Rick Mulready

Пікірлер

@superfliping 8 күн бұрын

@Mr styles:new code updated GPT3.5.5 was given out today free. makes cleaner code each time organized structure creating and checking oversight loop repeat instructions before printing code with recall memory

@al2935 8 күн бұрын

If you have mastery over your subject and have already built up your prompt scripts Claude 3 is still hands down better as you can use the larger context window to leverage the most out of the tool

@Kristoferwitha_k 9 күн бұрын

So, from what i understand. Is it now possible to us this to get a customer service email chat job and just have the ai do it all? Because that would be a dream

@RickMulready 8 күн бұрын

lol essentially yep

@JudahCrowe-ej9yl 9 күн бұрын

Gp to

@itchy79 9 күн бұрын

I've been testing GPT4o since its release. It's a huge step backwards. It's dumber, less personable, makes more mistakes, is lazier, and ignores its instructions even more than before (which was often). I don't see a button for choosing which GPT4 model to use.

@Sindigo-ic6xq 9 күн бұрын

brilliant!!

@RickMulready 9 күн бұрын

🙌

@stephanhochkeppel9552 10 күн бұрын

But gpt4o is free , claude is not free. The free claude version in switzerland is like reading a fantasy book. I asked to give me the 3 best rated dermatologist in my city and the answers where totally wrong .none of this doctors excists. Copilot snd gemini did it correct. So for me as a free user( i dont pay) gemi, Gpt4o, are much more better then the useless claude 3( free version). So its important that you also look at the people who are not paying. For us gpt4o, Gemini...are 100% better then claude ( claude i would only need if i would write a fantasy story. But this I dont)... i testet Claude 3 opus ( on the Ai arena) with the same question and it gave me also totaly wrong answers ...no doctor really exists...so also Claude 3 opus is for me as a normal user totally useless. For my questions i am interested in better is gemini, gpt4o, copilot

@Sindigo-ic6xq 9 күн бұрын

it has no internet access. but yes lol it indeed is better for fantasy writing, actually even the free sonnet version is better than gpt 4o here. although gpt 4o is far better at math than any other model what was not tested in the video

@RickMulready 9 күн бұрын

Appreciate your feedback. For the dermatologist use case, I wouldn’t use Claude either as it’s not connected to the internet. I was testing on online business use cases, but it’s also a great reminder why we test different models for what we’re trying to accomplish. Thanks for watching 🙌

@Inspired_JG 9 күн бұрын

It’s all about the use case. For me, document reading and writing more natural sounding content, Claude is the way to go. Everything else I use GPT 4, for now.

@superfliping 10 күн бұрын

Switch back to 3.5 GPT add a memory code in the custom settings now your model will have memory created 1500 lines of code usable code tokenized thousands of words with my phone because it has memory

@YTDZ77 10 күн бұрын

Really useful video, thanks, as I was thinking of testing out these three models myself in similar scenarios. I've always preferred Claude Opus for its writing style, but have shied away from paying $20 a month, as I don't personally use it enough for that cost. Wish the API was available for individuals, not just business.

@RickMulready 9 күн бұрын

You should have no problem getting access to the API. If you don’t use Claude much, you’ll pay hardly anything using the API. This might help: docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/getting-access-to-claude

@clintfaber 10 күн бұрын

Finally someone with an honest review. I immediately noticed that the new o model was dumb compared to 4 yeah I hadn't been hearing anybody talk about this until now.

@unboxinglife2308 9 күн бұрын

Funny I’ve had the complete opposite experience. It’s chatting ability is way better

@NathanScott-lq8vu 5 күн бұрын

same for me, using 4 as a general assistant for coding and non coding tasks in domains where I have knowledge, really just using it as a time saver over going through my notes or google. I tried 4o when it came out, but was immediately struck by the return to gpt3-like time wasting, i.e. the wasting of my time with it not following my prompts and then me having to try again and again with it, which you quickly learn is just a rabbit hole that you are not coming out of. gpt-4o, to me, is like a glorified version of 3.5 with more capabilities, it is faster than 4, can read images etc. However, gpt-4 actually gives me enough reasoning and accuracy to be helpful and limits time wasting, which is key for me, I would still pay a couple of $ a month for gpt4 over use the free gpt-4o for the time being. I guess it comes down to what you want out of these things.

