Sirrrr I have a question. I'm confused. How did you derived on the unit kW in second problem? The answer there is in kW unit. Please answer this huhu ASAP
@QuestionSolutions14 сағат бұрын
1 watt = 1 J/s. From there, you should be able to derive kJ/min to kW. Let me know if you are unable and I will help.
@MissPhilemonКүн бұрын
I am a comp engineering student and I have my mid terms in 6 hours💀
@QuestionSolutions14 сағат бұрын
I hope you did well on your midterm!
@amoritemweember3449Күн бұрын
Am going to fail
@QuestionSolutionsКүн бұрын
Why?
@unimportant372Күн бұрын
Hello how did u get 6.67 huhu its 6.4 in my calculations
@QuestionSolutionsКүн бұрын
Please use timestamps, I'm not sure where you're referring to.
@fatimakabir5632Күн бұрын
You saved my life, thank you ❤️
@QuestionSolutionsКүн бұрын
You're very welcome! :)
@Mohammed-c3g3mКүн бұрын
I'm electrical engineering. This video is very attractive and also helpful so I want to say thank you again and again continue just like this ,try to add additional example that more make more prepare for exams thank you.
@QuestionSolutionsКүн бұрын
Thank you for the kind words and for the feedback!
@mirriamnamuwelu9394Күн бұрын
Anyone to help with how x and y was found in question 2 using the ratios
@QuestionSolutionsКүн бұрын
See this video, especially the 2nd example: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hKOvZpdjZ6iUmLM
@אוך2 күн бұрын
You are a life-saver man. Thank u so much
@QuestionSolutions2 күн бұрын
You're very welcome! :)
@JamesVestal-dz5qm2 күн бұрын
I got 20 for the reduced pressure of argon at -130c and density 0.910 grams per cubic centimeter. The table and graph for the compressibility factor only has reduced pressures between 0 and 10. I used hard sphere equation of state. Pressure was determined using the sigma hard sphere radius and number density.
@QuestionSolutions2 күн бұрын
Not sure where you're referring to, but it seems like you got what you needed :)
@JamesVestal-dz5qmКүн бұрын
@QuestionSolutions no I didn't get what I needed. I need to write a spreadsheet today to calculate a Lenard Jones parameter for a radial distribution function and I'm worried I won't get it. The Matlab code on the course website says 5 errors and I dont know how to fix it.
@QuestionSolutionsКүн бұрын
@@JamesVestal-dz5qm So if you don't know how to fix it, it's probably a good idea to see your professor or your TA and get the help you need. Best wishes!
@JamesVestal-dz5qmКүн бұрын
@@QuestionSolutions my professor loves to cap the office hour to 1 hour. Get out of my office I have another student to work with says the professor. But I haven't figured it out yet say I and he says try again in two business days!
@QuestionSolutionsКүн бұрын
@@JamesVestal-dz5qm Wow, never heard that before, must be a really busy professor. Is there a TA you can get help from? Or a friend who already worked on the project?
@vox_celeste94272 күн бұрын
go back to school
@QuestionSolutions2 күн бұрын
Why, thank you! I always love a good excuse to learn something new. Maybe I'll see you there?
@MrMakeItRain.2 күн бұрын
No way u made it that simple. I am mind blown!!
@QuestionSolutions2 күн бұрын
:) Glad to hear!
@muhammadabdulbasit11662 күн бұрын
4:25 im confuse why left value in Compression and right value is tension but both in positive
@QuestionSolutions2 күн бұрын
So it has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with whether a force is positive or not. Positives and negatives only tell you whether an assumption was right or not. What matters is the direction of the force. Is the force coming towards the pin or going away from the pin. Rewatch this part from 1:48.
@evangelinepiper66303 күн бұрын
At 6:55 I’m not sure where the equation 10ag(0.4) has come from and my it’s included in the equation
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
I circle it at 6:50 😅It's the mass of the ring multiplied by the acceleration. That is 0.4 m away from point C, (perpendicular distance), which means it creates a moment. So whatever creates a moment must be written down on our equation.
@evangelinepiper66303 күн бұрын
@ I thought it was just the forces that create a moment and rhs was just moment of interim times angular velocity.
@NadimGhaddar3 күн бұрын
🐐goat
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@yourpapa66413 күн бұрын
Thank you for such an informative video! My question is regarding the moment equation when used for a different point. Why do we use clockwise as positive? In dynamics so far I have been told only consider counter clockwise as positive. Regards!
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
You're very welcome. In 2D problems, you can use clockwise as positive or counterclockwise as positive. You will get the same answer regardless of which you pick. It's totally up to you. In 3D problems, you will need to use the right hand rule to figure out the positive vector directions. Try it out :)
@makarelsardines84573 күн бұрын
15:51 May I ask why you don't use the equation like 2I1 + I1-I4 = 0 in the mesh 1? Is it wrong to equate it to 0 or because there is an independent current source that solves mesh 1 and 2 or because there is no voltage given in mesh 1?
