A reboot of Wynona Earp is in Order !!!!

Just watched again & can’t stop smiling watching. Thank you for this wonderful video ❤🫶 So looking forward to POJ ☺️

I saw the show twice and I am going back for closing! I loved it. Do you mind sharing what they said in the talk back at all? I’m curious if they said anything interesting about the show. Thanks!

Amelia my beloved 😭😭😭

i miss it 😭

i miss it so muchhh!! thank u for this❤

thank you for these interviews!!! that convention was genuinely one of the best 💓

Great video!!!!!

Fantastic video ☺️ thank you 🫶❤️ I went to see Tori & ended up buying extras for other guests as all so so amazing. Had a wonderful time at my first con & would do it all over again & hope Tori does too for another con 😉

Great review! I'm a bit jealous you got to meet Kit & Rachel. I saw the show about 2,5 weeks ago and enjoyed it too. If you enjoyed Kits performance, I can recommend that you watch Heartstopper.

I was born in 1958, I've watched George Reeves episodes thousand's of times (no exaggeration). His portrayal holds a special place in my heart. But it's because of him that I became a "Superman" fan, which gave me precious performances to love thereafter such as Christopher Reeve, Dean Cain, Tom Welling, Brandon Roth, Henry Cavill, Tyler Hoechlin, and Kirk Alyn (before him). There's always one common denominator: the author who writes the stories for the radio, comic books, animation and live action performances upon which every incarnation of Superman rests. It's that simple. I'm looking forward to and hoping the best for James Gunn's story. I know from past experience that there will be a few jarring differences for me to absorb and finally integrate into my fandom for Superman.... I encourage all Superman fans to do the same. And, by all means, check out George Reeves too. You'll see some of the early building blocks that produced the Super-men we all know and love today.

Lol, everybody wants to be a movie critic. I'm going to see the movie for entertainment purposes . I've been going to the movie theatrs since 1958. Yes, there have been very good movies and, of course, very bad ones in my 72 years of life. To me, movies can provide a way to temporarily leave everyday life and experience different worlds.

Waverly won't be back. Because Dom doesn't want to be in it anymore.

Wow…I totally disagree. I think James Gunn nailed it with this teaser trailer, which exudes hope. There is a reason this is by far the most viewed movie trailer in DC/WB history. There is almost no dialog besides the Krypto scene and the child and protestors. IMO this is a perfect teaser, which is an introduction to James Gunn’s DC universe that begins with Superman. We’ll get more about the story in the next trailer. I hope you like that one more…

Its not encroaching on Reeves’s legacy. Technically it was called Superman the Movie. There has never been a Superman movie where the title was simply, Superman. I know, semantics. But that's the facts .

Superman: The Movie was the first film I remember my father taking me to see in theaters when I was 4 years old. I still remember the opening to this day. Christopher Reeve was my childhood MoS although I enjoyed Henry Cavill's iteration. That said, Hollywood will do what they always do and repurpose movie titles to pay homage and to cater to a nostalgic fans like myself so I don't mind JG using the title Superman for his film. It doesn't change what came before and if this new movie is mediocre, I will always have the original.

Yall are cute

The worst thing about this reaction was the SF whiners logo. 😜GO Rams!🐏 To Sheila, I'm surprised y didn't react nostalgically with the revamped original score. I've seen many older men tear up listening to it. To Kimberly, Krypto was put in & inspired by Gunn's own adopted, feral dog Ozu and his growing pains training her. So supposedly Krypto will be just like her, except with super powers. I wish yll would have articulated more on what y wanted out of the teaser.

I got the opposite, I wasn't expecting much, I was let down to have ANOTHER Superman... but it exceeded my expectations by much.

Minor thing, but the original Christopher Reeve movie is titled "Superman: The Movie".

Yep, it is going to be a great season! Can't wait.

George Reaves was my superman from the 50s. I grew up in the 70s and was obsessed with the tv show until the Christopher Reaves version. It was so good.