@mtallan 10 күн бұрын

It’s not complete yet. Gotta wait for the image and audio features.

@RickMulready 9 күн бұрын

Yeah, I’m excited to see what comes with the audio modalities.

@mtallan 4 күн бұрын

@@RickMulready Me too mate. Probably have to wait a bit longer now that the Sky voice that was used in the demo has been put on hold.

@ventilator98 10 күн бұрын

I just put it to the test as far as image generation, by having it generate an image of a patient who is critically ill in the ICU, and told it to be very very accurate. I gave it great detail. I mean I wrote exactly what the vital signs were, the ventilator settings were, the medications that I wanted in the IV pumps, and went much further than what I'm stating in the comment, and boy did it fail. It created a blurry image of an ICU setting, but nothing I requested was right. It was a down right mess! A down right complete mess of equipment with display screens that were not accurate, and It just made a mess of the job. In a few years, I will see if does any better, at the exact same request, with the same wording as I used tonight, but right now, It is nowhere near ready to do something as elaborate as what I asked it to do. We'll see what it does in a few years with the same request. I smehow don't see it being much better, but I'll try. What I requested it to do, was very very extreme, as I went on and on, giving every single detail.

@RickMulready 9 күн бұрын

Interesting, I tested it the other day with an image for my AI-ify newsletter and did a good job. Although it wasn’t as extensive a description.

@GringaCR 10 күн бұрын

Brilliant! This was most helpful. Thanks, Rick.

@RickMulready 10 күн бұрын

Awesome, appreciate the feedback and glad it was helpful 🙌

@galefraney 10 күн бұрын

Great comparison of the various models. Thanks!!

@RickMulready 10 күн бұрын

You bet! Thanks for watching 🙌

@user-bb2ze8hm8d 11 күн бұрын

So much value, thank you. You save me much time ❤

@RickMulready 11 күн бұрын

Thanks for watching and I’m glad the content is helpful!

@mattn4925 13 күн бұрын

It seems like it might be faster to just write an email

@jarid.orgeron 6 күн бұрын

True, but Ai is faster to write 100,000 custom emails instantaneously 24/7 for nearly zero cost

@stevenpage2829 15 күн бұрын

This is really awesome information! Nice bonus to find out about new tools also.

@RickMulready 15 күн бұрын

Glad it was helpful, Steven! 🙌

@PurifyWithLight 16 күн бұрын

I wonder if I can upload my Dungeons and Dragons pdf rule books and have it pull up rules when I ask?

@RickMulready 16 күн бұрын

You totally could. You could also create a custom GPT for something like that too. Also check out this video which is another option to accomplish this How I've Created an Army of AI Agents (so I don't have to work lol) kzbin.info/www/bejne/eV69oaVpl5p9g8U

@kharmaroyale1593 17 күн бұрын

Excellent Transfer of knowledge... 👍 Thanks 🙂

@RickMulready 16 күн бұрын

Thanks mate!

@tyfisk 19 күн бұрын

Great video Rick! Awesome to see the AIX shirt too!

@RickMulready 19 күн бұрын

Thanks Tyler!

@ridgelightranch4334 20 күн бұрын

Is there any significance of when you use the pound sign?

@RickMulready 20 күн бұрын

Yeah, you’re using it for markdown. So “##” would mean an H2 header. It’s used for formatting the prompt. Great question

@DeePatience 21 күн бұрын

Thanks Rick! so glad to see you are still around. thanks so much

@RickMulready 21 күн бұрын

Haha I feel like I’m just getting started :). Thank you for watching and glad you are here! I’ve also started a new newsletter. Are you getting it?