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
So we can't write that equation because we don't know the voltage in the 4 mA current source. If a current source is shared between two mesh currents, it's simply easier to write an equation for a loop so that the current source is ignored. You can write it with the current source, but you will need to assign an arbitrary voltage to the current source and then solve it at the end. That's a waste of time since writing an equation for a loop will get you an answer way faster and you're less prone to mistakes. Remember, at the end of the day, you are just writing KVL equations when it comes to mesh analysis. So if we don't know the the voltage, we can't write it.
@makarelsardines84573 күн бұрын
@QuestionSolutions thank you
@joeyni28613 күн бұрын
Thanks question solution for this video it really helped me with my quiz tomorrow just a quick question wouldn’t it be easier to take the moment at B first then take the sum of Fy to get Bg isn’t that easier?
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
You're very welcome. Could you please give me a timestamp so I know where you're referring to, then I can take a look. Thanks!
@Obliviousovertimer173 күн бұрын
6:20 wouldn't the oc be oa instead
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
Both will work and give you the same answer.
@mehmetalitastekin003 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! I successfully passed Statics, Dynamics, and Thermodynamics with the help of your videos. Could you please create a playlist on Mechanical Vibrations? It would be really helpful for exam preparation.
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
You're very welcome and I am happy to hear these videos were helpful to you. I will add mechanical vibrations to my list of things to cover, but it probably won't get done before your exams since I just started working on the circuit analysis playlist. On the bright side, there are lots of great videos on youtube on that subject so don't fret! :)
@Cheeselova344 күн бұрын
wish you would cover centroids
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
One day!
@DUMPL1NGZ4 күн бұрын
thank you so much for your amazing videos. I love the effort and animation you put into these.
@QuestionSolutions3 күн бұрын
Thank you very much. I appreciate your comment :)
@franciscoronjansen65634 күн бұрын
good day sir, in the vid 8.05 in wolffrom alpha how did xy=200x-60 become 0=200x-122.5 where did that 122.5 came from?
@QuestionSolutions4 күн бұрын
Sorry, but I don't know where you're referring to. I don't see the -122.5. Where is it?
@hanaaissa54844 күн бұрын
thankuuuusm
@QuestionSolutions4 күн бұрын
You're very welcome!
@selen41854 күн бұрын
hi i have a question, i will really appreciated if you can responde quickly. the thing i wawnt to ask why in the 2:32 we call it -k. its spoused to be -i
@QuestionSolutions4 күн бұрын
So to figure out the direction of the vector, you have to use the right hand rule. While the angular velocity is clockwise, this is a 3D vector. If we curl our right hand fingers the same direction as our angular velocity, we see that our thumb points into the screen. So that's the negative z axis, or -k axis.
@trentonstevens65754 күн бұрын
I am getting hung up on problem 1. I am using this video as a reference to a similar homework problem where the force applied to the pin is 680N, I go through and solve the problem the same way this one is solved yet I am told my answer Cx= 676.6N and Cy= 0 is incorrect.
@QuestionSolutions4 күн бұрын
Does the question specifically say the force is applied to the pin? Does the diagram look the same? Really hard to say without seeing the problem/ diagram. I encourage you to see your professor during their office hours to get everything cleared up.
@petrus27464 күн бұрын
For anyone wondering why Force BG was eliminated 3:01, it's because it's vertical component goes through B and so does its horizontal component
@QuestionSolutions4 күн бұрын
That's right, but even more easier to remember is to keep in mind that any force starting where the moment is calculated, cannot create a moment at that point. The same as force BC.
@manexomega4 күн бұрын
Your lectures are amazing,so pleas help us on Mechanism of Machines.
@QuestionSolutions4 күн бұрын
Thank you very much. Mechanisms of machines is a very broad topic. Are you looking for videos on a specific subtopic or just a general set of videos on the topic?
@JGambrosia5 күн бұрын
U r an amazing person :)
@QuestionSolutions5 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! :)
@doniellsithole23465 күн бұрын
I see V doesnt always act in the same direction, how do you know whether its acting up or down
@doniellsithole23465 күн бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/goHHZamNbctsd8U I just found the video that explains.
@QuestionSolutions4 күн бұрын
Please see this video, and if you still have any questions, let me know: kzbin.info/www/bejne/goHHZamNbctsd8U
@mohammadshabih52936 күн бұрын
bro started circuit analysis just as I finished it lol
@QuestionSolutions6 күн бұрын
Aw, that's unfortunate to hear. But on the bright side, if you ever need a refresh, the videos will be here.
@toss_na6 күн бұрын
u are the best bro, i understand this videos much better watching from JEDS Namibia
@QuestionSolutions6 күн бұрын
Thank you very much! I am really happy to hear you can understand this video :) Keep up the awesome work and I wish you the best with your studies!