I agree with you Sheila. There's only ONE Superman and it's Christopher Reeve. I do like the guitar cover of the original Superman movie. It's a nice lil piece of nostalgia . I agree with you Kim about loving the dog. Krypto is the best boy. *lol* I wasn't impressed with this trailer.

A chosen family can be the best of people to share an experience with. I’m happy to see that you two were also affected by the “euphoric amnesia” that psychologists have named the Taylor concert afterglow! Glad you had a great time.❤❤❤

That friendship started when they raided the medicine cabinet 😅😅😅😂😂😂

Meep, meep. Buzz buzz!

I see your point. The original animations are perfection. The only thing live actors can add is true imperfection, ie, reality. If merged well, you end up with superior blends like Star Wars.

Perhaps the new characters portend additional movies to come?

Well Doc is dead ( or is he ) and Waverley is gone and may not return. So what if Wynonna and Nicole develop feelings of the romantic kind. 😊😅

saw this in the previews for Wicked!!! when I tell you I started to tear up....

ANGELA!!!!!!

Honestly can't wait for this season. I loved the second game but man oh man does it ask a lot of the player's heart. I feel as time has passed more and more people have come around to it and i predicted as much. Sometimes bad situations can turn people messy and seemingly irrational, and a lot of people don't have the patience for that in media. But once you've stewed on it you'll realize that all of the small things have so much more meaning on the second playthrough. Kinda difficult to talk about without spoilers but I did my best! lol😅

girl on the left is pretty

8:00 They actually wanted to do Thelma & Louise together but the plans fell through. 10:15 The original version of the movie was actually 2hrs. The last two scenes are reshoots (shot only a week before the NY premiere!). Basically a half hour of the original cut is gone. Ernest originally had a girlfriend who works at a bar, Toni played by Tracey Ullman. Ernest goes there practically everyday to escape Madeline. There is also a drunk who just sits there with his head on the counter. This comatose man became Ernest's savior in the third act. When Ernest falls into the pool the potion vial was still INTACT. He escapes with it and drives to Toni and she plans to expose the cult by bringing the vial to The Times but they need an escape plan for Ernest as well. 'Die and be reborn' was kind of the theme. The drunk comatose dude sees the potion, points his finger up as if he has a great idea and then suddenly drops dead on the counter (his toupee flies off) (This is in the trailer!). Since the dead drunk doesn't have anyone in his life Toni & Ernest decide "He would have wanted it this way!" to dress him in Ernest's clothes to fool Mad & Hel. When the ladies arrive outside the bar they are informed by Toni who is fake crying (this is in the trailer as well!) that Ernest has died. Madeline wants the potionvial so she decides to lift the sheet and 'identify Ernest'. Ernest who is hiding in an alley sees this and throws the potionvial in kind of a magical arc over the heads of everyone and Toni catches it. She asks them if that is what they're looking for and Helen rips it out of her unwilling hand. Madeline drops the sheet just in time so she won't recognize that it's not Ernest. The cop tells her she will have to identify him officially at the morgue anyway and she swallows "THE MORGUE? I'll just send someone!". The women realise they are stuck together now and take off. Ernest watches them and wonders when they will realise it was not him but Toni promises he will be long gone when they do. 27 years later Mad & Hel sit on a balcony of a gorgeous hotel overlooking a park, lakes and mountains, somewhere in Switzerland. The scenery is totally lost on them as they moan to eachother. They may look stunning but are plagued with deadly boredom. Helen suggests places to go but Madeline can't be bothered to get excited. Madeline looks out into the park where she notices an old couple and she riducules them for being old and finds them 'pitiful'. Not Helen though, she looks at the couple with longing. The old couple sit down on a grassy area and they drink some wine. They touch hands and here we see that the man has still one young hand. It's Ernest & Toni, old, but well groomed. They enjoy the afternoon sun with eachother, then we see Mad & Hel watching them, perhaps realising who the old people are... and as the movie fades out on their beautiful faces they turn to skulls for a second. Because this subplot and ending was removed and reshot a lot of other scenes were removed as well. The whole wedding ceremony is gone, sex scene between Mad & Dakota, Rose the maid had 3 scenes one in which she finds Madeline stuffed in the home freezer, Helen & Ernest meet up to revise their plans at the Four Seasons hotel, Ernest bumps into a dead priest on a slab at the morgue, Lisle tells Ernest she is in fact more than 600 years old and she killed Shakespeare and other because they refused to take the potion, she also had a great funny speech at the Spring Party etc etc... an immense amount of scenes were cut last minute. The ending was deemed too soft during previews (although others said it really left a deep impression on them). So they opted for the more wilde and crazy ending. Goldie Hawn did an interview about this and to put it mildly she wasn't happy with the choice to change the ending.