@jvp4323 23 күн бұрын

I’m interested in how you set up your Prompt Engineering Assistants in CassidyAI?

@RickMulready 22 күн бұрын

I know that Cassidy is working on the ability to share Assistants with other Cassidy users, but not there yet. I’m going to be sharing all my prompts that I’m using in my Assistants inside my new membership community called The AI-ify Lab. Feel free also to email me Rick at rickmulready dot com and I’m happy to share these two prompts with you.

@billgrey 23 күн бұрын

Thanks so much, Rick! This looks like a great brainstorming/research tool for blog posts. Just subscribed.

@RickMulready 23 күн бұрын

Appreciate it! 🙌

@bigeplus4 23 күн бұрын

I took lots of notes on this one, Rick! One that I love to use just before submitting my prompt is “Before fulfilling my request, what questions do you have for me that will help you provide the best possible response?” The resulting questions force me to really think through my specific situation and requirements, but takes the results up ten levels!

@RickMulready 23 күн бұрын

Yeah! Super smart to do that. 🙌

@SherryTvOfficial 23 күн бұрын

Rick, have you tried Zimwriter?

@RickMulready 23 күн бұрын

I’ve not should I?

@blissweb 24 күн бұрын

In a video like this, proof of agents doing actual work would have been nice. e.g. send it an email and see what it responds. I didn't even see much of a setup of how it links into email, apart from totally manually.

@midnight1951 24 күн бұрын

PERPLEXITY DOES NOT ALWAYS FOLLOW YOUR REQUESTS AS YOU WOULD THINK IT SHOULD. I ASKED IT TO BE A PROMPT GENERATOR, I GAVE IT A KEYWORD, IT GAVE ME PROMPTS FOR THE KEYWORD BUT NOT ALWAYS IN THE CONSTRAINTS OF THE PROMPT. AS VERBIAGE WENT ON IN THE PROMPT AND I ASKED FOR MORE PERPLEXITY KIND OF GOT CONFUSED AND WENT BACK TO THE BEGINNING INSTEAD OF FOLLOWING THE THREAD AND CONTINUING.

@AndrzejLondyn 24 күн бұрын

Act as a dental surgeon, your task is to extract upper left molar. Describe steps and time needed for a such procedure Extracting an upper left molar typically involves the following steps. Keep in mind that the duration of the procedure can vary based on the complexity of the case, but generally, it ranges from 20 to 40 minutes. 1. **Preparation**: - The dental surgeon reviews the patient's medical history and any necessary X-rays to assess the position and condition of the molar. - The area around the tooth is cleaned to ensure a sterile environment. 2. **Anesthesia**: - Local anesthesia is administered to numb the area around the upper left molar. This helps ensure that the patient is comfortable and pain-free throughout the procedure. 3. **Tooth Loosening**: - The dental surgeon uses dental instruments like elevators to gently loosen the molar from the surrounding gum and bone tissue. This helps to facilitate easier extraction. 4. **Extraction**: - Once the tooth is sufficiently loosened, dental forceps are used to grasp the tooth and carefully remove it from the socket. The dentist uses a controlled force to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. 5. **Debridement**: - After the tooth is removed, the surgeon cleans the socket to remove any debris or remaining tooth fragments, ensuring a clean area to promote healing. 6. **Hemostasis**: - The surgeon may place gauze and apply pressure to the extraction site to control bleeding and encourage clot formation in the tooth socket. 7. **Post-operative Instructions**: - The patient receives instructions on how to care for the extraction site, such as avoiding vigorous rinsing or sucking actions and limiting intake to soft foods for a few days. Pain management strategies, such as prescribed or over-the-counter pain relievers, are also discussed. 8. **Follow-up**: - A follow-up appointment may be scheduled to ensure proper healing and to address any complications, such as infection or dry socket. Each step is carefully performed to minimize discomfort and promote a smooth recovery. The actual time required for the extraction can vary depending on the specifics of the case, such as the molar's position and the patient’s overall oral health.