@rjaal6 күн бұрын
first thanks for the incredible work you've really managed to reach the ideas in such short time even for the hard learners like me but in 6:24 shouldn't the answer be (128.28i-128.28j+256.5k)? and thanks for your time 🌹
@QuestionSolutions6 күн бұрын
You're very welcome and thank you for the feedback! To answer your question, the correct answer is {-128.34i + 128.34j - 256.68k}. There is a typo in the video where the K term is shown as positive, when it's actually negative. So while the magnitudes of your values are correct, the signs are wrong. It's probably just a small mistake in assigning positives and negatives to your i,j,k components, so if you have some time, take a look at this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fGmseaWdaNWWbck
@EaK-y7v6 күн бұрын
Why are referring to the distance as X ? I didn’t understand the clarification said in the video.
@QuestionSolutions6 күн бұрын
So we want to represent length as a variable. If we use a specific distance, then the value we get is just for that distance. Let's say we did it at 2 m, then the all the values we calculated would be just for 2m. We want to use a variable for length so that we can plug in any distance we want and figure out the values at that spot. So if we wanted to figure out a moment at 3.5 m, all we do is plug that into our "x" value. So that's why we want the length represented as a variable.
@judekirkcruz71776 күн бұрын
wowowwwww thank youu so muchhh!!!!
@QuestionSolutions6 күн бұрын
You're very welcome!
@crystalsgalaxy49876 күн бұрын
this is so underrated, simple explanation, no complexities, love every part of the video! thank you!
@QuestionSolutions6 күн бұрын
Thank you very much, I really appreciate your comment. Glad to hear this was easy to follow :)
@SkylightStudios-r8l7 күн бұрын
umm how can i join your channel and view membership video and examples??
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
If you click the "join" button (next to the subscribe button), it should come up. If you don't see it there, if you go to the channel page, there is also another join button. Also, thanks for even considering to join this channel! :)
@PasantAssem7 күн бұрын
inspiring solution for real
@QuestionSolutions6 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@PasantAssem7 күн бұрын
thanks alot'
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
Happy to help!
@jenniferdiaz65877 күн бұрын
So helpful!!!!! Thank you
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
You're very welcome!
@axviiaxvii59097 күн бұрын
For the triangle question, where are you taking moments from?
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
So let's look at 00:45, where are we calculating the moment about? Couple moments don't work like the normal moments. You're not specifically taking the moment about a point, though you can think of it as taking it about the center between the two forces. So in the triangle, you're just figuring out the moment, not about a specific point, but rather the moment created by the opposing forces. If it makes it easier, you can think of the triangle pinned at the middle and the forces creating a moment that spins it about that pin.
@itsheynahhh7 күн бұрын
6:25 Good day, sir! May i ask how did the k became 256.68k i thought it's supposed to be negative. Just asking how it became negative. Thank you for your response sir!🤍
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
So it should be: k[ (4 x -64.17) - (0 x 21.39)] = k[-256.68-0] = -256.68k. Hope that helps :)
@itsheynahhh7 күн бұрын
The final answer in your video is positive 256.86 k. I just want to clarify sir if the final and correct answer is -256.58 k?
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
@@itsheynahhh Yes, -256.58k is correct. There is a typo in the video, that's why I made a pinned comment about it.
@viperjod-o7z8 күн бұрын
You sort of my life very very very thankyou
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
You're very welcome!
@h.muralikrishnan3688 күн бұрын
the formula is only applicable for rigid bodies right?
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
Yes, for relative velocity of particles, see: kzbin.info/www/bejne/paG5fIF5msmeiNE
@nahidshohag-u8f8 күн бұрын
i am from bangladesh,and i am studing in BAUST,thank you for this video
@QuestionSolutions7 күн бұрын
Thank you! I hope the video was helpful to you, and I wish you all the best in your studies.
@princessannetraya79788 күн бұрын
This is the best 🥰
@QuestionSolutions8 күн бұрын
I'm glad to hear that :)
@InfernoHues8 күн бұрын
This was really helpful!
@QuestionSolutions8 күн бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@sundasnabi26298 күн бұрын
thanks for the help ,I found this approach best
@QuestionSolutions8 күн бұрын
Great to hear!
@ZexMutsawu-nw2ov8 күн бұрын
6:28 in your explanation you said that only the x component of force BG can cause a moment about D but on the working you used Sin instead of Cos. May you please clarify
@QuestionSolutions8 күн бұрын
So my guess is, you assume cos is for x and sine is for y. This is fundamentally wrong, and you must, absolutely must, remove that idea from your head. You have to look from the perspective of the angle every single time. Here, the opposite side to the angle gives us the x-component, and sine is opposite over hypotenuse. So you need to use sine. To get the y-component, which is now adjacent to the angle, you need to use cosine. See this video, it's less than 60 seconds and you will see what I mean: kzbin.infovynnKlJD_Jo?feature=share
@ZexMutsawu-nw2ov8 күн бұрын
Noted thank you @@QuestionSolutions
@QuestionSolutions8 күн бұрын
@@ZexMutsawu-nw2ov Awesome. Best wishes with your studies. Let me know if you need any further clarifications.