David Koepp & Martin Donovan wrote it. The original movie was much longer with a subplot. It was around 2 hrs. Originally Ernest falls into the pool and when he wakes up on the bottom he sees the potion vial still intact, floating around. Ernest grabs it and crawls out of the pool. Jim Morrison says: "Are you gonna be done soon or what?" And Ernest says "Yes!" waves the potion in front of Jim's face and goes "And so will all of you!" The whole deleted resolve of the third act was about Ernest's escape and him wanting to expose the cult. He drives off to his neighbourhood bar (established in an earlier deleted scene in the movie) to his 'girlfriend' Toni played by Tracey Ullman. She has one customer in there (a drunk comatose dude) with his head on the counter of the bar (in an earlier scene as well). Ernest shows Toni the potion and they try to come up with an escape plan for Ernest and Toni will bring the potion to 'The Times'. Then the drunk gets up and points his finger up as if he has a great idea. He looks at the potion and suddenly drops dead on the counter right there (his toupee falls off) (you can see a shot of this in the theatrical trailer). Since the dude only hangs out at the bar and has nobody in his life they decide to dress him up in Ernest's clothes to fool the ladies. Madeline and Helen are at the mansion wondering where Ernest has gone and eventually notice the liquor cart and then they realise he's at the bar and they take off. At the bar the cops and an ambulance take the gurney with 'Ernest's' body on there as Toni confirms to the cop she saw Ernest die right there and when Mad & Helen arrive she starts fake crying and tells them Ernest is dead. Helen: "Dead, Ernest is dead?! EVERYBODY'S DEAD!" (Also in the trailer). Madeline wants to see the body (find the potion) and starts lifting the sheet off the dead drunk's face. Ernest (hiding in the alley) notices it and throws the potion vial to Toni. Madeline drops the sheet just in time and Helen grabs the potion from Toni's unwilling hand. The cop asks Madeline if it is indeed Ernest and Madeline finally realising she is a grieving widow and confirms it's him. The cop says she has to officially identify him anyway at the morgue, she thinks back, swallows and goes "I'll just send someone!". The ambulance takes off while Helen and Madeline realise they are now stuck together forever... as they turn to eachother with forced smiles, that look more like grimaces. Ernest and Toni have met up at the bar and watch the women leave. Ernest realises he got away but is sad he had to give up the potion as he looks into the sky. 27 years later A beautiful scenery of mountains and lakes somewhere in Switzerland. Helen & Madeline sit on a balcony of a gorgeous hotel. They still look stunning but are bored to death, they've been everywhere and seen everything. They bicker back and forth until Madeline sees an old couple walking in the park. "How pitiful! Look how old they are." Madeline goes, but not Helen who looks at herself and then at Madeline. She looks out to the old couple with longing who have now settled on a grassy area drinking some wine as they enjoy the late afternoon sun. The old man touches his wife's old hand... with his still young hand. It's Ernest and Toni, old but still very well groomed. Madeline & Helen keep watching them and as the movie fades to black on their perfect faces they turn to skulls for a a few seconds leaving a last eerie image of the Eternal Ladies. Because this ending has a bit of a tonal shift people felt 'deflated' it was decided to reshoot 3 scenes. Ernest now doesn't find the potion intact in the pool, the whole third act at the bar is gone and replaced by Madeline & Helen not finding Ernest at the house where they start to peel and the Funeral ending. This was a very last minute reshoot (one week before the NY premiere). Because this was all erased from the movie they felt the need to change the overall pace so there are basically removed and heavily trimmed scenes everywhere. After Ernest picks up the formaldehyde there is actually a whole 24 hrs of events removed. Helen & Ernest meet up at The Four Seasons hotel where Helen tells him they have to bury Madeline but Ernest tells her Mad & Him have reconciled (Helen: "Ernest, that's SICK!"). Ernest eventually chickens out, then there was a whole morning scene with maid Rose finding Madeline in the freezer, all frozen, but awake. Ernest rips Madeline from the freezer (this is in the trailer) and she starts walking around like some icicle zombie. Ernest fires the maid and he starts lifting Madeline up the stairs ("I'm sweaty!" "I don't think it's sweat dear I think you're defrosting!" also in the trailer). There was also two short little scenes with Helen exercising like crazy (another trimmed subplot) and her shopping for the hardware where a Clerk implies she has killed someone when he rings up all her suspicious stuff.

