Thanks for the heads up. Yeah I just saw that announcement. Well, the 4770k system will be decommissioned for a while. It will take the 2500k place at some point, however the 3060ti is now residing within my 12600kf system. These two are close, so I could test I guess. Maybe I will get better card for the 12600kf and install the 3060ti on the 4770k again. We'll see.

I am impressed. With a GTX 970 also. I am sure the cpu helps a ton. But still WOW

Thanks for the feedback. As you can see, it runs quite nicely here. It must be your cpu. It's quite old and doesn't have hyperthreading, which nowadays is better, due to games having been quite a lot more multithreaded, compared to the past. My 2500k+290X also had quite some trouble running it, as shown in the below video, however it don crash, at least for the time I was testing. kzbin.info/www/bejne/garGqpaYm5ermtU I will also test on 2700k+GTX 1070, to see how it fairs. I also have a 4770k which I will try to test soon. It is disabled for now.

Well, I think they are interesting as metric, while the game runs. Glad they are of use to someone. :)

It got improved but needs a lot of work still...

@@toutagamon It's way more stable now. Before 1.1 it would load in with errors which would keep breaking the game the further you progress in the story.

@@club4ghz thanks for the info mate

@@toutagamon Bdw if you download DLSS 3.8.10 and replace the 3.7.0.0 that is in the game you will get performance boost with DLSS enabled.

@@toutagamon BDW if you replace DLSS 3.7 dll with the latest 3.8.10 version in game, you will get performance boost with DLSS enabled. I'm 165hz locked at 1440p 95% of the time with 4080 at 1440p with Frame Gen. Latency is fine, just needed to slightly increase mouse sensitivity.

The HDD3 on the OSD is the storage it is running from. It has a couple 300MB/sec bursts, but overall the read speed is within HDD limits. I will test on HDD on some future tests. The 1.1.1 patch came out and will test soon.

Hmm...this is the first part of the game, maybe it gets heavier later? Have you tested the same location? This is pretty much at the start of the game. I find it weird that a 8600k would stutter in it though. Seemed quite light at first glance. Still haven't played the game thoroughly. Too much of backlog fml.

@ yes i tested at the same spots as you in the video and damn i stutter and have frame spikes with my 8600 and rtx 4060. have you played the game recently? maybe it got updated and more demanding? how have you set your cpu settings in the bios? if you could answer me i would apreciate it very much

@@mammedthn Well I haven't gone back to it for a while. However it could be they did something that made it heavier. I have made a video of the settings for higher overclock of the 8600k. kzbin.info/www/bejne/r5iUo4B9oKirers Make sure you have good sub-systems, psu, mobo, cooling, etc. I have an RX6600 on that system now, so the framerate it could give would be way lower, but I'll see if I can do a new run.

@@toutagamon thank you very much for the reply! i apreciate it

@@mammedthn Hello friend. Happy New Year! Sorry for the delay, but I don't have all the time in the world unfortunately. Anyhoo, I got around and managed to retest on the 8600k. This time, on a rx6600, still ultra preset with way lower resolution of course. All things considered, the rx6600 did ok. The game still runs quite well on the 8600k OC. This run is capped at 60fps. There some framedrops here and there, but they are gpu related. The cpu usage hovers arouns 40-70% for 60 fps at the ultra preset. So I'd say it's about the same, maybe a litte heavier on the new run, but I think there are more zombie npcs running around. Here it is. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXuwl4h9mJdmY68

What you are describing is a cpu limit. My cpu is overclocked here, but it can't be THAT much faster. The problem is that AMD's driver is better for DX12. It has lower overhead and maybe this also helps, aside from the overclocking. Solutions: 1) Overclock your cpu. Most 2500Ks can go up to 4500mhz easily, as long as you have a good mobo and cooling 2) Upgrade your cpu. Throw in a 2600k or a 3770k in there 3) See if the game supports DX11 or Vulkan and launch it with that instead 4) Get an AMD card from a friend and see if this will help and if it does, sell you card and get an AMD one

​@@toutagamonsorry for my bad english, thanks for your suggestion, ​well, mine was overclock to 4ghz, is it need good psu too for overclocking? what mobo do you using mate? mine was gigabyte p67 chipset, unfortunately i cant test it with any amd gpu, and i think gtx 1660s is enough for tekken 8, but the driver is the problem, right?

@@tegarsetiawan5998 Technically it's not the driver that has a problem, it's just that Nvidia is stronger in DX11 and AMD is stronger in DX12. The distance is not that big for what you are desrcibing here. Yes a good psu is always a given. However for 4Ghz the difference will be miniscule.

Omg I would just quit, lol. I am just testing it for now.

@@toutagamon It's just too good to quit. You even have to add save game folders and game exes to antivirus exceptions to prevent game crashes, save corruption. The game is constantly writing in main save game file even when you're not saving manually and have autosave disabled.

Hey man. Technically I am not "back". I never left. I upload stuff all the time. It's just getting lost amongst the myriads of vids and subscribes we all have. I am not a pro anyway. Just doing silly capped tests. And youtube does not push non monetized channels on top of that.... Anyhoo, It was selected by default and I left it, since nowadays I do capped runs 99% of the time. I aim for smoothness above all. This one for example, shows the 4070ti using only half its power with these settings. Which is good. This is how I would play it.

