choice to vote for Socialists.

While I respect the crux of this analysis and I am convinced it's true, i would like to point to an issue in the phraseology of the study regarding the information age and the opening up of less economically viable university degrees to more women. Now I imagine that the presenter of this video is just stating the study, so I am not crticizing him, instead i want to provide a different but similar perspective on whats happening. The phrase "these women became more critical of the structures that gave them their freedom in the first place, because yhey realized how many more freedoms they did not have" does not hold up. Having completed a humanities degree myself, I can say that what is being taught is not "critical thinking", but pure demolition abd deconstruction. Nobody tries to understand why anything was done the way it was in the past, nobody tries to rationalize why they think things can be "different" now, they are only taught how to dismantle and discredit past concepts with the nebulous idea that we will eventually "build new, better, ways of life", which have nit been seen anywhere, if anything, people now have ended up re-inventing the wheel as far as social norms are concerned. Secondly, a person cannot realize "how many freedoms they are missing". If it's a "freedom" that nobody has, then it is a non-existent fiction. If it demands that governments or corporations need to grant someone that "freedom", then it, again, isn't a freedom. I dont think it is crazy for me to argue that human freedom has a limit, which we may never be able to surpass. There are limits put on human beings by our biology, the laws of reality and the mere fact that we want to live in a society and under some economic system. This is not sbout capitalism or socialism or whether the state should be more liberal or more conservative, it is the recognition that ANY community of humsn beings will have a political, economic and social structure which will necessarily limit human freedom. Even a person that decides to live alone in the woods would have to live under the laws of nature in order to survive. Freedom outside the aforementioned bounds is thus enturely theoretical abd completely pointless to think about. People like the Violet girl in the example, think we can somehow live in a society where we all work 3 hours a day from home, take 6 month vacations, have a powergrid serving 350 million people being fuelled completely by wind turbines, while ALSO not filling every hill and mountain top with them and, at the same rime, nobody having any responsibilities or commitments to anyone else, because that would be "social tyranny". This is not achievable under ANY social, political or economic system. It is a complete fiction abd they must come to understand that.

Violet for greens and peter for nationalists.

violet would be left leaning support greens and Peter is likely far right leaning

2:00 That makes little sense. Violet intends to live off state largesse which can exist only at the expense of people like Peter.

Firstly I will say that I really enjoyed the video but I would like to point out some concerns of mine as to its integrity. I feel like cultural/communication studies = more critical thinking while techincal and economical do not is wrong. Fields like engineering, STEM, law and managment are filled with problem solving scenarios were critical thinking is KEY and a huge emphasis is given. Not saying that "Human" studies don't provide that as well but saying that the other group doesn't is really unfair.

Methinks School Teacher will vote green and Vocational will vote Nationalist Edit: Called it! Edit 2:Very Well made video. No partisanship. Politically neutral and straight to the facts. Again, well done!

Right off the bat, a video sponsored by EU political interests can't be objective and will always be pro-EU, if they want to keep the money coming in, which they must. Furthermore, the theoretical question proposed is massively simplistic, as boiling down people to their jobs and sex overlooks a lot, if not most of what informs out decisions - nothing useful can be gleaned by answering it. Lastly, a lot of comments point out the clear bias extant in this presentation - as I would have expected, given the sponsor and the question posed. Conclusion: Watching the entirety of this video would be a waste of my time.

Peter would be either in the socialist or Conservative party and the woman I honestly can’t pin down.

Great video

Bonus guessing game: can anybody tell me which occupation the lonely little dot at the bottom right in the chart at 14:32 represents?

6:57 "promote critical thinking". yeah.... because for a liberal, having soaked up the liberal agenda to the point of not being able to comprehend dissent is "critical thinking"

green or -nationalist- brown... can nationalism also be about other things than hate?

This was incredibly shallow and stupid.

10:52 can we break up those into stem and non-stem? I doubt that quarter of stem would vote green.

Very interesting video. As a man I have a bachelor in economics and another bachelor in teaching and often have my doubts on what to vote for. I guess the party I voted for last time is closer to Greens than Nationalist, I wonder if its because my latest bachelor and my job involves teaching.

violet -> greens peter -> old conservatives

(spoiler alert) I'll say Violet votes for the Greens and Peter the Nationalists...ah. As I expected.

5:00 I've read that Luxembourg has problems with congestion so that must be why it's the dirtiest.

13:14 Reminds me of whaddyou meme.

and then there's my country where multiple parties joined together to fight against a selfish incompetent populist in a conflict of interest that bribed the seniors with donuts-

14:53 “work shifted from the hands to the brain” not really? There were also journalists,philosophers, economists, etc, in the XIX century, it is true that now there are more of them but that’s mostly in imperial core countries like Germany, meanwhile in the global south and imperial periphery that doesn’t really happen

6:09 “suddenly it’s your education that determines your chances in life, not your phisycal activities” and what determines your education?? My friend who lives in a small mountain village in eastern Spain simply doesn’t have the chance to have an education as good as the princess of Spain for example, class struggle is still the primary division of society.