Timeless.

Timeless

You are not getting all of the 2nd game in season 2, there will also be a season 3 and perhaps even a season 4, so there will surely be some new content and they have also alluded to changing the chronology-timeline. Obviously HBO need to attract viewers and make money while both keeping the gamers and viewers who did not play the game happy.

watching this trailer it feels like its a general overview of the two seasons to come to me. some events i see take place wayyyyy into the game even close to the end. what im most excited to see them pull off is abby and the hospital! if they can get the same feeling from the game i will dub this franchise the best adaptation of a game ever!

Ugh... part 2 was my most loathed game of all time. (I'm 46 and been a gamer since the atari) I hated it, I came to understand later, was because of how much healing I personally needed to undertake. Now it's my most loved game of all time. I am still not ready for this season.

im pretty sure they will make an episode 3 like for Eugene... im pretty sure the guy with the binoculars is Eugene and we get some backstory of him... this is not a spoiler its just me speculating.

If they go by part 2 of the game! People are not gonna like season 2.

No spoilers! I LOVED both games equally and loved the first season. As surprised as we were with Bella and Pedro's performance I think we'll be equally amazed by Kaitlin Dever. She is really talented. Plus Catherine O'hara and Jeffrey Wright will be a real treat. The ticking clock appears in the first game at the very beginning in Line 1, Scene 1. It is also REALLY prevalent in the 2nd game near the end, right before the Epilogue - again no spoilers but it's a theme. Glad they added it to the show here. Season 2 will only be 7 episodes (confirmed by Craig and Neil) so they will likely do what was speculated - the 2nd game will be split into season 2 and season 3. Two of the main characters for the 2nd game are still yet to be cast, but HBO has not confirmed a 3rd season yet so that leaves me a bit worried. Great reaction! <3

Yassssssss!

Vengeance was amazing. Hoping Tubi gives us more. #Tubi #Vengeance #E4L

I am in total agreement with you on how they treated Nicole throughout the movie. Also, really unhappy with how they basically put Dom as Waverly instead of Waverly being Waverly. It wasn't character growth of Waves it was basically Dom the entire time. I have been doing a rewatch of the entire show and the Waverly we know is nothing like Vengeance. If you are going to do character growth it should be the actual character not the actor.