@toutagamon yeah.. I guess i didnt see any of your content for a time because of youtube.. I ve seen after i watched this gameplay. This game for me is amazing, i played yesterday on my 3070 and 5800x all oced ahah. I havent got time or patience to edit vids nowadays. I only have like 50 subscribers but i do it for fun. Well, i Will be watching u bro. Love your content.. Cheers and if we dont speak till Xmas have an amazing one with your family man.

@@brunorodrigues2060 I don't edit anything either. This is just a hobby. I upload raw as it is. Merry Christmas to you too my friend.

No problem mate. Well fsr can only do so much regarding upscaling, however without it, this one would be unplayable and/or would need even lower settings. So for a 10yo part, that can access todays technologies, I think it's a good thing.

@@toutagamon Yeah it's definitely nice that a 970 can run this, but I'm not used to all these rendering techniques at all. UE5 is a beast even on my main rig so I wonder what games will look like 5 years from now once game devs and hardware adapt

What if you use the settings I am using here?

@@toutagamon I tried them. They did not seem to have much of an impact. Are you using the latest Nvidia driver? Or are you using an older driver version?

@@Super80sMan I always use the latest driver. What you are describing is very weird. First of all, your cpu is essentially has the same performance as the one I am using here. I only have 200mhz more and for 60fps, in the Vatican area, the cpu usage is around 60%. So your cpu is not the problem. Then we have the GPU. The 3060ti is at 150W, which mean it has more power to spare, since its max is at 210-220W. So at the same settings, your 3060 should be more than enough to accommodate the required workload for 60fps. Yet here we are and you say you cannot break 30. In terms of your hardware you should be OK. Load up MSI Afterburner, enable the OSD and see what kind of loads are being recorded. Is anything maxed out? Are your clocks ok, etc.

@ Yes I don’t understand it either. I will try using MSI Afterburner when I have some more time but using the performance overlay accessible from the game’s menu it indicates the CPU is maxed out at near 100%.

@@toutagamon I checked using MSI afterburner and did some more research. The overlay indicates the cpu is never going above 3.8 GHz. Apparently, it can only actually boost one core to 4 GHz at a time. If all 4 cores are being used then they can only reach a max of 3.8. I guess the 400 MHz difference you have with the K version makes a large difference in this game.

Lol. This was a friend's system really. I didn't even remembered that I had uploaded vids of his system. Still has it. He only changed the graphics cards because they both went bad. Thanks for the reminder. I had a similar and even better system though. Rich though? nuhhhh

I tried to run it on my 2500k rig and did not receive any such error message. This is UE5 and these generally run without AVX2. However the game crached, most likely due to the old video card drivers of that system. I will try to test it on my 2700k+GTX 1070 tomorrow.

@@toutagamon inform us please

@@TankoxD Hello friend. Didn't forget about you, I just was too busy. Happy to report Stalker 2 works on Sandy Bridge, therefore no AVX2 required. Just uploaded a video. Saddly it turned darker than I expected, due to the external recorded, but you can see the performance. Considering it's probably on the top 10 of the heaviest games ever, I am impressed. kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5zPenaPf7J6qrs

@@toutagamon thank you 🙏

I only have 60hz panels, so I use that. I try to test my systems within this boundary, up to the max settings they can muster. That being said, even with dlss, the 4070ti has severe frame drops in the 40s, so higher framerate would be moot. This is a typical Unreal Engine 5 behavior (if you push it) and this is what this video is showing here.

The way things are going, it would be better to aim for the card, with the better hardware upscaler, which is an Nvidia card. However new cards will be announced soon. It would be better to wait and see. AMD is going for lower end models this time, which means they will play the underdog card, which will hopefully mean lower prices and better vfm. Moreover these new ones, will feature a hardware upscaler too. I have a 8600k too.Didn't have the time to test this game on it, because the beta was too short. However if you see the age old 4770k here, giving a playable experience, the 8600k will be way better.

@@toutagamon Thanks for the advice, your gameplay is really smooth which surprised me. The only thing im wondering is how much is the difference if it ran on the RTX 4060 8GB instead of the 3060 Ti 12GB, will the lost of 4GB of VRam make much of an impact or it can be compensated with lowering some settings? Yeah i would want to see what the 50 series will offer but from what i heard 5060 will still be 8GB of VRam and for AMD hopefully their new line up would be more vfm.

@@caim1984 The 3060ti always had 8GBs of video ram.The 3060 (non ti) is the one with 12GBs. Still, the 3060ti has always been the better card. That's why it's more expensive. Vram can only do so much. Games need horse power first and foremost. The 4060 is also a little slower than the 3060ti, but they are close. Overall the combination of 4060+8600k would do better than what you see here.

@@imtrash2812 This was just a test my friend. I was not the one asking. I have two other systems better than this. I just uploaded a test run, that's all.

@@toutagamon sr im tagging wrong person :pppp

I got it from here friend. www.playground.ru/god_of_war_ragnarok/file/god_of_war_ragnarok_patch_s_obhodom_avx2_i_fma_v1_0_618_4551-1727476

I know right? Still it runs fine, does it not?