Wynonna’s backstory in the special as a 15 year old messing around with magic to prove her “delusions” and accidentally creating the special’s Big Bad Mina. We need to address this inconsistency as a fandom. Besides from the fact she was very knowledgeable about things that are an inconsistency not just in the lore of the TV show but also for her characterization… I think her motivations to use magic to prove herself is definitely something that Wynonna would attempt to do. Especially with feeling as powerless and insecure as she felt back when she was a juvie-stained teenager who just wanted to protect Waverly. I think that makes sense for Wynonna at that point in her life and Nedley does bring up the truth of this in the special. That she was a little power hungry and she deep-down thought her father and big sister were horrible to her and due to always being the “weak one” she couldn’t really do anything but sit and stew in her borne insecurities. Hence why her main priority was always Waverly - who was just as weak but a whole lot smarter than her. So what I don’t think makes any sense at all is that she was basically more like an aggressive Waverly in those flashback scenes in that she was hyper aware of and so adamant about things that adult Wynonna isn’t and has already proven wasn’t in the TV show. That whole spiel 15 year old Wynonna gives about the homestead being built on a bedrock of the mineral ammolite to ward off the evil that wanted to attack her family… Honestly, sometimes I think Emily knows and loves her characters so much to the point where she ends up just mixing them up because in 1x02 the character that knew that information or was smart enough to figure it out was not Wynonna. It was Dolls. It’s not that 15 year old Wynonna wouldn’t do those things in those flashback scenes that we saw. It’s that she was uncharacteristically knowledgeable when she did. The storytelling feels off because the character does. And I say this all the time - but how to avoid that is by wrapping the narrative around the characterization rather than wrapping the characterization around the narrative. In other words: if Emily had just thought for a moment about what kind of character Wynonna is or would be when she was that age - she wouldn’t have made an inconsistency in both the lore and character. So I like the backstory. I even like the portrayal by the actress. What I don’t like is the OOC script writing for a 15 year old Wynonna who had no idea what the mineral “ammolite” even is or was used for, let alone knew the homestead was built on a bedrock of it because it wasn’t even HER who figured that out. And it certainly wouldn’t have been a 15 year old Wynonna who would be knowledgable enough to figure it out. A 15 year old Waverly. Sure. A 15 year old Jeremy. Sure. Even a 15 year old Dolls. Sure. A 15 year old Wynonna?

Waverly going on a temporary trip to Egypt to reconstruct a corrupted Black Badge Division. Waverly and Jeremy. The BIG brained duo. Honestly, I’m happy for her. I acknowledge that Nicole couldn’t come with her due to the whole Angel’s Shield stipulation but then I think that would kind of be counterintuitive and counterproductive if she could. This is WayHaught’s necessary break from each other to find their own paths in life and follow their own ambitions - and to be actually EQUAL in their marriage which I kind of understood was the point of the contention between them in the special. Nicole was holding Waverly back. Not selfishly as such. She just didn’t realize Waverly wanted more - or more specifically - wanted to be more than just a wife. Nicole wasn’t around for Waverly declaring “Shut your patronizing mouth garbage. I can be a hero AND a wife” but their wedding vows were pretty pointed when it came to that. They need equal partnership and for Waverly, that means having an adventure where she can use her full potential and learn new things and just be her own guide and warrior in life. It’s not that it’s not something Nicole doesn’t want either. It’s just that she already has it with being the Sheriff of Purgatory and she’s fully satisfied with that. What she does want - however - is something much more personal and that is to have a kid with Waverly. Which - I mean - ugh… every time I think about this subject I just have a screaming “what about Rachel?!” response come from the back of my mind because where is Rachel and why isn’t she mentioned? That WayHaught conversation was the time for her to be but they cut all that short following Mina showing up. I mean I like it when WayHaught get interrupted but not like that. Not when they were about to have an important conversation that we really needed to hear - at least as far as… WHERE THE FUCK IS RACHEL?! But yes, I am satisfied with this next step in Waverly’s journey and I believe it makes complete sense for her. Can they actually manage long distance? Maybe their libidos can’t. But time will tell whether their love for each other is strong enough to withstand separation. And for them to be equal partners in life and love. In marriage and heroship. This is what it’s going to take. Can the WEARP fandom be okay with that? I don’t see why not ‘cause surely they’d want them both to grow. As for me - I’m used to seeing main female characters that are in a relationship go off on their own for awhile to do their own thing for their individual development. I expect it. More than that. I encourage it. WLW/queer relationships are great and I love seeing WayHaught together. But I also love seeing them individually too and how their dynamic changes and evolves based on the contrasting effects of being together vs individual. It’s one of the things I love about Xena and Gabrielle. How they’re so much a part of each other that they can be separated and still be whole characters alone and I don’t like any form of art/entertainment that perpetuates the ridiculous notion that they can’t be because it’s insulting and condescending as all fuck. I wasn’t worried about the conflict for WayHaught in the special in the slightest once I realized where it was going because I knew they would resolve it just fine. I just wish they hadn’t cut THAT conversation short because even if Waverly didn’t answer Nicole about whether she wanted to start a family with her or not, I still wanted them to talk about RACHEL because ??? It was just a gross oversight of a significant character from Season 4 of the TV show and the only thing I can honestly say really bothered me about the special because even if Emily doesn’t consider Rachel to be WayHaught’s adopted daughter, I still need to know about where she even is, why she isn’t mentioned and how WayHaught aren’t fucking concerned about her! Everything else in the special that I disagree with I can take with a pinch of salt and be just like “meh, it’s whatevs. You can’t please everyone” but NOT THAT! If Emily just wanted to erase Rachel from the storyline, that’s a choice that has to be acknowledged in the characterization because - what the fuck, Emily?! 😑

A lot of people in the WEARP fandom seem to be having issues with the WayHaught narrative in the ‘Vengeance’ special. Specifically with the dialogue used of Nicole “holding Waverly back” and “keeping her on the hook” and being blamed for Waverly’s miscommunications about her desires and ambitions. I feel like I need to address this because I think people are taking it WAY out of context based on the specific dialogue used by the characters and I want to throw some perspective into people’s opinions with this. Wynonna saying what she does to Nicole is just Wynonna being Wynonna. Those are just her words and accusations. They’re not a statement of fact about Nicole or even an accurate account of how Waverly thinks or feels about Nicole and her treatment of her. It’s literally just Wynonna talking aggressively to Nicole because of what she’s got going on in her head at that moment. It’s not a true reflection of what’s actually happening. Wynonna’s just taking her stress and frustration out on Nicole because she can and because that’s what she does and because she loves Waverly so very much and is worried that she’s letting married life change her. Waverly has not egged Wynonna on or got her to fight her own battles or anything like that. Yeah,… she’s talked to her sister about the way she’s feeling. She’s talked about her anxieties. But none of that has anything to do with Nicole or how she believes Nicole is treating her. Wynonna has just perceived it that way because she always takes things to heart and blows them out of proportion. That’s just what she does. Especially when it comes to the people she loves. Especially Waverly. Nicole, however, has taken in what Wynonna has said personally and thought about how having Waverly around 24/7 is actually hindering her growth and not helping it. She realizes that she kind of has been holding her back. Obviously, it’s not in a selfish way. It’s just in the way that she was not aware of what Waverly wanted or needed because Waverly just had trouble being open and communicating that with her - which also isn’t something that should be taken as a reason to blame either of them for their contention. This is a completely natural and normal thing that all real life married couples go through and the special is just representing that because it’s just an interesting subject to explore. Especially between two women. There’s no animosity there. There’s no aggression there. That’s all Wynonna butting in and just being her usual flawed emotional hot mess self - which we love because that makes her real and raw and compelling. There’s no one to blame with any of this really… and why do we even need to blame anyone anyway? 💁‍♀️ This is just interesting storytelling that probably just needed a little more time to really explore properly so that this subject wouldn’t be taken so out of context. I mean people can interpret what goes on in the special any which way they like but why they have to think of it as more serious or dramatic than it is I… I honestly do not see it that way myself at all. I just see it as a realistic representation of very natural, normal and interesting to explore storytelling of married life. At no point did I see any of this narrative in the special look toxic - as if they were on the verge of a break-up. What I saw was partners very much in love figuring out equal partnership in very early years of their marriage. The “drama” or “conflict” between WayHaught came about very naturally and it was resolved very naturally.

Thank you for this review. You nailed my feelings perfectly with how Nicole was treated. With the sacrifice she made, then the question i need answered is : Is Nicole still the Angel's Shield if there is no angel there to shield?